ZNS H2S Photocat H2

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Hazardous Materials


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhazmat

Photocatalytic degradation of H2 S aqueous media using sulfide


nanostructured solid-solution solar-energy-materials to produce
hydrogen fuel
Mohsen Lashgari a,b,∗ , Majid Ghanimati a
a
Department of Chemistry, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran
b
Center for Research in Climate Change and Global Warming: Hydrogen and Solar Division, Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran

h i g h l i g h t s

• Synthesis of alloy photocatalyst nanoparticles through a facile hydrothermal route.


• Simultaneous photo-degradation of H2 S solutions and production of hydrogen fuel.
• HS− plays a crucial role in photo-redox processes, serves as e/h scavenger species.
• Mechanism of pH influence on the photocatalyst performance in H2 S media.

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: H2 S is a corrosive, flammable and noxious gas, which can be neutralized by dissolving in alkaline media
Received 20 May 2017 and employed as H2 -source by utilizing inside semiconductor-assisted/photochemical reactors. Herein,
Received in revised form 30 October 2017 through a facile hydrothermal route, a ternary nanostructured solid-solution of iron, zinc and sulfur was
Accepted 31 October 2017
synthesized in the absence and presence of Ag-dopant, and applied as efficient photocatalyst of hydrogen
Available online 6 November 2017
fuel production from H2 S media. The effect of pH on the photocatalyst performance was scrutinized and
the maximum activity was attained at pH = 11, where HS− concentration is high. BET, diffuse reflectance
Keywords:
and photoluminescence studies indicated that the ternary solid-solution photocatalyst, in comparison to
H2 S photocatalytic degradation
pH effect
its solid-solvent (ZnS), has a greater surface area, stronger photon absorption and less charge recombina-
Alloy semiconductor nanoparticles tion, which justify its superiority. Moreover, the effect of silver-dopant on the photocatalyst performance
Hydrogen solar fuel was examined. The investigations revealed that although silver could boost the absorption of photons
Water photosplitting and increase the surface area, it could not appreciably enhance the photocatalyst performance due to its
weak influence on retarding the charge-recombination process. Finally, the phenomenon was discussed
in detail from mechanistic viewpoint.
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction 3
H2 S + O2 → SO2 + H2 O (2)
2
Hydrogen sulfide (H2 S) is a toxic, corrosive (Eq. (1)) and
H+ H+
flammable (Eq. (2)) gas [1–5]; its emission to the environment is S2− ↔HS− ↔H2 S (3)
harmful and could be lethal at concentrations above 500 ppm [6].
This hazardous material has the stench of rotten eggs, and can be This noxious gas is biologically generated via microbial activities
easily produced by acidification of sulfide media (Eq. (3)) [7,8]. of sulfur reducing bacteria (SRB), by degradation of sulfur-
containing compounds in sewage environments [9]. Hydrogen
sulfide is also recognized as by-product of sour gas and oil,
H2 S + Fe → FeS + H2 (1)
which is the main cause of severe corrosion and hydrogen
damage/embrittlement in petroleum and gas industries [10,11].
Therefore, the deactivation of this noxious/devastating gas is not
∗ Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Institute for Advanced Stud- only important from environmental but also crucial from corro-
ies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran. sion as well as industrial standpoints. Beside these aspects, the
E-mail address: Lashgari@iasbs.ac.ir (M. Lashgari). elimination of H2 S is highly interesting from energy/fuel per-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.062
0304-3894/© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17 11

