Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evidence-Based Treatment For Adult Women With Child Abuse-Related Complex PTSD: A Quantitative Review
Evidence-Based Treatment For Adult Women With Child Abuse-Related Complex PTSD: A Quantitative Review
To cite this article: Ethy Dorrepaal, Kathleen Thomaes, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, Dick J.
Veltman, Nel Draijer & Anton J. L. M. van Balkom (2014) Evidence-based treatment for adult
women with child abuse-related Complex PTSD: a quantitative review, European Journal of
Psychotraumatology, 5:1, 23613, DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY æ
REVIEW ARTICLE
Introduction: Effective first-line treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are well established, but
their generalizability to child abuse (CA)-related Complex PTSD is largely unknown.
Method: A quantitative review of the literature was performed, identifying seven studies, with treatments
specifically targeting CA-related PTSD or Complex PTSD, which were meta-analyzed, including variables
such as effect size, drop-out, recovery, and improvement rates.
Results: Only six studies with one or more cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) treatment conditions and one
with a present centered therapy condition could be meta-analyzed. Results indicate that CA-related PTSD
patients profit with large effect sizes and modest recovery and improvement rates. Treatments which include
exposure showed greater effect sizes especially in completers’ analyses, although no differential results were
found in recovery and improvement rates. However, results in the subgroup of CA-related Complex PTSD
studies were least favorable. Within the Complex PTSD subgroup, no superior effect size was found for
exposure, and affect management resulted in more favorable recovery and improvement rates and less drop-
out, as compared to exposure, especially in intention-to-treat analyses.
Conclusion: Limited evidence suggests that predominantly CBT treatments are effective, but do not suffice to
achieve satisfactory end states, especially in Complex PTSD populations. Moreover, we propose that future
research should focus on direct comparisons between types of treatment for Complex PTSD patients, thereby
increasing generalizability of results.
Keywords: Review; meta-analysis; PTSD; psychotherapy; cognitive behavioral therapy; cognitive behavioral treatment; child
abuse; childhood abuse; adult survivors of child abuse
Responsible Editor: Ruth Lanius, Western University of Canada, Canada.
*Correspondence to: Kathleen Thomaes, GGZinGeest/VUmc, A.J. Ernststraat 1187, 1081 HL, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, Email: k.thomaes@vumc.nl; Ethy Dorrepaal, PsyQ, Parnassia Groep, The Netherlands,
Email: E.Dorrepaal@psyq.nl
For the abstract or full text in other languages, please see Supplementary files under Article Tools online
Received: 23 December 2013; Revised: 14 July 2014; Accepted: 19 August 2014; Published: 14 October 2014
ffective treatments for posttraumatic stress dis- opment, CA may result in PTSD complicated by problems
European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014. # 2014 Ethy Dorrepaal et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons 1
Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC-BY 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or
format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license
is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
(page number not for citation purpose)
Ethy Dorrepaal et al.
2010, 2013; Van Der Kolk, Roth, Pelcovitz, Sunday, & analysis) (Peleikis & Dahl, 2005; Price, Hilsenroth,
Spinazzola, 2005; Zlotnick et al., 1996). A prevalence of Petretic-Jackson, & Bonge, 2001). Moreover, it is doubtful
1% of Complex PTSD has been observed in a student whether the results of these reviews can be generalized to
population (Ford, Stockton, Kaltman, & Green, 2006). the CA-related Complex PTSD population, since only
Reviews on CA (with a diversity of symptoms, not a few studies on both CA and PTSD were included, and
specifically PTSD) (Callahan, Price, & Hilsenroth, 2004; little attention was paid to indicators of complexity such as
Kessler, White, & Nelson, 2003; Martsolf & Draucker, Axis II comorbidity. Also, exclusion criteria such as
2005; Peleikis, Mykletun, & Dahl, 2005; Taylor & Harvey, suicidality and self-injurious behavior may have resulted
2010) showed that a variety of treatments can be beneficial. in the exclusion of Complex PTSD patients. Thus, drawing
Earlier reviews mainly included group treatments, while conclusions based on the currently available empirical
more recently individual treatments showed favorable evidence for effective treatments in CA-related Complex
effect sizes. Structured treatment characteristics such as PTSD is problematic. Consequently, it is still unclear for
availability of a manual, an instructional format and pro- clinicians whether Complex PTSD patients are generally
viding homework increased treatment effect in terms of able to tolerate, and benefit from, commonly available
PTSD symptoms, while externalizing problems were un- first-line treatments equally well as DSM-defined PTSD
affected (Taylor & Harvey, 2010). However, these reviews patients, and opinions are divided on this issue. Complex
included a limited number of randomized controlled trials PTSD as well as PTSD with Borderline Personality
(RCTs) with adequately diagnosed PTSD, and these PTSD Disorder (BPD) has been associated with poor treatment
studies were not analyzed separately to investigate dif- outcome (Cloitre & Koenen, 2001; Ford & Kidd, 1998)
ferential treatment effects. Therefore, generalizing these and a higher drop-out rate following exposure (Cloitre
results to the CA-related Complex PTSD population is et al., 2010; McDonagh et al., 2005). Moreover, first-line
problematic. PTSD treatments may not target all relevant pathology in
Reviews on PTSD (resulting from various trauma the CA population, such as poor affect regulation and
types, not specifically CA) concluded that active treat- interpersonal problems.
