Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Opinion

Climate emergency
Planning application
Carbonprocedures
offsetting

2.Low carbon

A short guide to carbon offsetting


Offsetting greenhouse gas emissions will be required in the short term while the construction
industry develops zero-carbon materials. Will Arnold summarises the key considerations for
engineers looking to offset a project’s emissions.

Introduction increase in the future2 (adding risk to the notion sustainability agenda. As shown in Figure 1,
A net-zero asset is one where the whole-life of offsetting operational carbon), but for now, our top priority as engineers remains ensuring
carbon asset-related greenhouse gas emissions this means that the cost of offsetting the upfront that as little material (‘stuff’) as possible is
(modules A–C), plus offsets, equal zero. As emissions of a 500kgCO2e/m2 project is around used – through maximising reuse, promoting
such, until we reach a point where zero-carbon £5–25/m2 – barely 1% of the construction cost. efficient structural configuration, putting the right
or carbon-negative construction materials exist, Of course, this low cost is both a blessing and materials in the right place, and then maximising
offsetting will be required in order to claim net a curse: meaning that there is no reason not to design utilisation.
zero. offset every project’s emissions immediately; but, Once this is done, we should pursue a low-
Over the past year or so, over 50 articles unfortunately, providing little financial incentive carbon material specification, before offsetting
have been published in The Structural Engineer to reduce emissions in the first place – 1% is a whatever remaining emissions result from the
(www.istructe.org/climate-emergency) examining small premium in return for being led to believe final delivered construction.
different ways that our profession can reduce that you can continue with business as usual.
carbon emissions. Offsetting has not yet been Offsetting effectively
covered, as our focus must remain on reducing Limitations and opportunities The Oxford Principles for Net Zero Aligned
our emissions. Of course, it is well recognised now that business Carbon Offsetting5 were launched in 2020 to
However, there are benefits to the use of as usual isn’t physically possible, and all currently provide guidelines to ensure offsetting helps to
offsetting in the short term while the industry available forms of offsetting are limited as to what achieve a net-zero society. It should be noted at
decarbonises, and so it is useful for the engineer is possible to achieve. this point that the first step towards complying
to have a basic understanding of the principles Greenhouse gas removal schemes are with the Principles is to cut project emissions,
of offsetting in order to start a conversation with limited by the amount of land required. The before starting to offset.
their client about how offsetting could be used Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change3 The Principles go on to define high-quality
effectively on their project. states that humanity currently emits 42GtCO2e/ offsets as those that are ‘verifiable and correctly
year, so to reabsorb this would require a forest accounted for, and have a low risk of non-
Types of offsetting the size of Russia, China and the USA combined additionality, reversal, and creating negative
There are two main types of offsets – removals (based on Forest Research4 numbers of unintended consequences for people and the
and reductions: 12tCO2e/ha/year). environment’.
Ò|Greenhouse gas removal schemes take And emission reduction schemes, by This definition is unpicked further by the
existing carbon emissions out of the definition, don’t work once everyone else has diagram reproduced here in Figure 2, which
atmosphere, typically through afforestation already reduced their emissions to match your orders offset types from least preferable (Type I)
or reforestation, although in the future this own – once this has happened, it will be simpler to most preferable (Type V).
will also be through various forms of carbon to try and reduce your own emissions, than Carbon removal is prioritised (Types IV and
capture and storage. someone else’s. V), with the document advocating for all offsets
Ò|Emission reduction schemes do not absorb to be of this type by mid-century, although it
any emissions from the atmosphere, but Offsetting as part of sustainable maintains that emissions reductions (Types I,
minimise or prevent emissions by other design II and III) still remain crucial in the shorter term.
people. Typically this is through investment Because of the limitations described above, With both offset types, more permanence will
in renewable energy generation, household offsetting can only be used as part of a wider be guaranteed in the future if carbon capture
energy efficiency measures, and peatland
restoration.*

High-quality offsets of any type should be


additional (meaning that they would not have
happened if it wasn’t for the offsetting scheme†),
measurable and verified – there is more on this in
the ‘Offsetting effectively’ section below.