spective; here, by photocatalytic decomposition of H2 S solutions, a handmade stainless steel (SS 316) autoclave reactor with an inter-
without needing external hole-scavenger additives, hydrogen fuel nal vessel made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and heated for
can be effectually produced [12,13] upon appropriate semicon- 12 h at 433 K. After cooling the reactor, the obtained precipitate
ductor photocatalyst/solar-energy materials [14]. The method of was decanted and washed several times with distilled water and
photocatalytic utilization of H2 S media is deemed to be economi- finally was dried overnight at 343 K. The product was a rust color
cal and efficient [15–17]. This is because, a vast amount of H2 S gas IZS powder. For the synthesis of zinc sulfide (ZS; a milky-white
is annually generated during various industrial/natural processes, color photocatalyst material), the same procedure was applied in
including hydrodesulfurization of crude oil, acid leaching of sul- the absence of iron precursor. In the case of silver-doped photo-
fide ores, sewage treatment, geothermal activities, etc. [18–20]. catalyst (IZSS), we repeated the synthesis of IZS in the presence of
Therefore, using low-cost, efficient, solar-energy materials, this Ag+ cation (0.008 M), by adding 0.067 gr of AgNO3 (Merck; 99.8%)
hazardous feed could be economically/effectually converted into to the reaction medium (the product color was burnt umber).
hydrogen clean fuel.
Concerning photocatalytic production of hydrogen fuel, it is
worth noting that zinc sulfide (ZnS) is a non-toxic, photostable,
2.2. Photocatalyst characterization
semiconductor material with a proper (high) conduction-band
energy-level [21,22]; this is a reason why ZnS is usually selected
For the characterization of the solar-energy-materials syn-
as a good photocatalyst base for photochemical reduction of pro-
thesized here, we employed different techniques including
tons and production of hydrogen solar fuel [23,24]. This compound
X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),
(Eg ∼ 3.5 eV [25]) however is only active in the UV region–which
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy
forms a small portion of sunlight (∼5% [26]). To absorb photons in
(SEM), diffuse reflectance (DR) spectroscopy, and photolumines-
the visible region (∼43% of sunlight [26]), therefore, it is crucial to
cence (PL) spectroscopy. XRD patterns of the materials were
decrease the bandgap of the semiconductor/solar-energy material
determined using a Philips X’Pert Pro X-ray powder diffractome-
without noticeable lowering its conduction-band energy-level [27].
ter (␭ = 1.54 Å; Cu K␣ beam). XPS spectra were recorded via an
To this end, one of the effective methods is the application of dopant
8025-BesTec (Germany) spectrometer with monochromatic Al
to synthesize a solid solution or alloy semiconductor material
K␣ radiation source (1486.6 eV). Peak deconvolution was per-
[24,27]. For ZnS semiconductor, the use of cadmium [28], indium
formed using MATLAB software [33]. N2 adsorption-desorption
[29], and copper [30] alloying components has been reported in the
(BET isotherm) and porosimetry experiments were conducted
literature; albeit the toxicity as well as the abundancy of dopants
at 77 K on a BELSORB-max (BEL, Japan) instrument. The field
should also be taken into account.
emission SEM images of the solar-energy-materials were taken
In this paper, we focused on Fe dopant and synthesized the
(III) (II) by a ZEISS SIGMA VP electron microscope. DR spectra were
ternary Fe0.2 Zn0.7 S solid-solution (IZS) through a facile hydrother-
recorded by applying a Varian Cary 5 UV–vis-NIR spectrometer
mal route [24], and applied it for the first time as an effective
(BaSO4 was used as the blank). To record PL spectra of the solar-
photocatalyst of hydrogen fuel production from H2 S aqueous
(III) (II)
energy-materials, we utilized a fluorescence Avantes spectrometer
media. We synthesized Fe0.2 Zn0.7 S because this composition (AvaSpec-ULS2048 × 64 TEC) with excitation wavelength 350 nm.
exhibited the greatest extent of photon absorption [31]. Concern-
ing the selection of iron dopant, it is also worth noting that Fe is an
eco-friendly abundant element which can combine with sulfur and
produce FeS. This compound is relatively stable (Ksp = 8 × 10−19 ) 2.3. Photoreactor setup, hydrogen measurement, and
and being industrially applied as a high temperature (550–900 ◦ C) photocatalyst performance
catalyst of H2 S decomposition to produce hydrogen gas [32]:
Similar to our previous report [14], the hydrogen evolution

FeS + H2 S→FeS2 + H2 (4) experiments were carried out in a double-walled 50 ml cylindrical
glass vessel equipped with a T-controlling bath circulator (exposed
In the present work, instead of oxide semiconductor materials, surface area: 10 cm2 and T = 298 K). During the tests, the photo-
we employed sulfide one. The choice was based on the ability of catalyst powder (0.2 g in 50 ml solution [27]) was continuously
sulfide materials to form a chemical bond with proton species (Eq. dispersed using a magnetic stirrer, and the reactor was illumi-
(3)), which in turn could result in the facilitation of electron trans- nated by a 500-W power-tunable Xe-lamp (Ushio Xenon Short
port from the photoexcited semiconductor solar-energy-material Arc Lamp). We applied xenon light source, because its spectrum
to proton species on the photocatalyst surface [14]. is close to that of Sun and the intensity of incident photons was
The effect of pH of medium on the photocatalyst performance set at 100 mW/cm2 , similar to that coming directly from the Sun
was another interesting issue, which was scrutinized in this article. to the Earth’s surface under non-cloudy/standard conditions [24].
Due to the ability of silver atoms to exhibit surface Plasmon reso- The quantity of photogenerated gas was measured through a vol-
nance and enhance the photocatalyst performance [27,4], we also umetric method, described in detail elsewhere [27]. The reaction
examined the effect of silver on the photocatalyst activity. medium was an H2 S saturated solution (containing ∼16 g/L of sul-
fide [34,16]), prepared by conducting H2 S gas into a 0.5 M NaOH
2. Experimental solution. Due to safety issues, H2 S gas was not purchased but pro-
vided in the laboratory through the reaction between FeS and HCl
2.1. Synthesis of solid-solution photocatalyst/solar-energy feed, using a Kipp generator setup [35]. Alternatively, the reaction
materials medium (H2 S solution) can be directly prepared by acidifying a
sodium sulfide solution (0.5 M Na2 S, the optimum concentration
(III) (II)
The ternary solid-solution photocatalyst, viz. Fe0.2 Zn0.7 S (IZS) of sulfide reported in literature [34]; Eq. (3)). To prohibit the dis-
was synthesized through a hydrothermal procedure using appro- charge of un-reacted H2 S into the atmosphere, the excess gas was
priate molar ratio of the precursor ions [24]; here, we first prepared de-neutralized by passing the outflow through a sodium hydroxide
a 50 ml aqueous solution containing 0.36 M zinc acetate (Fluka; solution (H2 S + 2NaOH → Na2 S + 2H2 O). To adjust the pH at con-
98%), 0.08 M iron (III) nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich; 99.98%) and 0.4 M sidered values, appropriate quantities of HCl were added to the
thioacetamide (Scharlau; 98%). The solution was then poured into medium.
12 M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17