ments for PTSD are highly effective and superior to Summarizing, after early severe CA, DSM-defined
waiting list (WL) controls (Benish, Imel, & Wampold, PTSD may be complicated by additional features referred
2008; Bisson et al., 2007; Bradley et al., 2005; Cloitre, to as Complex PTSD. Reviews on CA as well as reviews on
2009; Powers, Halpern, Ferenschak, Gillihan, & Foa, DSM-defined PTSD conclude that effective treatments are
2010; Schottenbauer, Glass, Arnkoff, Tendick, & Gray, available for CA or PTSD, but research on the overlap
2008; Seidler & Wagner, 2006). The largest body of between these populations is scarce, and generalizability
evidence has been accumulated for CBT, either exposure, of results to the CA-related Complex PTSD population is
cognitive therapy, or both, and EMDR. These reviews questionable. Moreover, treatment effects and compliance
included only a small number of primary RCTs concern- of different types of treatments with varying duration,
ing CA populations, again limiting generalizability to the structure and content in CA-related Complex PTSD are
CA-related Complex PTSD population. Powers et al. insufficiently known. Therefore, we aimed to investigate
(2010) found no significant difference in effect sizes which evidence is available to effectively treat the subgroup
between studies with and without a child sexual abuse of CA-related Complex PTSD. We define Complex PTSD
population, based on two (partly) CA studies. However, as PTSD according to DSM-IV criteria plus Disorder of
this non-finding could be explained by the fact that they Extreme Stress (as measured by the SIDES; Van der Kolk
reported neither on exposure to other complex trauma, et al., 2005), which is based on the WHO field trials on
nor on the presence or absence of Complex PTSD. In Complex PTSD in which it has been shown that 9496% of
women with a history of CA and chronic interpersonal Complex PTSD patients fulfill criteria of DSM-IV defined
violence, Cloitre (2009) found a range of CBT treatments PTSD (Van der Kolk et al., 2005). This has led to the
effective to achieve PTSD symptom reduction. In addi- current proposal to categorize PTSD and Complex PTSD
tion, a few treatments were reported that focused on as sibling disorders in ICD-11, sharing the DSM-defined
other symptom domains, such as affect management PTSD symptoms with the added symptom domains of (1)
(AM) and interpersonal skills training, with beneficial affect dysregulation, (2) negative self-concept, and (3)
results in these domains as well. interpersonal disturbances in Complex PTSD (Cloitre,
To our knowledge, reviews which focus exclusively on Garvert, Brewin, Bryant, & Maercker, 2013).
the efficacy of treatments of CA-related Complex PTSD
or CA-related PTSD are sparse. Furthermore, these Method
reviews show considerable differences in study selection
(target population, study design), outcome measures and Literature search
data analysis methods (effect size, recovery and/or im- Our literature search covered the period January 1965 to
provement rates, intention-to-treat analysis or completers’ May 2012. We searched MEDLINE using the following
2
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
Evidence-based treatment for Complex PTSD
terms: CA OR childhood abuse OR child sexual abuse anger), without classifying this as ‘‘Complex.’’ Studies
OR childhood physical abuse OR maltreatment OR assigned to category C focused on PTSD patients,
PTSD OR posttraumatic OR DESNOS AND treatment of which the majority suffered from a CA history, but
OR therapy AND controlled trial OR clinical trial OR CA was not the index trauma in the majority of the
randomized OR review OR meta-analysis. These terms patients. In category D, the patients had a CA history
were searched as key words, title, abstract and Mesh and CA was the index trauma; however, only parts of
terms. Findings were cross-referenced with references these patients were diagnosed with PTSD and this sub-
from reviews. We included published randomized original group was not analyzed separately. Category E pertained
studies comparing interventions with other interventions to studies with not all but mainly patients suffering from
or control conditions in study populations combining CA as well as a mainly suffering from PTSD.
CA and PTSD (not only Complex PTSD) for comparison Figure 1 is a diagram showing all RCTs grouped
with other reviews on this issue. Inclusion criteria were according to these criteria, in order to visualize their
(1) 50% of participants who met DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, relevance in terms of our research question on evidence-
or DSM-IV-TR criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder based treatments for CA-related PTSD or Complex
or PTSD as a main treatment target; (2) 50% of parti- PTSD and in terms of index trauma (CA or other trauma)
cipants with CA or CA analyzed separately; (3) random and outcome measures. Since we were specifically inter-
assignment; (4) study participants at least 18 years of ested in treatments focusing on CA-related Complex
age; (5) the study had to test a specific psychothera- PTSD, we selected the studies of category A and B,
peutic treatment against a control condition and/or an because these studies all included outcome measures
alternative treatment; (6) the study had to be reported in covering Complex PTSD symptoms. We performed a
English. separate analysis for category A with diagnosed Complex
PTSD or other Complex PTSD indicators ( 50% per-
sonality disorder).
Study selection
In these seven studies, numbered 17 in tables and
A total of 24 RCTs were identified that satisfied in-
text (see also references: marked with *), four treatment
clusion criteria, including both 50% patients with
conditions were distinguished: CBT, present centered
PTSD symptoms, as well as 50% patients with a history
therapy (PCT), treatment as usual during waiting list
of CA.
(TAU) and waiting list only. CBT was further subdivided
These 24 studies were heterogeneous with regard to the
into ‘‘including (prolonged) exposure’’ (PE) (imaginary
number of patients meeting criteria for PTSD diagnosis
or in vivo) and ‘‘including affect management’’ (AM)
or other PTSD indicators (e.g., level of PTSD symptoms),
(skills training to improve affect regulation). Control
and the number of patients meeting criteria for Complex
conditions included TAU and WL.
