Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15.0 PP 217 226 Index
15.0 PP 217 226 Index
15.0 PP 217 226 Index
217
conformity, 7, 29, 30, 38, 52, 82, 169; shame reintegratively, 88; internal
pressures, in Japan, 158; stake in, 31 compliance systems, 135; phar-
confrontation, 139, 168 maceuticals, 136; rational conception,
conscience, 2, 3, 10, 35, 36, 37, 52, 57, 141
59, 7 0 - 5 , 8 2 , 1 0 2 , 1 3 2 , 1 3 3 , 1 3 9 , 1 4 1 , corporatization of the professions, 154
143, 144, 147, 149, 151, 178 corruption, 148
conscience building, 74, 75, 78, 81, 150, Costa Rica, 84
182 courts of law, 2, 7, 39, 82, 87, 96; records
consensus, 3, 4, 15, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 96, of delinquency, 122; people's courts,
1 0 9 , 1 3 7 , 1 3 9 , 184-5 180
conservative law and order policies, 156 Cressey, D.R. (1953), 13, 98, 127;
consumer activism, 143 (1960), 26, 37; (1978), 128; (1980),
consumer product safety, 142-3 148
consumer protection laws, 40 crime: and inequality, 96; and severity of
controls: loosening, 42; repressive, 10 punishment, 69; biological causes of,
control techinques, 73 37; trend, 4 9 - 5 0
control theory, 4, 5, 13, 16, 27, 2 8 - 3 1 , 30, criminology: American, 5; as U S export
36, 38, 42, 43, 48, 51, 52, 90, 105; and industry, 6; classical, 155; empirical,
interdependency, 15; consensus- 43, 44; general theory, 1; liberal-
based, 43; master status, 18, 101 permissive, 6, 7; 'neo-classical', 5, 7;
conviction, 131; false (of children within positivist, 7-8; professionalization of,
family), 160; of the innocent, 158 5-8; relation to crime rates, 5; tradi-
corporal punishment, 59; and schools, 93 tional, 45; utilitarian, 6, 8
corporate compliance, 135; internal, 151 Crow Indians, 5 8 - 9
corporate conduct, 185 Cuba, 58
corporate controls, 149 cultural diversity, 94
corporate convictions, 143 cultural goals, 31-2
corporate crime, 30, 54, 83, 141, 145; cultural heterogeneity, 96,153
and publicity, 125-7, 150; control, cultural homogeneity, 9 4 - 6 (in Japan);
140-51, (and communitarianism), 62
139; in pharmaceutical industry, 137; cultural transformation, 116
punishment, 143 culture: adolescent, 91, 176; non-violent
corporate culture, 139, 146, 147, 150, (Japan), 62; of resistance, 80; patriar-
154, 155, chal, 92
corporate deterrence, 143 curriculum of crimes, 77-9, 104
corporate disciplinary practices, 139
corporate ethics, 143, 145, 146, 163 Dahrendorf, R. (1985), 61, 185-6
corporate executives, 144, 152 defamation laws, rationalization, 143
corporate image advertising, 126 degradation ceremonies, see ceremonies
corporate loyalty (Switzerland), 136 delinquency, 6, 8, 17, 19, 21-9, 32, 33,
corporate ombudsman. 146 36, 39, 42, 52, 54, 67, 72, 80, 95, 119,
corporate reform, 127, 163 122, 128, 139, 160, 165, 166, 167, 174;
corporate responses to non-compliance female, 92; juvenile, 13, 25, 29, 30, 32,
(Japan), 139 55, 133; male, 45; reduction policy,
corporate self-regulation, 133-4 175; self-report studies, 49
corporate shaming, 144 denunciation, 73,86, 181; see also
corporate social responsibilty, 144-5 shaming
corporate subcultures, criminogenic, 129 dependency, 93
corporations, 40, 60, 63, 136; and illegal deterrence, 6, 55, 68, 69, 70-5, 81, 100,
practices, 146; and repentant role, 120, 122, 141, 143, 150, 177-9; model,
