Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Functional Design: Functionality Levels and Design Tasks
Functional Design: Functionality Levels and Design Tasks
The process of responding to the needs or desires of the people who will use an item in a way
that allows their needs or desires to be met. Functional design is both an outcome and a
process. As an outcome, it describes products that work well to perform their assigned tasks; as
a process, functional design is a set of practices guided by the principles that produce that
positive outcome.
Functional design is not a discrete task that is performed at just one point in the design process.
Rather, it is interwoven with other design activities.
User ‐level functionality is the expression of the webapp capabilities that support
users in achieving their goals.
Application‐level functionality represents a lower‐level design of internal
functionality that may not be directly visible to users
Application‐level functionality is more deeply embedded within the structure of the webapp and
will often emerge out of the progressive design of the user ‐ level functionality
These goals were then refined into the following list of functions to be performed:
Ultimately these functions are elaborated into a set of use cases that capture the key user
information and functional interactions.
Functional architecture
Components.
An example
• consider whether the specific scenario component should be invoked dynamically on user
request, dynamically on event initiation, or manually.
Architectural patterns—mvc
Detailed functional
• detailed functional modeling for webapps is usually only carried out for those components that
are extremely complex or extremely critical
• wae establishes a set of extensions to uml that facilitate the modeling of webapp low ‐level
design
– Oriented applications.
Webml
State modeling
• state modeling is necessary when:
– a state model represents the behavior of a webapp by depicting its states and the events
that cause the webapp to change state.
– a state model indicates what actions (e.g., process activation) are taken as a
consequence of a particular event.
State model
sequence in time
required environments
duration of activities
This means that every building should be designed according to the purpose it’s going to serve. This
statement is not very self-evident, and is a subject of great confusion.
Many times, it takes a controversial dimension among practicing architecture professionals, particularly
in connection to modern architecture. However, one can’t deny the very practicality of the fact that
people want more buildings that are livable and less that would serve as tombs, no matter how
magnificent.
In French architect le Corbusier’s words, “a building is a machine to live in.” He is one of the most
prominent and pioneering modernist architects. This idea went on to be followed by his successors and
a new architectural style called the international style was evolved. This new style flourished and
reached all corners of the globe through the 20th century. Making heavy and super efficient use of
building materials like glass, steel, aluminum, brick infill and concrete, it was adopted in building
corporate landmarks across all metropolitan cities in the world.
Corporate towers apart, the functional international style have been incorporated in building massive
number of housing apartments. Even churches have been built accordingly. The chapel of st. Basil
(houston) and crystal cathedral (california) are good examples of it. So much so, even museums, art
galleries, and convention centers have widely been built upon this design philosophy.
Functionalism vocalists
Chicago based architect, louis sullivan, another pioneer and probably the most vocal of all functionalists,
held the belief that the size of a building, it’s massing, spatial grammar and every other characteristic
should be singularly decided by the function it is proposed to serve.
German architect, ludwig mies, needs special mention for his contribution to functionalism. He brought
about radical simplification to styles of the previous eras. He advocated that god is in the details and put
in everything to get the best out of a simple design. He believed that true architecture is always
objective and built designs upon the acronym “less is more.”
Functionalism hijacked
Despite the numerous advantages and worldwide popularity, it also needs to be seen that numerous
towers of the international style, built under the strict codes of functionalism, that were fashionable in
their times, have waned in popularity and prestige, over the years.
Excepting the top-of-the-line buildings in this style most are plagued by the economic malpractices of
builders and developers. They usually reduce and compromise the designs laid down by the architects in
order to save costs.
Technically, the architects have already pared down the design to a bare minimum, with no ornament or
redundancy. Developers further pare them down out of cost-necessity or usual habit. This results in
buildings that are neither very pleasant nor quite safe.
Insensitive criticism
Another often criticized lacuna of the international style is its insensitivity to the surroundings. It usually
pervaded into the spaces of buildings around and added a jarring note into the skyline or the street,
causing negative feelings to people in the vicinity. In most non-american cities that these buildings
sprang up overnight, people experienced a sort of cultural and style disharmony. This is a primary
reason why ‘human factors’ are given greater recognition in building design.