Table 3
Surface area and porosimetry data of the semiconductor photocatalysts obtained
from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (BET measurements).

Semiconductor Surface area (m2 g−1 ) Mean pore diameter (nm)

ZS 12.1 7.2
IZS 20.9 22.0
IZSS 60.8 10.1

be present in both metallic and cationic forms (the peaks at 373.7


and 374.2 eV correspond to Ag+ and Ag◦ , respectively [39,40]). The
presence of Ag+ was already expectable, because we used silver
(I) nitrate precursor in the synthesis of photocatalyst material (see
Experimental). The production of metallic silver is also rationalized
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the ternary solid-solution photocatalyst to thioacetamide, serving not only as a sulfur source but as a weak
(solar-energy-material) in the absence (IZS) and presence (IZSS) of Ag dopant (the
reducing agent, which partially converts silver cations to metallic
solvent is zinc sulfide, ZS).
element [24]. Besides XPS evidence, the presence of Ag metal is indi-
rectly verified by the observation of surface plasmon resonance effect
Table 1
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX) data (wt.%) obtained for the solid- in diffuse reflectance spectra of the Ag-doped photocatalyst/solar-
solution photocatalysts. energy material [27,41] (see next section; Fig. 5).
The surface area of photocatalysts was determined using BET
Photocatalyst Fe Ag Zn S
studies (Fig. 2) and the results are summarized in Table 3. The
ZS – – 68.4 31.6 observation of a hysteresis loop in BET diagrams indicates that all
IZS 18.3 – 54.2 27.5
IZSS 15.0 6.2 52.1 26.7
photocatalyst materials synthesized here are mesoporous (the size
of pores is in the range of 2–50 nm) [24]. Moreover, data listed in
Table 3 show that the presence of alloying element (dopant/solute)
Table 2 causes an increase in the surface area of the resulting photocatalyst
XPS results of the solid-solution photocatalyst (containing all atoms).
material.
Element Spectral line Binding energy (eV) Oxidation state References The porous structure of the photocatalyst/solar-energy mate-
Fe 2p1/2 723.4 +3 [31] rials was also confirmed by SEM studies (Figs. 3 and 4). The SEM
2p3/2 710.8 image of ZS (Fig. 3) exhibited a gravel-like nanostructure for this
Zn 2p1/2 1044.1 +2 [36] solar-energy material –which consists of some fine and coarse
2p3/2 1021.2 nanoparticles (Fig. 3b) and their aggregation constructs greater size
S 2p1/2 162.5 −2 [38,39]
microspheres (Fig. 3a). The addition of iron and silver dopants to ZS
2p3/2 161.3
Ag 3d3/2 (373.7a , 374.2b ) 0, +1 [39,40] makes the size of nanoparticles to be more diminutive (see Fig. 4).
3d5/2 ∼368c The spherical shape and porous structure recognized here seem to
a,b
Data are standing for cationic and metallic silver, respectively. be the characteristics of hydrothermal route for the synthesis of
Owing to negligible shift in binding energy of Ag 3d5/2 between Ag+ and Ag◦
c ZnS-based solid-solution materials, which were also observed in
(0.2 eV [40]), as compared with that of Ag 3d3/2 (0.5 eV), the deconvolution was just our previous study [27].
successfully attained for Ag 3d3/2 peak.

