Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 1 PEC106
Module 1 PEC106
Module 1 PEC106
VISION
A center of human
development committed to the MODULE 1 (ASL)
pursuit of wisdom, truth, justice,
pride, dignity, and local/global I. COURSE CODE/TITLE:
competitiveness via a quality but PEC 106 Assessment of Student Learning 1
affordable education for all
qualified clients. II. SUBJECT MATTER:
MISSION Introduction to Assessment in Learning
Establish and maintain an
academic environment promoting III. COURSE OUTCOME:
the pursuit of excellence and the
total development of its students A. Define and compare the concepts of assessment,
as human beings, with fear of God
and love of country measurement and evaluation.
and fellowmen. B. Discuss assessment in learning, assessment and testing
And assessment in grading
GOALS
Kolehiyo ng Lungsod ng Lipa
C. Classify the purpose of classroom assessment in terms of
aims to:
1. foster the spiritual, intellectual, assessment of, for and as learning.
social, moral, and creative life of
its client via affordable but quality IV. ENGAGEMENT:
tertiary education;
A. Read the following content with comprehension.
2. provide the clients with reach
and substantial, relevant, wide B. Discussion:
range of academic disciplines,
expose them to varied curricular Vocabulary Words used in Testing, Assessing, Teaching
and co-curricular experiences
which nurture and enhance their And it’s Relationship.
personal dedications and
commitments to social, moral, Testing:
cultural, and economic
transformations.
Test- a method of measuring a persons ability,
knowledge, or performance in a given domain.
3. work with the government and Method - a way…, HOW TO DO… Techniques,
the community and the pursuit of Strategy, Process… Procedures,… with characteristics
achieving national developmental
goals; and of structured, Explicit
Measure - Instruments/ tool to grade… Specific
4. develop deserving and qualified student’s level of competence
clients with different skills of life Individual ability, knowledge- Individual skill,
existence and prepare them for
local and global competitiveness.
competence, background experience
Performance – ability in performing language
Given Domain – Specific area, Reading, Speaking,
Listening, Writing
CTE
Assessing:
Test – prepared administrative procedures that occurs at
identifiable times.
Assessment – An ongoing process
EX:
Student responds to a question Assessed by:
-Offers a comment - teacher
-Tries out a new word - himself
-Tries out a structure - other students
Teaching:
1. Teacher – student interaction
2. Students must have the freedom to experiment
3. Students try out their own hypothesis
4. Freedom to practice their skills in a classroom without being formally graded.
5. No teacher’s judgement in terms of their trials and errors.
Teaching – the opportunities for learners to listen, Think, take risk, set goals, process feedback
from the teacher and then recycle through the skills that they are trying to master.
Introduction:
Student measurement, assessment and evaluation play important roles in the teaching
learning process. These support the whole educational system. Schools greatly depend on
assessment, measurement and evaluation for improvement. For schools to attain their objectives,
regular assessment and evaluation must be conducted. Similarly, students do not learn effectively
unless they receive feedback, which is obtained through educational measures. Teachers similarly
cannot be effective without information gained through measurement of student performance.
Basic Concept:
1. Measurement – defined as an instrument or device to measure individuals achievement,
personality, attitude and intelligence among others that can be expressed quantitatively.
(Calmorin 2000)
- A process of obtaining numerical description of the degree of individual possesses. Quantifying
of how much does learner learned. (quantify…test, rating scale) (Boyet Aluan)
2. Assessment – refers to the full range of information gathered and synthesized by teachers about
their students and their classrooms (Arends 2004)
- Information can be gathered through informal ways such as observation or verbal exchange. It
can also be gathered through formal ways such as assignments, test and written reports or
CTE
outputs (Garcia 2008)
- Process by which evidence of student achievement is obtained
visit us at: www.facebook.com/College-of-Teacher-Education
Republic of the Philippines
Commission on Higher Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Municipality of Lipa
KOLEHIYO NG LUNGSOD NG LIPA
Measurement and assessment are therefore both essential to evaluation (Garcia 2008)
Why to evaluate….
Measures the effectiveness of the instructor
Measure the effectiveness of impact in meeting objectives.
Provide feedback to students
Provides students gratification and motivation.
