iCommunicate

Learning Packet

Quarter 1
AcademicT
ext
Haelenna June V. Cubalan
Grade 12- Our Lady of Immaculate Conception
Text B
 Text A Text B Text C Text D Text E

It’s Not A Letter to Cracking US vs. China:

About Mother The Real Cold
Mr and Mrs Jokes in an
Online Tongue War
Aquino Inappropriate
Learning: A Situations?
Reflection You Might
on the New have
Normal in Witzelsucht
Education

What is the text The The text is It was an The text is

about? reflection about the Admission focused on The main
(subject/focus) focuses on complexity of letter for Mr the rarely subject is
explaining the English and Mrs diagnosed about the cold
the Language due Aquino from disease war between
struggles of to its the admission named the United
the new variations. department Witzelsucht, a States of
normal we People use head person having America and
are facing different sorts confirming an China as
due to of English them about inappropriate China has
COVID-19. depending on the humor. been
how we grew acceptance of
challenging
up with the their
the Western
language or daughter Jean
how often we to the Sunny hegemony in
use the Days Private ways unlike
English Kindergarten. any power in
Language at history.
home.

What is the The The writer’s The writer’s The main The writer’s
writer’s goal in purpose of goal is to goal is to purpose of purpose is to
writing the text? the text is make the inform and the text is to let the
(purpose) to inform readers confirm the inform the readers know
the readers reflect that parents about readers that about the two
how the the English how their laughing to an countries’
 Philippines Language daughter was inappropriate cold war as
is too much may vary qualified to be situation is they continue
focused on according to admitted in not normal. to battle for
technology the country the exclusive It’s greater
tools and we may live program considered power. China
learning in and on how offered by the as a disease leading in the
needs even often we use Sunny Days over the last multiple
though not the language Private 130 years areas of AI
all Filipino within our Kindergarten. common development
Citizens are families or in among people has been
capable and our who have recognized as
very fitting household. damages in a hegemonic
to coping the right peer the West
and living brain have been
according hemisphere . warning for
to the new decades.
normal.

Who is the The target This text is The letter is This text is The text is
target reader of reader of intended for intended for for everyone intended for
the text? this text are everyone Mr and Mrs to read since educators,
(audience) the people using the Aquino. we are all students,
living in the English concerned scholars,
Philippines. Language as a about taking researchers
medium of care of our and
communicatio bodies in politicians
n and order to who ought to
instruction. prevent study and
diseases such provide
as opinions on
Witzelsucht how we can
from resolve the
happening. issue
regarding this
Cold War.

What is the In the text the The text is a

point of view Since the The text is Since it was a writer is mixture of
used in the text? text is a based on the letter made using the first person
(first person, reflection writer’s by Rhea third person point of view
third person of Francis opinion Fernandez pronouns and third
limited, third Jim regarding the from the such as “he”. person
person Tuscano English admission Moreover, the limited. From
 omniscient) and it’s Language department, writer also the text the
clear that basing on her using the first explained writer was
he own person what the using “I” in
realistically perspective pronouns “I” neurologists the second
know how so basically and “we” I studied about paragraph so
Covid19 it’s in the first could tell the disorder he was
has been person’s directly that and how the writing in his
affecting point of view. it’s in the first patients with own
the lives of person’s point Witzelsucht perspective
Filipinos, of view. would behave according to
the text is on such what
written on situations. happened in
a reliable Hence, I the webinar
first conclude that entitled “Is
person’s the text is Hong Kong’s
point of angled in a Present Going
view. third person to be Asia’s
omniscient future?”
point of view. The
continuing
paragraphs
were in the
third person’s
limited point
of view
because the
writer
quoted
important
phrases from
the advocates
and activists
present in the
said webinar .

I could tell Considering The writer is It’s clear that The writer
How much does that the that the one able to Mikael Angelo was quoting
the writer know writer is who made the express the Francisco is necessary
of the subject? knowledge text was a message she knowledgeabl phrases said
(writer’s able on the writer who wanted to e on the by activists
knowledge) topic since loved and point out in subject since and advocates
he grew up with the letter he quoted and mentioned in
profoundly the English using simple cited a the webinar
explained Language words to journal and called “Is
how the gave me an make it more documents Hong Kong’s
new normal idea that she understandab from present Going
made an is le therefore I neurologists to be Asia’s
impact to knowledgeabl think she’s in the 1888 Future?” to
our lives by e with the knowledgeabl and 2016 support his
citing the topic e. regarding this ideas on the
 governmen regarding serious cold war so I
t, Mother disorder of think he is
Education Tongue. the brain, knowledgeabl
sector, Witzelsucht. e on the topic.
schools and
universities
’ response
on how to
country’s
system will
continue
amidst the
Covid-19.

How did the The writer The writer This text is in This text is This is a non-
writer organize organizes explained a much formally fictional type
the text? the text by how the defined letter written, clear, of text having
(style) explaining English format focused, a specific role
the new language has containing structured to inform the
normal a lot of the contact and backed readers on
based on variations information up by the Cold War
facts and according to and a evidences between the
asking her own complimentar therefore it’s US and China
rhetorical experiences y close so it an academic using a
questions and opinion falls on the writing, journalism
(“can we”). so this text is expository format.
The writer under the type of text
uses a descriptive- under the
cause and expository business style
effect text. structure
expository category.
text style in
presenting
ideas, facts,
causes and
correspond
ing results
of
Covid -19
in the
present
time.
 The tone of The tone of The tone of The writer Since the
the text is the text is this business wrote the text structure of
formal. informal letter is in a formal this text is
Did the writer manner due formal. tone. like a news
write in a to the fact article it is in
formal or that the the formal
informal author is manner.
manner? (tone) telling her
own story
casually
about her
own
experiences
on mother
tongue and
how she dealt
with using the
English
language in
context.

How did the The The language The writer is The writer The sentences
writer choose language used by the using a formal has discussed were
the words and and writer is language the rarely organized by
organize the wordings casual. since it is a diagnosed the writer
sentences? Was used by the business disorder formally.
the language writer is letter. Witzelsucht
formal, informal informal using formal
or casual? since words and
rhetorical sentences.
questions
were fired
to the
reader.