Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crim Pro Arrest
Crim Pro Arrest
The prevailing Criminal Procedure came into effect through the issuance of
Administrative Matted (A.M.) No. 00-5-03-SC dated October 3, 2000. It took
effect on December 1, 2000, following its publication in the Official Gazette and two
newspapers of general circulation.
Criminal action – it is defined as one by which the State prosecutes a person for an
act or omission punishable by law
CHAPTER 1
ARREST, SEARCHES, AND SEIZURES
LESSON 1
ARREST
Arrest – it is defined as the taking of a person into custody in order that he/she may be
bound to answer for the commission of an offense
Time of arrest – a person may be arrested anytime whether day or night, twenty-four
hours a day and seven days a week and even during holidays
Only the COURTS can issue warrant of arrests, such as Regional Trial Court, First-
Level Courts (Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial
Courts or Municipal Trial Courts in Cities), Court of Tax Appeals, and Sandiganbayan.
Probable cause – pertains to facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonably
discreet and prudent person to believe that an offense has been committed by the
person sought to be arrested
If a party has reasons to prove that the arrest warrant was issued without probable
cause, such party may move to quash the warrant of arrest.
If the accused is already arrested, the court will not issue an arrest warrant but a
commitment order to bring the detainee from the police station to the city or
provincial jail under the supervision of the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology.
Warrantless arrests:
Examples:
a. Arrest conducted in an entrapment operation such as buy-bust operation of
dangerous drugs
b. Arrest of a person caught in the act of gambling in a public place
2. Hot pursuit arrest – the arrested has probable cause that an offense has just
been committed and has personal belief that the person to be arrested committed
a crime.
Mere suspicion that a crime took place is not enough. Warrantless arrest based
“in personal knowledge on the facts and circumstances” must be coupled
with the element of immediacy.