Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit - 1 - Triangulation & Trilateration
Unit - 1 - Triangulation & Trilateration
1. TRIANGULATION
1.1 Introduction
Triangulation as a form of horizontal control is applied when a large area is to be surveyed and
when the method of traversing would not be expected to maintain a uniformly high accuracy over
the entire area. The methods of triangulation require a maximum number of precise angle
measurements and a minimum number of distance measurements. The triangles are develo ped in
to a net of interconnected figures, and lines, calle d base lines, must be measured with extreme
precision in order to compute the sides in the net.
(a)
Fig. 1. 1 triangulation nets (b) (c)
In order to eliminate the effects of random errors as much as possible , triangulation systems
always include more than the minimum number of measurements necessary to fix the positions of
the points in the net.
2. The accurate location of engineering works such as the lo cation of large bridge structures, state
and federal highways, dams, canals, tunnels, and others in order to maintain the necessary
accuracy throughout the system.
3. The establishment of accurately located control points in connection with aerial surveying.
Page 2 of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
There is only one route to compute the unknown side. Because of this it doesn’
t provide the most
accurate result. This type of triangulation systems is employed in rather long and narrow surveys of
low precision. The means of check in this system is by comparing the computed length of check
base with the measured. E.g. fig. 1.2: a
The most common triangulation system best adopted to rather long and narrow surveys where the
high degree of precision is required.
The sides can be computed with different route as well as different triangles and angles offering
excellent checks on the computation. E.g. fig. 1.2: b
This type of triangulation system is used when horizontal control is to be extended over a rather
wide area involving number of points. It is very strong and quite easy to arrange.
The central point figure is further strengthened by using diagonal as shown. The most common
figure used is the braced quadrilateral (fig. 1.2: b) below. It is best suited to long narrow systems.
Brace polygons (fig. 1.2: c) can also be used in the case of wide systems.
a b c
1.7 Reconnaissance
The success of any triangulation depends on the reconnaissance, which is the most difficult and
exacting task of the extensive survey.
Reconnaissance consists of selection of sites for stations, determination of shape and size of the
resulting triangles, the number of stations to be occupied, the number of angles and directions to
be measured, inter visibility, and accessibility of stations, usefulness of stations in later works, the
cost of the necessary signals and / or towers, and the convenience of base line measurements. In
order to acquire the information, available maps, survey information and aerial photographs of the
area are used. Field inspection and rough measurements may also be carried out to suppleme nt the
study, sele ct favourable location for stations and checks suitability.
Heavily wooded country is the most difficult in which to carry triangulation. A valley of proper
width, with peaks on either side, is the most favourable. Stations are located on higher points,
provided that their locations will give the best shaped triangles. The ideal condition is one in which
no or lo w towers are used and no clearing is required. A most important and difficult part is to
determine the height of towers necessary to make the sight between any two of the stations clear
of obstruction.
A mistake on the part of the person may lead to a delay of the work, especially in the first and
second order triangulation work where observation is done after dark.
In triangulation the lengths of triangle sides are computed with the low of sines. When triangles are
used that contain small angle s, the best results may not be obtained because of the fact that the
rate of change of the sines of angle s near 00 or 1800 is quite large compared to the rate of change
for angles near 900. Thus angles near 900 are the optimum ones to use, with those from 300 to 1500
being acceptable .
It is not correct to say that small angle s should always be avoided- rather, they should not be used
where they will weaken the system. For instance, in calcula ting the length of a given side of a
triangle there are two angle s that are used: the angle opposite the known side and the angle
opposite the side whose length is to be determined.
B
c
a A
Fig. 1. 3: Example of Strengt hof figure
b
C
In figure above, the length b is assumed to be known and it is desired to determine the length c.
With the sine law only the angles B and C are used, and as a result the angle A has no direct effect
on the calcula tions and thus can be quite small without affecting the strength of the figure.
Therefore, the strongest chain of triangle is the one whose distance angles are near 90 0.There is a
method of testing by which the strength of figure is measured. The measure of the strength of
figure with respect to length is evaluated quantitatively in terms of a factor R base d on the
probability.
R = { (D - C) / D } [ Σ{ δA2 + δAδB + δB2} ]
where, C= no of conditions to be satisfied
= (n` - S` + 1) + (n –2S + 3)
S = no of total stations
S’
= no of occupied stations
D = no of directions observed (fore and /or backward excluding the base line)
Example
Compute the strength of the fig. given below:
D
h a = 40
C g b = 60
a
b c = 40
d = 40
e = 40
f f = 50
c
g = 50
d e
A B
Fig. 1. 4: Braced quadrilateral with base line AB to compute CD
Therefore the length of side CD is best computed if the 3rd case is chose n. Accordingly:
CB = AB sin 80 / sin 60
CD = CB sin90/sin 50 = [ AB(sin 80)( sin90)] / [(sin 60)( sin 50)]
Use R1= 3 to compute the sides
R2= 5.4 to check the computed.