3.2. Optical response (DR, PL)


3. Results and discussion
Diffuse reflectance spectra of the photocatalyst/solar-energy
3.1. Synthesis and characterization (XRD, EDS, XPS, BET, SEM) materials synthesized here are plotted in Fig. 5. This figure indi-
cates that ZS absorbs photons only in the ultraviolet (UV) region.
XRD patterns of the ZnS-based solid-solution materials are pre- By adding Fe and Ag dopants (alloying elements) to ZS and syn-
sented in Fig. 1. Here, three intense peaks observed at 2 = 28.8, 47.7 thesizing IZS and IZSS, the absorption of photons is boosted and
and 56.6◦ are the characteristic peaks of zinc sulfide (ZS), indicating extends toward longer wavelengths (visible domain). Concerning
a cubic structure (zinc blende; JCPDS 77-2100) for the synthesized the prerequisites of a good photocatalyst material, it is worth not-
solid-solution materials [24,36]. In these solid-solution materials, ing that besides its ability to absorb a greater number of incident
ZnS has the role of solvent and the addition of solute (Fe/Ag dopant) photons in a broad range of wavelengths, an efficient photocatalyst
has no noticeable effect on shifting the position of the character- should also exhibit a low recombination [14]. Under this condition,
istic peaks mentioned above. The existence of weak peaks around the photogenerated e/h pairs would have a greater opportunity to
24, 36, 41, 50, 54, 62.5, and 64◦ indicate that besides the synthesis participate effectually in the photo-redox reaction, prior to being

of solid-solution material, a negligible amount of impurity (Fe2 S3 annihilated via charge recombination process (eCB + h+ VB
→ null);
and Fe7 S8 [37]) could also be co-synthesized by the present facile here, the less recombination is normally recognized as a decrease
approach. The addition of silver to IZS, because of its low quantity in the PL emission intensity of the photocatalyst material [14].
(the molar ratio of Ag+ to Fe3+ is 1:10), has no definite influence on Based on PL spectra depicted in Fig. 6, a noticeable extinction is
XRD pattern [see Fig. 1; the XRD patterns of IZS and IZSS are quite observed in the PL spectrum of IZS, when Fe-dopant is added to
similar]. ZS photocatalyst material. Thus, a greater photocatalytic activity is
The presence of Ag and Fe dopants in the synthesized solid- anticipated for IZS as compared with ZS. The less recombination of
solution materials was approved by EDS/EDX and XPS studies IZS is attributed to the presence of Fe3+ cations–which act as elec-
(Tables 1 and 2). XPS investigation also revealed that the oxidation tron traps [42], delaying the annihilation (recombination) of the
state of Fe is +3. This result was predictable because in the synthe- transiently photogenerated e/h pairs. Fig. 6 also reveals that the
sis of photocatalyst, we used Fe3+ cations as precursor. Moreover, addition of silver to IZS does not exhibit an appreciable influence
deconvolution of Ag 3d spectrum indicated that Ag in IZSS could on improving the charge separation process (notice, the PL spectra
M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17 13

Fig. 2. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the photocatalysts/solar-energy materials synthesized through facile hydrothermal route.

Fig. 3. SEM images of ZS (zinc sulfide) solar-energy-material taken at two different magnifications (a: the scale bar is 1 ␮m, b: the scale bar is 200 nm).

of IZS and IZSS are almost identical). Therefore, despite the ability of alyst material decreases (∼2.04 eV), but the PL emission is also
Ag to augment the absorption of photons (see Fig. 5), the presence of notably diminished. This explains how IZS can effectively harvest
Ag could not effectively boost the photocatalyst performance [this the incident photons and produce more fuel. In the presence of Ag,
prediction is confirmed by Fig. 7]. although extra photons can be absorbed by IZSS [refer to Fig. 5], no
substantial enhancement on the photocatalyst performance was
achieved. As mentioned beforehand, this behavior is rationalized
3.3. Photocatalysts performance to the weak ability of Ag on improving the charge separation pro-
cess. Since, both IZS and IZSS solar-energy materials displayed a
The ability of photocatalyst/solar-energy materials to produce significant photocatalytic activity, their long-term action was also
hydrogen fuel from H2 S solutions is presented in Fig. 7. This investigated. The diagrams depicted in Fig. 8 approved that both
figure shows that the lowest photocatalytic activity is result- solar-energy materials synthesized here have a good photostability
ing for ZS, having the widest bandgap (∼3.5 eV) as well as the for prolonged application in H2 S media.
greatest PL-emission. By adding Fe-dopant and synthesis of IZS
solid-solution, not only the bandgap of the resulting photocat-
14 M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17

Fig. 4. SEM images of IZS (a) and IZSS (b) solid-solution solar-energy materials.

Fig. 7. The volume of hydrogen gas being photocatalytically produced as a function


of irradiation time (data were recorded every 10 min under atmospheric pressure
at 298 K; the reaction chamber contained 0.2 g photocatalyst/solar-energy material
Fig. 5. Diffuse reflectance (DR) UV–vis spectra of the photocatalyst/solar-energy
(powder) dispersed in a 50-mL H2 S alkaline solution at pH 11).
materials.

     
ance law ( S2− = S2− + HS− + [H2 S]) [46], the concentration

of sulfureous species were calculated at different pHs for a 0.5 M
sodium sulfide solution; the results are illustrated in Fig. 9. Using
this figure, the following points can be deduced:

