Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transforming Seismic Uncertainties To Reservoir Parameters: An Integrated Approach To Characterising A Carbonate Reef Complex
Transforming Seismic Uncertainties To Reservoir Parameters: An Integrated Approach To Characterising A Carbonate Reef Complex
Introduction
The Central Luconia Province, offshore Sarawak, is one of the world’s largest reefal
carbonate depositional complexes, with over 200 known build-ups of Oligocene
and Miocene age (Cycle II and Cycle IV), created by coral reefs growing on horst
block structures. In general, geological models are an essential part of reservoir
studies, in which Gross Rock Volume (GRV) and porosity are main key inputs in
resource estimation and static model for any field to be developed.
Gross Rock Volume (GRV) is often observed to be a first-order sensitivity in
resource estimation. However, time surface interpretation is always a challenge
to the seismic interpreter, where uncertainty may remain on talus and internal
layer of carbonate build-up.
In addition, porosity is a significantly difficult property to predict in subsurface
reservoir characterisation. The high uncertainty in porosity estimation is mainly
due to diagenesis, which alters the pore structure, texture and composition of the
rock, affecting pore size and shape. In this paper, we will discuss a case study
where a quantitative seismic technique has been applied to reduce the uncertainty
in reservoir characterisation.
Internal
seismic interpretation and has a direct impact on volumetrics (Yusoff A.I et al,
2015).
Internal
Figure 2: Seismic Inversion workflow of carbonate reservoir.
Horizon interpretation was divided into four layers of equal thickness. The seismic
pattern of each internal layer was extracted in acoustic impedance, with the
impedance volume now depicting internal layer properties of the carbonate instead
of the reflectivity contrast at layer boundaries. In general, high impedance streaks
have less favourable properties in comparison to the surrounding low impedance
layers which have better reservoir characteristics. Two main results have been
delivered:
1) An acoustic impedance volume provided better refinement of top of
carbonate and internal stratigraphic layering of the carbonate build-up.
2) A porosity cube was produced with reasonable correlation to acoustic
impedance and was used as input for subsequent reservoir characterization
and modelling work.
Conclusion
Accurate prediction of reservoir quality is, and will continue to be, a key challenge
for hydrocarbon exploration and development. Thus, broad bandwidth and rich
low frequency content seismic data have favorably contributed into better
subsurface imaging. In addition, seismic inversion can be a valuable tool for
reservoir characterisation prior to field development with improved results of
reservoir characterisation. The static reservoir model has significantly benefited
from the understanding of the distribution of porosity in the reservoir zones
generated by the seismic inversion study, which can be a key success factor for
future field development and well target optimisation (Figure 3).
Internal
Figure 3: High correlation shows between well porosity and Inverted porosity.
Seismic Inversion of carbonate reservoir. This acoustic impedance- porosity
transform allows characterizing carbonate reservoir heterogeneity.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank PETRONAS Managements for allowing us to share the
results.
References
Ahmad Izzuddin Yusof, Marie LeFranc, Nurul Amira Zulkurnain, Zhu Jidong, Mohd Zamri
Abd Wahab. 2015. New Reprocessed Seismic Improves Karst Conduit Modelling in
Carbonate Buildups. EAGE Seismic Driven Reservoir Characterization and Production
Management Symposium.2015.
Von Hartmann, Hartwig; Buness, Hermann; Krawczyk, Charlotte M.; Schulz, Rüdiger.201
2. 3-D seismic analysis of a carbonate platform in the Molasse Basin - reef distribution and
internal separation with seismic attributes Tectonophysics, 572, 16
Internal