Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wearable Sensor For Monitoring Joint Kinematics: Bachelor of Technology
Wearable Sensor For Monitoring Joint Kinematics: Bachelor of Technology
kinematics
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
by
We hereby declare that the work reported in the project titled “Wearable sensor
for monitoring joint kinematics” submitted by Siddharth Anand Srivastav
(19095092), Kushagra Yadav (19095058), BVV Pavan Kalyan (19095024)
for the partial fulfillment of B.Tech degree at the Department of Electronics Engineer-
ing, Indian Institute of Technology BHU, Varanasi, is record of my work carried out
under the supervision of Dr. M. Thotappan. I further declare that the work reported
in this project has not been submitted and will not be submitted, either in part or
in full, for the award of any other degree in this institute or any other institute or
university.
2
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BHU, VARANASI
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATE BY CANDIDATE
This is to certify that the work incorporated in the project report entitled âWearable
sensor for monitoring joint kinematicsâ is a record of work carried out by Siddharth
Anand Srivastav (19095092),Kushagra Yadav(19095058), BVV Pavan Kalyan(19095024),
under my guidance and supervision for the award of B.Tech in Electronics Engineering
in Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi.
3
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BHU, VARANASI
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATE BY SUPERVISOR
It is certified that project entitled Wearable sensor for monitoring joint kine-
matics was carried under my supervision for partial fulfillment of B.Tech degree in
Electronics Engineering. It is further certified that the above candidate has car-
ried out the project work under my guidance during the academic session 2022-2023
at the Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology BHU,
Varanasi.
Dr. M. Thotappan
Department of Electronics Engineering
IIT BHU- 221005
4
Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 Operating Principle 4
3 Design 7
6 Conclusion 18
1
Chapter 1
Introduction
2
Unfortunately, these technologies are not portable, implying that
they cannot capture elbow kinematics in the individualâs daily environ-
ment. Wearable joint monitoring sensors have recently been proposed,
however they raise concerns as to their obtrusiveness and maximum
number of flexions they can withstand. Therefore, there is a large
discrepancy between the capabilities of current technologies versus the
capabilities required in order to efficiently and effectively monitor elbow
joint kinematics in real-time and while the patient is performing daily
tasks (e.g., exercising, running, or simply walking or sitting).
3
Chapter 2
Operating Principle
Two mutually coupled coils (transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx)) of un-
equal radii are placed symmetrically across the elbow joint, as shown
in Fig. 1. When the joint flexes (i.e., bending of the limbs about the
joint, with the center of rotation marked as C in Fig. 1), the Tx and
Rx coils get misaligned with respect to each other. This changes the
transmission coefficient (|S21 |) between the two coils, which in turn can
be used to monitor joint flexion.
In this study, our ultimate aim is to monitor flexion angle (θf ), which is
defined as the angle formed between the axes of two limbs at the center
of rotation (C) per Fig. 1. It is important to note that coils have to
be, preferably, placed symmetrically across the joint to obtain a consis-
tently increasing trend of |S21 | with increasing θf , In fact, asymmetric
placement can also be used to monitor joint flexion; however, beyond
a certain limit, the increasing trend can flip after a particular flexion
angle and can cause ambiguity in measurement.
4
Fig. 1: Simulation set-up depicting wearable TC loop sensor upon a
cylindrical limb that is straight and bent at flexion angle θf
5
small loops (ESLAs) operating at 34 MHz provide optimal performance
in terms of: 1) received power levels; 2) resolution (smallest detectable
angle); and 3) robustness to changes in tissue properties.
6
Chapter 3
Design
SENSING INTERFACE
The sensing interface consists of two coils serving as a transmitter and
receiver located at either end of the wearable sleeve. A low-power RF
signal is fed into the transmitter that generates a magnetic field, and
the flux captured at the receiver generates a voltage on the receiver
coil. The ISM band of 433 MHz was selected in order to avoid EM
interference with other wireless transmissions and to ensure good cou-
pling between the coils as attributed to its inherent long wavelength.
Next, an experimental prototype can be devised as shown in Fig.
7
WIRELESS INTERFACE
POWER INTERFACE
8
electrochemical fabrics can be designed in order to serve as the power
supply of the wearable sensor. The designed electrochemical fabrics
must consist of solid silver and zinc metals deposited onto a flexible,
adhered onto the fabric with a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binding
solution. Once the electrochemical fabric was placed in a conducting
fluid (sweat, saline solution, etc.), the free ions in the conducting fluid
induced a charge across the metal deposits on the fabric. Furthermore,
conducting E-threads can be used to wire several metal deposits to-
gether: providing scalable voltage from a flexible power supply that
could be used to power the wearable joint monitoring sensor. Cur-
rently, research is still being conducted to fully integrate the designed
electrochemical fabric batteries with the wearable sensor.
9
Chapter 4
10
angle at the resonance frequency, as obtained by simulation.
11
Notably, there is a one-to-one correlation between |S21 | and θf , con-
firming the feasibility of monitoring joint flexion via the proposed ap-
proach.
12
Chapter 5
13
the coils where they behave as loop antennas, while 230 MHz corre-
sponds to an example frequency in the combined mode of operation.
14
B. Effect on Flexion Angle Resolution
As would be expected, high angular resolution is desired for the de-
signed system, implying that the range of |S21 | values corresponding to
the extreme 0◦ and 130◦ flexion angles should be as large as possible.
To better understand how this parameter is affected by the operating
frequency, Fig. below plots the aforementioned |S21 | range (i.e., |S21 | at
|S21 | = 0◦ subtracted from |S21 | at |S21 | = 130◦ ) for operating frequen-
cies in the inductive and combined mode. As seen, lower frequencies (in
the inductive or combined mode) are preferred so as to enable higher
15
angular resolution.
The reason is that coils are inductively coupled via magnetic fields
and are not radiating. Since human tissue has a relative permeability
of µr∼1, magnetic coupling is not affected by the presence or absence
of tissue.
16
ation deep in the inductive mode is preferred. On the other hand, for
reduced power requirements on the transmit side, higher frequencies in
the inductive mode or even the combined mode are preferred. With this
trade-off in mind, we herewith select the 34 MHz operating frequency.
17
Chapter 6
Conclusion
18
IMUs or optical cameras. Even more importantly, the reported ap-
proach is extremely robust to changes in human tissue dielectric prop-
erties as verified via simulations in canonical models, and brings forward
multiple degrees of freedom to optimize the design, per application re-
quirements.
19
Bibliography
[2] V. Bonnet , ”Monitoring of hip and knee joint angles using a single
inertial measurement unit during lower limb rehabilitation”
20