1. By acidifying the sulfide medium (pH < 9), the concentration


of H2 S increases substantially. Under this situation, if [H2 S]
exceeds the saturation limit (ca. 0.103 M [47]), the excess quan-
tity escapes as H2 S gas. Moreover, it is worth noting that by
bubbling H2 S gas into the alkaline solution (0.5 M NaOH), the
minimal pH that could be practically attained under atmospheric
pressure, is ∼7.3 (to get less pHs, extra pressures or lower tem-
Fig. 6. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the photocatalyst/solar-energy materials.
peratures are required).
2. Under high alkaline conditions (pHs greater than 11), both sul-
3.4. pH effect on the photocatalyst activity and mechanistic fide and bisulfide are simultaneously existing in the reaction
understanding of the phenomenon medium; at slightly lower pHs, between 9–11, however, the pro-
tonated form of sulfide, viz. bisulfide (HS− ) becomes the sole
A glance at the literature indicates a pH-dependence for the dominant species.
amount of H2 gas being photocatalytically evolved from H2 S media
[43–45,34]. To scrutinize the effect of pH on the photocatalyst per-
formance, it is essential to respond these queries: 1- At a given As mentioned above, by decreasing the pH, sulfide anions
pH, which form of H2 S (sulfide, bisulfide, or hydrogen sulfide) is get unstable; in aqueous solutions with moderate alkalinity
dominant? 2- In H2 S solutions, how does the hydrogen photo- (9 ≤ pH ≤ 11), sulfide anions are predominantly transformed to
evolution process take place? 3- What can we declare about the their protonated form (HS− ). Under such a condition, if the sul-
stability of photocatalyst at different pHs? Concerning the first fide semiconductor (SC) is irradiated by photons (h + SC  e + h
query, by using dissociation constant data of H2 S and mass bal- [27]), the photogenerated electrons can be transferred to the proton
M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17 15

By recombination of the H atoms, H2 gas is consequently evolved


[14]:

H + H → H2 ↑ (6)

With consumption of the photogenerated electrons and pro-


duction of hydrogen gas (Eqs. (5) and (6)), to satisfy the charge
neutrality (e− + h+ = 0), the photogenerated holes must also be syn-
chronously used up via an oxidative process [49]. In the present
system, both sulfide and bisulfide (HS− ) anions play the role of hole-
scavenger; they are oxidized to disulfide (S2− 2 ) anions as follows
[50]:

S2− + 2h+ → S

S2− + S → S2−
2 (7)
− − − − − − −−
2S2− + 2h+ → S2−
2

and [43,32,34],

HS− + h+ → HS ·

2HS · → H2 S2 → 2H+ + S2−


2
(8)
− − − − − − − − − − −−
2HS− + 2h+ → 2H+ + S2−
2

 As implicitly pointed above, the concentration of proton


( H+ = 10−pH ) can directly (H+ + e− → H; Eq. (7)) or indirectly (by
Fig. 8. The ability of IZS and IZSS solid-solution photocatalyst/solar-energy materi-
affecting on [HS− ]; Fig. 9) influence on both photo-redox processes
als to evolve hydrogen gas, examined for 3 successive runs (each run lasted 3 h and (Eqs. (5) and (8)), and hence alter the quantity of H2 gas (Fig. 10).
the volume of gas was recorded every 10 min; the pH was 11). Moreover, since HS− plays a pivotal role [51] in photochemical pro-
duction of hydrogen fuel (it participates in both photo-reduction
and −oxidation processes; see Eqs. (5) and (8)), where [HS− ] is high
(9 ≤ pH ≤ 11; Fig. 9), it is predicted H2 gas being more effectively
species already attached to the sulfide anions at the photocatalyst
evolved (see Fig. 10).
surface, and produce H atoms and S2− anions [48,14]:
Concerning the effect of pH on photocatalyst performance, it
should be noted that there are some controversial reports in the lit-
HS−  H+ + S2− erature [44,45,38,51–54]. Some researchers reported that the best
photocatalytic activity is achieved at pH 7.8, whereas the oth-
H+ + e− → H (5) ers witnessed the greatest performance at pH 12.8 [38,54,51].
−−−−−−−−−
Therefore, in addition to these values, extra pHs were also selected
HS− + e− → H + S2− from Fig. 9 and examined in the present study; see Fig. 10. From

Fig. 9. Concentration of sulfide (S2− ), bisulfide (HS− ) and hydrogen sulfide (H2 S) species determined theoretically as a function of pH in a 0.5 M sodium sulfide aqueous
solution.
16 M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17

[2] H. Kimura, Hydrogen sulfide as a neuromodulator, Mol. Neurobiol. 26 (2002)


