A Lot!: Fundamentals of Performance Measurement +

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 69

5/21/2020

Fundamentals of Performance  What we’ll cover:


Measurement +

Module #5: The GIPS® Standards
•A lot!
David D. Spaulding, DPS, CIPM
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 1 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 2

What we’ll cover: What we’ll cover:


• What the Standards are • Fair valuation
• Their objectives • The calculations
• A bit of history: why do we have them • The contents of GIPS reports
• How they’re organized • Supplemental information
• GIPS fundamentals, including firm definition, • Advertising guidelines
composites, and discretion • Policies & Procedures
• Verification
• Fair valuation
• An approach to compliance

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 3 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 4

1
5/21/2020

Firms Asset Owners Over time, we’ve seen many changes to 


the rules …
• Naming changes
• Wording changes
• Procedural changes
• Calculation changes
• Valuation changes
The Standards are definitely quite dynamic!
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 5 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 6

While I will reference some of the 2020 changes So, what are the GIPS standards?


• This isn’t a review of the changes, nor will we cover  • They’re voluntary standards governing the calculation and 
all of them presentation of investment performance based on the 
• Rather, the class is intended to cover a large portion  ethical principles of fair representation and full disclosure
of the Standards, based upon what is now required  • The mission of the GIPS standards is to promote ethics and 
under the 2020 rules integrity, and instill trust
• We’ve done webinars on the changes, so if you want 
to see them, let us know.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 7 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 8

2
5/21/2020

What are their objectives?


• Ensure accurate and consistent data
• Obtain worldwide acceptance of a single standard for 
calculating and presenting performance
• Promote fair, global competition among investment firms
• Promote industry self‐regulation on a global basis
• Promote investor interests and instill investor confidence
How are the Standards
organized?
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 9 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 10

In all previous versions of the Standards, The 2020 edition is broken into 3 chapters
• We’ve had a single book, comprising the entirety of the 
provisions
• With the 2020 edition, it’s a bit different …

Available in hard copy, as well as soft:


Firms: https: //www.cfainstitute.org/en/ethics/codes/gips-standards/firms
Asset Owners: https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/ethics/codes/gips-standards/asset-owners
Verifiers: https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/ethics/codes/gips-standards/verifiers

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 11 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 12

3
5/21/2020

Other “structural” changes w/2020 2020 GIPS Standards for Firms sections
• There are no longer separate asset‐class sections for real  1. Fundamentals of Compliance 7. Pooled Fund Money‐Weighted 
estate, private equity, or wrap fee portfolios 2. Input Data and Calculation  Return Report
Methodology 8. GIPS Advertising Guidelines
• Each section includes any asset‐class or asset‐type 
3. Composite and Pooled Fund  Glossary
provisions Maintenance Appendices:
• E.g., for overlays, carve‐outs, wrap‐fee, private market 4. Composite Time‐Weighted  A: Sample GIPS Composite Reports
• Dates are now included in footnotes Return Report
B: Sample GIPS Pooled Fund Reports
• Section numbers have gaps, to allow for easy insertion of  5. Composite Money‐Weighted 
Return Report C: Sample GIPS Advertisements
new sections (w/o having to renumber everything) 6. Pooled Fund Time‐Weighted  D: Sample Lists
Return Report

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 13 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 14

2020 GIPS Standards for Asset Owners sections 2020 GIPS Standards for Verifiers
21. Fundamentals of Compliance Glossary Verification
22. Input Data and Calculation  Appendices:
Methodology
Performance Examination
A: Sample Total Fund GIPS Asset 
23. Total Fund and Composite  Owner Reports Glossary
Maintenance B: Sample Composite GIPS Asset  Appendix A: Sample Independent Verifier’s Verification Report
24. Total Fund and Composite Time‐ Owner Reports
Weighted Return Report Appendix B: Sample Independent Verifier’s Performance 
C: Sample GIPS Advertisement
25. Additional Composite Money‐ Examination Report 
D: Sample List of Total Fund and 
Weighted Return Report Composite Descriptions
26. GIPS Advertising Guidelines

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 15 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 16

4
5/21/2020

In the past … • No standards for how to


present performance
Why? •

A lot of confusion
Some deception
• No “level playing field”
• Risks of regulatory
involvement
?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 17 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 18

Result: Some problems w/aggressive advertising  An exposé! 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 19 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 20

5
5/21/2020

A word about discretion… So, something had to happen
Either
• The regulators would define the rules
• or, the industry would

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 21 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 22

Examples of approaches used to present 
performance to prospects
And
Variability in how returns calculated
• Single account (“representative account”) • net‐of‐fee
• Static group of select accounts • gross‐of‐fee
• various approaches to discretion
• Dynamic group of select accounts • w/ or w/o accruals; w/ or w/o cash
• All accounts • time periods for returns (daily; monthly; quarterly; 
• Model annually)
Inconsistency
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 23 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 24

6
5/21/2020

A brief history …
1986 – the Financial Analysts
Federation formed a “blue ribbon
committee” to address the issue of
presenting performance to prospects
1987 – draft standards published in
the FAJ

How do you select a manager?
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 25 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 26

A brief history … A brief history …


1990 – FAF merged with the 1995 – AIMR forms an international
Institute of Chartered Financial standards committee
Analysts to form AIMR (Assoc’n 1999 – First edition of GIPS
for Investment Management & published
Research) 2001 – AIMR-PPS becomes a
1993 – AIMR-PPS published “Country Version of GIPS”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 27 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 28

7
5/21/2020

A brief history … We have a true, global standard


2006 – Second edition of GIPS
published (“Gold”)
2010 – Several new requirements went
into effect
2011 – Third edition published
2020 – Fourth edition goes into effect

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 29 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 30

GIPS Standards’ SPONSORS


Australia Financial Services Council (FSC) Italy Italian Investment Performance 
(AS OF 30 June 2019)
Philippines CFA Society Philippines; Fund  United Kingdom United Kingdom Investment 
A brief history of
global standardization
Canada Canadian Investment Performance  Committee (IIPC): Associazione Bancaria Italiana Managers Association of the Philippines (FMAP)  Performance Committee (UKIPC): The 
Council (CIPC) (ABI); Associazione Italiana degli Analisti e  and Trust Officers Association of the Philippines  Investment Association (TIA); The Association of 
Consulenti Finanziari (AIAF); Assogestioni;  (TOAP) British Insurers (ABI); Pensions and Lifetime 
China CFA Society Beijing Società per lo sviluppo del Mercato dei Fondi Savings Association (PLSA); The Association of 
Poland CFA Society Poland
Cyprus CFA Society Cyprus Pensione (Mefop); Associazione Italiana Revisori Consulting Actuaries (ACA); The Society of 

• In a word: abomidable
Contabili (Assirevi); and CFA Society Italy Portugal Associação Portuguesa de Analista Pension Consultants (SPC); The Investment 
Czech Republic CFA Society Czech Republic and  Financeiros (APAF) Property Forum (IPF); The Alternative 
Czech Capital Market Association (AKAT) Japan The Securities Analysts Association of 
Russia CFA Association Russia Investment Management Association (AIMA); 

• Consider
Japan (SAAJ)
Denmark CFA Society Denmark and The Danish  and The Wealth Management Association 
Finance Society Kazakhstan Association of Financial and  Saudi Arabia CFA Society Saudi Arabia (WMA) 
Investment Analysts (AFIA) Singapore Investment Management Association 

Paper
France CFA Society France and Association  United States United States Investment 

Française de la Gestion Financière (AFG) Korea Korea Investment Performance  of Singapore (IMAS)
Committee (KIPC) Performance Committee (USIPC) of CFA 
Germany German Asset Management  South Africa Association for Savings and  Institute

Spelling
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein Bankers Association  Investment South Africa (ASISA)

Standards Committee (GAMSC): Bundesverband
Investment und Asset, Manager e.V. (BVI);  (LBA) Spain Asociación Española de Presentación de 
Deutsche Vereinigung fur Finanzanalyse und  Mexico CFA Society Mexico Resultados de Gestión
Assetment Management (DVFA); and CFA 
Society Germany Micronesia Asia Pacific Association for Fiduciary 
Studies (APAFS)
• Driving
Even electricity!
Ghana Ghana Securities Industry Association 
(GSIA)
Greece CFA Society Greece
The Netherlands VBA‐Beleggingsprofessionals Sri Lanka CFA Society Sri Lanka
Sweden CFA Society Sweden and The Swedish 

India CFA Society India New Zealand CFA Society New Zealand Society of Financial Analysts (Sveriges
Nigeria Nigeria Investment Performance  Finansanalytikers Forening or SFF)
Committee: CFA Society Nigeria; Pensions  Switzerland Swiss Funds & Asset Management 
Indonesia CFA Society Indonesia and Indonesia  Operators Association of Nigeria (PENOP); and  Association (SFAMA)
Association of Mutual Fund Managers (Asosiasi Fund Managers Association of Nigeria (FMAN)
Pengelola Reksa Dana Indonesia, or APRDI) Thailand The Association of Provident Fund 
Norway The Norwegian Society of Financial 
Ireland Irish Association of Investment  Analysts (NFF) (AOP)
Managers (IAIM)
Pakistan CFA Society Pakistan Ukraine The Ukrainian Association of 
Peru Procapitales Investment Business (UAIB)

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 31 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 32

8
5/21/2020

Why comply? 
Especially when  The m ain reason
it’s firm s com ply:
• Costly,
• Time‐
consuming, 
and
• Risky?
M ore & M ore,the M arketDem andsCom pliance

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 33 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 34

O ther reasons include: Questions?