Page 7 of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
Example
1. For the triangles shown, the measured angles are given. Make station and figure adjustment to the
angles.
Measured angles
1. 41 16 10
2. 53 33 20
3
3. 265 07 45
9 10 4. 91 16 10
5. 268 43 30
6. 35 07 00
5 4 7. 78 42 30
7 8. 246 11 00
B
Fig. 1. 5: Stat ion & Figure adjustment of 9. 60 01 05
chain of single t riangle C 10. 249 59 15
Solution
A. Station adjustme nt
B. Figure Adjustment
A. Geometric condition: the sum of the interior angles must equal to (n-
1)*1800; where n is the sum number of sides of the figure.
Page 9 of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
B. Trigonometric condition: The sine of each angle must be proportio nal to the
opposite side of that triangle.
B
A a b
h c
Fig. 1. 6: Adjustment of Quadrilateral
d
g
e
Base line C
D
4. For each angle record the tabular logarithmic sine difference for 1”opposite each logarithm.
5. Find the average required change (α ) in log sines by dividing the differences between the
sums by eight.
6. Find the average difference (b) for 1”
.
7. The ratio of (α/b) gives the number of seconds or arc to be applied as a correction. This
correction is added to each of the four angles whose sum of log sines is the smaller and
subtracted from each of the other four angle s whose sum of lo g sines is the larger, and thus
the correct value of angles are obtained.
Example
1.Make the nece ssary adjustment for the following quadrilaterals.
B Measured angle
A a b
a = 38 44 06
h c
b = 23 44 38
c = 42 19 09
d = 44 52 01
e = 69 04 21
f = 39 37 48
d
g g = 26 25 51
e h = 75 12 14
C
å = 360 00 08
D Fig. 1. 7: Example for Adjustment of Quadrilateral
Solution
Step 1. Diff. = 08”
; correction = 08”
/ 8 = 1”
step 6
b = 20.2 * 10-6 / 8 = 2.53 * 10-6
step 7
b = 6.24/2.53 = 2.47”
Correction: add 2.47”to all angles whose sines of log sine is smaller ( i.e for angles a, c, e and g ) &
vice-versa( subtract 2.47”from b, d, f, and h )
Note : If the corrections are properly applied,the sum of the logsines of the corrected angles will
agree with in 1 or 2 in the last 7th decimal place .
of the side CD, which is the forward side of the quadrilateral. However, only the result for the
strongest route will be used in the further computations.
If the coordinates of stations A and B are known, the length of line BA computed by:
DAB= 3000.000m
With the side AB known, the sides AC and CB are computed by using the law of sines.
Also,
The line CA = AC is then used as the start ing side of triangle DCA.
Triangle CAD
CA 3068.554
0
D h+g 50 06'36.58'' 0.76727890
C f 66035'55.30'' 0.91774558
A a 63017'28.12''
AD 3670.311
CD 3572.554
Page 13of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
A. Computation of Azimuths
If the coordinates of stations A and B are known, the azimuth from north of the line AB is
determined by:
tan AAB =
AAB = tan-1
B. Position Computation
The coordinates of all the stations throughout the triangulation system are computed by using the
strongest route of triangles in the network. When a station is reached whose coordinates are fixed,
the positions of the intermediate stations can then be adjusted. If the triangulation system is of
great extent and high precision, this adjustment should be made by application of the least-squares
principle. If the system is moderate in extent, an application of the compass rule will give highly
satisfactory results. In this case a traverse extending from one fixed point to another fixed point
and including all the intermediate triangulation stations is selected in as direct a line as possible. This
traverse is then adjusted by the compass rule.
Page 14of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
2. TRILATERATION
A trilateration net work, like triangulation, may consist of a series of single triangle s, braced
quadrilaterals and centre point polygons or combinations of these but, unlike triangulation, the
observed quantities are the distances not the angles.
The methods used in trilateration computations are very similar to those used in triangulation and
proceed as follo ws.
1. Using the measured or calculated baseline length and all the measured lengths, the angles in
the network are calculated using the cosine rule. This is carried out by breaking down all the
figures into their constituent triangles and proceeding as follows. In triangle ABC of figure
below, the angles are given by:
Cos α=
Cos β=
β
B γ
Cos γ=
C
2. These computed angles are adjusted by the method discussed in adjusting triangulation
systems.
3. The strength of the figure of the system is evaluated.
4. Starting at the baseline, all the lengths of the sides in the network are computed using the
adjusted angles. In addition the bearings of all the triangle sides throughout the network are
computed, again using the adjusted angles.