13–19.
[3] N.P. Dasgupta, J.F. Mack, M.C. Langston, A. Bousetta, F.B. Prinz, Design of an
atomic layer deposition reactor for hydrogen sulfide compatibility, Rev. Sci.
Instrum. 81 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3384349 (044102).
[4] W. Sun, S. Nesic, A mechanistic model of H2 S corrosion of mild steel, Paper No.
07655, Corrosion 2007 (NACE International Conference & Expo 2007); http://
www.corrosioncenter.ohiou.edu/nesic/papers/FullText/conference-91.pdf.
[5] I.A. Gargurevich, Hydrogen sulfide combustion: relevant issues under Claus
furnace conditions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 7706–7729.
[6] R.O. Beauchamp, J.S. Bus, J.A. Popp, C.J. Boreiko, D.A. Andjelkovich, P. Leber, A
critical review of the literature on hydrogen sulfide toxicology, CRC Crit. Rev.
Toxicol. 13 (1984) 25–97, http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408448409029321.
[7] S. Licht, J. Manssen, The second dissociation constant of H2 S, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 134 (1987) 8918–8921, http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.2100595.
[8] M.S. Wiener, B.V. Salas, M. Quintero-Núñez, R. Zlatev, Effect of H2 S on
corrosion in polluted waters: a review, Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 41 (2006)
221–227, http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174327806x132204.
[9] L. Zhang, P.D. Schryver, B.D. Gusseme, W.D. Muynck, N. Boon, W. Verstraete,
Chemical and biological technologies for hydrogen sulfide emission control in
Fig. 10. Volume of hydrogen gas evolved from the H2 S solution at different pHs; sewer systems: a review, Water Res. 4 (2) (2008) 1–12.
data were measured after 90 min operation of the photoreactor containing 0.2 g of [10] Y.J. Li, X.L. Wang, Y.L. Zhang, Corrosion of welded aluminium coated steel in
the ternary solid-solution photocatalyst/solar-energy material. saturated H2 S solution, Br. Corros. J. 28 (1993) 149–152.
[11] C. Rena, D. Liu, Z. Bai, T. Li, Corrosion behavior of oil tube steel in simulant
solution with hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide, Mater. Chem. Phys. 93
comparison of the diagrams of pH 7.8 and pH 12.8, a greater activ- (2005) 305–309.
[12] S.V. Tambwekar, M. Subrahmanyam, Photocatalytic generation of hydrogen
ity (hydrogen evolution) is observed at the second pH (12.8). This from hydrogen sulfide: an energy bargain, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 22 (1997)
observation could be rationalized to the greater stability of metal 959–965.
sulfides in alkaline media [55]. Through a similar argument, we can [13] V. Preethi, S. Kanmani, Photocatalytic hydrogen production, Mater. Sci.
Semicond. Process 16 (2013) 561–575.
justify why a greater activity is achieved at pH 11 as compared with
[14] M. Lashgari, P. Elyas-Haghighi, M. Takeguchi, A highly efficient pn junction
that of pH 10 and 9. The less gas evolution at pH 12.8 in comparison nanocomposite solar-energy-material [nano-photovoltaic] for direct
to that of pH 11 is also rationalized to low concentration of bisulfide conversion of water molecules to hydrogen solar fuel, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol.
Cells 165 (2017) 9–16.
as well as proton at this pH. Furthermore, we should declare that at
[15] R. Priya, S. Kanmani, Batch slurry photocatalytic reactors for the generation of
pHs less than 9, the level of H2 S increases with acidification of the hydrogen from sulfide and sulfite waste streams under solar irradiation, Sol.
medium (see Fig. 9); correspondingly, Fig. 10 demonstrates that by Energy 83 (2009) 1802–1805.
increasing H2 S, a greater volume of hydrogen gas is evolved. The [16] E. Subramanian, J.O. Baeg, S.M. Lee, S.J. Moon, K.J. Kong, Dissociation of H2 S
under visible light irradiation (␭ 䊐 420 nm) with FeGaO3 photocatalysts for
greater hydrogen gas being evolved at higher H2 S concentration the production of hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 6586–6594.
is obviously attributed to the facile dissociation of H2 S as com- [17] S. Patil, D.R. Patil, S. Apte, M. Kulkarni, J. Ambekar, C. Park, S. Gosavi, S.
pared with that of H2 O molecules (GH dis.
S
= 33.4kJmol−1 , GH
dis.
O
= Kolekar, B. Kale, Confinement of Ag3 PO4 nanoparticles supported by surface
2 2 plasmon resonance of Ag in glass: efficient nanoscale photocatalyst for solar
237kJmol−1 [56]). H2 production from waste H2 S, Appl. Catal. B 190 (2016) 75–84.