• They’re a global standard that promote full
disclosure and ethical principles
• They are widely/globally accepted
• They’re considered “best practice”
• They provide rules that most organizations find
of value
• They result in the firm having great written P&P

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 35 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 36

9
5/21/2020

The Fundamentals of the GIPS Standards It all fits together …
Three of the most fundamental issues that a firm must  • Firm definition is the foundation for firm‐wide compliance and 
consider when becoming compliant are  creates defined boundaries whereby total firm assets can be 
• Firm definition determined. 
• The firm’s definition of discretion, as it applies to the GIPS  • The firm’s definition of [GIPS] discretion establishes criteria to judge 
standards which portfolios should be in a composite to accurately reflect the 
application of the firm’s investment strategy. 
• And the firm’s composite definition principles and guidelines. 
• Once the firm and discretion have been defined, composites can be 
constructed based on the strategies implemented by the firm. 
• Under the GIPS standards, they must comply with all applicable 
laws and regulations. 
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 37 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 38

The Fundamentals of the GIPS Standards
We’ll now delve a bit deeper into the fundamentals
• Firm definition
• Firm assets
• Composites
• Composite assets
• Discretion
Plus, a great deal more!
Begin with
“Firm Definition”
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 39 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 40

10
5/21/2020

Firm Definition: Adopting at the broadest level


the first step in moving to • Firms are encouraged to adopt the broadest, most meaningful 
compliance definition of the firm. Examples:
• All offices operating under same brand name
• Other names resulting from mergers, acquisitions
• Financial services holding company, a global firm with multiple brands, 
Ideally, define at the highest different legal entities, multiple offices, investment teams and 
strategies
possible level. • A firm with one name, but multiple strategies and teams
A fair amount of flexibility. • All offices operating with same recognizable name with different global 
Can require a lot of thought, offices (e.g., Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management (UK) Ltd.)
especially for larger firms.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 41 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 42

Firm definition flexibility … Possible criteria for the firm
• While firms are encouraged to adopt the broadest, this is not  • A legal entity
required.  • Has a distinct market or client type
• The GIPS “firm” does not have to be a legal entity • E.g., private wealth, institutional, retail
• If it does not comprise the entire FIRM (i.e., it’s a division or 
• Uses a separate and distinct investment process
separate office of the FIRM), it must be held out distinctly from 
the FIRM
• It can reference the larger FIRM, but the FIRM isn’t claiming 
compliance, it’s the division or separate office
• It would be the firm that claims compliance, not the FIRM

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 43 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 44

11
5/21/2020

Exercise: How many different ways can the  Additional considerations re. firm definition
following collection be defined? Note: they are all  • When jointly marketing w/other firms, the firm claiming 
independent divisions of XYZ Asset Management  compliance must ensure it is clearly defined and separate, 
relative to any other firms being marketed, and that it is clear 
• XYZ Equity Management, New York City Office which firm claims compliance
• XYZ Fixed Income Management, NYC Office • If a parent company has multiple “defined firms,” each is 
• XYZ Equity Management, London Office encouraged to disclose the other firms that claim compliance
• XYZ Fixed Income Management, Tokyo Office
• XYZ Equity Management, Tokyo Office

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 45 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 46

GIPS’ meaning of firm assets Firm assets must include:
• “All discretionary and non‐discretionary assets for which a  • Assets for which the firm has either conditional or unconditional 
firm has investment management responsibility.” authority to make investment decisions
• Must be the aggregate fair value of all discretionary and  • Fee‐paying assets and non‐fee‐paying assets 
[GIPS] non‐discretionary assets managed by the firm. This  • Cash and cash equivalents (substitutes).
includes fee‐paying and non‐fee‐paying portfolios • Regarding “sub‐advisory” situations:
• Regarding “sub‐advisory” situations: • If the compliant firm has the ability to hire/fire sub‐advisors, then 
• If the compliant firm has the ability to hire/fire sub‐advisors, then  those assets fit within the firm
• If the compliant firm acts as a sub‐advisor, those assets fit within the 
those assets fit within the firm
firm
• If the compliant firm acts as a sub‐advisor, those assets fit within 
the firm
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 47 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 48

12
5/21/2020

Firm assets must exclude: Advisory‐only assets
• Advisory‐only assets • Advisory‐only assets are assets for which the firm 
• Uncalled committed capital provides investment recommendations and for which two 
• Overlay exposure. conditions are met. The firm:
• Has no control over implementation of investment decisions
• Does not have trading authority over the assets
• E.g., “UMA” (Unified Managed Account) programs

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 49 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 50

Advisory‐only assets Uncalled committed capital
• In the case of advisory‐only assets, the firm has no direct  • Committed capital are pledges of capital to an investment vehicle by 
investors (limited partners and the general partner) or the firm, and is 
authority to manage or trade the account.  typically drawn down over time.
• For this reason, the account must not be included in any  • Uncalled committed capital is the amount of capital not yet drawn. 
composite, and must not be included in total firm assets • For periods beginning on/ after 1 January 2020, uncalled committed 
• Firms may report advisory‐only assets (“advisory assets”)  capital must not be included in total firm assets. 
• Uncalled committed capital is excluded from total firm assets because 
and/or combined with  (“firm + advisory assets”) in their  • It is not actively under management by the firm and 
GIPS reports • There may be cases in which the committed capital is never called and will 
never be actively managed.
• Firms must still report separately “Firm assets”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 51 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 52

13
5/21/2020

Overlays and overlay exposure Overlays and overlay exposure
• Overlay strategy are strategies where the management  • For overlay strategies, overlay exposure is the 
of a certain aspect of an investment strategy is carried  economic value for which a firm has investment 
out separately from the underlying portfolio.  management responsibility. 
• They are typically designed either to limit or maintain  • Overlay exposure is the notional value of the overlay 
a specified risk exposure that is present in the  strategy being managed, the value of the underlying 
underlying portfolio or to profit from a tactical view on  portfolios being overlaid, or a specified target 
the market by changing a portfolio’s specified risk  exposure.
exposure. 
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 53 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 54

Included in Total 
Summary: helpful table

Type of Asset Reason
Overlays exposure Firm Assets?
(source: p. 5, Explanation of Provisions, Section 2)

Discretionary assets for which the firm has 
Yes Firm controls investment decisions.
unconditional authority to implement its 
• Firms must not include overlay exposure in total firm  Non‐discretionary assets for which the firm 
has conditional authority to implement the 
Yes
Firm has limited control of investment 
decisions.
assets. Non‐fee‐paying assets for which the firm has 
conditional or unconditional authority to  Yes
Firm has all or limited control of investment

• However, firms may wish to present information about  implement the strategy
decisions.

Firm retains discretion over sub‐advisor 
firm‐wide overlay exposure.  Assets directed to a sub‐advisor by the firm Yes
selection and has investment management 
Firm does not retain discretion over sub‐advisor
• For overlay strategy composites, the firm is not required  Assets directed to a sub‐advisor by the client No selection and does not have investment
management responsibility.
to present total firm assets, and may, instead, choose to  Assets within advisory‐only client 
Firm has no control over implementation of
No investment decisions and no trading authority
present total firm overlay exposure as of each annual  relationships
for the assets.

period end Uncalled committed capital No
Firm is not actively managing uncalled 
committed
Overlay exposure No Firm is not managing the underlying assets.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 55 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 56

14
5/21/2020

Definition – Composite: Importance of composites


• A composite is an aggregation of a number of • Allows for an “apples‐to‐apples” comparison
portfolios into a single group that represents a • Provides the prospect with the performance history 
particular investment objective or strategy. relative to the strategy, style, approach, objective 
• Creating meaningful composites is critical to the fair they’re interested in
presentation, consistency, and comparability of results
over time and among firms.
• Firms are free in defining the composites and setting
the principles to include a portfolio in a particular
composite.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 57 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 58

Guiding Principles for Composites Guiding Principles for Composites
• Composites must be defined according to similar investment  • Firms must apply the inclusion criteria consistently (e.g., no “cherry‐
objectives and/or strategies. Can’t mix different investment  picking”), and must include all portfolios that satisfy the criteria. 
strategies or objectives in the same composite. The results would  • If there are many portfolios with unique investment characteristics, it 
be meaningless. may be necessary to create numerous single‐portfolio composites.
• Composites should enable clients to compare the performance of  • Portfolios can’t be moved into/out of composites except in the case of:
one firm to another.  • documented, client‐driven changes to investment objectives or guidelines 
• composite redefinition
• The firm should also consider the definition and construction of 
• [new, with 2020] the client has granted the manager the authority to make 
similar products found within the competitive universe.  such changes. 
• Composites must be representative of the firm’s products and be  • Portfolios’ historical records must remain with the composite. 
consistent with the firm’s marketing strategy.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 59 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 60

15
5/21/2020

Composite Definition Criteria Suggested criteria for composite creation 
• Asset classes (e.g., equity, fixed income)
• Before defining composites, the firm needs to establish
reasonable criteria to support the fundamental principle of fair • Investment style or strategy (e.g. growth)
representation. • Portfolio Risk characteristics (e.g. target tracking error)
• A variety of criteria must be analyzed to identify whether • Client type (e.g. institutional, retail)
portfolios are similar and should be grouped together into a
composite, or placed into multiple composites. • Portfolio size
• Some firms drive composite definition based off the strategies • Instruments used (e.g., funds, ETFs , individual
they offer, while others create new composites whenever a securities)
client makes a new request. • Base currency

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 61 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 62

Suggested Criteria (cont’d) Composite definitions/descriptions
• Compliant firms are required to have both composite 
• Client characteristics (e.g., tax status, cash flow
definitions and composite descriptions
needs, risk tolerances)
• Composite Definition: Detailed criteria that determine the 
• Investment guidelines (especially for balanced assignment of portfolios to composites. Criteria may include, 
portfolios) but are not limited to, investment mandate, style or strategy, 
• Extend of the use of derivatives, hedging and leverage asset class, the use of derivatives, leverage and/or hedging, 
• Benchmark(s) of the portfolios targeted risk metrics, investment constraints or restrictions, 
• Treatment of taxes and/or portfolio type (e.g., segregated account or pooled 
fund; taxable versus tax exempt).

