HEPF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

HEPF TECHNOLOGY

Beijing, China
OUTLINE

• Introduction

• HEPF Technology

• Application And Case Studies

• Conclusions
Why HEPF?
1. Actual penetration in hard formations
Target strength (psi) Penetration
12000-15000 50%
22000-25000 25%
2. Compact damage Damaged Sand From Zone 1

Clean sand before perforating Same sand after perforating


Theory Basis
Fast - Explosive Intermediate-Propellant Slow - Hydraulic

Explosive
Propellant Hydraulic
fracture
P Rock crushing P P Fracturing

Fracturing Fracturing

T T
T
Technical Features

1. Breaking through compaction layer

2. Simple process and convenient operation

3. Safety operating and economical costs

4. Using two different types of energy


HEPF Perforators

Perforating Perforating
charge charge

Propellant
Propellant

HEPF – IA guns HEPF – IB guns


Basic Process
Propellants and shaped charges are loaded and run in hole.
The guns are detonated at the expected depth.
Basic Process

High pressure gas produced and created fractures.


Basic Process
When the gas pressure dissipates, damaging fines
are carried away.
Process Review By Downhole P-T
Conventional vs. HEPF

HEPF P-T

Conventional P-T
Design Basis of Propellant

• Controllable burning speed


• Stable performance
• Reasonable match with shaped charge
• Max. pressure working time while maintaining peak pressure
HEPF Optimized Design Software
Surface Test

• Target OD: 5.0 m


• Radial fracture length: 2.5 m
• Fracture width: 5.3 mm
Casing Inspection After HEPF
Casing Inspection Data after HEPF

Well Perf. Interval Thickness Nominal ID Measured ID Offset


No. (m) (m) (mm) (mm) (mm)

1109.0~1113.5 4.5 124.3 124.69 0.39

1115.4~1118.4 3.0 124.3 124.88 0.58

XXXX 1118.8~1121.7 2.9 124.3 124.66 0.36

1122.2~1126.1 3.9 124.3 124.41 0.11

Total:14.3m

Average offset: 0.36 mm


VDL Confirmation
The first and
second
interfaces are
still in good
condition, no
damage
caused due to
HEPF

CBL before HEPF CBL after HEPF


Most Suitable in Hard Formations for …

• Wells with serious drilling contamination

• Production decrease from flow problem


• Injection improvements
• Pre-treatment before acid operations
Applications
China: More than 10,000 jobs
International: More than 1,800 jobs

3600 3352
3200 China 2931
2664
2800
Inter.
2400
HEPF(run)

1905
2000
1600 1230
1200
800 476 583
398
400 196 237
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year
Case 1
140
120
120

100
Production (bpd)
80 70 Conventional

60 HEPF

40

20

Location: Kazakhstan
Well type: Vertical well
Porosity: 15%
Permeability: 53md
Burst pressure: 7200 psi
Case 2
2500.0
2190.8

2000.0

Production (bpd)
1500.0 Expected by
1192.3 Conventional
Actual by HEPF
1000.0

500.0

0.0

Location: Kazakhstan
Well type: Horizontal well
Porosity : 12%
Permeability: 45 md
Burst pressure: 10000 psi
Perf. Interval: 4410 – 4780 m
Conclusions

1. Utilizing two kinds of energy.

2. Breaking through perforations and fracturing.

3. Removing compacted damage effectively.

4. Increasing permeability of near Wellbore area.


Great
GreatWall
WallDrilling
DrillingServing
Servingthe
theWorld
World

You might also like