PTSD (as measured by the SIDES) or other Complex
PTSD indicators (e.g., percentage comorbid personality
disorders), and the number of patients with a CA history. Calculation of study outcome measures
Moreover, they differed in index trauma (CA or other The following measures from the original studies were
trauma) and outcome measures. On the basis on these drawn upon for estimating PTSD effect sizes: (1) Clinician-
factors we established five categories: Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS; Blake et al., 1995); (2)
PTSD Symptom Scale*Self-Report (PTSD-SR; Foa,
A. CA-related Complex PTSD (4 RCTs), Cashman, Jaycox, & Perry, 1997); (3) Modified Posttrau-
B. CA-related PTSD (3 RCTs), matic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale*Self-Report
C. All PTSDmainly CA (9 RCTs), (MPSS-SR) (Falsetti, Resnick, Resick, & Kilpatrick,
D. All CAmainly with PTSD (5 RCTs), 1993); and (4) Davidson Trauma Scale (Davidson et al.,
E. Mainly PTSDmainly CA (3 RCTs). 1997). Two calculations were performed for each original
study: (1) an assessment of effect sizes defined as the
Category A consists of studies on Complex PTSD as standardized prepost score difference of the groups
measured by the SIDES,1,7 and when SIDES ratings studied, and (2) a standardized score between conditions
were not available we used studies in which patients met per study. For both calculations Cohen’s d ([mean 1
criteria for PTSD plus comorbid personality disorders, mean 2]/sd prepooled) (Cohen, 1988) was used as the
as a proxy for Complex PTSD.5,6 In this category, all measure of the effect size using the following formula for
patients were diagnosed with PTSD, all suffered from the pooled standard deviation of the pretreatment scores:
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ðn1 1Þs21 þðn2 1Þs22
CA as the index trauma and the treatment target was s¼ n1 þn2
, resulting in an effect size also known
Complex PTSD. In category B, all study participants as Glass’s delta. We considered prepost effect sizes (1)
were diagnosed with CA-related PTSD with some indi- 0.2 small, 0.5 medium, and 0.8 large. For a direct
cators covering Complex PTSD symptoms (e.g., disso- comparison of two forms of treatment (2), we calculated
ciation, interpersonal problems, affect modulation, and the post/post effect sizes (dpost/post), and corrected these
A
Zlotnick 1997
C McDonnagh 2005
Cloitre 2010
Echebura 1997
Dorrepaal 2012
Resick 2002 D
Kubany 2003 CHILD ABUSE
Kubany 2004 Edmond 1999
RELATED
E vanderKolk 2007 Bradley 2003
COMPLEX PTSD
Resick 2008 Sikkema 2007
Scheck 1998 Krupnick 2008 Paivio 2010
Krakow 2001 Zlotnick 2009
Johnson 2011 Mueser 2009 ALL CHILD ABUSE
B + MAINLY PTSD
ALL PTSD Classen 2001
+ MAINLY CHILD ABUSE Cloitre 2002
Chard 2005
CHILD ABUSE
RELATED PTSD
effect sizes for group differences at the beginning of the intention-to-treat results were published, we estimated
study (dpre/pre) because such baseline differences may bias non-reported CPL results using drop-out rates and
comparisons. Corrected effect sizes dcorr were obtained assuming LOCF.
by computing dcorr dpost/post dpre/pre (Becker, 1988; Next, we computed a cumulative effect size of global
Morris, 2007; Seidler & Wagner, 2006). Between-condition PTSD symptoms across studies. First, a joint effect
size was calculated for the three original studies using
effect sizes (2) are considered medium between 0.35
more than one PTSD measure. This joint effect size is
and 0.75.
equivalent to the arithmetical average of the global
Additionally, we present (1) percentage inclusion,
scale scores. Subsequently, the average global effect size
conservatively defined as number of patients screened by
was calculated from these primary-study effects, using
researchers, even if prescreened during telephone inter-
fixed effect weights with Metan software (Borenstein,
views or by clinicians, (2) recovery rate, defined as per- Hedges, Higgins, & Rothstein, 2009). Subsequently, we
centage of patients who no longer met diagnostic criteria computed confidence intervals for both continuous
for PTSD, and (3) improvement rates using definitions for (prepost) as well as binary data (drop-out, recovery,
improvement as used by the authors for both completers’ and improvement rates). For confidence intervals the
and intention-to-treat analyses, with the aim to provide proportions of overlap were computed to establish if
a comprehensive overview (Bradley et al., 2005). In case the pooled data of two groups of studies differed sig-
only completers’ (CPL) results were published, we as- nificantly (Cumming & Finch, 2005). Non-overlapping
sumed last observation carried forward (LOCF) impu- intervals have a corresponding pB0.01, and intervals
tation and used published drop-out rates to estimate overlapping no more than 0.5 have a corresponding
non-reported intention-to-treat results. Similarly, if only pB0.05.