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 63 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 64

16
5/21/2020

Composite definitions/descriptions Composite definition criteria
• Composite Description: General information regarding the  • Firms may choose to define their composites according 
investment mandate, objective, or strategy of the composite. It  to relevant criteria and must document the definition of 
may be more abbreviated than the composite definition, but 
each composite, including any criteria or constraints. 
must include all key features of the composite and must include 
enough information to allow a prospect to understand the key  • It is constructive to consider a hierarchical structure of 
characteristics of the composite’s investment mandate,  criteria for composite definition that promotes primary 
objective, or strategy, including: and secondary strategy characteristics. 
• The material risks of the composite’s strategy.
• How leverage, derivatives, and short positions may be used, if they 
are a material part of the strategy.
• If illiquid investments are a material part of the strategy. 
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 65 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 66

Sensitivity to the marketplace Composite definition/redefinition
• It is also important to understand the defining  • While investment strategies can change over time, in most 
characteristics commonly found in the marketplace for  cases firms should not change the definition of a composite. 
investment products.  • Generally, changes in strategy result in the creation of a 
• Comparability of similar strategies or products is a  new composite. 
fundamental objective of the Standards, and benefits  • In some very rare cases, however, it may be appropriate to 
current and prospective clients when firms define  redefine a composite. 
strategies similarly, using clear and unambiguous  • If a firm determines that it is appropriate to redefine a 
composite, it must disclose the date and nature of the 
terminology. 
change.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 67 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 68

17
5/21/2020

Composite definition/redefinition Composite descriptions
• Changes to composites must not be applied retroactively.  • Firms are also required to disclose that a complete list of 
• It is required that firms disclose any changes to the name of  the firm’s composites composite descriptions is available. 
a composite. • Prospective clients can request to see additional 
• Discontinued composites must continue to be listed on the  information on the firm’s historical performance record 
firm’s list of composites for five years after discontinuation.  through other composites on the list. 
• When requested, firms must provide a compliant  • These requirements exist to provide prospective clients 
presentation for any composite on the firm’s list of  with a complete picture of the firm’s investment 
composites (i.e., no distinction between “marketed” and  performance achieved on all accounts under the firm’s 
“non‐marketed” composites.  discretion. 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 69 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 70

Let’s clarify these rules
• Actual: means a real portfolio
• Fee‐paying: means the client pays an advisory fee
All actual, fee paying, • Discretionary: that’s a bit more complex,…
All actual, fee paying,
discretionary accounts must be in discretionary accounts must be in
at least one composite at least one composite

Accounts can be in more than one Accounts can be in more than one
composite composite

Single account composites are Single account composites are


permitted permitted

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 71 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 72

18
5/21/2020

Mark Twain
“The difference between the right
word, and the almost right word, is
the difference between lighting and
the lightening bug.”

And so, let’s spend some time on …


Discretion!
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 73 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 74

“Discretion” is one of the most confusing “GIPS” Discretion


aspects of the GIPS standards  Discretion is the ability of the firm to implement
its intended strategy.
 If documented client-imposed restrictions
significantly hinder the firm from fully
implementing its intended strategy, the firm may
The problem: it’s a term we’re determine that the portfolio is non-discretionary.
already familiar with: legal  Nondiscretionary portfolios must not be included
discretion granting authority to in a firm’s composites.
trade

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 75 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 76

19
5/21/2020

“GIPS” Discretion Evaluating the restrictions


 There are degrees of discretion and not all client-  A client stipulates the firm cannot purchase any tobacco
stocks for its portfolio
imposed restrictions will necessarily cause a
The firm should consider if this restriction will hinder
portfolio to be non-discretionary.

the implementation of the intended strategy.
 The firm must determine if the restrictions will,  If so, the firm could either classify this portfolio as
or could, interfere with the implementation of the  non-discretionary (and all other portfolios with this
intended strategy to the extent that the portfolio restriction)
is no longer representative of the strategy  discretionary and create a composite for portfolios with
tobacco restrictions
 Where possible, the firm should label as “discretionary”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 77 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 78

Is the portfolio 
Non‐discretionary
representative of  A portfolio would be considered non‐discretionary if the 
the strategy? client‐imposed restrictions and/or limitations hinder or 
prohibit the manager to apply their desired investment 
strategy; in such cases, it’s not representative and would 
Has the client imposed  be labeled “non‐discretionary”.
any restrictions such 
that the portfolio 
wouldn’t be?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 79 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 80

20
5/21/2020

Discretionary Rules A few examples Potential Discretionary Situations
• No sin stocks; ESG sensitivity; no links to terrorism; no weapons 
• Define and document your rules for discretion in your P&P • No technology stocks
• Be consistent • No foreign companies (domestic only)
• Document any portfolio which is deemed non‐ • No bonds below “BBB” 
discretionary • No “union unfriendly”
• Take your time developing – tradeoffs exist with too many  • Call before you execute a trade
/ too few • Can’t sell XYZ (restricted assets)
• Discretion can be “dynamic” • Don’t buy certain companies
• Strict asset allocation rules 40% equities; 60% fixed income

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 81 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 82

Composite assets
• Composites will include all actual fee paying, discretionary
[for GIPS purposes] portfolios
• Includes their aggregated fair value as of year-end
• If a portfolio’s December return is included in the composite’s
December return, its assets are included; otherwise, they’re
not.
• Includes only actual assets managed by the firm
• Can include fee-paying accounts
• Cannot include non-discretionary portfolios
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 83 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 84

21
5/21/2020

Composite assets Discretionary leverage
• Are calculated net of discretionary leverage, and not grossed • Refers to loans taken at the investment manager’s discretion.
up, as if the leverage did not exist • For example, if the firm is managing a portfolio with $100
• Must not include uncalled committed capital for periods MM, and the firm elects to borrow $25 MM, the portfolio’s net
beginning on or after 1 January 2020. assets are $100 MM and its gross assets are $125 MM.
• Since the firm chose to lever the fund, the firm must use net
assets of $100 MM when calculating total firm and composite
assets

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 85 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 86

Non‐discretionary leverage No double‐counting assets …
• Refers to borrowings that are mandated by or undertaken by • In “composite” or “total firm” assets
the client. • E.g., If a composite holds both separate accounts 
• Non-discretionary leverage is not deducted when calculating
total firm assets, composite assets, or pooled fund assets. and mutual funds, and one or more of the 
• E.g., if a client gave the firm $100 MM to manage, of which separate accounts holds shares in the mutual 
the client borrowed $25 MM, the amount of assets included funds, the value of those shares must be excluded 
in total firm and composite assets is $125 MM. from the composite (and total firm) assets

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 87 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 88

22
5/21/2020

Handling pooled funds Definitions
• Firms that created composites that hold only one or  • Broad Distribution Pooled Fund (BDPF): A pooled fund 
more pooled funds may be terminated, if the strategy  that is regulated under a framework that would permit 
of those composites is not offered as a segregated  the general public to purchase or hold the pooled 
account. fund’s shares and is not exclusively offered in one‐on‐
• This applies to both “limited distribution pooled funds”  one presentations
(LDPFs) and “broad distributed pooled funds” (BDPFs) • Limited Distribution Pooled Fund (LDPF): Any pooled 
fund that is not a broad distribution pooled fund

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 89 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 90

Broad Distribution Pooled Funds Broad Distribution Pooled Funds
• Firms may provide a GIPS pooled fund report or a GIPS  • The key point here is that firms that have many BDPFs 
composite report that includes the broad distribution  in strategies that are never offered to separate 
pooled fund to broad distribution pooled fund  accounts can discontinue the composites.
prospective investors, but is not required to do so. • And, for firms that have held off on complying because 
• If the BDPF falls under regulatory advertising  of the perceived onerous task to create dozens or 
requirements, those rules are to be followed.  hundreds of composites can adopt the Standards and 
Otherwise, the Standards provides certain  not have to create the composites (except in cases 
requirements to advertise BDPFs.  where the strategy is offered to separate accounts).
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 91 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 92

23
5/21/2020

Limited Distribution Pooled Funds GIPS Pooled Fund Report for LDPFs
• Firms must make every reasonable effort to provide a  • If an LDPF is in a composite, firms may provide the 
GIPS report (either a GIPS Composite Report or a GIPS  associated composite report or a GIPS Pooled Fund 
Pooled Fund Report) to all limited distribution pooled  Report. 
fund prospective investors when they initially become  • Firms with LDPFs will not be required to create GIPS 
prospective investors. Pooled Fund Reports for individual LDPFs. 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 93 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 94

Back‐testing, model, simulated, etc., portfolios 
Pooled Fund Lists (LD & BD)
are excluded from composites
Firms must maintain:
• The results may be shown as supplemental 
• A complete list of pooled fund descriptions for LDPFs. 
information, but cannot be included with the 
The firm is not required to include terminated LDPFs on 
this list.
composite
• A complete list of BDPFs. The firm is also not required  • Ensure you provide sufficient disclosures so that the 
to include terminated BDPFs on this list. prospect understands the results do not belong to 
actual portfolios. Don’t want to run afoul of regulators

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 95 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 96

24
5/21/2020

What’s a “minimum account size”


• The minimum is not the marketing minimum Adding and removing portfolios 
• Rather, it’s the threshold, below which, the account isn’t to/from composites
representative of the strategy • Adding:
• Optional; buffers are permitted • Define the timing to add new accounts to composites
• The firm needs to define how they test for minimums in • Can vary from composite to composite
P&P (e.g., using the start- and/or end-of-month values • Timing to get the account fully invested should be considered
• Composites can have different minimums • Removing:
• Note: if all composite fall below minimum, you’ll have a • In general, we expect accounts to be removed once you’re told that 
gap in performance. the account is leaving
• Need to document your rules in your P&P

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 97 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 98

You also need a rule for Fair


the timing for strategy
changes
When will accounts be
removed from the original
composite, and added to the
For periods after 1 January
new one? 2011, portfolios must be valued
in accordance with the definition
Rules tend to be similar to treatment
of fair value and the GIPS
of new and terminated accounts Valuation Principles.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 99 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 100

25
5/21/2020

Fair
Fair value Fair
Recommended Valuation Hierarchy
• The amount at which an investment could be exchanged in a  a. Quoted prices for identical or similar investments in markets that 
current arm’s length transaction between willing parties in  are not active (markets in which there are few transactions for the 
which the parties each act knowledgeably and prudently.  investment, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary 
• The valuation must be determined using the objective,  substantially over time and/or between market makers). If not 
observable, unadjusted quoted market price for an identical  available or appropriate, then investments should base on:
investment in an active market on the measurement date, if  b. Market‐based inputs, other than quoted prices, that are 
available.  observable for the investments. If not available or appropriate, 
• If not available, the valuation must represent the firm’s best  use:
estimate of the market value.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 101 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 102

Fair
Recommended Valuation Hierarchy Fair
Recommended Valuation Hierarchy
c. Investments must be valued using objective, observable,  e. Subjective unobservable inputs for the investment where markets 
unadjusted quoted market prices for identical investments in  are not active at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs 
active markets on the measurement date, if available. If not  should only be used to measure fair value to the extent that 
available, then use: observable inputs and prices are not available or appropriate. 
d. Objective, observable quoted prices for similar investments in  Unobservable inputs reflect the firm’s own assumptions about the 
active markets. If not available or appropriate, then investments  assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the 
should use: investments and should be developed based on the best 
information available under the circumstances.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 103 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 104

