03 Literary Criticism and Literary Theory

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Literary Criticism

and
Literary Theory

OKEJ Lectures
Smiljana Narančić Kovač, PhD
Literary Criticism

• Discourse about literature


(R. Wellek)

• Two basic ways of understanding LC:


• Works of literature
• Discussion of literature in general
• Principles
• Theory
• Aesthetics (of literature: formerly poetics and
rhetoric)
LC as discourse about L works
• Description
• Analysis
• Interpretation
• Understanding first
• Evaluation
• Judgement : aimed at establishing value
• Problem: criteria
• Objective criteria
• Subjective criteria
• Objective
• Standards – norms
• Universal system of value
• Foundation: rationalism
Criteria
• common sense, general judgment
• E.g. Aristotelian tradition: rationalistic theory of literature

• Subjective
• Intuitive judgement, subconsious, identification
• Identifying with the ‘spirit’ of the literary work itself (Herder)
• Foundation: idealism
• Relativism and subjectivism
• E.g. Romanticism :
• Goethe: What did the author intend? Was this plan sensible? Was the
author successful in carrying it out?
• Coleridge: Does the work bring pleasure?
LC as discussion of literature in general
Discussion of its
• Principles
• Theory
• Aesthetics of literature :
• Poetics
= making (-> how literature is made: Aristotle)
• Genre theory (poetics of the novel, of fiction, poetry, tragedy…)
• Science of literature
• Rhetoric
= art of speech (techniques of speech)
• Art of persuasion
• Stylistic techniques (figures of speech, etc. )
• A set of conversational principles, maxims, functions, signaling
strategies……discourse analysis….. (linguistics)
-> e.g. Wayne Booth (1961) Rhetoric of Fiction (telling vs. showing)
-> practical skill that can be taught (creative writing)
Back to Theory
Theory as a part of Literary Criticism?
• LC starts from an individual work
• Its subject: two basic aspects:
• what is inside - the work itself (how it works)
• what is outside the work: its context
• The context: tradition, history, national literature
 LC is between theory and history
• Its methods:
• Comparison; Introspection; Explanation and interpretation
• Its role:
• To evaluate
• To explain
• To educate
Problems such LC faces:
• Is it science or art?
• Can it be objective?
• Are there universal norms and criteria to judge by?
Also: LC is concerned with:
• How to approach literature
• How to judge literature
• How to use literature
An important question is completely forgotten:
What is literature?
• That question is left to theory as distinct from
criticism.
• Remember? Criticism • General discussion
• Discussion of individual works

• Establishing facts
History • Finding connections
• Evaluating : Canon

Theory • Ambition: objectiveness


• Problem: definition of literature

So, how are they related?


History vs. theory
Theory provides foundations for literary history.

• Yet… history offers material for theoretical analysis.


• Theories themselves seem to be historically
determined.
• Thus, there also exist:
• Theories of literary history.
• History of literary theories.
Criticism vs. theory
Theory provides foundations for criticism

• Yet…sometimes they are used interchangeably.


• Both are related to text
• Both deal with text
• Both make decisions how to approach literature:
• Starting from the text itself
• Starting from the outside (from the context)

You might also like