Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It's Depend: Questions For Discussion (Group 1)
It's Depend: Questions For Discussion (Group 1)
As such, Mr. Donoghue could not take action to prevent any further publications of
such articles.
– Who was the author of this article? Felstead or Donogue or both?
The articles were written by the journalist, info provided by the player himself.
The journalist was the author since he selected and arranged the words. The
expression dichotomy.
Copyright của các bài báo này thuộc Felstead (because Felstead là người đã sắp xếp
những cái thông tin mà Donogue cung cấp thành 1 bài báo hấp dẫn để đọc Donogue
có thể ngăn cản Felstead, tuy nhiên là ngăn cản theo privacy law (quyền riêng tư cá
nhân) chứ không phải theo IPR
The journalist Felstead was the author of this article. Because he was the one who
expressed the idea and clothed the idea into form.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 2)
2.2. West HCMC Telephone Co. has published a “white pages” telephone
directory (include only names, addresses and tel. numbers, there’s no
advertisement). FAHASA Publisher reprinted the directory for sale without
authorization of West HCMC Telephone Co.
3.1. Can emails and internet material be protected under copyright? Why?
Yes. Emails are literary works but they are only protected whenever they are
original & have creativity. In whatever form of expression đều được chấp
nhận.
The availability of the internet material does not prevent it from being
protected. Các tác phẩm dù biết tác giả hay không vẫn được bảo vệ như nhau
Enjoy cá nhân thì ok nhưng bật loa ngoài cho hành khách nghe thì là truyền
đạt tới công chúng 🡪 xâm phạm quyền thuộc về chủ sở hữu
QUESTION FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 4)
No, because they’re too short. In short, sharing similar phrases, particularly
common descriptive phrases, is usually not enough, by itself, to win a copyright
claim. These phrases and combinations of words will be protected by trademark.
B. You bought a book at the book exhibition with the author’s signature
on the first page. Afterwards, is it a copyright infringement if:
+ you give it to a friend. (first sale doctrine - no infringement)
+ you sell it to a bookstore. (first sale doctrine - no infringement)
(The principle of exhaustion:hết quyền sở hữu trí tuệ)
+ you rent it out. (apply for literary works, quyền cho thuê với sách chưa
có tại VN chỉ áp dụng với phim ảnh, âm nhạc và phần mềm)
+ you write another book based on it. (depends, based on ideas: yes,
based on the expressions: no)
The buyer has the ownership to the book
Quyền tác giả không cho phép reproduce and distribution nhưng có học
thuyết gọi là first sale doctrine, exhaustion of distribution right chỉ được
kiểm soát trong lần đầu tiên đưa tác phẩm ra thị trường
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 5)
Artists names and titles are considered public domain and are not protected
by copyright. The few words in a song title may have been used many times before
and should be able to be available for general use as a natural part of the English
language. A word or phrase used as a brand for goods or services can be protected by
trademark. For example, someone might theoretically trademark the phrase "See You
Again" as a clothing brand, and anyone else marketing clothing using that phrase may
be guilty of trademark infringement. This does not prevent anyone else from using the
phrase "See You Again" in any other context: as a song, movie or book title;
5.2. ABC Software, Inc. (ABC), a U.S. company, assigns Tim Smith, one of
its junior programmers, to work on a program to assist real estate investors
with managing their investment properties.
Tim develops the software product virtually on his own, with no
assistance from others in the company.
Once completed, the product is an unexpected success, and the company
realizes tens of millions of dollars in revenue from it.
Nonetheless, Tim's only reward for his work, in addition to his regular
salary, is a $500 end-of-year bonus.
Tim is bitter and sues ABC, claiming the copyright in the software is
owned by him because he created it?
Tim không có quyền kiện. Vì đây là 1 trường hợp đặc biệt của copyright.
Đây là 1 tác phẩm được tạo ra bởi nhân viên (người được giao nhiệm vụ) nên
quyền copyright thuộc về công ty ABC.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 6)
Compilation – derivative
Tác phẩm phái sinh muốn được bảo vệ 🡪license, creative
● A compilation of data means a set of data selected or arranged in a
creative manner and expressed in electronic form.