26
5/21/2020

Fair
Fair valuation, cont’d Any Questions?
• For periods beginning 1 Jan 2011, firms must disclose the 
use of subjective unobservable inputs for valuing portfolio 
investments
• Also, firms must disclose if the composite’s valuation 
hierarchy materially differs from the GIPS valuation 
principles’ recommended hierarchy

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 105 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 106

GIPS Math
• Composite Rates of Return
• Portfolio Rates of Return
• Dispersion
• 36‐Month Standard Deviation
• Allocating Cash for Carve‐Outs
• Estimating Transaction Costs

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 107 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 108

27
5/21/2020

Composite returns Method #1


• Must be asset-weighted Asset Weight by beginning account values, only
• Use beginning values
• Various approaches • Rather simple to implement
are permitted • Uses each account’s beginning value and return for the 
month
• Multiple account values and returns, and divide by the 
total of the values

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 109 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 110

Method #1 Asset‐Weighted Composite Return
Asset Weight by beginning account values, only Account BMV ROR Weighted ROR
1 100,000 1.45% 1,450
2 100,000 1.80% 1,800
  3 110,000 1.38% 1,518
v r 
n
4
5
120,000 1.60%
140,000 1.50%
1,920
2,100
   ni
BeginningValues 0 i 
RComposite 6 150,000 1.60% 2,400
  7 160,000 1.63% 2,608

  v 0i 
i 1 8 450,000 1.78% 8,010

 i 1  9 600,000 1.68%
1,930,000
10,080
31,886
ROR = 31,886 / 1,930,000 = 1.652%

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 111 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 112

28
5/21/2020

Method #2 Method #2
Asset Weight by beginning values and asset‐ Asset Weight by beginning values and asset‐
weighted cash flows weighted cash flows
• Provides a slight increase in accuracy
• Requires a bit more work n  m 
 V 
  Ci , j  Wi , j   ri
0i 
i 1  j0 
R
n  m 
 V0i   Ci , j  Wi , j  
i 1  j0 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 113 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 114

Flow‐Weighted Composite Return Method #3
Aggregate Method
Cash Flow Flow BMV + Wtd Flow-
Account
1
BMV
100,000
Flow
5000
Date Weight
10 0.667
Flows
103,333
ROR Wtd ROR
1.45% 1,498
• Treats the entire composite as a single portfolio
2 100,000 100,000 1.80% 1,800
3 110,000 5000 20 0.333 111,667 1.38% 1,541
4 120,000 120,000 1.60% 1,920
5 140,000 140,000 1.50% 2,100
6 150,000 150,000 1.60% 2,400
7 160,000 -40,000 25 0.167 153,333 1.63% 2,499
8 450,000 450,000 1.78% 8,010
9 600,000 -250,000 8 0.733 416,667 1.68% 7,000
1,930,000 1,745,000 28,769
ROR = 28,769 / 1,745,000 = 1.649%

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 115 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 116

29
5/21/2020

Composite Return using the Aggregate Method Optional: Equal‐Weighted ROR
Account BMV
Cash
Flow
Flow
Date
Flow
Weight EMV ROR
• Some felt this was preferable to asset‐weighting
1
2
100,000
100,000
5000 10 0.667 106,500
101,800
1.45%
1.80%
• Not acceptable for “GIPS compliant presentations”
3
4
110,000
120,000
5000 20 0.333 116,540
121,920
1.38%
1.60%
• However, recommended, but rarely if ever shown
5
6
7
140,000
150,000
160,000 -40,000 25 0.167
142,100
152,400
122,500
1.50%
1.60%
1.63%
•ACTUALLY, probably never done:  why 
8
9
450,000
600,000 -250,000 8 0.733
458,000
357,000
1.78%
1.68%
not?
1,930,000 -280,000 1,678,760

1,678,760  1,930,000  (  280,000)


ROR   1649%
.
1,930,000  0.667  5,000  0.333  5,000  0167
.  (  40,000)  0.733  (  250,000)

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 117 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 118

Equal‐Weighted Return Equal‐Weighted Return
Account ROR
n 1 1.45%

r
2 1.80%
3 1.38%
i 4 1.60%

R EqualWeighted
Composite  i 1 5
6
1.50%
1.60%
n 7 1.63%
8 1.78%
9 1.68%
14.42%
ROR=14.42 / 9=1.60%

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 119 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 120

30
5/21/2020

Portfolio Rates of Return Time‐weighting
• Options: time‐weighting or money‐weighting • Applies to most managers
• Must value portfolios at least monthly
• If use a monthly method, must
• Day-weight cash flows
• Revalue for large cash flows

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 121 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 122

Large vs. Significant Cash Flows are Confusing Large cash flows …
It’s quite common  • Are a rule, which requires firms to revalue portfolios at 
for the terms to be  least with all large flows
used in place of  • The firm gets to decide what “large” means, though we 
each other or  typically see it at 10%
• Smaller (e.g., 5%) is fine
synonymously, but  • Larger isn’t
they mean two  • The rule exists to improve the accuracy of time‐weighted 
different things! returns

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 123 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 124

31
5/21/2020

A couple LCF FAQs The SEC’s view of the LCF Rule


• “We use the aggregate method to calculate our  • While it’s not written anywhere, we believe there’s 
composite returns; must we therefore use this rule  an expectation that SEC‐registered firms revalue 
at the composite level?” their portfolios for large cash flows.
• Yes! • The basis for this view: their “performance sweep”
• “We use the aggregate method to calculate our  • If the firm doesn’t revalue, then the SEC seems to 
composite returns; are we still obligated to apply  want you to disclose this, as the returns you report 
this rule at the portfolio level?” are less accurate
• Also, yes!
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 125 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 126

Ideally, the firm uses the exact method


• And revalues for all cash flows
• This is preferred, and if daily market prices are 
available, should be employed
We revalue only for
LARGE cash flows?
Sound simple?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 127 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 128

32
5/21/2020

It can get tricky when Consider this:


there are other flows! • V0 = $100,000
• “Large” Flow: 10%+
• Testing for “large” • C1 = $20,000; “large”
• If there are also “small” • Adjusted Value with flow = 
• If there are other large $121,000
• C2 = $11,000

Is C2 large?
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 129 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 130

Consider this: • V0 = $100,000 Exercise solve this:


• “Large”: 10%+
• V0 (5/31) = 100,000
• C1 = ‐$20,000; 
• C1 (6/12) = 15,000
“large”
• V1 = 102,000
• Adjusted Value with 
• C2 (6/21) = 5,000
flow = $81,000
• V2 = 118,000
• C2 = $9,000
• VE (6/30) = 125,000
Is C2 large?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 131 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 132

33
5/21/2020

Step #2: calculate the return for the period after the large
Solution: cash flow; since the flow is “small,” we’ll use Modified Dietz.
Step #1: calculate the return for the period up to the First, calculate the “weighting factor,” W (used start-of-day
large cash flow treatment)
CD  D  1 19  10  1 10
W    0.526316
CD 19 19
V1 102,000
R1  1   1  2% We next enter the values into our formula
V0 100,000
VE  V0  C 125,000  (102,000  15,000)  5,000
R   2.62%
V0  WC 117,000  0.526316  5,000

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 133 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 134

Step #3: we geometrically link the two subperiod returns Just imagine all the possible cash
flow scenarios; e.g.,
R   ri  1  1  ( 0.02  1)  0.262  1  1  4.68%
• Large, small, large
• Small, large, small
• Large, small, small, large
• Small, large, small, large
• Small, large, large, small
• … this can get very complicated!
If daily prices are available,
daily revaluation is a lot simpler!
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 135 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 136

34
5/21/2020

Significant Cash Flows Significant Cash Flows


• Firms have the option to TEMPORARILY remove  • If the firm adopts the policy, they must document it
accounts from composites when “significant” flows  • It can be employed at the “Firm” level, or by composite
occur • Composites that use SGFs must include appropriate 
• Why would you do this? disclosures:
• Because it may take time to (a) raise the necessary  • How a significant cash flow is defined and 
cash or (b) invest the cash, causing the account to not  • For how long an account will be removed.
be “representative for some period

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 137 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 138

Significant Cash Flows: be cautious! An alternative: temporary accounts


• If a composite has only a few accounts (e.g., 1‐3)  • When substantial flows occur, set up a temporary 
and if they all experience SCFs in the same month,  investment account.
the composite could have a “gap” (break) in  • As new securities are purchased, move them into the 
main account.
performance
• Or, when the firm is required to raise cash, move the 
• No one likes gaps in performance
securities being sold and/or the cash raised into the 
temporary account
• Rarely used; probably because difficult to implement

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 139 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 140

35
5/21/2020

Another SCF policy alternative Money‐weighting


• Flag assets, including cash that’s raised, as non‐managed • The use of money‐weighting has expanded.
• E.g., if securities are sold and cash is raised, causing 
• If a firm manages the external cash flows and either
a) Closed-end
the allocation to cash to be substantial, move the cash  b) Fixed Life
into a separate “cash account” that is “non‐managed”  c) Fixed Commitment
(“non‐managed cash”), until the client draws down  d) Illiquid investments as a significant part of the investment
strategy
the funds.
they may use money‐weighting instead of time‐weighting 
• Required for private equity & real estate 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 141 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 142

Money‐weighting Returns for firms: gross- or net-of fees?


