PRINCIPIUM SAPIENTIZPRINCIPIUM
SAPIENTIA
THE ORIGINS OF
GREEK PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT
F.M, CORNFORD,
CAMBRIDGE
AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS
1952
Tandon Ofc: Brey Howe, 1-1
‘Azo fo Cn a, nd Pak: Mecmion
Prelit Bi he Univer Pe, Combe
(date Cate, Uso Prise)CONTENTS
PREFACE page vii
PART t
EMPIRICISM VERSUS INSPIRATION
1. Problems and aims of ancient natura philosophy 3
Ml Epicuras 2
IIL The empirical theory of knowledge a
IV Annness 4s
V_ Seer, poet, philosopher @
VE Shamanism 88
‘VIL The philosopher as succes of the ser-poet 107
‘VII The quarrel ofthe seer and the philosopher 7
IX The quart of philosophy and poetry us
PART IL
PHILOSOPHICAL COSMOGONY AND ITS
ORIGINS IN MYTH AND RITUAL
X Anaximander’ system 139
“XI Patrem of nian cosmogony 187
XIL_ Hesiod’s Hymn eo Zeus 202
XIN Life sory of Zeus a4
XIV_Cosmogonical myth and ritual 2s
XV_ The Hymn to Marduk and the Hymn to Zeus 239
XVI "The Canaanite myth and the Palestinian ritual 250
AprxDIx as7
‘OEnmRAL INDEX 261
INDEX OF CREBK WoRDS anPREFACE
HE work on which Comford was engaged ais death was
‘one by which he himself ser great store. Asacomparatvely
‘young man he had seed, in From Religion to Philosophy,
«olay bare the prephilosophical origins of philosophy among the
Grecks, That book contains much that is sill of value, but the
progres of discovery and che increasing maturity ofis own mind
and enrichment of its store of reading and meditation had made
him keenly aware thatafreshapproach wasnecessary. The problem
iself was one which absorbed him above allochers in ltr s in
earlier life; and che present work represents the results of his atest
researches and reflexions upon it
‘The manuscript of the book, which is unfinished, was sub-
rmited to Profesor E.R. Dodds inorder that the decision —aays
a difficult one—whether to publi it posthumously should not
be taken on one man’s opinion alone. Afr reading it Professor
Dodds wrote: ‘Iam strongly of the opinion that it ought to be
published as soon as possible. ...Comnford would doubsless have
palled the threads together in a final chapter. He might also have
provided certanratherthinchapterswith moteillustrative material.
But even as it stands the book seems ro me to throw important
new light on the origins of Greck philosophical thinking, and ie
certainly contains pages as brillant as any that he ever wrote." He
remarked, in addition, how Comford’s theory of the oriental
‘xign of certain myths in Hesiod’s Theogony seems to have been
confirmed, in a way which would have delighted him, by the
publication ofthe Hitste-Hurrian Epic of Kunarbi. (See his note
‘on p. 249, below.) The question ofthe geieral origin of myth in
ritual, and of the oriental, and ultimately ritual origin of certain
Greck myths in particular, illuminated as they have been by
important additions to out collection of ancient Near Easter
religious texts, are unde lively discussion today.* These questions
* Compare, fr example, R Dus, Les Andes Onetcs d e Thlo=
ove Pidods, Brose, vl pp. 37-3 elena ter Theodore
ise’ book Then 195, dee wih the me problens ad ha fall
Uiogrpby.
PREFACE
‘oom large in the second part ofthe presen book, and Cornford's
contribution to their development is certainly not one which
should be withheld,
‘The final extant chapter (ch. xv) is evidently incomplete, and
there are some rough notes in manuscript fo two more, with the
tiles ‘Suppression of Death and Resurrection of the God” and
“India and China’. Since, however, the notes which the author
lefe under the headings of the completed chapters do not always
correspond to the contents of the chapters as waittn, but rather
suggest earlier and abandoned schemes, it seemed wisest not t0
attempt any reconstruction. Though adding to the material, the
notes do not strengthen the main argument.
‘The book appears to fill naturally into two parts, and an in-
tention 50 to divide i is pethaps indicated by the opening words
of Chapter x. This division has therefore been adopted. The fst
partis complete and speaks for itself The argument ofthe second
4s also not difficult extract, but since the author did not live to
make a final summing-up, I have tried to summarize the main
ideas in an appendix, using as far as posible notes left by the
author himself
W. KC. GUTHRIE
JonesPART 1
EMPIRICISM VERSUS INSPIRATIONPROBLEMS AND AIMS OF ANCIENT
NATURAL PHILOSOPHY
'Nhisadmirable survey of Hippocratic Medicine," W. A. Heidel
defended the ancient Greck men of since against the charge
that they
‘were not in the habic of experimenting or that, ifand when they did it
‘watsolely in theinteest of confirming conclusion arrived at by abetract,
reasoning. Thus Bacon, in the Novum Organ, aserted that we should
giveno weight co he fic that Artodle in some of his works was com
‘cemed with experiments, because he had formed hie conclsions before
and made experiment conform with what he withed. In another con
nexion Bacon refered, obviously as confiematory evidence for his
contention, tothe circumstance that Arstode cited very few authorities
and when he did so that he mentioned them only in order to refute or
ifr from them.
In reply, Heidel alleges the obvious fact that Bacon knew lite
‘of the way the human mind actually works’—a rather surprising
charge to bring against the author of the Esays and of the
Aphorisms on the four kinds of idol—
wing metering dn
od places a ee recnacae
cetera Scone
ering enn
differences, dlasifying and forming hypotheses which are tested and.
Soy eerie
pier terete
igo hier meres Sanday
ci aeesreeaunnmmcee