Measurement can be defined as the process of quantifying the attributes of an object, whereas
evaluation may refer to the process of making value judgements on the information collected
from measurement based on the specified criteria. In the context of assessment in learning
measurement refers to the actual collection of information on student learning through the use
of various strategies and tools while evaluation refers to the actual process of making a decion
or judgement on student learning based on the information collected from measurement. There
fore assessment can be considered as an umbrella term consisting of measurement CTE
and
evaluation. However, There are some authors who consider assessment as distinct and separate
from evaluation (Huba and Freed 2000 1998)
visit us at: www.facebook.com/College-of-Teacher-Education
Republic of the Philippines
Commission on Higher Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Municipality of Lipa
KOLEHIYO NG LUNGSOD NG LIPA
The two most common psychometric theories that serve as frameworks for assessment and
measurement, especially in the determination of the psychometric characteristics of a
measure (e.g., test, scale, are the classical test theory (CTT) and the item response theory
(IRT).
The CTT, also known as the true score theory, explains that variations in the performance of
examinees on a given measure is due to variations in their abilities. The CTT assumes that an
examinee’s observed score in a given measure is the sum of the examinee’s true score and
some degree of error in the measurement caused by some internal and external conditions.
Hence, the CTT also assumes that all measures are imperfect, and the scores obtained from a
measure could differ from the true score(i.e., true ability) of an examinee.
The CTT provides an estimation of the item difficulty based on the frequency or number of an
examinees who correctly answer a particular item; items with fewer number of examinees
with correct answers are considered more difficult. The CTT also provides an estimation of
CTE
item discrimination based on the number of examinees with higher or lower ability to answer a
particular item. If an item is able to distinguish between examinees with higher ability
visit us at: www.facebook.com/College-of-Teacher-Education
Republic of the Philippines
Commission on Higher Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Municipality of Lipa
KOLEHIYO NG LUNGSOD NG LIPA
(i.e., higher total test score) and lower ability (i.e., lower total test score), then an item is
considered to have good discrimination. Test reliability can also be estimated using
approaches from CTT (e.g., Kuder- Richardson 20, Cronbach’s alpha). Item analysis based on
CCT has been the dominant approach because of the simplicity of calculating the statistics
(e.g., item difficulty index, item discrimination index, item-total correlation).
The IRT, on the other hand, analyzes test items by estimating the probability that an examinee
answers an item correctly or incorrectly. One of the central differences of IRT from CTT is that
an IRT, it is assumed that the characteristics of an item can be estimated independently of the
characteristic or ability of the examinee and vice-versa. Aside from item difficulty and item
discrimination indices, IRT analysis can provide significantly more information on items and
tests, such as fit statistics, item characteristic curve (ICC), and test characteristic curve (TCC).
There are also different IRT models (e.g., one-parameter model, three-parameter model)
which can provide different item and test information that cannot be estimated using the CTT.
(Balagtas 2020)
provided with challenging but age- and context- appropriate assessment tasks. This
assessment principle is consistent with the OBE principle of high expectations.
8. Assessment should be as authentic as possible. Assessment tasks or activities should closely,
if not fully, approximate real- life situations or experiences. Authenticity of assessment can be
thought of as a continuum from least authentic to most authentic, with more authentic tasks
expected to be more meaningful for learners.
Functions of assessment
According to Calmorin (2011), there are 10 functions of assessment which are very important
in student’s learning. There are:
and passing means success. Likewise if they always get low score in all examinations in all
subjects, low score means a failing mark and means failure on the part of the students.
7. Diagnoses the Nature of Difficulties
The weaknesses of the student’s can be detected through assessment of their learning. For
example, the teacher administers diagnostic test to his students. The result of diagnostic test
determines what part or subject the student is weak or have difficulties, so that the teacher
can identify what remedial instruction should be given.
8. Evaluates Teacher’s Performance
The performance of teacher’s is determined through assessment of student’s learning. For
instance, National Achievement Test (NAT) is administered to fourth year secondary students
and Grade VI students. If NAT results are within the mean percentage score (MPS), it means
that the teachers performance are satisfactory; of above the MPS, very satisfactory; and below
the MPS; below satisfactory.
9. Evaluates School’s Facilities and Resources
Adequacy and inadequacy of school’s facilities and resources are determined through
assessment of student’s learning. If students passed the licensure examinations higher that the
national percentage passing score, it means the institution has adequate facilities and
resources. Resources include Manpower, Money, Materials, Machinery, Methods, Moment,
and Marketing. The 7th M, marketing means graduates are employed right after passing the
licensure examination. Likewise, when a school program applies for accreditation and it
passed, it means facilities and resources are adequate; if it failed, it means that the facilities
and resources are not in the accreditation standard, thus, inadequate.