• Previously, the internal rate of return (IRR) was required • In prior versions of the Standards, “gross” was 
• Now, other money‐weighted methods can be used (e.g., 
recommended for firms.
Modified Dietz)
• We recommend the IRR; more accurate • Firms are now recommended to report both gross‐
• Previously, firms were required to report since‐inception  and net‐of‐fee
IRRs for all years shown • The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) 
• Now, must only report since‐inception MWRR for most  has certain requirements regarding reporting gross, 
recent year shown when not a one‐on‐one situation

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 143 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 144

36
5/21/2020

Returns for asset owners Net-of-fee


• Asset owners are required to report net‐of‐fee  • Composites can have different fee schedules
returns • For net‐of‐fee, can use “actual” or “model” fees
• They can be net‐of‐external‐costs‐only, or net‐of‐ • Model fees must be appropriate to the investor
fees; must indicate which • If the firm uses model fees, the returns must be 
• May show gross‐of‐fee returns as supplemental  equal to or lower than those that would have been 
information calculated using actual investment management 
fees.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 145 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 146

If report net-of-fee performance, must disclose: Employing estimated transaction costs


a) If any other fees are deducted in addition to investment  ‐ The opportunity to use estimated transaction costs is a major 
management fees and transaction costs. change with the 2020 edition of the Standards.
b) If net‐of‐fees returns are net of any performance‐based fees or  ‐ It will provide great benefits.
carried interest*. ‐ The challenge: how to get it done.
c) If model or actual investment management fees are used. ‐ This method will work, though it is nontrivial, and should ideally be 
d) If model investment management fees are used, and composite  incorporated into the firm’s software (ideally, not a spreadsheet‐
gross‐of fees returns are not presented, the model investment  based solution)
management fee used to calculate net‐of‐fees returns.*
e) If model investment management fees are used, the methodology 
used to calculate net‐of‐fees returns.*
* New with the 2020 edition
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 147 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 148

37
5/21/2020

Dispersion: how consistent is the implementation 
of the strategy? Standard Deviation
• A required disclosure • Most widely used measure
• Various approaches supported • Asset‐weighted or Equal‐weighted
• Portfolios must be in composite for entire period • Population or sample form ok
• N/A for ≤ 5 Portfolios •We recommend equal‐weighting

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 149 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 150

Additional options for dispersion:  Other dispersion options, though VERY rare: 
High‐Low or Range Quartiles/Quintiles/Deciles
• Simple to calculate and interpret • Uses spread of dollars across quartiles to provide 
• Extreme returns can skew and be misleading additional insights into dispersion
• Combine with other methods to enhance presentation • Compares top performing quartile with lower 
• Perhaps giving out too much detail, when not needed performing ones

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 151 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 152

38
5/21/2020

To be included, accounts must be  36-Month Standard Deviation


present for full period
Included • As of January 1, 2011, firms must report
36-month standard deviation for each year
in
dispersion
Account Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec formula?
1
2 Added
Yes
No • May use sample or population form; we
recommend population
3 Yes
4 Left No
5 Added Left No

• If a period clearly has less than 36-months


6 Yes
7 Yes

of performance, do not have to disclose that


8 Left No
9 Yes
10 Yes

it’s not being shown; otherwise, need to


explain why not shown
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 153 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 154

Hold on! Standard Deviation: Risk or Dispersion Measure?


Didn’t we just
speak of
standard
Month 1 2 3 … 33 34 35 36
Composite Return 1.00% -1.07% 2.14% -0.80% -0.70% 1.25% 1.77%

deviation in the Annual

context of Account
A
Return
12.70%

dispersion?
B 12.65%
C 13.01%
D 12.99%
E 13.07%

X 12.73%
Y 13.08%
Z 13.25%

Composite 13.04%

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 155 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 156

39
5/21/2020

Carve-outs

Any
Questions?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 157 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 158

What is a carve-out? For example …


• As per the GIPS glossary, it’s “A portion of a • Carving out the equity portion of a
portfolio that is, by itself, representative of a balanced portfolio and put it into an Cash

distinct investment strategy. It may be used to equity composite Bonds

create a track record for a narrower mandate • You will increase the amount of
from a multiple-strategy portfolio managed to a assets in that composite, which may Stocks

broader mandate.” prove beneficial.


• It may help you demonstrate the
• Key point: that it is representative! breadth to which you are managing
that asset class, sector, etc.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 159 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 160

40
5/21/2020

Carve-outs Carve-outs
• This option can be especially attractive for The rules have changed on the carve out process.
private wealth management firms, who may have • Prior to the 2010 version, firms had the option to
many “custom” allocations, and wish to segregate allocate cash
the equity and fixed income components, to • The 2010 version changed that, only allowing firms to
better represent these returns. use carve outs if the cash was managed separately.
• This could be quite challenging, and so, most firms who
• At times, these allocations are directed by the had previously used carve-outs stopped.
client, so by carving out the asset class segments, • The 2020 version has re-introduced the option to
they can present their performance. allocate cash.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 161 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 162

How can we allocate  1) Manage the cash separately
the cash to the  • This is the ideal approach.
• Need separate cash “buckets” for each segment being 
carved‐out 
carved out
segments? • Can do by having subportfolios
• This can be an accounting challenge.
We will review four acceptable methods.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 163 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 164

41
5/21/2020

2) Beginning of Period Allocation Method 2) Beginning of Period Allocation Method Example
V AssetClassi Cash Equities Bonds Portfolio
AllocatedCash AssetClassi  TotalCash  Extra precision shown 
VTotal , ExcludingCash Actual     10,000     50,000     40,000     100,000
to demonstrate that 
RAssetClassi PlusCash  Returns 0.1% 2.0% 1.0% 1.4%
Target 0% 55% 45% 100% there can be differences
 V AssetClassi   AllocatedCash AssetClassi 
  RAssetClassi     RCash 
 V AssetClassi  AllocatedCashAssetClassi   V AssetClassi  AllocatedCash AssetClassi  VEquities 50,000
AllocatedCashEquities  TotalCash   10,000   5,556
VTotal , ExcludingCash 90,000
• This approach is easy to employ. But is it appropriate?  REquitiesPlusCash 
• For example, if the target allocation is 60% stocks, 40% bonds, and if the   VEquities   AllocatedCashEquities 
actual allocation is 60% stocks, 30% bonds, and 10% cash, the stock portion    REquities     RCash  
 VEquities  AllocatedCashEquities   VEquities  AllocatedCashEquities 
will get two‐thirds of the cash, even though one might argue that all the cash 
belongs to the bond portion.   50,000   5,556 
  2.0%    01%
.   1810%
.
 50,000  5,556   50,000  5,556 
• Nevertheless, the approach is simple and avoids the risk of “gaming.” 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 165 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 166

3) Define a percentage of cash to allocate 3) Define a percentage of cash to allocate
• This method is the simplest to employ.  • This approach smacks of potential “gaming,” and is therefore one 
• But, it may seem a bit arbitrary, unless the firm can justify the  that the verifier would be expected to be sensitive to and quick to 
basis for their percent.  question. 
• We would generally expect the percentages to be in line with the  • The firm would be expected to document the basis for the 
firm’s strategic or tactical cash allocation. E.g., if the portfolio is to  percentage(s) used, with some justification for it. 
be 60% equities, 40% fixed income, then the use of the 60% for  • While this approach was permitted under the AIMR‐PPS, and may 
stocks and 40% for bonds would be deemed appropriate.  very well be permitted with the 2020 version, we consider it to be 
• The method can be considered questionable when an extreme  the weakest approach. 
allocation, e.g., 95% to bonds and 5% to equities, when the  • My least favorite method … I’d pick one of the others
strategic or tactical allocations are quite different. 
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 167 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 168

42
5/21/2020

3) Define a percentage of cash to allocate 3) Define a percentage of cash to allocate: Example
Cash Equities Bonds Portfolio
The formulas we’ll use: Actual     10,000     50,000     40,000     100,000
The 55% defined here 
makes some sense, since 
Returns 0.1% 2.0% 1.0% 1.4%
Target 0% 55% 45% 100% it matches the target
AllocatedCash AssetClassi  T arg et AssetClassi  VCash
Using the targets, the equity carve‐out return:
RCashPlusEquities  AllocatedCashEquities  T arg et Equities  VCash  55%  10,000  5,500
 V AssetClassi   AllocatedCashAssetClassi 
  REquities     RCash   VEquities   AllocatedCashEquities 
 V AssetClassi  AllocatedCash AssetClassi   V AssetClassi  AllocatedCashAssetClassi  RCashPlusEquities    REquities     RCash 
 VEquities  AllocatedCashEquities   VEquities  AllocatedCashEquities 
 50,000   5,500 
  2.0%    01%
.   1812%
.
 50,000  5,500   50,000  5,550 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 169 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 170

4) Actual breakdown vs. tactical allocation 4) Actual breakdown vs. tactical allocation: Example

CashNeeded AssetClassi  T arg et AssetClassi  VPortfolio  V AssetClassi  Actual
Cash
    10,000
Equities
    50,000
Bonds
    40,000
Portfolio
    100,000
Returns 0.1% 2.0% 1.0% 1.4%
 V AssetClass   CashNeeded AssetClass  Target 0% 55% 45% 100%
RAssetClassi PlusCash   i
 RAssetClassi    i
 RCash 
 T arg et AssetClassi   T arg et AssetClassi  
CashNeeded Equities  T arg et Equities  VPortfolio  VEquities  
• This is perhaps the best way to allocate cash (my favorite) (55%  100,000)  50,000  55,000  50,000  5,000
• It considers what the tactical allocation is, vs. what was done, to   VEquities   CashNeeded Equities 
REquitiesPlusCash    REquities     RCash  
determine how much cash the segment is due.  T arg etEquities   T arg et Equities 
• The math is perhaps a bit more challenging, but not difficult.  50,000   5,000 
  2.0%    01%
.   1827%
.
 55,000   55,000 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 171 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 172

43
5/21/2020

Additional Carve-Out Rules Additional Carve-Out Rules


• When the firm creates a carve-out of a particular • When the firm has or obtains standalone portfolios
strategy, allocates cash to the carve-out, and includes managed in the same strategy as the carve-outs with
the carve-out in a composite, the firm must create allocated cash, the firm must create a separate
carve-outs with allocated cash from all portfolios and composite for the standalone portfolios.
portfolio segments within the firm managed to that • If such a standalone portfolio exists, the firm must
strategy, and must include those carve-outs with provide certain information from its presentation in the
allocated cash in the composite. [i.e., no cherry-picking!] carve-out presentation
• The carve-out composite must contain “carve-out” in its • In addition, the firm must make prospects aware of this
name other [stand alone] composite, and offer to provide it.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 173 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 174

Any Questions? GIPS Reports: come in several varieties


• Consist of two sections:
• Disclosures (footnotes) 
• Presentation (numbers)
• Optional: supplemental information
• May provide performance‐related 
information separate from GIPS 
reports

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 175 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 176

44
5/21/2020

Use samples in Standards as a template Disclosure Requirements


• Each version of the Standards comes with changes
• The 2020 version is no different
• What is provided is in line w/the 2020 edition
• Will only cover required items
• If an item applies to you, you have to disclose it

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 177 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 178