4
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
Evidence-based treatment for Complex PTSD
6
assessment and severity of trauma and symptoms and previous treatments
Assessment Severity
Author, year N Population Recruitment criterion Exclusion criteria ratea Trauma Axis I Axis II Trauma Symptom Comorbidity treatments
Zlotnick et al., 48 All women Referred CSA- Psychosis, substance NR CTQ CAPS NR PTSD based on sexual DTS 70 100% 50% previous
95% White NR PTSD mania, schizophrenia, 30% ELS CAPS SCID-II intrusion (partly) related. DES 15 (10.8% BPD) NR
80% High school (DSM-IV) schizoaffective disorders, SCID-I At least 1 clear detailed
or higher psychosis, DID, organic memory
83% Employed psychosis, severe, Much CSACPA and
bipolar or psychotic much adult abuse,
depressive disorder, majority involved
current alcohol/drug penetration by a relative
abuse last 3 months,
active suicidality, history
of 2 suicide attempts,
abusive partner
Cloitre et al., 2010 104 All women NR CA-related Substance dependence, 34% NR CAPS SCID-II Primary diagnosis of CAPS 64 90% Axis I Mean 2
(A) Mean age ca. 36 Complex psychotic symptoms, Blind for CA-related PTSD by BDI 21 diagnosis previous
yrs PTSD cognitive impairment, condition care taker/someone in 50% psychological
35% white 88% (DSM-IV) bipolar disorder, active authority before age 18 personality treatments
high school suicidality requiring ER, 90% CSA disorder (24%
33% current PTSD focused 80% CPA BPD)
unemployed psychotherapy Much additional adult
abuse
Mean 6.5 traumatic
experiences
Dorrepaal et al., 71 All women Referred CA-related Long-lasting psychosis, 79% STI CAPS 96% Axis I CA before age 16 as DTS 85 96% Axis I Mean 2
2012 (A) Mean age 40 yrs patients PTSD and DID, severe substance SIDES (55% MDD) defined by STI DES 25 (55% MDD) previous
Mean education Complex abuse interfering with blind 75% Axis II 93% CSA 75% Axis II psychological
9.9 yrs PTSD compliance, antisocial (52% BPD) 50% CSACPA (52% BPD) treatments
17% employed (DSM-IV) personality disorder 70% used 50% additional adult 70% used
psychotropic abuse psychotropic
BDI Beck Depression Interview; BPD borderline personality disorder; CAPSClinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CBTcognitive behavioral therapy; CMIS Childhood Maltreatment
Interview Schedule; CA child abuse; CPAchild physical abuse; CSA child sexual abuse; CTQ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; DES Dissociative Experiences Scale;
DID dissociative identity disorder; ELS evaluation of lifetime stressors; ER emergency room; MDDmajor depressive disorder; MPSS-SR Modified Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Symptom Scale*Self-Report; NR not reported; SAAIVS Sexual Assault and Additional Interpersonal Violence Schedule; SAEQ Sexual Abuse Exposure Questionnaire; SCID-I/SCID-
II Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV*for Axis I/Axis II; SES Sexual Experiences Survey; SIDES Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress; SIDP-IV Structured
Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders; STI Structured Trauma Interview; TSC-40 Trauma Symptom Checklist-40.
a
Included patients/recruited patients 100%.
8
Active Index Target Psycho- Affect Exposure Home
1st Author, year treatment Format trauma symptoms education CT/CR management techniques Social skills work
Zlotnick et al., AM 15 weekly 90 min CSA PTSD and affect dysregulation 92 sessions
Ethy Dorrepaal et al.
AM affect management; C(S)A child (sexual) abuse; CBT cognitive behavioral therapy; CPT-SAcognitive processing therapy for sexual abuse survivors; CRcognitive restructuring;
CT cognitive therapy; PE prolonged exposure; PFT present focused therapy; STAIR Skills Training in Affect and Interpersonal Regulation; Sup supportive treatment; TFTtrauma
focused therapy; WAwritten accounts.
Mean ITT is estimated from mean completers, N ITT and N completers, assuming non-completers did not change; bmean completers is estimated from mean ITT, N completers and N ITT,
DTS Davidson Trauma Scale; ITTintention-to-treat; Mmean; MA minimal attention; MPSS-SR Modified Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale*Self-Report; NR not
reported; PTSD-SR PTSD Self-Report; PEprolonged exposure; PFT present focused therapy; SDstandard deviation; STAIR Skills Training in Affect and Interpersonal Regulation;
assuming non-completers did not change; cCBT vs. PCT; dSTAIR/PE vs. Sup/PE; eSTAIR/Sup vs. Sup/PE; fSTAIR/PE vs. STAIR/Sup; gchange scores as reported in article, unknown if
AM affect management; CAPS Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CBTcognitive behavioral therapy; CPT-SA cognitive processing therapy for sexual abuse survivors;
Improvement rate
45%
21%
ITT
condition. Within the Complex PTSD studies (A) the
comparison between different types of CBT showed lower
Completer
drop-out in AM only and AM combined with exposure
55%
24%
as compared to exposure only (Table 5).
In sum, PCT showed lowest drop-out rates. Within CBT
Post
Completer
Effect sizes
Tables 3 and 4 indicate that active treatments resulted
in substantial improvement from pretreatment to post-
treatment in this patient population, with effect sizes
(Cohen’s d corrected)
treatment vs. control
0.35
ITT
ITT
18%
12%
out
TAUWL
or WL
standardized.
10
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
Table 4. Aggregated drop-out, prescores and postscores, and effect sizes for PTSD symptom changes, and recovery and improvement rate across CA-related PTSD studies by
type of treatment
Control
conditions1,3,4,5,7 5 16a 72 64 65 0.4c 0.3f 0 4 27g 22i 3 11j 9l
3,4,5 k
WL only 3 15 68 61 62 0.4 0.3 0 3 24 20 2 4 3m
TAU during WL1,7 2 18 78 69 70 0.4 0.4 0 1 41 30 1 24k 21m
AMaffect management; CA child abuse; CBT cognitive behavioral therapy; ITT intention-to-treat; PCT present centered treatment; PE prolonged exposure; TAU treatment as
usual; WL waiting list.
*Without Cloitre et al., 2010 due to incomparability of score ranges.
1
Zlotnick et al., 1997; 2Classen et al., 2001; 3Cloitre et al., 2002; 4Chard, 2005; 5McDonagh et al., 2005; 6Cloitre et al., 2010; 7Dorrepaal et al., 2012; 8Percentage decrease of PTSD
12
studies by type of study population
CA-related Complex
PTSD (A)1,5 (2x),6 (3x),7 7 26 69 38 46 1.6d,e 1.2f,g 4 0.8t 0.6u 6 60h,i 44k,l 4 35o 26q
3,4 d f t u h k o
CA-related PTSD (B) 2 22 65 19 29 2.3 1.8 2 1.9 1.4 2 87 67 2 65 51q
Within CA-related
Complex PTSD (A):
AM affect management; CA child abuse; CBT cognitive behavioral therapy; ITT intention-to-treat; PCTpresent centered treatment; PE prolonged exposure; TAU treatment as
usual; WL waiting list.
*Without Cloitre et al., 2010 due to incomparability of score ranges.