10. Evaluate School Managers Performance
Assessment evaluates school manager’s performance. These managers are the top and middle
managers like the president as head of the institution, vice presidents and deans. The result of
accreditation lies on the performance of school managers. The subordinates cannot do
anything without the full cooperation among the school’s top and middle managers. If the
school managers spearheaded the implementation of the various programs, projects, and
activities of the institution by providing the subordinates the necessary facilities in instruction,
research, extension, and production, passing level of accreditation is possible with flying
colors.
Scopes of Assessment
As statement by Calmorin (2011), the scopes of assessment are as follows:
1. Assessment of curricular offerings. The course offerings must be assessed to determine if
they are relevant, realistic and responsive to the changing needs and problems of the society.
2. Assessment of school programs. The school programs must be appraised to determine if
teachers are not loaded or under loaded.
3. Assessment of instructional materials. The instructional materials like books, reference
books, visual aids, and devices must be evaluated to ascertain if they are adequate and
updated. Books and reference books beyond ten years of its publication must be revised.
CTE
Diagnostic. Teachers can use assessment to identify specific learners’ weaknesses or difficulties
that may affect their achievement of the intended learning outcomes. Identifying this weaknesses
CTE
allows teachers to focus on specific learning needs and provide oppurtunities for instructional
intervention or remediation inside or outside the classroom.
visit us at: www.facebook.com/College-of-Teacher-Education
Republic of the Philippines
Commission on Higher Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Municipality of Lipa
KOLEHIYO NG LUNGSOD NG LIPA
Facilitative. Classroom assessment may affect student learning. On the part of teachers,
assessment for learning provides information on students’ learning and achievement that
teachers can use to improve instruction and the learning experiences of learners. On the part of
learners’ assessment as learning allows them to monitor, evaluate, and improve their own
learning strategies. In both cases, student learning is facilitated.
Motivational. Classroom assessment can serve as a mechanism for learners to be motivated and
engaged in learning and achievement in the classroom. Grades, for instance, can motivate and
demotivate learners. Focusing on progress, providing effective feedback, innovating assessment
tasks, and using scaffolding during assessment activities provide opportunities for assessment to
be motivating rather the demotivating.
Goals. Goals are general statements about desired learner outcomes in a given year or during the
duration of a program (e.g., senior high school),
Standards. Standards are specific statements about what learners should know and are capable
of doing at a particular grade level, subject, or course. McMillan (2014, p. 31) described four
different types of educational standards: (1) content (desired outcomes in a content area), (2)
performance (what students do to demonstrate competence), (3) developmental (sequence of
growth and change over time), and (4) grade-level (outcomes for a specific grade).
there are three taxonomies that can be used by teachers depending on the goals. Each taxonomy
consists of different levels of expertise with varying degrees of complexity. The most popular
among the three taxonomies is the Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in the Cognitive
Domain, also known as Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for Knowledge-Based Goals.
The taxonomy describes six levels of expertise: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis,
synthesis, and evaluation. The table 1 below presents the description, illustrative verbs, and
sample objective for each of the six levels.
Table 1 : Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in the Cognitive Domain
Students will be able to differentiate qualitative research and quantitative research. In the
example, differentiate is the verb that represents the type of cognitive process (in this case,
analyze), while qualitative research and quantitative research is the noun phrase that represents
the type of knowledge (in this case, conceptual).
Tables 2 and 3 present the definition, illustrative verbs, and sample objectives of the cognitive
process dimensions and knowledge dimensions of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Table 2 Cognitive Process Dimensions in the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Learning Targets
Learning Targets are statements on what learners are supposed to learn and what they can do
because of instruction.It should be congruent with the standards prescribed by program or level and
aligned with the instructional or learning objectives of a subject or course. Teachers must inform
learners about the learning targets of lesson prior to classroom instruction. The learning target should
be meaningful for the learners, it must be as clear and as specific as possible like using the phrase “I
can….ex….. I can differentiate between instructional objectives and learning targets.”
CTE
Others experts consider a fifth type of learning target-affect, which refers to affective characteristics
that students can develop and demonstrate because of instruction. This include attitudes, beliefs,
interests and values. Some experts affect or disposition learning target.
Table 5 and 6 present a matrix of the different types of learning targets and sample assessment
methods.
there are other types of assessment and its up to the teachers to select the method of assessment
and design appropriate assessment tasks and activities to measure the identified learning targets.
References :
Balagtas, Marilyn et al. 2020. Assessment in Learning 1. Rex Bookstore. Quezon City
Philippines.
Arellano and Ordoña. 2016. Assessment of Student learning 1. St. Andrew Publishing
House. Quezon City Philippines
Macarandang, Mercedes A and Vega, Violeta A. 2016. Assessment of Student
Leaning 1. Books Atbp. Publishing Corp.
CTE