Disclosure Requirements Claim of compliance statement: if verified
“[Insert name of firm/asset owner] claims compliance with the 
• Unlike the Standards, themselves, that separate  Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has 
asset owners and firms, for ease of presentation, we  prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS 
combine them. Unless otherwise noted, items apply  standards. [Insert name of firm/asset owner] has been 
to both firms (asset managers) and asset owners independently verified for the periods [insert dates]. The 
verification report(s) is/are available upon request.
• There are slightly different requirements for money‐
weighted returns. We will not cover them today.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 179 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 180

45
5/21/2020

Claim of compliance statement: if verified Claim of compliance: verified + examinations
“A firm [An asset owner] that claims compliance with the GIPS  “[Insert name of firm/asset owner] claims compliance with the 
standards must establish policies and procedures for complying with  Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has 
all the applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification  prepared and presented this report in compliance with the GIPS 
provides assurance on whether the firm’s [asset owner’s] policies and  standards. [Insert name of firm/asset owner] has been 
procedures related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as  independently verified for the periods [insert dates].
well as the calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, 
have been designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have 
been implemented on a firm‐wide basis. Verification does not provide 
assurance on the accuracy of any specific performance report.”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 181 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 182

Claim of compliance: verified + examinations Claim of compliance: not verified
“A firm [An asset owner] that claims compliance with the GIPS standards  “[Insert name of firm/asset owner] claims compliance with the Global
must establish policies and procedures for complying with all the  Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®) and has prepared and 
applicable requirements of the GIPS standards. Verification provides  presented this report in compliance with the GIPS standards. [Insert name 
assurance on whether the firm’s [asset owner’s] policies and procedures  of firm/asset owner] has not been independently verified.”
related to composite and pooled fund maintenance, as well as the 
calculation, presentation, and distribution of performance, have been 
designed in compliance with the GIPS standards and have been 
implemented on a firm‐wide basis. The [insert name of composite] has had 
a performance examination for the periods [insert dates]. The verification 
and performance examination reports are available upon request.”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 183 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 184

46
5/21/2020

Trademark disclosure Descriptions
“GIPS® is a registered trademark of CFA Institute. CFA  • Firm/asset owner definition used to determine total 
Institute does not endorse or promote this organization, nor  firm/asset owner assets
does it warrant the accuracy or quality of the content  • Composite description
contained herein.” • Benchmark description, including 
• key features of the benchmark or the name of the 
benchmark for a readily recognized index or other point of 
reference.
• the periodicity of the benchmark if benchmark returns are 
calculated less frequently than monthly.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 185 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 186

Miscellaneous items When presenting net‐of‐fee return 


• When presenting gross‐of‐fees returns, must disclose if  information, a firm must disclose
any other fees are deducted, in addition to transaction  a. If any other fees are deducted in addition to investment 
costs. management fees and transaction costs.
• The firm must disclose which fees and expenses other  b. If NOF returns are net of any performance‐based fees or carried 
than investment management fees (e.g., research costs)  interest.
c. If model or actual investment management fees are used.
are separately charged by the firm to clients, if material. d. If model are used, and composite gross‐of‐fees returns are not 
• The firm/asset owner must disclose or otherwise indicate  presented, the model fee used to calculate net‐of‐fees returns.
the reporting currency. e. If model fees are used, disclose the methodology used to calculate 
net‐of‐fees returns.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 187 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 188

47
5/21/2020

When presenting net‐of‐external‐costs‐only returns,  When presenting composite net‐of‐fees returns, the 
the asset owner must disclose if any other fees are  asset owner must disclose if any other fees are 
deducted in addition to the transaction costs, fees and deducted in addition to the transaction costs, fees and 
expenses for externally managed pooled funds, and  expenses for externally managed pooled funds, 
investment management fees for externally managed  investment management fees for externally managed 
segregated accounts. segregated accounts, and investment management 
costs.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 189 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 190

Miscellaneous items Disclose appropriate current fee schedule*
• The firm must disclose which measure of internal  a. For a standalone portfolio, it must reflect the fee schedule for a 
dispersion is presented. standalone portfolio managed according to that strategy.
b. Of a composite that includes carve‐outs to a prospective client for a 
• If the fee schedule includes performance‐based fees or  multi‐asset strategy portfolio, it must reflect the fee schedule for a 
carried interest, the firm must disclose the performance‐ multi‐asset strategy portfolio managed according to that strategy.
based fee description or carried interest description. c. To a wrap fee prospect, it must reflect the total wrap fee.
• The composite inception date. d. For a pooled fund included in the composite, the firm must disclose 
• The composite creation date. the pooled fund’s current fee schedule and expense ratio.

* Firm, only; will use “it” as a substitute for “current fee schedule”

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 191 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 192

48
5/21/2020

The firm must disclose that the following lists  If the asset owner chooses to create 


are available upon request: additional composites, or if the asset owner 
a. Composite descriptions. has more than one required total fund, the 
b. Pooled fund descriptions for limited distribution  asset owner must disclose that the asset 
pooled funds. owner’s list of total fund descriptions and 
c. Broad distribution pooled funds.
composite descriptions is available
upon request.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 193 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 194

Miscellaneous items firms/asset owners must disclose If estimated transaction costs are used, must 
• That policies to value investments, calculate performance, and  disclose:
prepare GIPS reports are available upon request.
• How leverage, derivatives, and short positions have been used  a. That estimated transaction costs were used.
historically, if material. b. The estimated transaction costs used and how 
• All significant events that would help a prospective client [the  they were determined.
oversight body] interpret the GIPS composite/asset owner 
report. This disclosure must be included for a minimum of one 
year and for as long as it is relevant to interpreting the track 
record.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 195 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 196

49
5/21/2020

Miscellaneous items firms must disclose Miscellaneous items must disclose
• For any performance presented for periods prior to the  • The minimum asset level, if any, below which portfolios are not 
minimum effective compliance date that does not comply with  included in the composite, and any changes to the minimum.*
the GIPS standards, the periods of non‐compliance. • If composite returns are gross or net of withholding taxes, if material.
• If the firm/asset owner is redefined, the date and description of  • If the benchmark returns are net of withholding taxes if this 
information is available.
the redefinition.
• If the GIPS report conforms with laws and/or regulations that conflict 
• If the composite is redefined, the date and description of the  with the requirements of the GIPS standards, this fact and disclose the 
redefinition. manner in which the laws and/or regulations conflict with the 
• Changes to the name of the composite. This disclosure must be  Standards.
included for a minimum of one year and for as long as it is 
relevant to interpreting the track record. * Firms, only

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 197 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 198

If carve‐outs w/allocated cash are included Miscellaneous items firms must disclose
a. Indicate carve‐out in the composite name. • The use of a sub‐advisor/external managers and the 
b. Disclose that the composite includes carve‐outs with  periods they were used
allocated cash. • If the composite’s valuation hierarchy materially differs 
c. Disclose the policy used to allocate cash to carve‐outs. from the recommended valuation hierarchy.
d. Disclose that the GIPS composite report for the  • If the firm/AO determines no appropriate benchmark for 
composite of standalone portfolios is available upon  the composite exists, why no benchmark is presented
request, if one exists. • If the firm has adopted a significant cash flow policy for 
the composite, how the firm defines a significant cash 
flow for the composite and for which periods.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 199 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 200

50
5/21/2020

If the benchmark is changed, disclose If a custom benchmark or combination of 
a. For a prospective benchmark change, the date and  multiple benchmarks is used, disclose:
description of the change. Changes must be disclosed  a. The benchmark components, weights, and rebalancing 
for as long as returns for the prior benchmark are  process, if applicable.
included in the GIPS composite report. b. The calculation methodology.
b. For a retroactive benchmark change, the date and  c. Clearly label the benchmark to indicate that it is a 
description of the change. Changes must be disclosed  custom benchmark.
for a minimum of one year and for as long as they are 
relevant to interpreting the track record.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 201 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 202

If a portfolio‐wtd custom benchmark is used, disclose: If the total fund benchmark is a blend of asset class 


a. That the benchmark is rebalanced using the weighted average  benchmarks based on the policy weights of the 
returns of the benchmarks of all of the portfolios included in the  respective asset classes, the asset owner must 
composite.
b. Rebalancing frequency
disclose:
c. The components that constitute the portfolio‐weighted custom  a. The benchmarks used by each asset class along with 
benchmark, including the weights that each component  their weights as of the most recent annual period end.
represents, as of the most recent annual period end. b. General information regarding the investments, 
d. That the components that constitute the portfolio‐weighted 
structure, and/or characteristics of the benchmarks.
custom benchmark, including the weights that each component 
represents, are available for prior periods upon request.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 203 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 204

51
5/21/2020

Miscellaneous items firms/AOs must disclose Material error disclosure: Firms
• For composites with at least three annual periods of  • Any change to the GIPS composite report resulting from 
performance, if the three‐year annualized ex post std  the correction of a material error. Following the 
deviation of the composite and/or benchmark is not  correction of the report, this disclosure must be included 
presented because 36 monthly returns are not available. for a minimum of one year and for as long as it is relevant 
• If performance from a past firm or affiliation is  to interpreting the track record. This disclosure is not 
presented, and for which periods. required to be included in a GIPS composite report that is 
provided to a prospective client or prospective investor 
that did not receive the GIPS composite report containing 
the material error.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 205 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 206

Material error disclosure: Asset Owners Miscellaneous items firms must disclose


• Any change to the GIPS asset owner report resulting from  • If the firm chooses to not present the number of 
the correction of a material error. Following the  portfolios in the composite because there are five or 
correction of the GIPS asset owner report, this disclosure  fewer portfolios in the composite, that the composite 
must be included for a minimum of one year and for as  contains five or fewer portfolios or use similar language.
long as it is relevant to interpreting the track record • If the firm chooses to not present the internal dispersion 
of individual portfolio returns because there are five or 
fewer portfolios in the composite for the full year, that 
the internal dispersion measure is not applicable or use 
similar language.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 207 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 208

52
5/21/2020

Miscellaneous items firms/AOs must disclose Miscellaneous items firms/AOs must disclose
• If preliminary, estimated values are used to determine  • If the firm/asset owner presents additional risk 
fair value. measures, describe the any additional risk measure and 
• If the firm changes the type of return(s) presented for the  disclose the name of the risk‐free rate, if a risk‐free rate 
composite (e.g., changes from money‐weighted returns  is used in the calculation of the additional risk measure.
to time‐weighted returns), must disclose the change and  • Firm: If gross‐of‐fees or net‐of‐fees returns are used to 
the date of the change. This disclosure must be included  calculate presented risk measures.
for a minimum of one year and for as long as it is relevant  • Asset owner: if gross‐of‐fees, net‐of‐external‐costs‐only, 
to interpreting the track record. or net‐of‐fees returns are used to calculate presented risk 
measures.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 209 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 210

