  

 About Categories  Tools  How-To Guides Privacy Policy 

Home  Short-Circuit Studies  Fault Level Calculation Using The MVA Method

Fault Level Calculation Using The MVA

Method
 Vladimir Kristof  Short-Circuit Studies
Accelerate your
growth with
AWS Cloud
Learn more ›

Top Posts & Pages

Vector Group of Transformer

Dyn1|Dyn11|Ynd1|Ynd11
Basic Transformer Differential
Protection Calculation
Table of Contents  [hide]
kAIC Rating of Circuit Breakers |
Calculation in Low Voltage
Introduction System
Numerical-Graphical Methods

Numerical Methods

The MVA method

Calculation of MVA level of each element of the electrical network

Comparison to IEC 60909

Conclusion

References

Abstract: There are a lot of methods that can be used for short-circuit current calculation. One method
was previously discussed here and is based on the guidelines presented in IEC 60909. This article deals
with an alternative method for the short-circuit current calculation so-called the MVA method. This
method is simple, quick, and easy to remember. It is also sufficiently accurate for engineers in practice for
basic estimation of fault levels at any point in an electrical network.

尊重您隐私的广告

Keywords: short-circuit current, the MVA method, calculation methods


Introduction
The determination of the level of short-circuit current at any point of an electrical network can be of
interest because of several reasons, e.g.:

design of electrical equipment (from the point of view of thermal and dynamic effects of short-
circuit currents),

control of circuit breakers switching capability,

design of grounding systems and the associated determination of allowable touch-voltage, step-

voltage and transferred voltage (for example in the low-voltage grid during earth-fault in the high-
voltage grid),

design and operation of protection devices,

power system stability verification,

control of voltage ratios during short-circuit and during the start-up of large asynchronous motors,

calculation of induced voltage in telecommunication lines caused by high-voltage or extra-high-

voltage networks,

control of propagation and impact of upper harmonics in power system,

assessment of overvoltage occurrence during line-to-ground faults.

In most practical applications, it is not necessary to know the exact time course of short-circuit currents. A
simplified calculation is often sufficient. There are several methods for the calculation of short-circuit
currents. These can be divided into numerical and numeric-graphical methods. Some of them are listed
below:

Numerical-Graphical Methods

Short-Circuit Curves Method

This method can be used when the task is limited only to finding the short-circuit current at the short-
circuit location. This method is popular because of its simplicity and relative accuracy. The method
consists of the application of special curves that give the value of the a.c. component of the short-circuit
current in any moment of the short-circuit fault,

Nomogram Method

This is a simple graphical method that consists of subtracting the necessary parameters of the electrical
system elements (impedances) from the graphs that were pre-printed on the sheets, separately for each
voltage level. The disadvantage of nomograms is their limited use only for radial networks and the fact
that the method accuracy is directly dependent on the accuracy of reading from the graphs drawn.

Numerical Methods

Ohmic Method

Also known as the Impedance Method. The disadvantage of this method is it is cumbersome if the
system under investigation contains several voltage levels,

Per-unit Method

This method is no better in terms of manual calculations than the previous method since it involves a
number of relationships and bonds associated with reference values, which can often cause errors in the
calculation procedure,
Superposition Method

This method is used very often but requires knowledge of steady-state conditions before the short-circuit
occurrence, which reduces its applicability for general and fast calculations.

Circuit Breaker Short-

Circuit Duty Calculation |
IEC60909
Learn More

Short Circuit Analysis

Using ETAP | IEC 60909
Learn More

The MVA method

The MVA method is an alternative to the earlier mentioned methods. It is based on a mathematical
modification of the ohmic method. The first step of calculation procedure is to convert classic single-line
diagram of the power network to an equivalent MVA diagram. The next steps are based on the
simplification of an equivalent MVA diagram to one final value of MVA at the fault point (this represents
short-circuit MVA at the fault point).

