RESEARCH PAPER EVALUATION

I may offer the following suggestions and comments that are required
for improvement based on the research paper that was provided to us
for evaluation:

➢ 1st is the Background of the Study.

• The explanation of the mud crab shell experiment that was stated
on the problem statement makes the topic of the research paper
difficult to understand.
• The language used in the debate is extremely technical. It should
connect with your target audience in a logical and straightforward
manner that fully explains your work so that it will be more widely
understood.
• Based on the assigned topic, the conversation should be focused
and exact.

➢ 2nd is the Statement of the problem.

• The problem should be clearly described based on the study’s
background discussion.

➢ 3rd is the Hypothesis of the study.

• The results must be accurately and precisely described in relation
to the chosen topic.

➢ 4th is the Significance of the study.

• The offered paragraph heads on the selected topic lacked clarity
and conciseness. The titles for the paragraphs should reflect the
importance of the study and how it will help the respondents and
participants.
➢ 5th is the Scope and Delimitations of the study.
• The study’s scope and delimitations are inconsistent with what is
said about the study’s context and problem statement.

➢ 6th is the Definition of terms.

• Based on the definitions provided, it may be said that some terms
were not fully covered.

➢ 7th is the Research Paradigm.

• Based on the formulation of the issue, the research paradigm that
was employed was not adequately explained.
• The output of the research paradigm ought to provide more details
concerning the subject of the investigation.

➢ 8th is the Form and style of the research paper.

• The pagination shouldn’t be on the bottom page; it should be in the
right corner of the paper.
• The spacings weren’t exactly in line.
• The spacings need to be correctly maximized.
• If a format was available and provided to the researchers, the
margins should have been correctly adhered.
• The research paper’s opening pages did not adhere to the school’s
format, if one was provided.

SUBMITTED BY:
WARREN L. VINOYA BSEE 1B