Costs
Currently, offsetting is inexpensive compared
with construction, with most offsetting schemes
priced at £10–50/tCO2e. The cost is expected to

* Damaged peatlands around the world currently emit over


1GtCO2e annually1.

e.g. investing in renewable power in Western Europe would not
be ‘additional’ as it is happening anyway. ëFIGURE 1: Hierarchy for net-zero structural design (inspired by PAS 2080)

16
July 2021 | thestructuralengineer.org

Climate Carbon offsetting_TSE JULY 2021_The Structural Engineer.indd 16 29/06/2021 11:41


Carbon offsetting Climate emergency

îFIGURE 2:
Taxonomy of
carbon offsets5

ELI MITCHELL-LARSON/OXFORD OFFSETTING PRINCIPLES


technologies are scaled up. Summary
The document highlights the co-benefits that Reducing material consumption remains the Will Arnold
accompany nature-based offsets, including focus of the structural engineer’s response MEng, CEng, MIStructE
increasing biodiversity and natural flood risk to the climate emergency. However, until we
Will is Head of Climate Action at the IStructE.
management, and argues that the protection reach a point where construction materials can
He leads the Institution’s response to the
and restoration of ecosystems must be rapidly be produced for zero (or negative) emissions
climate emergency, bringing this action into
scaled up regardless of any discussions around over and beyond their entire lifecycle, the
all aspects of its work, including the
carbon offsetting. construction of structures will always result in
There are three further key aspects to the net emissions of carbon. As such, some form of publication of best practice emergency
principles, regardless of type. First, offsets must offsetting will be required in order to reach net guidance.
be ‘verifiable’. There are several independent zero, and it is our responsibility to guide good
accreditation schemes that can be used to decision making around offsetting whenever we
ensure this, with the International Carbon can.
HAVE
YOUR
Reduction & Offset Alliance (www.icroa.org/ High-quality offsetting can bring many positive SAY
ICROA-Audit-Status) auditing and maintaining a outcomes: the world needs more forests and tse@istructe.org
list of platforms around the world. peat bogs, and there are many countries in
Two common platforms used internationally need of emission-reduction technologies. And
are Gold Standard (www.goldstandard.org/) so, in the short term at least, quality offsetting
and the UN carbon offset platform (https:// schemes give the opportunity for clients to
@IStructE
offset.climateneutralnow.org/) – and in the invest positively in the future of humanity. #TheStructuralEngineer #TheStructuralEngineer
UK the Woodland Carbon Code (https://
woodlandcarboncode.org.uk/) can be used for
REFERENCES
carbon-removal offsetting, and the Peatland
Code (www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/
peatland-code-0) for nature-based emission- 1) International Union for Conservation of and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain
reduction offsetting. Nature (2021) Peatlands and climate change [Online] Available at: www.forestresearch.gov.uk/
Second, emissions, accounting practices and [Online] Available at: www.iucn.org/resources/ documents/953/FCRP018.pdf (Accessed: May
targets must all be reported in a transparent issues-briefs/peatlands-and-climate-change 2021)
manner. This is not unique to the Oxford (Accessed: May 2021)
5) Smith School of Enterprise and the
Principles, it is also a requirement of both 2) Buli N., Abnett K. and Twidale S. (2021) EU Environment, University of Oxford (2020) The
the Science Based Targets initiative (https:// carbon price hits record 50 euros per tonne on Oxford Principles for Net Zero Aligned Carbon
sciencebasedtargets.org/) and the Race to route to climate target [Online] Available at: www. Offsetting [Online] Available at: www.smithschool.
Zero (https://racetozero.unfccc.int/). There is reuters.com/business/energy/eu-carbon-price- ox.ac.uk/publications/reports/Oxford-Offsetting-
extensive government guidance on this topic6. tops-50-euros-first-time-2021-05-04/ (Accessed: Principles-2020.pdf (Accessed: May 2021)
May 2021)
Finally, the Oxford Principles encourage users 6) HM Government (2019) Environmental
to enter into individual or collective long-term 3) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reporting Guidelines: Including streamlined
offset purchase agreements wherever possible, (2018) Special Report: Global Warming of energy and carbon reporting guidance
rather than just making one-off purchases. This 1.5°C [Online] Available at: www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ [Online] Available at: www.gov.uk/government/
behaviour provides more guarantee to future (Accessed: May 2021) publications/environmental-reporting-guidelines-
including-mandatory-greenhouse-gas-emissions-
revenue, which can be used to plan better for 4) Morison J., Matthews R., Miller G. et al. (2012)
reporting-guidance (Accessed: May 2021)
the financing of carbon projects. Research Report: Understanding the carbon

17
thestructuralengineer.org | July 2021

Climate Carbon offsetting_TSE JULY 2021_The Structural Engineer.indd 17 28/06/2021 10:46

You might also like