This method has the following simplifications:

magnetizing currents and losses in the transformer core are neglected,

power lines capacitance is neglected,

all transformers have set nominal tap (0),

internal voltage of all sources is equal to 1 (in per unit).

Advantages of this method are the following:

no need to convert impedance from one voltage level to another,

no need to select common MVA base,

no need to consider transformer ratios,

contains simple formulas for calculation (in comparison with other methods),

information about pre-fault steady-state is not required,

fast and easy to remember,

sufficiently accurate,

easy to determine the contribution from each branch to fault point,

can be used for calculation of symmetrical and unsymmetrical faults, voltage drop during motor
start-up, or steady-state.

Let’s consider following a simple 22kV electrical network according to Figure 1 (taken from [3]   and
modified). Let us assume that the industrial power network is connected through the power line V1 and
supplied from the 22 kV external distribution network. For sake of simplicity, we consider only one
synchronous generator, TG, and one synchronous motor, SM1 in the industrial power network. The task is
to find out the value of initial symmetrical three-phase short-circuit current at 6.6 kV busbar. 
 Figure 1. Single Line Diagram of the Industrial Electrical Network

As mentioned earlier, the first step is the calculation of the MVA level of each component and converting
the single line diagram to its equivalent MVA diagram.

Calculation of MVA level of each element of the electrical

network

22kV External distribution network

22kV Power Line (V1)

For overhead power lines, the short-circuit MVA can be calculated directly from the impedance in form
Zv=R+jX, therefore we can write

22/6.6kV Transformer (T1)

An advantage of this method is that the short-circuit voltage of the transformer (percentage value of
reactance) is given directly in relationship with the nominal apparent power of the transformer. The same
is valid for motors and generators as well.

6.6kV Generator (TG)

6.6kV Motor (SM1)

The equivalent MVA diagram is shown in figure 2.

Figure 2. Equivalent MVA Diagram of the Industrial Electrical Network

Now we can reduce the equivalent MVA diagram. For elements connected in series the equivalent value of
initial symmetrical short-circuit power is equal to the sum of inverted MVA values of elements.

For example, the equivalent MVA at branch A (consisting of network feeder, transformer T1 and power line
V1) is
For elements connected in parallel, the final value of initial symmetrical short-circuit power is equal to the
sum of MVA values of elements.

The electrical network equivalent MVA can be obtained from the sum of three parallel branches A, B, and
C.

The graphical representation of industrial power network reduction is shown in figure 3.

Figure 3. MVA Network Reduction

Finally, the initial symmetrical short-circuit current at the fault point can be calculated from the equivalent
network MVA.

Competency-Based
Solutions
Learn how to manage your Competencies
with Expert Curated Competency Toolkit.

HRSG Open

Comparison to IEC 60909

In order to validate the accuracy of the MVA Method, we will calculate the initial symmetrical short-circuit
current at the fault point using the calculation method based on IEC 60909. For simplicity, resistance will
be neglected.

22kV External Distribution Network

22kV Power Line (V1)

22/6.6kV Transformer (T1)

6.6kV Generator (TG)

6.6kV Motor (SM1)

The equivalent short-circuit impedance at the fault point is calculated to be

Calculating the short-circuit MVA,

Finally, the initial symmetrical short-circuit current at the fault point can be calculated from the equivalent
network MVA.

Bonus

If the value of initial symmetrical short-circuit current  is known, the peak short-circuit current can be
determined using

A comparison of the results between the two methods is shown in the following table. The results based
on IEC 60909 calculation method will be used as a reference.

Table 1. Comparison of Short-circuit Values

It can be seen that the MVA method gives results with sufficient accuracy.

Conclusion
The methods calculation short-circuit currents vary in complexity and the amount of effort put into. The
MVA method is known to be simple, quick, and easy, and is sufficiently accurate for engineers in practice
for basic estimation of fault levels at any point in an electrical network.
References
[1] Jaffari, H.: Fault Current Calculation. Power System Review: Module 6. Northeast Public Power
Association, 2013.

