2 Eng PT 2

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Chel Diokno Art Tugade Explanation

Fluency / Chel Diokno answers smoothly and


efficiently without any pauses and
stutter of words, unlike Art
Tugade. The speed was enough to
make the listeners comprehend the
information stated. In terms of
prosody, he expressed the thought
with hand gestures.
Cohesion / He applied correct cohesive
devices such as "but" to connect
the information of his message.
Therefore, the ideas presented
made sense since it was in a logical
and organized order compared to
the answers of Art Tugade.
Correctness / He executed the grammar well.
The words used were formal and
appropriate to each question.
Pronunciation was clear without any
struggles, making the listener
understand his message better.
Tone / Chel Diokno lacked interest in his
answers, whereas the questions
corresponded to Art Tugade's
tone. He answered in a jolly manner
when Tony asked for something
happy and was upset when it was
sad. All of this while maintaining to
be formal.
Rayl Grace Bedayos 10-Rigel

You might also like