For real estate investments that are directly owned,  Miscellaneous items firms must disclose


the asset owner must disclose that • For overlay strategy composites, the methodology used to 
• external valuations are obtained and the frequency  calculate composite overlay exposure and if collateral and 
with which they are obtained;  collateral income are reflected in the composite returns.
• For real estate investments that are not in a real estate open‐end 
• or that the asset owner relies on valuations from  fund, that external valuations are obtained, and the frequency 
financial statement audits. with which they are obtained, or that the firm relies on valuations 
from financial statement audits.
• For wrap fee composites, when the firm presents pure gross‐of‐
fees returns, that pure gross‐of‐fees returns do not reflect the 
deduction of transaction costs.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 211 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 212

53
5/21/2020

Firms: When the GIPS report includes theoretical  When the GIPS composite report includes theoretical 
performance as supplemental information, disclose: performance as supplemental information, disclose:
a. That the results are theoretical, not based on the  c. Whether the theoretical performance reflects the 
performance of actual assets, and if the it was derived from  deduction of actual or estimated investment 
the retroactive or prospective application of a model. management fees, transaction costs, or other fees and 
b. A basic description of the methodology and assumptions  charges that an actual client portfolio would have paid 
used to calculate the theoretical performance sufficient for  or will pay.
the prospect to interpret the theoretical performance,  d. Clearly label the theoretical performance as 
including if it is based on model performance, backtested  supplemental information
performance, or hypothetical performance.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 213 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 214

Asset Owners: When the GIPS report includes theoretical  When the GIPS composite report includes theoretical 
performance as supplemental information, disclose: performance as supplemental information, disclose:
a. That the results are theoretical, not based on the  c. Whether the theoretical performance reflects the 
performance of actual assets, and if the it was derived from  deduction of actual or estimated investment 
the retroactive or prospective application of a model. management fees, investment management costs, and 
b. A basic description of the methodology and assumptions  transaction costs.
used to calculate the theoretical performance sufficient for  d. Clearly label the theoretical performance as 
the oversight body to interpret the theoretical 
supplemental information
performance, including if it is based on model performance, 
backtested performance, or hypothetical performance.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 215 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 216

54
5/21/2020

Presentation Requirements The firm must present, in each GIPS report:


a. At least five years of performance (or for the period since the 
• The Standards differentiate between the footnotes  composite inception date if the composite has been in existence 
less than five years) that meets the requirements of the GIPS 
(“disclosures”) and the numbers.
standards. After the firm presents a minimum of five years of GIPS‐
compliant performance (or for the period since the composite 
inception date if the composite has been in existence less than five 
years), the firm must present an additional year of performance 
each year, building up to a minimum of 10 years of GIPS‐compliant 
performance.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 217 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 218

The firm must present, in each GIPS report: The firm must present, in each GIPS report:


b. Composite returns for each annual period. g. Composite assets as of each annual period end.
c. When the initial period is less than a full year, the return from the  h. Total firm assets as of each annual period end.
composite inception date through the initial annual period end. i. A measure of internal dispersion of individual portfolio annual 
d. When the composite terminates, the return from the last annual  returns for each annual period. If the composite contains five or 
period end through the composite termination date. fewer portfolios for the full year, a measure of internal dispersion is 
e. The total return for the benchmark for each annual period and for  not required.
all other periods for which composite returns are presented, unless  j. For composites for which monthly composite returns are available, 
the firm determines there is no appropriate benchmark. the three‐year annualized ex post standard deviation (using 
f. The number of portfolios in the composite as of each annual period  monthly returns) of the composite and the benchmark as of each 
end. If the composite contains five or fewer portfolios at period  annual period end.
end, the number of portfolios is not required.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 219 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 220

55
5/21/2020

The asset owner must present, in each GIPS report: The asset owner must present, in each GIPS report:


a. At least one year of performance (or for the period since the total  b. For total funds, total fund returns that are net‐of‐fees.
fund or composite inception date if the total fund or composite has  c. Total fund or composite returns for each annual period.
been in existence less than one year) that meets the requirements  d. When the initial period is less than a full year, the return from the total 
of the GIPS standards. After the asset owner presents a minimum  fund or composite inception date through the initial annual period end.
of one year of GIPS‐compliant performance (or for the period since  e. When the total fund or composite terminates, the return from the last 
the total fund or composite inception date if the total fund or  annual period end through the total fund termination date or composite 
termination date.
composite has been in existence less than one year), the asset 
f. The total return for the benchmark for each annual period and for all 
owner must present an additional year of performance each year,  other periods for which total fund or composite returns are presented, 
building up to a minimum of 10 years of GIPS‐compliant  unless the asset owner determines there is no appropriate benchmark.
performance.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 221 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 222

The asset owner must present, in each GIPS report: Firms: Miscellaneous information to present


g. The number of total funds or portfolios in the composite as of each  • The total fair value percentage of composite assets that were 
annual period end. valued using subjective unobservable inputs as of the most recent 
h. Total fund assets or composite assets as of each annual period end. annual period end, if such investments represent a material 
i. Total asset owner assets as of each annual period end. amount of composite assets.
j. For total funds or composites for which monthly total fund or 
• Must clearly label or identify the periods that are presented and if 
composite returns are available, the three‐year annualized ex post 
composite returns are gross‐of‐fees or net‐of‐fees.
standard deviation (using monthly returns) of the total fund or 
• If the firm includes more than one benchmark in the GIPS 
composite and the benchmark as of each annual period end
composite report, the firm must present and disclose all required 
information for all benchmarks presented.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 223 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 224

56
5/21/2020

A/Os: Miscellaneous information to present Miscellaneous information to present
• The total fair value percentage of total fund or composite assets  • If the composite loses all of its member portfolios, the composite 
that were valued using subjective unobservable inputs as of the  track record must end. If portfolios are later added to the 
most recent annual period end, if such investments represent a  composite, the composite track record must restart. The periods 
material amount of total fund/composite assets. both before and after the break in track record must be presented, 
• Must clearly label or identify the periods that are presented and if  with the break in performance clearly shown. The firm/asset 
composite returns are gross‐of‐fees, net‐of‐external‐cost‐only, or  owner must not link performance prior to the break in track record 
net‐of‐fees. to the performance after the break in track record.
• If the asset owner includes more than one benchmark in the GIPS  • All required and recommended information in the GIPS composite 
report, the asset owner must present and disclose all required  report must be presented in the same currency.
information for all benchmarks presented.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 225 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 226

Firms: Miscellaneous information to present Firms: If presenting uncalled committed capital or a 
• If the composite includes carve‐outs with allocated cash, the firm  combination of composite assets and uncalled 
must present the percentage of composite assets represented by  committed capital
carve‐outs with allocated cash as of each annual period end. a. Present composite uncalled committed capital for the same periods 
• If the composite includes non‐fee‐paying portfolios, the firm must  for which the combination of composite assets and composite 
present the percentage of composite assets represented by non‐ uncalled committed capital is presented.
fee‐paying portfolios as of each annual period end when net‐of‐ b. Clearly label composite uncalled committed capital as such.
fees returns are presented and are calculated using actual  c. Clearly label the combination of composite assets and composite 
investment management fees. uncalled committed capital as such.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 227 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 228

57
5/21/2020

Firms: If presenting firm‐wide uncalled committed  Firms: If presenting advisory‐only assets, or a combination 
capital or combination of total firm assets and firm‐ of composite and advisory‐only assets that reflect the 
wide committed capital composite’s investment mandate, objective, or strategy, 
a. Present advisory‐only assets that reflect the composite’s investment 
a. Present firm‐wide uncalled committed capital for the same periods 
mandate, objective, or strategy for the same periods for which the 
for which the combination of total firm assets and firm‐wide  combination of composite assets and advisory‐only assets that reflect 
uncalled committed capital is presented. the composite’s investment mandate, objective, or strategy is presented.
b. Clearly label firm‐wide uncalled committed capital as such. b. Clearly label advisory‐only assets that reflect the composite’s investment 
c. Clearly label the combination of total firm assets and firm‐wide  mandate, objective, or strategy as such.
uncalled committed capital as such. c. Clearly label the combination of composite assets and advisory‐only 
assets that reflect the composite’s investment mandate, objective, or 
strategy as such.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 229 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 230

If the firm chooses to present firm‐wide advisory‐only assets  When presenting performance of a composite that includes 


or a combination of total firm and firm‐wide advisory‐only  carve‐outs w/allocated cash and also has a composite of 
assets, the firm must: standalone portfolios managed to the same strategy, firms
a. Present firm‐wide advisory‐only assets for the same periods for  must present for the composite of standalone portfolios:
which the combination of total firm assets and firm‐wide  a. The composite returns for each annual period for which the 
advisory‐only assets is presented. composite of standalone portfolios exists, and
b. Clearly label firm‐wide advisory‐only assets as such. b. The composite assets as of each annual period end for which 
c. Clearly label the combination of total firm assets and firm‐wide  the composite of standalone portfolios exists.
advisory‐only assets as such. This information must be included in the GIPS composite report of 
the composite that includes carve‐outs with allocated cash.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 231 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 232

58
5/21/2020

For wrap fee composites, when presenting performance to a  For wrap fee composites, when presenting pure 
wrap fee prospective client, the firm must present: gross‐of‐fees returns, firms must:
a. The composite that includes the performance of all actual wrap 
a. Clearly label returns as pure gross‐of‐fees.
fee portfolios, if any, managed according to the composite 
b. Identify pure gross‐of‐fees returns as supplemental 
investment mandate, objective, or strategy, regardless of the 
information.
wrap fee sponsor.
b. Composite performance that is net of the entire wrap fee.
c. The percentage of composite assets represented by wrap fee 
portfolios as of each annual period end.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 233 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 234

Any supplemental information included in the  Firms: For overlay strategy composites
GIPS report • The firm must present composite overlay exposure as of each 
a. Must relate directly to the composite. annual period end. For those periods for which the firm presents 
b. Must not contradict or conflict with the required or  composite overlay exposure, the firm may choose not to present 
recommended information in the GIPS composite report. composite assets
c. Must be clearly labeled as supplemental information. • The firm is not required to present total firm assets and may 
instead choose to present total firm overlay exposure as of each 
annual period end

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 235 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 236

59
5/21/2020

Where’s the GIPS report?
Distribution of 
If the GIPS materials are included in the firm’s 
GIPS reports marketing materials or “pitch books,” they are 
• Firms are required to “be able to demonstrate how  required to indicate that the materials are included.
it made every reasonable effort to provide” the  • Perhaps in a Table of Contents
appropriate GIPS composite reports and/or pooled  • Or in a cover letter
fund reports to prospects.  • Or, with tabs
• This is something verifiers will review. • Or, ???