[18] S.K. Apte, S.N. Garaje, S.D. Naik, R.P. Waichal, J.O. Baeg, B.B. Kale, Quantum
confinement controlled solar hydrogen production from hydrogen sulfide
4. Conclusion using a highly stable CdS0.5 Se0.5 /CdSe quantum dot–glass nanosystem,
Nanoscale 6 (2014) 908–915.
Based on the present study, we can conclude that: [19] M. Barbeni, E. Pelizzeti, E. Borgarello, N. Serpone, M. Grätzel, L. Balducci, M.
Visca, Hydrogen from hydrogen sulfide cleavage improved efficiencies via
modification of semiconductor particulates, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 10 (1985)
• Using a facile hydrothermal route, one could easily synthesize 249–253.
efficient solid-solution solar-energy-materials and apply them to [20] V. Preethi, S. Kanmani, Performance of four various shapes of photocatalytic
reactors with respect to hydrogen and sulphur recovery from sulphide
generate hydrogen solar fuel from H2 S solutions. containing waste streams, J. Clean. Prod. 133 (2016) 1218–1226.
• The ternary solid-solution photocatalyst synthesized here (IZS) is [21] Z.Q. Lin, Y.K. Lai, R.G. Hu, J. Li, R.G. Du, C.J. Lin, A highly efficient ZnS/CdS@TiO2
able to serve as an efficient solar-energy material in H2 S media photoelectrode for photogenerated cathodic protection of metals,
Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 8717–8723.
to produce hydrogen gas. [22] M. Kimi, L. Yuliati, M. Shamsuddin, Photocatalytic hydrogen production under
• By doping Ag to IZS, the photocatalyst performance is slightly visible light over Cd0.1 Snx Zn0.9-2x S solid solution photocatalysts, Int. J.
enhanced; therefore, the use of this element is not recommended Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011) 9453–9461.
[23] L. Wang, W. Wang, M. Shang, W. Yin, S. Sun, L. Zhang, Enhanced
for the present system, due to its high price.
photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light over Cd1-x Znx S solid
• The maximum photocatalyst performance was attained at pH 11, solution with cubic zinc blend phase, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 19–25.
where HS− species is dominant in the reaction medium; during [24] M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati, Efficient mesoporous/nanostructured Ag-doped
alloy semiconductor for solar hydrogen generation, J. Photon. Energy 4
the photocatalytic degradation of H2 S solutions, this anion plays
(2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.4.044099 (044099-9).
a crucial role in both photo-redox processes. [25] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, A. Kudo, Visible-light-induced H2 evolution from an aqueous
solution containing sulfide and sulfite over a ZnS–CuInS2 –AgInS2
solid-solution photocatalyst, Angew. Chem. 117 (2005) 3631–3634.
[26] S.G. Kumar, L.G. Devi, Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/vis
Appendix A. Supplementary data light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier
transfer dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A 115 (2011) 13211–13241.
[27] M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati, A highly efficient nanostructured quinary
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
photocatalyst for hydrogen production, Int. J. Energy Res. 39 (2015) 516–523.
in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10. [28] E.N. Savinov, Yu A. Gruzdkov, V.N. Parmon, Suspensions of semiconductors
062. with microheterojunctions—a new type of highly efficient photocatalyst for
dihydrogen production from solution of hydrogen sulfide and sulfide ions, Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy 14 (1989) 1–9.
References [29] N.S. Chaudhari, A.P. Bhirud, R.S. Sonawane, L.K. Nikam, S.S. Warule, V.H. Rane,
B.B. Kale, Ecofriendly hydrogen production from abundant hydrogen sulfide
[1] V. Varlet, N. Giuliani, C. Palmiere, G. Maujean, M. Augsburger, Hydrogen using solar light-driven hierarchical nanostructured ZnIn2 S4 photocatalyst,
sulfide measurement by headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Green Chem. 13 (2011) 2500–2506.
(HS-GC–MS): application to gaseous samples and gas dissolved in muscle, J. [30] T. Arai, S. Senda, Y. Sato, H. Takahashi, K. Shinoda, B. Jeyadevan, K. Tohji,
Anal. Toxicol. 39 (2015) 52–57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jat/bku114. Cu-doped ZnS hollow particle with high activity for hydrogen generation
M. Lashgari, M. Ghanimati / Journal of Hazardous Materials 345 (2018) 10–17 17