1
Zlotnick et al., 1997; 2Classen et al., 2001; 3Cloitre et al., 2002; 4Chard, 2005; 5McDonagh et al., 2005; 6Cloitre et al., 2010; 7Dorrepaal et al., 2012; 8Percentage decrease of PTSD
diagnoses as reported by author; 9Percentage of patients that improved as defined by author.
Prepost effect sizes, recovery and improvement rates were tested: CA-related Complex PTSD (A) vs. CA-related PTSD (B); active vs. control; CBT vs. PCT and the three subtypes of CBT
amongst each other, and the two types of control conditions: a,b,c,d,f,j,l,m,sDifferences between groups of studies with the same superscript are significant at pB0.05 as a result of modest
overlap of confidence intervals. e,g,h,i,k,n,o,p,q,r,t,uDifference between groups of studies with the same superscript are significant at pB0.01 as a result of non-overlap of confidence intervals.
and CA was the index trauma; however, only parts generalizability to the most impaired Complex PTSD
of these patients were diagnosed with PTSD and this patients and stresses the importance of developing and
subgroup was not analyzed separately. Category E studying treatment improvements for this group with
pertained to studies of patients only partly suffering high rates of comorbidity, suicidality, unemployment,
from CA and partly from PTSD. and utilizing costly intensive treatment including medica-
The patients of the category A and B studies pre- tion and hospitalization.
dominantly consisted of Caucasian patients, who were Additionally, a considerable proportion of patients
mostly well educated, employed, and severely traumatized. drop-out of treatment, without relief of their disturbing
Suicidal and dissociative (identity) disorder patients were symptoms, whereas the remaining patients generally
frequently excluded. The included patients were recruited achieve large effects in completers’ analyses. Our findings
mostly by advertisements. Information regarding previous indicate the relevance of comparing results between (sub)
treatments including hospitalizations and medication use populations, which may be illustrated by a difference in
was lacking in most studies, limiting generalizability to drop-out between exposure and AM in the Complex
‘‘real life’’ populations. PTSD population, but not in the PTSD populations.
Results of the meta-analysis showed that these patients Probably, patients who are able to tolerate exposure
improved substantially following different types of treat- are likely to complete their treatment successfully. The
ments targeting CA-related PTSD or Complex PTSD, differential drop-out rates between PCT (9%) and CBT
as indicated by large effect sizes. Patients in active treat- (26%) as well as between exposure and other treatments
ment conditions, predominantly cognitive behavioral stress the importance of additional intention-to-treat
treatments, showed superior outcomes in recovery and analyses to obtain more balanced results. These findings
improvement rates compared to control conditions. How- concur with a previous report showing higher drop-out
ever, post treatment symptom scores were still substantial: during exposure therapy in more complex patients (with
just less than half of patients no longer met criteria for comorbid personality disorder) (McDonagh et al., 2005),
a PTSD diagnosis and only a minority showed clini- whereas within a Complex PTSD population the least
cally relevant improvement. CBT and PCT were generally complex patients (without comorbid BPD) drop-out
equally effective, but differed in drop-out rate favoring more frequently during AM (Dorrepaal et al., 2012). In
PCT, and recovery rate favoring CBT in completers’ the literature it has been noted that drop-out risk may be
analysis. CBT treatments ranged from AM to exposure, highest in the first exposure sessions (McDonagh et al.,
always including psycho-education and cognitive therapy. 2005) and may decrease after improvement of negative
Between CBT types, exposure resulted in greater effect mood regulation or achieving a more robust working
sizes as compared to AM, although recovery and im- alliance (Cloitre, Koenen, Cohen, & Han, 2002).
provement rates were similar. Systematic inventories among experts recommend an
When comparing CBT treatment outcome after 1224 initial focus on ‘‘stabilization’’ in Complex PTSD patients
weeks for the most Complex PTSD populations (assigned as well as dissociative disorders with an inability to
to category A) with PTSD populations (assigned to tolerate strong affects before exposure (Baars et al., 2011;
category B), we found that the Complex PTSD popula- Brands et al., 2012; Cloitre et al., 2011). Thus, regular
tion benefitted less from treatment as compared to DSM- exposure treatments may be unsuitable for Complex
defined PTSD. Moreover, no differential treatment effect PTSD patients in the first phase of their treatment.
sizes were observed in Complex PTSD. In contrast, for More psycho-educational or stabilizing treatments tar-
Complex PTSD patients, more favorable drop-out, re- geting affect dysregulation, irrational beliefs, and/or lack
covery, and improvement rates for AM were observed of social and self-soothing skills may prepare patients to
compared with exposure treatment. subsequent treatments such as exposure (e.g., Harned,
These findings indicate that despite the large effect Jackson, Comtois, & Linehan, 2010), or directly reduce
sizes, which are in line with earlier PTSD reviews, the PTSD symptoms in other cases (e.g., Zlotnick et al.,
presence of substantial symptoms post treatment to- 1997).
gether with low to moderate improvement and recovery It is unknown if treatment outcome can be improved
rates imply a clear need for better treatments. This is even by varying treatment type and duration, since most
more the case for the Complex PTSD population in treatments studied to date are 1224 week CBT treat-
which the results are less favorable as compared to the ments. An integrated approach focusing not only on
PTSD population. Even within the four Complex PTSD PTSD outcome but also on (complex) associated features
studies effect sizes are highest in the studies5,6 with is therefore mandatory. For example, a treatment sche-
more exclusion criteria and lower inclusion rates. This dule starting with AM was shown to be both tolerable as
is in agreement with the finding in the meta-analysis well as effective (Cloitre et al., 2002, 2010), although not
of Bradley et al. (2005) showing that higher effect tested yet in a fully diagnosed Complex PTSD popula-
sizes are related to more exclusion criteria. This limits tion, or analyzed separately for the PD subgroup.
