Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some Definitions Among Scientits: Autopoietic Definition VS Darwininan Definition
Some Definitions Among Scientits: Autopoietic Definition VS Darwininan Definition
This considers that the beginning of life forms must have started
earlier. Thus the mark “life” is likely to have preceded cellular life and this suggests the
existence of some forms of life which we do not know presently. Moreover this
indicates that in the study of origin of life and its definition, we have not simply to
consider “life as it is now” (cellular) but to include “life as it initially was”, for instance
some transient forms that have preceded cellular life, and maybe also include artificial
life, namely “life as it could be” (Luisi, P. 1998).
Nevertheless, whatever the scenario chosen for the emergence of life, scientists have
been proposing several definitions of life along the years, although none has reached a
general agreement.
An interesting question regarding the question of life at the level of a single object and
in the “here and now” connotation appears because there are cases where the term life
may potentially apply to a single specimen. For instance, some consider our planet to be
self-maintaining and self-regenerating, as Lovelock (1979, 1988), Margulis and Sagan
(1995) proposed with the Gaia hypothesis. Within this hypothesis our planet is a super-
organism, but can it be considered living? Another interest point is the one of robots and
other artificial life artifacts which might be called living if we only take into
consideration the “life here and now” (Luisi, P. 1998).
To sum up, the problem of both definitions, the autopoietic and the Darwinian, is that
each focuses on just one of those two dimensions: the individual-metabolic (on the
autopoietic) and the collective-ecological (on the Darwinian) sides of the phenomenon
of life. As Oparin highlighted, these two definitions together show that the relationship
with the environment is one of the key ingredients to understand how a minimal self-
constructing chemical system operates (Ruiz-Mirazo, K. et al 2002).
The RNA world
Thinking about the origin of life, there are different lines of evidence supporting the
existence of an RNA world. These have led to proposals that the starting point for the
history of life on Earth was the de novo emergence of the RNA world from a
nucleotide-rich prebiotic soup. This implies that life can be so well defined that the
exact point at which it started can be established with the sudden appearance of the first
RNA-replicating molecule. Thus, there is a proposal that “ribosome-catalyzed, nucleic
acid–coded protein synthesis is the outcome of Darwinian selection of RNA-based
biological systems and not of mere physicochemical interactions that took place in the
prebiotic environment” (Tirard, S. 2010).
Physiological: For many years a physiological definition of life was popular where life
was defined as “any system capable of performing a number of such functions as eating,
metabolizing, excreting, breathing, moving, growing, reproducing, and being responsive
to external stimuli.” But many of these properties are either present in machines that
nobody is willing to call alive, or absent from organisms that everybody is willing to
call alive.