ANOVA

PROF
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .037 2 .018 .043 .958
Within Groups 15.804 37 .427

Total 15.840 39

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: PROF
95% 95%
Confidence Confidence
(I) Highest (J) Highest Mean Sig. Interval Interval
Education Education Difference Lower Bound Upper Bound
Attainment Attainment (I-J) Std. Error
LSD High College -.02596 .24319 .916 -.5187 .4668
School Master .07500 .38665 .847 -.7084 .8584
College High School .02596 .24319 .916 -.4668 .5187
Master .10096 .35101 .775 -.6103 .8122
Master High School -.07500 .38665 .847 -.8584 .7084
College -.10096 .35101 .775 -.8122 .6103
Game High College -.02596 .18482 .989 -.4839 .4319
s- School Master .07500 .50215 .988 -1.8607 2.0107
Howel College High School .02596 .18482 .989 -.4319 .4839
l
Master .10096 .50335 .978 -1.8281 2.0300
Master High School -.07500 .50215 .988 -2.0107 1.8607
College -.10096 .50335 .978 -2.0300 1.8281

A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the effect of (ages) on the response of

respondents with regards to the use of Facebook for online recruitment in terms of the profile.

A one-way ANOVA revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in mean

response in terms of profile between at least two groups (F(2,37) = [0.43], p = 0.958).

(If the p-value of an ANOVA is less than .05, then we reject the null hypothesis that each group

mean is equal.