Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Friendly Letter

    Uploaded by

    Bianca van den heever
    This document contains a rubric for assessing a student's informal letter. It evaluates the letter based on criteria such as content, language structures, and general presentation. For each criterion, like address/greeting/ending, introduction/conclusion, and sentence construction, the rubric provides descriptors to assess the work as excellent, good, room for improvement, or insufficient. Scores from 0 to 4 are assigned for each criterion, with a total score out of 10. The bottom contains spaces for the teacher's signature and date.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Friendly Letter

    Uploaded by

    Bianca van den heever
    13 views3 pages
    This document contains a rubric for assessing a student's informal letter. It evaluates the letter based on criteria such as content, language structures, and general presentation. For each criterion, like address/greeting/ending, introduction/conclusion, and sentence construction, the rubric provides descriptors to assess the work as excellent, good, room for improvement, or insufficient. Scores from 0 to 4 are assigned for each criterion, with a total score out of 10. The bottom contains spaces for the teacher's signature and date.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Friendly letter

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a rubric for assessing a student's informal letter. It evaluates the letter based on criteria such as content, language structures, and general presentation. For each criterion, like address/greeting/ending, introduction/conclusion, and sentence construction, the rubric provides descriptors to assess the work as excellent, good, room for improvement, or insufficient. Scores from 0 to 4 are assigned for each criterion, with a total score out of 10. The bottom contains spaces for the teacher's signature and date.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views3 pages

    Friendly Letter

    Uploaded by

    Bianca van den heever
    This document contains a rubric for assessing a student's informal letter. It evaluates the letter based on criteria such as content, language structures, and general presentation. For each criterion, like address/greeting/ending, introduction/conclusion, and sentence construction, the rubric provides descriptors to assess the work as excellent, good, room for improvement, or insufficient. Scores from 0 to 4 are assigned for each criterion, with a total score out of 10. The bottom contains spaces for the teacher's signature and date.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Assessment – Written work

    Informal Letter

    Learner: _____________________________________________________________ Gr. ______

    IMPROVEMENT
    SUFFICIANT
    EXCELLENT

    ROOM for
    GOOD
    CRITERIA

    CONTENT:

    4 3 2 1/0

    According to
    Too many mistakes
    Address / Greeting / Ending: instructions. No 1 - 2 mistakes.
    made.
    mistakes.

    Good introduction Intoduction


    No introduction or
    Introduction/ Conclusion: and letter ended or
    ending given.
    correctly. ending present.

    Creative, original Little or no


    Creative and original Limited creativity
    Content: and interesting
    work. and originality.
    creativity and
    work. originality.

    LANGUAGE STRUCTURES:

    Sentences well Sentence


    Sentences well Sentences well
    formulated. construction can
    Sentence construction: formulated with no formulated.
    More than 3 improve, too many
    mistakes. (2 – 3 mistakes)
    mistakes made. mistakes made.
    Excellent use of Average use of Inadequit use of
    language and language and language and
    Language / Vocabulary / Spelling: vocabulary. Less vocbulary. vocabulary. More
    than 5 mistakes. 6 – 9 mistakes. than 10 mistakes.

    GENERAL:

    Correct length Insufficiant length Length of text


    Paragraphs / Amount of words: with sufficiant of work. insufficiant.
    paragraphs. Paragraphs No paragraphs.
    sufficient.

    TOTAL (.......... ÷ 2) ___ /10

    __________________________ ________________________
    (Signature of Teacher) (Date)

    1
    2
    3

    You might also like