5. The computed bearings and distances obtained in (4) are used to calculate coordinates
throughout the network.
A disadvantage of trilateration is that, compared to triangulation, the number of geometric
conditions for adjustment is less than that for equivalent figures.
Page 15of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
3.1 INTERSECTION
The Coordinate of new station or point can be determined by a combination of measurements
from other points of fixed (known) position. In effect the position of the new points is established at
the known points toward the new station these particular variations of the method include:
i. Direction-Direction intersection
ii. Direction-Distance intersection
iii. Distance-Distance intersection
1(x1,y1) 2(x2,y2)
Fig. 1. 10:Direction-direction Intersection
ii. Direction-Dist ance intersection
In this type of intersection it is nece ssary to know the distance from the one fixed points 1and the
azimuth from the other fixed points 2 to
3(x3,y3)
new point 3. Here distance and angle
Distance Azimuth m easurements are required.
In this type of intersection it is necessary to know the distance from the two fixed points 1
and 2 to new point 3. Here no angle
3(x3,y3)
m easurements are required.
Distance Distance
1(x
Fig. ,y1)Dist ance-distance Intersection
1. 112: 2(x2,y2)
Example:
With reference to Fig. 1. 10 suppose that the coordinate of station 1is (350, 450) and coordinate of s
tation 2 is (775, 500). The interior angles at station 1 and 2 are measured to be 50o 30’and 35045’ ,
respectively. Determine the coordinate of station 3.
Solution
1. First the azimuth and distance of line 1-2 can be determined
Δx 12
Az12 =tan-1 ( ) (
Ax 12
=tan-1
775-350
500-450 )= 83° 27 24.5
' ''
Δx12
HB12=√ (ΔX12 )2+ (ΔY 12 )2 =√(175-350)2+ (500-450)2=421 93 A z12 =tan-1 ( )Ax12
2. Next we can use the interior angles at 1, and 2, and the known azimuth of 1-2 to determine
the azimuth of 1-3 and 2-3.
3. Using the law of sine solve the distance 1-3 and 2-3:
3.2 RESECTION
The horizontal position of a new point can also be determined by measuring angles from new point
to three points of known coordinates. This method is called resection.
Depending up on the position of control points A, B and C, P can lie either outside triangle ABC or
inside. B
A B C
B
P A C
A
P
P
Fig. 1. 13: Resection--shows the three possibilities of the location of the points “P”, the coordinate of which is going to
be computed.
Page 18of 19
Surv ey ing I I [CENG 1082],
Hand Out- Unit 3; Prepared B y: Y onas A sefa
Addis Ababa Science and T echnology Univ ersity, 2015
4. ADJUSTMENT OF SURVEYOBSERVATION
4.1 Adjustments
When the absolute size of an error is known, and when weights have been assigned to
measurements having varying reliabilities, corrections to the field data will be made in such a way
that the error is eliminated by applying corrections that reflect the various weightings. It’
s obvious
that measurements having large weights will be corrected less than measurements having small
weights. The more certain the measurement, is the larger the weight. It follo ws that correction
factors should be in inverse ratio to the corresponding weights.
Example:
The angles in a triangle were determined, with A being measured three times, B being measured
two times, and C being measured once. It is noticed that the correction factor is simply the inverse
of the weight, and that the actual corrections for each angle is simply the ratio of the correction
factor to the total correction factor, all multiplied by the total correction.
Correction Adjusted
Angle Me an Value We ight(SE) Corrections
factor(SE)2 Angle
A 45007’ 32’’ 3 1/ 3=0.33 ’
0.33/ 1.83*20’ ’
=+4’ 450 07’ ’
3 6’
B 71051’ ’
06’ 2 ½=0.50 ’
0.50/ 1.83*20’ ’
=+ 5’ 71051’ ’
11’
C 63001’ ’
02’ 1 1/ 1=1.00 ’
1/1.8 3*20’ ’
=+11’ 630 01’ ’
13’
1790 59’ ’
40’ ∑ =1.83 ∑=20 180000’ ’
00’
Adjusted
Error = Me asured Value - Given Value
=1790 59’ ’
40’-1800 00’ ’
00’ ’
=-20’
Exercise
Consider the same angles, exce pt in this case the weights will be related to standard error (SE)
characteristics of three different theodolites.
also true that the num ber of measurem ents varies inversely with the SE2m, .
If the reliability of different sets of m easurements varies one to the other, then equal considerations
cannot be given to those sets. Som e method (weighting)m ust be used to arrive at a best value. For
example, measurem ents may be m ade under varying considerations using varying levels of skills
and repeated a varying number of times.
That is
Note: If the distance had been measured six times and six different results had occurred, each
measurement would be received a weight of one, and the computation would be the same as for
the arithmetic mean.