Functionalism resurrects
The functionalist is usually engaged in systematic organization, and works to build a building system that
is more efficient and effective. Therefore, functionalists interpret the ‘human factors’ as the ergonomic
efficiency of a system. This in itself is quite appreciable because the ‘ends’ is achieved, irrespective of
the ‘means.’ buildings based on functionalism are often accused of being emotionally neutral. But,
there’s no doubt about the fact that lean designs would make the most magnificent structures, when
based upon the three testing grounds of vitruvius: ‘firmitas, utilitas, venustas.’
Spaces in a building can be organized into patterns so that they relate to one another in a specific way.
Spatial relationships between forms help define their interaction. Some common spatial relationships
used in architecture include:
Interlocking space
Adjacent spaces
Approaches used in the design of buildings. Spatial organizations help unite an array of
Centralized organization
Linear organization
Radial organization
Clustered organization
Grid organization
These organizational methods can be found in architecture throughout all ages. From the time of
ancient civilizations to modern architectural design, these compositional techniques have withstood the
test of time. Let's now take a look at each of these concepts in more detail, starting with spatial
relationships.
Interlocking Spaces
Source: static.designboom.com
Source: architizer-prod.imgix.net
A large space can have a smaller space within its volume and of the two larger space helps in
defining the boundaries for the smaller space inside it. For this spatial relationship to be
understood, a clear distinction of size between two spaces is needed.
Adjacent space
Source: i.pnimg.com
Source: i.pnimg.com
An intermediate space links two spaces to each other and the spatial relationship of the two
places is dependent on the quality of the third space.
Centralized organization
Source: 2.bp.blogspot.com
Source: static.dezeen.com
A linear organization usually consists of repetitive spaces which are similar in size, form, and
function. It also consists of a single linear space that organizes along its length a series of
spaces that differ in size, form, or function. And in both cases, each space along the sequence
has an exterior exposure.
Radial organizations
Source: i.pnimg.com
Radial organizations are effectively a combination of linear and centralized organizations. They
have a central focal point from which linear forms radiate from. Expansion in the radial
organization is towards the exterior surroundings.
Clustered organization
Source: cdn.architecturelab.net
Spaces that are grouped, collected, or gathered closely together and related by proximity to
each other. Clustered spaces can be organized about a point of entry into a building or along
the path of movement through it. The spaces can also be clustered about a large defined field or
volume of space.
Grid organization
Source: images.adsttc.com
In particular, circulation routes are the pathways people take through and around buildings or
urban places. Circulation is often thought of as the “space between the spaces”, having a
connective function, but it can be much more than that. It is the concept that captures the
experience of moving our bodies around a building, three-dimensionally and through time.
Horizontal disposition - solving problems in architectural design begins with the familiar study
of plan elements, which develops into consideration of interior and exterior areas and details
The various units of plan are first arranged in a horizontal manner in order to secure a workable
relationship between the different areas. This pattern is dicated by the function of the building
and the desirable size and shape of the units themselves. The rooms of a house, the galleries of
a museum, or the units of the factory must be laid out to faciliate movement through the
building, quickly and easily. There should thus be economy and directness of circulation.
This is called planning for potential circulation. Structures are built to be used, and the purpose
is defeated unless people can go easily and directly from one area to another, and unless the
related areas are adjacent to each other. Architecture thus, begins with a two-dimensional plan
which is translated into foundations for vertical development. If the plan is properly laid-out,
there will be no problem with regards to proper circulation. Lay-out would depend on the
principles related to function.
Adjacency–synonyms: proximity, closeness, immediacy, nearness, contiguity, antonyms:distance, remoteness
Architectural space
Space is the core of architecture. In order to design, it is necessary to conceive and think about
architectural space surrounding us by decoding its nature and discovering messages in its built
forms. This kind of awareness helps architects to decide on the principles and concepts of
his/her desired space.
Forming space
Spatial qualities
Scale types
Scalar sequence
Scalar flexibility
Designed space
Anonymous space
Space to space relationship
Division of space
Door placement , circulation and use zones
Circulation as a space
Multiuse of space dealing with residual space
Natural light
Artificial light
*Images used in this presentation are not the property of the presenter. Reference/s:
http://www.csun.edu/~twang/595web/slides/week9.pdf
https://courses.minia.edu.eg/attach/3869design_studio_4_lecture_3_%20zoning%20and%20space.pdf
https://www.bluentcad.com/blog/the-element-of-function/
https://www.yourownarchitect.com/spatial-organization-in-architecture/
https://pdfcoffee.com/tad2-functional-concepts-and-the-interior-environment-pdf-free.html