14
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
Evidence-based treatment for Complex PTSD
Strengths and limitations Complex PTSD cannot be ruled out. Given the low
In contrast to most PTSD meta-analyses, which are only inclusion rate, the presence of exclusion criteria like
based on the results of completer analyses, we addition- suicidality and low inclusion rate in these two Complex
ally presented aggregated intention-to-treat data, and PTSD studies (Cloitre et al., 2010; McDonagh et al.,
when necessary estimated these based on drop-out rates 2005), and the fact that most patients were self-referred,
and completers’ results. This is of relevance since drop- Caucasian, well educated, and employed (except seven)
out rates differed between treatments. Additionally, we indeed warrants some caution regarding the general-
calculated multimodal outcome measures, presenting izability of the results, especially for exposure, to the most
not only effect sizes but also recovery and improvement Complex PTSD population.
rates, inclusion rates and postscores, resulting in a more
comprehensive overview. Moreover, we attempted to Future research
focus on well-circumscribed populations, thereby avoid- Given the paucity of studies in CA-related Complex
ing conclusions that would be over-generalizing and PTSD populations to date, additional trials are needed to
hence unspecific. However, even within the Complex explicitly address these patients, with careful assessments
PTSD study populations some characteristics like inclu- and minimal exclusion criteria. The main challenge is
sion rates and exclusion criteria indicated different levels whether more favorable effects and lower drop-out rates
of complexity/severity. can be achieved using established approaches for routi-
From a methodological viewpoint, in performing the nely included study populations, such as C(P)T vs.
meta-analysis, the relatively low number of studies pre- exposure vs. EMDR, comparing these to, e.g., personality
cluded rigorous testing and adjustment for homogeneity disorder treatment programs. To investigate possible
(although the random effects model gave very similar treatment population interactions, a study comparing
results compared to the presented results from the fixed treatments having the same number of sessions within a
effects model) and also impeded proper assessment of Complex PTSD diagnosed population is warranted. This
funnel plots in order to evaluate publication bias. could also add to the results of Cloitre et al. (2010) who
Due to our stringent inclusion criteria the number of compared eight sessions of AM with eight sessions of
identified studies was modest, limiting the power to exposure with 16 sessions of both of these modalities
identify differential treatment (e.g., length of treatment) successively. It remains unclear whether extending the
or population effects. Additionally, different numbers of eight session stabilizing AM condition to 16 sessions
studies could be included per outcome, for example, effect would result in similar results as compared to the 16
size or recovery rate, limiting their interpretation. More- session combined treatment or 16 sessions exposure only.
over, we did not analyze follow-up data, which might As noted earlier, to enhance generalizability of results
provide important additional information, as for instance it is important to broadly include referred populations
in the Cloitre et al. (2010) study most differential results with minimal exclusion criteria like suicidal behavior,
were not evident before follow-up. Follow-up data did dissociation or substance abuse, which are characteristic
not allow meaningful aggregation: Two studies1,7 did not for the Complex PTSD population. In addition, person-
report follow-up data; two more studies2,4 did not report ality disordered, non-Caucasian, lower educated, unem-
means and SDs needed to aggregate on follow-up; also ployed, medicated, and previously treated patients should
generally no follow-up information of the control condi- be included and these characteristics should be reported
tion3,5,6 was given. Notwithstanding these limitations, and their relevance analyzed. This important knowledge
findings indicate that gains are at least sustained and gap as identified in this review corroborates earlier
sometimes improved over follow-up, specifically concern- publications (Bradley et al., 2005; Cloitre, 2009, 2011).
ing PTSD symptoms.36 We were only able to analyze Axis II disorder assessment and separate analyses of
treatment outcome in terms of PTSD symptom severity, patients with and without Axis II diagnoses are likewise
which is likely to introduce a bias with regard to patients’ needed to address questions regarding generalization of
perceived needs and treatment effects. For example, a effects to more Complex PTSD populations. Moreover,
meta-analysis on CA studies found CBT treatments differential drop-out and analysis on both completers
superior in terms of PTSD outcome, but not on exte- as well as intention-to-treat are warranted to obtain a
rnalizing problems (Taylor & Harvey, 2010). Moreover, balanced overview. Finally, uniform measures for Com-
the interpretation of the effects of Complex PTSD versus plex PTSD symptoms are needed to allow comparisons
AM on treatment results may be confounded, since AM between studies.
was used in Complex PTSD populations only. Lastly, Concluding, the results of this review suggest that a
we defined Complex PTSD study populations arbitrarily variety of treatments may be effective for CA-related
as Complex PTSD diagnosed or PTSD with at least 50% PTSD, but they may not be sufficient enough to obtain
PD comorbidity, so the possibility that patients in a study satisfactory end states in the more Complex PTSD
population meeting the latter criteria did not all have populations. Therefore, it is important firstly to be able
to differentiate properly between DSM-defined and vors of childhood sexual abuse: A randomized controlled trial.
Complex PTSD populations, and secondly to compare Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy,
3, 8493.
the effect of different combinations and sequences of +Classen, C., Koopman, C., Nevillmanning, K., & Spiegel, D.
a variety of treatment modalities in well-established (2001). A preliminary report comparing trauma-focused and
Complex PTSD populations. present-focused group therapy against a wait-listed condition
among childhood sexual abuse survivors with PTSD. Journal of
Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 4, 265288.
Conflict of interest and funding Cloitre, M. (2009). Effective psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress
There is no conflict of interest in the present study for disorder: A review and critique. CNS Spectrum, 14, 3243.
any of the authors. This study was funded by ZONMW, Cloitre, M., Courtois, C. A., Charuvastra, A., Carapezza, R.,
The Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Stolbach, B. C., & Green, B. L. (2011). Treatment of complex
PTSD: Results of the ISTSS expert clinician survey on best
Development, number 100-002-024 (RCT) 100-002-020 practices. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24, 615627.