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 237 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 238

Supplemental information
• Supplemental information is any performance‐related 
information that supplements or enhances a GIPS‐
compliant presentation (i.e., any additional 
performance‐related information beyond what GIPS 
requires or recommends)
12 MONTHS • Does not include general information regarding the 
firm, or the investment strategy or process
• Limited to information within the GIPS presentation

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 239 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 240

60
5/21/2020

Supplemental information and verification GIPS Advertising


• Supplemental information is not subject to verification  Guidelines
under the GIPS standards
• The firm is responsible to ensure that it conforms with  Don’t replace Standards or exempt
the ethical principles and spirit of the Standards  firms from Standards’ provisions
• Don’t replace laws/regulations covering performance
Verification
statement advertising
• Compliance, as well as performance, should approve
advertising materials
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 241 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 242

GIPS Advertising GIPS Advertising


Guidelines Guidelines
Rules for two types of Note!
advertising:
• The advertising guidelines have expanded considerably, and we
• With numbers simply do not have time to review them in detail.
• If you are going to have an advertisement refer to the GIPS
• Without numbers standards, ensure you familiarize yourself with the specifics of
these rules
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 243 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 244

61
5/21/2020

An approach to become compliant
• You will need support from senior management, as 
compliance is not free
• Develop the “why” behind compliance. Typically,
Any • Identify the benefits
• Gain marketing advantage
Questions? •

Avoid marketed disadvantage
Standards are “best practice,” and who settles for second 
best?
• Become familiar with the Standards 

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 245 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 246

More to do … An approach to become compliant
• Ideally, compliance is a “team” approach: • What will the firm be? (defines scope of effort)
• Head of performance • What composites will you need?
• Compliance • How far back will you go?
• Portfolio management • What will your rules of discretion be?
• Marketing/Sales
• What P&P apply to you?
• Operations
• IT • Do you have historical data to support?
• Assess where stand vis‐à‐vis Standards; a “gap  • How/where will calculations be done?
analysis” so to speak • Where will composites be maintained?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 247 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 248

62
5/21/2020

Get help! NEXT TOPIC:
• Identify who your verifier will be; they can provide 
assistance (e.g., we conduct GPS (GIPS Planning 
Sessions) for new clients
• Consider a specialty consulting firm to assist, especially 
if the breadth of work is significant

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 249 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 250

Verification Verification
• Another confusing concept
• Verification does not verify a firm’s claim of  • Must be conducted by an independent third‐party, 
compliance although internal reviews are also encouraged
• It assesses whether (1) the firm has complied with all  • Composite examinations are an option
the GIPS composite construction requirements on a  • Must have had verification done first (or 
firm‐wide basis and (2) the firm’s firm’s policies and  concurrently) 
procedures are designed to calculate and present  • Not a form of verification
performance in compliance with the standards.
• Done at the firm‐level
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 251 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 252

63
5/21/2020

Why is verification important? Verifier independence


-The Standards • Firms must gain an understanding of the verifier’s 
are complex. policies for maintaining independence and must 
- Many firms consider the verifier’s assessment of independence
think they’re
• This means verifiers will have to make available:
compliant, but
• Their policies for maintaining independence
they aren’t.
• Their assessment of independence
- Helps you avoid
to their clients.
a marketing
disadvantage.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 253 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 254

What about composite examinations?
Questions?
• These are essentially audits of the numbers you’re 
reporting
• We generally discourage them, though are 
absolutely fine to conduct for our clients
• This can be a discussion topic during initial 
meetings with your verifier

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 255 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 256

64
5/21/2020

Must have written What we expect to see in your P&P


Policies & Procedures  How you determine which composite(s) an account goes into
 What steps are taken?
 Who is involved in the decision?
 Rules for investment discretion [non-discretion]
 They need to be clear enough that interpretations are
consistent
 Ambiguous rules lead to confusion and inconsistent application
of policy
 These rules can change, though changes should be noted
 The firm’s rules to create composites
 What is the process?
 Who is involved?

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 257 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 258

What we expect to see in your P&P What we expect to see in your P&P
 How the firm assigns portfolios to composites; timing for  Interest/dividend accruals
 Inclusion (new portfolios)  How the firm accrues for income (req’d, if applicable)
 Exclusion (terminated portfolios)  How the firm accrues for dividends (optional)
 Changes in strategy  Market valuation (“fair valuation”): what are the rules?
 Ideally, include examples. E.g.,  The Standards provide a recommended hierarchy.
 If a portfolio is funded on May 15, it will be added to the  Most compliant firms seem to follow this guidance
composite on June 30  If your firm does, indicate this; if not, then what are your
 If we are notified by a client to terminate the relationship on rules
November 20, the portfolio is removed as of October 31  E.g., if a market price is not available for a security, what is
 If a client directs us to change their strategy on February 20, your procedure to price the security?
it will be removed from the original composite as of January
31, and added to the new composite on March 31
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 259 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 260

65
5/21/2020

Calculations explained in your P&P Calculations explained in your P&P


 Calculation of portfolio returns  How is dispersion calculated?
 What method do you use? TWR, MWR  What formula do you use? Has it changed?
 What’s the frequency (daily, monthly)?  If “equal-weighted” standard deviation, is it the population or sample
method?
 If monthly, that you day-weight and revalue for large flows
 For your 36-month standard deviation, do you use sample or
 How cash flows are treated (e.g., start-of-day/end-of-day)
population?
 If multiple methods are used, how and when?
 Note: we generally find the population method used more often
 If calculation formulas have changed, when and what was
than sample, and for good reason
previously done?
 We can argue that for both dispersion and the 36-month standard
 Calculation of composite returns deviation, you are measuring standard deviation for the population, not a
 What method do you follow? sample
 If multiple, where and how?  For dispersion, it’s against all accounts present the full year
 If the method changed, when and what was the prior method?  For 36-month std dev, it’s for all of the past 36 months

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 261 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 262

What we expect to see in your P&P What we expect to see in your P&P
 Error correction [don’t need to follow GS’s 4-levels]  Portability: if the firm has undergone situations where
 Typically, what constitutes “material” and “immaterial” is records from prior firms were “ported over,”
sufficient  You should document what these were
 Need to cover all items on your GIPS reports  Whether the rules of portability were met
 Need to specify what steps you take when encountering each  What history was converted to the new firm
 If “material,” in addition to providing corrected materials to  Significant events
active prospects and clients who received the prior version,  Document what would constitute a “significant” event.
ensure you provide to the current verifier and, if a different  E.g., the departure of the CIO
verifier handled the period being corrected, them, too!  Ideally, document which have occurred
 You should maintain a log of errors, to identify (a) what the
error was, (b) the level (e.g., “material”), and (c) what actions
were taken.
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 263 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 264

66
5/21/2020

What we expect to see in your P&P What we expect to see in your P&P
 Leverage, derivatives, shorts, should explain how and  How ensure existence & ownership of client assets
where they are employed, including the types that are used  Note: this was a requirement under the “2010” version; it no
 Define “materiality” in terms of including details in the longer is
firm’s GIPS reports  Significant cash flow policy
 Speaking of materiality, P&P should explain how the firm  If the firm has one, what are the specifics in terms of (a) size
that would cause the removal of accounts (e.g., 20% of the
defines for all disclosures that are dependent on it (e.g., prior month’s value) and for how long the account will be out
withholding taxes)  Note that (a) rules (i.e., the size and timing) can vary from
composite to composite and (b) you do not have to apply to all
composites
 Be careful if adopt for composites with only a very few
portfolios; don’t want to have gaps in performance!
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 265 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 266

What we expect to see in your P&P What we expect to see in your P&P
 How the firm ensures that reasonable efforts are made to  Compliant firms must create policies and procedures to
provide prospects with a presentation monitor and identify changes and additions to all of GS,
 The 2020 rule is that they are to be provided when they interpretations, and Q&As published by CFA Institute and
“initially become a prospect” the GIPS standards governing bodies
 Define how an interested party becomes a prospect.  Compliant firms must also create policies and procedures
Generally, to monitor and identify changes and additions to laws and
 When you determine that you can meet their needs regulations regarding the calculation and presentation of
 They qualify
performance
 For both of these, you’ll want to indicate that (a) you do these
things and (b) how you do them.

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 267 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 268

67
5/21/2020

Recommended policies Recommended policies


 To register annually w/CFA Institute, by 30 June  If subject to withholding taxes, how handled
 To explain how you decide what benchmarks to  On recordkeeping, which can simply point to a more
use; what the process is detailed policy that explains procedures to ensure
 Have a policy to explain how frequently comply with regulators
presentations are updated, and what the process  What formula(s) used for dispersion and 36-month
is, as well as who handles it standard deviation; indicate which form (population
or sample)

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 269 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 270

FOR JOINING
US THIS WEEK
We hope you found
the sessions of interest

Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020


Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 271
271 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 272
272

68
5/21/2020

The Spaulding Group, Inc. is the leading provider of


performance and risk measurement products and services
to the investment industry. It is the fastest growing GIPS
verification firm, hosts the annual PMAR conferences and
Performance Measurement Forum and Asset Owners’
Roundtable, provides consulting services (which include
David D. Spaulding, operations reviews and software certifications), publishes
The Journal of Performance Measurement® and the
DPS, CIPM Spaulding Series of books, and conducts training classes,
both open enrollment and in-house, which can be
DSpaulding@SpauldingGrp.com customized to meet our client’s needs.
@DSpauldingAtTSG
www.SpauldingGrp.com
www.linkedin.com/in/daviddspaulding

Blog: http://www.spauldinggrp.com/investment-performance-guy/
Newsletter: https://wc111.infusionsoft.com/app/form/na15
© The Spaulding Group. 2016
Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 273 Copyright © The Spaulding Group, Inc. 2020 274

69

You might also like