[2] Lee Wai, M., Pang, J.M.: Electrical Fault Level Calculations Using the MVA Method. Dostupné na
internete: < http://www.jmpangseah.com>

[3] Kakilli, A.: System Analysis with the MVA Method for Symmetrical Three-Phase Faults. TEM Journal, vol2
no1, 2013.

[4] Máslo, K., Novák, J., Doležal, J.: Analysis of short-circuit currents. In Symposium Elektroenergetika. Stará
Lesná, Slovakia, 2001.

[5] Pauza, J.: Short-circuits in electrical networks. SNTL Prague, Czech Republic, 1970.

[6] Máslo, K. et al.: Control and stability of power system. ČEPS and Energy managers’ association. Prague,
Czech Republic, 2013. ISBN 978-80-260-4461-1

[7] STN IEC 60909 – 0: Short-circuit currents in three-phase a.c. systems. Part 0: Calculation of currents.
Valid from 1.10.2016.

 Prev Next 

Related Articles

ANSI Short-Circuit Study Short-Circuit Studies

Short-Circuit Studies
Practical Evaluation of a Power
Short-Circuit Currents | 3-Phase VS Fuse Interrupting Capacity
1-Phase
15 thoughts on “Fault Level Calculation Using The MVA Method”

Mohammad Fucking Allah says:

June 29, 2022 at 9:12 AM

Thank you.

Loading...

Reply

Louie L. Ruivivar says:

July 20, 2021 at 9:09 PM

In getting the Zs of 22kV External Distribution Network by the IEC 60909 Method, I might have
missed where we get the constant C and the value assigned to it as 1.1. Please advise.

Loading...

Reply

PAC Basics says:

August 29, 2021 at 4:15 PM

Hi Louie,

I hope this is not too late but to answer your question, the constant C is taken from the
voltage factors recommended in the IEC 60909. This is in order to account for the system
prefault conditions. You can refer to the table of voltage factors from this link.

Kind Regards,
PAC Basics Team

Loading...

Reply

Athanassios Vassiliadis says:

January 30, 2021 at 9:50 PM

An excellent and very helpful article.Missing are only the calculations to detemine the value of
the total impedance Zfault=0,353 Ω,which I think would be very useful.Kindly advise
Many thanks

Loading...

Reply

PAC Basics says:

February 15, 2021 at 9:25 AM

Hi Athan,

Thank you for your interest in the topic. Actually, the total impedance, Zfault, is the equivalent
impedance i.e. series/parallel combination of the impedances upstream. So in this case, it is
the series combination of the source, line, transformer impedances, this, in parallel with the
generator and motor impedances.

Loading...
 Reply

Athanassios Vassiliadis says:

February 20, 2021 at 10:25 PM

Dear Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply
Regards

Loading...

Reply

Dr. Abbas says:

January 24, 2021 at 11:34 PM

Thank you
Nice article

Loading...

Reply

PAC Basics says:

February 15, 2021 at 9:27 AM

You’re welcome!

Loading...

Reply

Elvin says:
April 19, 2020 at 12:13 AM

Informative article re calculating fault currents using MVA method. Thanks

Loading...

Reply

Juls says:
April 13, 2020 at 9:53 PM

straight forward. clear and easy to follow.

thanks much.

Loading...

Reply

Anonymous says:
April 13, 2020 at 8:58 PM

Informative article. Thanks

Loading...
 Reply

Anonymous says:
April 4, 2020 at 8:16 PM

Nice article. Thank you

Loading...

Reply

Xabin says:
April 4, 2020 at 3:36 PM

Nice article and very informative.

Loading...

Reply

‫ سالم‬l‫ محمود‬says:
January 3, 2021 at 6:56 PM

Great and useful article,, thank you.

Loading...

Reply

PAC Basics says:

January 9, 2021 at 9:59 AM

You’re welcome!

Loading...

Reply

Tell us what you think

Enter your comment here...

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive

notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Subscribe

Copyright © All rights reserved. Cream Magazine by Themebeez