(neuroimaging). Cloitre, M., Garvert, D. W., Brewin, C. R., Bryant, R. A., &
Maercker, A. (2013). Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD
and complex PTSD: A latent profile analysis. European Journal
References of Psychotraumatology, 4, 20706, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/
ejpt.v4i0.20706.
APA. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Cloitre, M., & Koenen, K. C. (2001). The impact of borderline
IV*text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American
personality disorder on process group outcome among women
Psychiatric Press.
with posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse.
Baars, E. W., Van der Hart, O., Nijenhuis, E. R., Chu, J. A., Glas,
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 51, 379398.
G., & Draijer, N. (2011). Predicting stabilizing treatment
+Cloitre, M., Koenen, K. C., Cohen, L. R., & Han, H. (2002). Skills
outcomes for complex posttraumatic stress disorder and dis-
training in affective and interpersonal regulation followed by
sociative identity disorder: An expertise-based prognostic
exposure: A phase-based treatment for PTSD related to
model. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 12, 6787.
childhood abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change
70, 10671074.
measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical +Cloitre, M., Stovall-McClough, K. C., Nooner, K., Zorbas, P.,
Psychology, 41, 257278. Cherry, S., Jackson, C. L., et al. (2010). Treatment for PTSD
Benish, S. G., Imel, Z. E., & Wampold, B. E. (2008). The relative related to childhood abuse: A randomized controlled trial.
efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies for treating post- American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 91524.
traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of direct compar- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral
isons. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 746758. sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bisson, J. I., Ehlers, A., Matthews, R., Pilling, S., Richards, D., & Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye*Confidence
Turner, S. (2007). Psychological treatments for chronic post- intervals and how to read pictures of data. American
traumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychologist, 60, 170180.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 97104. Davidson, J. R., Book, S. W., Colket, J. T., Tupler, L. A., Roth, S.,
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., David, D., et al. (1997). Assessment of a new self-rating scale
Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., et al. (1995). The development for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine, 27,
of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Journal of Traumatic 153160.
Stress, 8, 7590. +Dorrepaal, E., Thomaes, K., Smit, J. H., Van Balkom, A. J.,
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. Veltman, D. J., Hoogendoorn, A. W., et al. (2012). Stabilizing
(2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. group treatment for complex posttraumatic stress disorder
Bradley, R., Greene, J., Russ, E., Dutra, L., & Westen, D. (2005). related to child abuse based on psychoeducation and cognitive
A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. behavioural therapy: A multisite randomized controlled trial.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 214227. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 81, 217225.
Bradley, R. G., & Follingstad, D. R. (2003). Group therapy for Echeburúa, E., De Corral, P., Zubizarreta, I., & Sarasua, B. (1997).
incarcerated women who experienced interpersonal violence: Psychological treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress dis-
A pilot study. Journal of Trauma Stress, 16, 337340. order in victims of sexual aggression. Behavior Modification,
Brand, B. L. (2012). What we know and what we need to learn about 21, 433456.
the treatment of dissociative disorders. Journal of Trauma and Edmond, T., Rubin, A., & Wambach, K. (1999). The effectiveness of
Dissociation, 13, 387396. EMDR with adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse.
Callahan, K. L., Price, J. L., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2004). A review of Social Work Research, 23, 103116.
interpersonal-psychodynamic group psychotherapy outcomes Falsetti, S. A., Resnick, H. S., Resick, P. A., & Kilpatrick, D. (1993).
for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. International The Modified PTSD Symptom Scale: A brief self-report
Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 54, 491519. measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. The Behavioral
+Chard, K. M. (2005). An evaluation of cognitive processing Therapist, 16, 161162.
therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K. (1997). The
related to childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress
Clinical Psychology, 73, 96571. disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychological
Classen, C., Cavanaugh, E. C., Kaupp, J. W., Kraemer, H. C., Assessment, 9, 445451.
Aggarwal, R., Palesh, O. G., et al. (2011). Comparison of Ford, J. D. (1999). Disorders of extreme stress following war-zone
trauma-focused and present-focused group therapy for survi- military trauma: Associated features of posttraumatic stress
disorder or comorbid but distinct syndromes? Journal of
+
Studies marked with * are included in the meta analysis. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 312.
16
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613
Evidence-based treatment for Complex PTSD
Ford, J. D., & Kidd, P. (1998). Early childhood trauma and Peleikis, D. E., & Dahl, A. A. (2005). A systematic review of
disorders of extreme stress as predictors of treatment outcome empirical studies of psychotherapy with women who were
with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Trau- sexually abused as children. Psychotherapy Research, 15,
matic Stress, 11, 743761. 304315.
Ford, J. D., Stockton, P., Kaltman, S., & Green, B. L. (2006). Peleikis, D. E., Mykletun, A., & Dahl, A. A. (2005). Current
Disorders of extreme stress (DESNOS) symptoms are asso- mental health in women with childhood sexual abuse who
ciated with type and severity of interpersonal trauma exposure had outpatient psychotherapy. European Psychiatry, 20, 260
in a sample of healthy young women. Journal of Interpersonal 267.
Violence, 21, 13991416. Powers, M. B., Halpern, J. M., Ferenschak, M. P., Gillihan, S. J., &
Harned, M. S., Jackson, S. C., Comtois, K. A., & Linehan, M. M. Foa, E. B. (2010). A meta-analytic review of prolonged
(2010). Dialectical behavior therapy as a precursor to PTSD exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology
treatment for suicidal and/or self-injuring women with border- Review, 30, 635641.
line personality disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, Price, J. L., Hilsenroth, M. J., Petretic-Jackson, P. A., & Bonge, D.
421429. (2001). A review of individual psychotherapy outcomes for
Herman, J. L. (1992). Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Clinical Psychology
prolonged and repeated trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5, Review, 21, 10951121.