164; and safety regulation, 133; and 152;theory, 11
social control, 133; as integrated mor- developmental psychology, 29, 57, 109—
al communities, 145; capacity to 10, 139
rebellion, symbolic, 176 rewards, 16, 27, 36, 37, 41, 43, 52, 59, 72,
reciprocity obligations, 127 73
reclamation of criminals, 117 rights and duties, 185; in Japan, 158-61
reconciliation, 68, 140, 182 role models, 32, 35, 74, 103, 126, 166
regulation, 33, 131, 151, 154; adversa- Rome, republican, 58
rial, 33, 129, 130; cooperative regula- Rosett, A. and Cressy, D.R. (1976), 180-
tory styles, 33; of mine safety (Austra- 1
lia), 136 Rowe, A.R. and Tittle, C.R. (1977), 46,
regulatory agencies, 80, 111-12, 129, 91
133, 134, 136, 148, 152, 163, 170-1; rule of law, 8
Japan,137
regulatory cultures, cooperative, 33, 133 saftey regulation, 133-4
regulatory laws, 140 sanctions, 55, 58, 69, 70, 81, 91, 170, 171,
rehabilitation, 6, 7, 20, 68, 73, 115, 117, 180
152, 162-3, 173, 180; and criminal Sandakan (Borneo), 157
justice policies, 116; Japan, 64 satellite workmen's towns, 115
reinforcement, 26, 35, 37, 51, 52; see also Saudi Arabia, 84
learning theory scapegoating, 155
reintegration, 76, 85, 126, 145, 155, 162; Scarman Report (Britain), 183
and communitarianism, 87-9; and schooling, schools, 90, 175, 176; see also
families, 74; by confrontation, 89 education
reintegrative shaming: and communitar- Schur, E.M. (1973), 8, 16
ianism, 147; and corporations, 88; and Schwartz, R.D. and Orleans, S. (1967),
deterrent effects, 75; and formal 70
punishment, 150; and gender, 74; and secondary deviance, 16, 3 0 , 4 2 , 43, 107;
inclusionary approach, 155; and mor- see also deviance, labeling
al educative effects, 75; and social secularization of society, 153
bonding, 30; and state intervention, segregation, in schools, 33
150; as labeling, 20; attachment to self-correction, capacity of individuals in
family, 30; defined, 55, 100-1; deter- Japan,65
rent effect of, 120; emphasis on act of, self-derogation, 75
101; Japan, 61-5; link between self-esteem, 102
theories, 5, 16, 30, 5 2 - 3 , 170; policy self-image, 22, 54
implications, 150, 152; purpose of self-incrimination, 41
theory, 44; stigmatization, 101; sym- self-regulation, 133-5, 143, 151, 154,
bolic advantages, 156; test of theory, 170; see also internal control
108-23 self-reintegration, 68
Reiss, A J . (1951), 27, 47 shame: and punishment uncoupled, 5 9 -
rejection, 25, 26, 33, 39, 59, 67, 68; re- 1; and reintegration, 162; and the col-
jecting rejectors, 55, 83, 128 lectivity (Japan), 63; symbolic, 114
religion, see church shame-based control strategy, 150
remorse, 57 shame-based criminal justice, 181
repentance, 57, 74, 7 5 , 8 1 - 3 , 181; in shame-based punishment (of white col-
Japan, 63 lar crime), 139
repentant role, 140, 162-5 shame-based state punishment, 151
reprimands, verbal, 167 shaming: and church congregation, 87;
reputation, 3 0 , 6 9 , 7 6 , 8 9 , 117, 176 and civil disobedience, 11 ; and com-
resentment, 22 munitarianism, 14-15, 76, 86-7; and
residential mobility, 15,86, 4 7 - 8 , 101, corporate crime, 55, 126, 144, 163;
105,106,119,138,153 and disintegration of social bonds,
respectability, loss of, 18 167; and family, 56, 7 2 , 8 7 , 1 6 7 ; and
retributivism, 7, 115, 116, 117, 152, 181 guilt induction, 77; and injustice, 1 1 -
12, 157-62; and integration of new