from alkaline sulfide solution under visible light, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) [45] N. Thangam, B.S. Devi, A.C.L. Muthu, Hydrogen production from hydrogen
1997–2000. sulfide wastestream using Ru/Cd0.6 Zn0.4 S photocatalyst, Int. J. New Technol.
[31] A. Goktas, Sol–gel derived Zn1-x Fex S diluted magnetic semiconductor thin Res. 1 (2015) 04–10.
films: compositional dependent room or above room temperature [46] D.A. Skoog, D.M. West, F.J. Holler, S.R. Crouch, Fundamentals of Analytical
ferromagnetism, Appl. Surf. Sci. 340 (2015) 151–159. Chemistry, 9th ed., Mary Finch (BROOKS/COLE, CENGAGE Learning), CA, 2014,
[32] A.V. Vorontsov, Photocatalytic transformations of organic sulfur compounds pp. 269–270.
and H2 S, Russ. Chem. Rev. 77 (2008) 909–926. [47] L.H. Gevantman, Solubility of selected gases in water, CRC Handbook of
[33] K. Artyushkova, S. Levendosky, P. Atanassov, J. Fulghum, XPS structural Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed. (2016–2017), 5–135.
studies of nano-composite non-platinum electrocatalysts for polymer [48] N. Buehler, K. Meier, J.F. Reber, Photochemical hydrogen production with
electrolyte fuel cells, Top. Catal. 46 (2007) 263–275. cadmium sulfide suspensions, J. Phys. Chem. 88 (1984) 3261–3268.
[34] V. Preethi, S. Kanmani, Photocatalytic hydrogen production over CuGa2-x [49] M. Lashgari, P. Zeinalkhani, Photocatalytic N2 conversion to ammonia using
Fex O4 spinel, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 18740–18746. efficient nanostructured solar-energy-materials in aqueous media: a novel
[35] C. Mele, B. Bozzini, A simple and safe method to implement corrosion hydrogenation strategy and basic understanding of the phenomenon, Appl.
experiments with 1 bar of H2 S, Corros. Eng. Sci. Technol. 52 (2017) 1–7, Catal. A 529 (2017) 91–97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478422X.2017.1288352. [50] R.C. Kainthla, J. O’M. Bockris, Photoelectrolysis of H2 S using an n-CdSe
[36] W. Zhang, Z. Zhong, Y. Wang, R. Xu, Doped solid solution: (Zn0.95 Cu0.05 )1-x photoanode, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 12 (1987) 23–26.
Cdx S nanocrystals with high activity for H2 evolution from aqueous solutions [51] C.A. Linkous, C. Huang, J.R. Fowler, UV photochemical oxidation of aqueous
under visible light, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 17635–17642. sodium sulfide to produce hydrogen and sulfur, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A
[37] R. Shimizu, I. Kubono, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Yamada, Iron (III) sulfide particles 168 (2004) 153–160.
produced by a polyol method, Hyperfine Interact. 231 (2015) 115–121, http:// [52] G. Lu, S. Li, Hydrogen production by H2 S photodecomposition on ZnFe2 O4
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10751-014-1095-7. catalyst, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 17 (1992) 767–770.
[38] J.S. Jang, H.G. Kim, P.H. Borse, J.S. Lee, Simultaneous hydrogen production and [53] S.A. Naman, S.M. Aliwi, K. Al-Emara, Hydrogen production from the splitting
decomposition of H2 S dissolved in alkaline water over CdS.TiO2 composite of H2 S by visible light irradiation of vanadium sulfides dispersion loaded with
photocatalysts under visible light irradiation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 RuO2 , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 11 (1986) 33–38.
(2007) 4786–4791. [54] D.V. Markovskaya, S.V. Cherepanova, A.A. Saraev, E.Y. Gerasimov, E.A. Kozlova,
[39] K. Li, B. Chai, T. Peng, J. Mao, L. Zan, Preparation of AgIn5 S8 /TiO2 Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from aqueous solutions of Na2 S/Na2 SO3
heterojunction nanocomposite and its enhanced photocatalytic H2 under visible light irradiation on CuS/Cd0.3 Zn0.7 S and Niz Cd0.3 Zn0.7 S1+z , Chem.
production property under visible light, ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 170–177. Eng. J. 262 (2015) 146–155.
[40] J.T. Wolan, G.B. Hoflund, Surface characterization study of AgF and AgF2 , [55] F.K. Crundwell, The mechanism of dissolution of minerals in acidic and
powders using XPS and ISS, Appl. Surf. Sci. 125 (1998) 251–258. alkaline solutions: part III. Application to oxide, hydroxide and sulfide
[41] S.R. Chalana, V. Ganesan, V.P.M. Pillai, Surface plasmon resonance in minerals, Hydrometallurgy 149 (2014) 71–81.
nanostructured Ag incorporated ZnS films, AIP Adv. 5 (2015) 107207, http:// [56] E. Subramanian, J.O. Baeg, S.M. Lee, S.J. Moon, K.J. Kong, Nanospheres and
dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4933075. nanorods structured Fe2 O3 and Fe2-x Gax O3 photocatalysts for visible-light
[42] B. Xin, Z. Ren, P. Wang, J. Liu, L. Jing, H. Fu, Study on the mechanisms of mediated (␭ ≥ 420 nm) H2 S decomposition and H2 generation, Int. J.
photoinduced carriers separation and recombination for Fe3+ –TiO2 Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 8485–8494.
photocatalysts, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253 (2007) 4390–4395.
[43] J. Zaman, A. Chakma, Production of hydrogen and sulfur from hydrogen
sulfide, Fuel Process. Technol. 41 (1995) 159–198.
[44] S.A. Naman, Photoproduction of hydrogen from hydrogen sulfide in vanadium
sulfide colloidal suspension–Effect of temperature and pH, Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 22 (1997) 783–789.

You might also like