377391. Resick, P. A., Galovski, T. E., O’Brien Uhlmansiek, M., Scher,
Johnson, D. M., Zlotnick, C., & Peres, S. (2011). Cognitive C. D., Clum, G. A., & Young-Xu, Y. (2008). A randomized
behavioral treatment of PTSD in residents of battered women’s clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing
shelters: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 542551. interpersonal violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Kessler, M. R., White, M. B., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Group Psychology, 76, 243258.
treatments for women sexually abused as children: A review of Resick, P. A., Nishith, P., Weaver, T. L., Astin, M. C., & Feuer,
the literature and recommendations for future outcome C. A. (2002). A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy
research. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 10451061. with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the
Krakow, B., Hollifield, M., Johnston, L., Koss, M., Schrader, R.,
treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female
Warner, T. D., et al. (2001). Imagery rehearsal therapy for
rape victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70,
chronic nightmares in sexual assault survivors with posttrau-
867879.
matic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA,
Scheck, M. M., Schaeffer, J. A., & Gillette, C. (1998). Brief
286, 537545.
psychological intervention with traumatized young women:
Krupnick, J. L., Green, B. L., Stockton, P., Miranda, J., Krause, E.,
The efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing.
& Mete, M. (2008). Group interpersonal psychotherapy for
Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 2544.
low-income women with posttraumatic stress disorder.
Schottenbauer, M. A., Glass, C. R., Arnkoff, D. B., Tendick, V., &
Psychotherapy and Research, 18, 497507.
Gray, S. H. (2008). Nonresponse and drop-out rates in
Kubany, E. S., Hill, E. E., & Owens, J. A. (2003). Cognitive trauma
outcome studies on PTSD: Review and methodological con-
therapy for battered women with PTSD: Preliminary findings.
siderations. Psychiatry, 71, 134168.
Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 8191.
Seidler, G. H., & Wagner, F. E. (2006). Comparing the efficacy of
Kubany, E. S., Hill, E. E., Owens, J. A., Iannce-Spencer, C., McCaig,
EMDR and trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy in
M. A., & Tremayne, K. J. (2004). Cognitive trauma therapy for
battered women with PTSD (CTT-BW). Journal of Consulting the treatment of PTSD: A meta-analytic study. Psychological
and Clinical Psychology, 72, 318. Medicine, 36, 15151522.
Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Sikkema, K. J., Hansen, N. B., Kochman, A., Tarakeshwar, N.,
Schmahl, C., Bremner, J. D., et al. (2010). Emotion modulation Neufeld, S., Meade, C. S., et al. (2007). Outcomes from a group
in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological evidence for a disso- intervention for coping with HIV/AIDS and childhood sexual
ciative subtype. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 640647. abuse: Reductions in traumatic stress. AIDS and Behavior, 11,
Martsolf, D. B., & Draucker, C. B. (2005). Psychotherapy ap- 4960.
proaches for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: An Taylor, J. E., & Harvey, S. T. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of
integrative review of outcomes research. Issues in Mental psychotherapy with adults sexually abused in childhood.
Health Nursing, 26, 801825. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 749767.
+McDonagh, A., Friedman, M., McHugo, G., Ford, J., Sengupta, Thomaes, K., Dorrepaal, E., Draijer, N., De Ruiter, M. B., Elzinga,
A., Mueser, K., et al. (2005). Randomized trial of cognitive- B. M., Sjoerds, Z., et al. (2013). Increased anterior cingulate
behavioral therapy for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in cortex and hippocampus activation in Complex PTSD during
adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of encoding of negative words. Social Cognitive and Affective
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 515524. Neuroscience, 8, 190200.
Morris, S. B. (2007). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest- Thomaes, K., Dorrepaal, E., Draijer, N., De Ruiter, M. B.,
control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11, Van Balkom, A. J., Smit, J. H., et al. (2010). Reduced anterior
364386. cingulate and orbitofrontal volumes in child abuse-related
Mueser, K. T., Rosenberg, S. D., Xie, H., Jankowski, M. K., Bolton, complex PTSD. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71, 16361644.
E. E., Lu, W., et al. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of Van Der Kolk, B. A., Roth, S., Pelcovitz, D., Sunday, S., & Spinazzola,
cognitive-behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disor- J. (2005). Disorders of extreme stress: The empirical foundation
der in severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical of a complex adaptation to trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress,
Psychology, 76, 259271. 18, 389399.
Paivio, S. C., Jarry, J. L., Chagigiorgis, H., Hall, I., & Ralston, M. Van Der Kolk, B. A., Spinazzola, J., Blaustein, M. E., Hopper,
(2010). Efficacy of two versions of emotion-focused therapy for J. W., Hopper, E. K., Korn, D. L., et al. (2007). A randomized
resolving child abuse trauma. Psychotherapy Research, 20, clinical trial of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
353366. (EMDR), fluoxetine, and pill placebo in the treatment of
posttraumatic stress disorder: Treatment effects and long-term women with posttraumatic stress disorder and histories of
maintenance. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 3746. childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10,
Zlotnick, C., Johnson, J., & Najavits, L. M. (2009). Randomized 425436.
controlled pilot study of cognitive-behavioral therapy in a Zlotnick, C., Zakriski, A. L., Shea, M. T., Costello, E., Begin, A.,
sample of incarcerated women with substance use disorder and Pearlstein, T., et al. (1996). The long-term sequelae of sexual
PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 40, 325336. abuse: Support for a complex posttraumatic stress disorder.
+Zlotnick, C., Shea, T. M., Rosen, K., Simpson, E., Mulrenin, K., Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 195205.
Begin, A., et al. (1997). An affect-management group for
18
(page number not for citation purpose)
Citation: European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014, 5: 23613 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23613