● The protection of copyright to compilation of data does not cove, and not
prejudicial to copyright to those very data
Có. Trong trường hợp tuyển tập đó được sắp xếp 1 cách sáng tạo (VD xếp theo
chủ đề). Tuy nhiên các tác phẩm nằm trong tuyển tập vẫn thuộc quyền sở hữu
của tác giả gốc. You need to show respect/obtain permission/authorization
6.2. “Chat with Mozart” is a collection of songs whose words were written by
musician Duong Thu and whose music is based on pieces of classical
music composed by Mozart, J.S. Bach, Tchaikovsky, Borodin, Elgar,
Schumann, Vivaldi, Gounod, Saint-Saens.
The singers of these songs are My Linh and the band, The Brothers.
“Chat with Mozart” was released in December 2005.
In November 2006, law scholar Cu Huy Ha Vu sent letters to the Hanoi
Department of Culture and Information and Tien Phong newspaper to
request that the authors and producers of “Chat with Mozart” be
disciplined for infringing copyrights.
Do you think that is the case?
All the classical music composers passed away more than 50 years ago 🡪 public
domain 🡪 no economic rights involved
But consider morals right 🡪 Right of integrity: to object against mutilation
and/or distortion of work;
Common law: moral rights the same with economic rights
Civil law: moral rights are protected forever
🡪 My Linh didn’t infringe copyright since the changes she made weren’t
harmful to the original works. The moral rights only stop people from distort the
works, not change it in the good way. Moral rights chỉ bảo vệ tác phẩm khỏi
những hành vi xuyên tạc, bóp méo, làm giảm giá trị của tác phẩm chứ không
phải những hành vi cải biên, thử nghiệm theo chiều hướng tích cực.
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 7)
7.2.
- To celebrate the 1000-year anniversary of Thang Long - Hanoi, people’s
Đặng Thái Sơn performed Concerto No. 1 by Chopin at Hanoi Opera
house.
- Someone in the audience makes a bootleg recording of Đặng Thái Sơn’s
performance and sells it to a record company other than Ho Guom Audio
Company, with whom Đặng Thái Sơn has a recording contract.
- The recording of Ho Guom Audio Co. is not copied or dealt with, the
bootleg recording is an entirely separate and independent recording.
- Both Đặng Thái Sơn as the performer and Ho Guom Audio Co. as the
recording company are unhappy with this sequence of events.
Tuy nhiên chỉ có ĐTS mới có quyền được khởi kiện người quay lén và công ty
X, HG Audio chỉ có quyền ghi hình và phân phối thôi.
Performance:
- live broadcasting
- fixation (audience)
- reproduction of illegal performance (company x)
Phonograms: belong to HG audio
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 8)
8.1. Can works that are out-of-print or no longer available for sale be
copyrighted?
Yes. Copyright chỉ đề cập đến tính original và fixation, không nói gì đến
market availability
8.2.
• FTU signed a contract with G-Brand Co. to change its new logo.
Who owns the copyright over the new logo? (thuộc về
commissioner là FTU) Mỹ thì thuộc về G-brand
• In whom did the copyright in the research papers vest – the students
or the advisor/professor? (thuộc về students)
• In whom did the copyright in the examination papers vest - the
examiners or the university? (thuộc về commissioner là FTU,
examiners got paid để ra đề)
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 9)
No. Vì những tấm ảnh này do máy móc chứ không phải con người tạo
ra
9.2. Discuss the possible copyright issues relating to the Game “Flappy
Bird”
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION (GROUP 10)
10.1. Vn Express has a section on “Những bài văn bất hủ của học trò”. Should
they respect copyrights over those?
10.2. Discuss copyright and/or related right issues in the case where Ngan Ha
sang the song “”Nơi ấy bình yên”, which is a “ca khúc độc quyền” of Thảo
Trang in Vietnam Idol. ☺
BTC chương trình lí luận rằng, sẽ hát trước trả tác quyền sau. Theo khoản 1
điều 26 Luật sở hữu trí tuệ 2005, được sửa đổi và bổ sung năm 2009, tổ chức
phát sóng sử dụng tác phẩm đã công bố để phát sóng có tài trợ, quảng cáo hoặc
thu tiền dưới bất kỳ hình thức nào thì không phải xin phép, nhưng phải trả
nhuận bút, thù lao cho chủ sở hữu quyền tác giả.Tuy nhiên, trước khi sử dụng ca
khúc nào đó thì đơn vị tổ chức phải hỏi ý kiến là ca khúc ấy có được đồng ý sử
dụng hay không? (moral rights)