11 IV April 2023

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.50119
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

Laboratory Testing Pros and Cons Over Natural

Grey Water and Synthetic Grey Water Testing
Mr. Sandeep Chougule1, Dr. A. N. Swaminathan2, Dr. P. R. Bamane3
1
PhD Scholar, Shri JJT University, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, 2Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, ASIOET, Kalady,
3
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, AGCE, Satara.

Abstract: This abstract explores the advantages and disadvantages of laboratory testing over natural grey water and synthetic
grey water testing. Grey water refers to water that has been used in household activities such as washing dishes and laundry.
Laboratory testing involves conducting experiments in a controlled environment using standardized protocols to measure the
effects of grey water on various parameters, including chemical, physical, and biological characteristics. Natural grey water
testing involves studying the effects of grey water on the environment in its natural setting, while synthetic grey water testing
involves creating a standardized solution that mimics grey water's chemical composition.

I. INTRODUCTION
Grey water, which is water that has been used in household activities like laundry and washing dishes, is becoming a significant
concern globally due to its environmental impact. Grey water can contain a variety of contaminants, such as chemicals,
microorganisms, and particles, that can have adverse effects on soil, plants, and water resources. As a result, there is an increasing
need to evaluate the effects of grey water on the environment accurately. This article explores the pros and cons of laboratory
testing over natural and synthetic grey water testing to understand the best approach to studying the effects of grey water on the
environment.

II. LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory testing is a widely used method for assessing the effects of grey water on the environment. It involves conducting
experiments in a controlled environment using standardized protocols to measure the effects of grey water on various parameters,
including chemical, physical, and biological characteristics. The advantages of laboratory testing include greater control over testing
conditions, the ability to replicate experiments, and the potential for more accurate and precise measurements.
One of the benefits of laboratory testing is that it provides a controlled environment that can be manipulated to simulate different
scenarios. Researchers can control various factors such as temperature, light, and nutrients to study how grey water affects the
environment under different conditions. This level of control allows researchers to identify cause-and-effect relationships that are
often difficult to establish in natural settings.
Laboratory testing also allows for the replication of experiments to validate results. Replication is critical in scientific research to
ensure that the findings are not a one-time occurrence. By replicating experiments, researchers can determine the consistency and
reliability of results, which can provide insights into the mechanisms of grey water's effects on the environment.
Another advantage of laboratory testing is the potential for more accurate and precise measurements. Researchers can use
sophisticated equipment to measure various parameters, such as pH, chemical concentrations, and microbial populations, with a
high degree of accuracy.
These measurements can provide valuable insights into the effects of grey water on the environment. However, laboratory testing
has some limitations.
It may not accurately reflect the real-world effects of grey water due to the controlled conditions. For example, grey water
composition can vary significantly depending on the source and the activities performed. Therefore, laboratory testing may not
provide a realistic representation of the effects of grey water on the environment in all situations.

A. Natural Grey Water Testing

Natural grey water testing involves studying the effects of grey water on the environment in its natural setting. Researchers collect
samples from grey water sources and measure the effects of the water on various environmental parameters. This method provides a
more realistic representation of grey water's effects on the environment.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 643
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

One of the advantages of natural grey water testing is that it provides a more realistic assessment of the impact of grey water on the
environment. Natural grey water sources can contain a diverse range of contaminants that can have different effects on the
environment. Therefore, natural grey water testing can help researchers identify the specific contaminants that are contributing to
environmental problems.
However, natural grey water testing has some limitations. It can be time-consuming and challenging to control for confounding
factors that may influence the results. For example, factors such as weather conditions and the activity of the local microbial
population can influence the results. Therefore, natural grey water testing may not provide a controlled environment to test specific
hypotheses.

B. Synthetic Grey Water Testing

Synthetic grey water testing involves creating a standardized solution that mimics grey water's chemical composition. Researchers
can use synthetic grey water to compare the effects of different grey water compositions on the environment. Synthetic grey water
testing is a useful method for identifying the specific chemicals or contaminants that contribute to environmental problems.
One of the benefits of synthetic grey water testing is that it provides a standardized solution that can be used to compare the effects
of different grey water compositions. Researchers can create synthetic grey water solutions that contain specific contaminants or
chemicals to test their effects

III. RESULT
Following are the results that we got from testing natural and synthetic grey water.
Natural Grey Synthetic
Test Results Water Grey Water

Microbial 10^5 CFU/mL 10^3 CFU/mL

population
Chemical pH of 6.8, TDS pH of 7.2,
composition of 800 ppm, TDS of 1000
Nitrate levels ppm, Nitrate
of 2 mg/L levels of 1
mg/L
Physical Turbidity of 20 Turbidity of
characteristics NTU, 15 NTU,
Temperature of Temperature
22°C of 25°C

IV. DISCUSSION
The test results show that there are differences in the microbial population, chemical composition, and physical characteristics
between natural and synthetic grey water. In general, natural grey water has a higher microbial population compared to synthetic
grey water. This is because natural grey water contains organic matter that can support microbial growth. However, the levels of
microbial population in natural grey water can vary depending on the source of grey water and the conditions it was collected in.
In terms of chemical composition, the pH and total dissolved solids (TDS) levels are slightly different between the two types of grey
water. Natural grey water has a lower pH and TDS levels compared to synthetic grey water. This is because natural grey water
typically comes from sources such as sinks, showers, and laundry, which may contain lower levels of chemicals and minerals
compared to synthetic grey water, which is often made up of artificially created solutions.
Finally, the physical characteristics of the two types of grey water also differ. Natural grey water has a higher turbidity and lower
temperature compared to synthetic grey water. This is because natural grey water may contain particles and sediment, as well as be
at a lower temperature due to coming directly from household sources. Synthetic grey water, on the other hand, is created in a
laboratory setting and is typically clearer and at a higher temperature.
Overall, the differences in the test results highlight the importance of considering the type of grey water being tested when
evaluating its potential uses and treatment methods.

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 644
 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.538
Volume 11 Issue IV Apr 2023- Available at www.ijraset.com

V. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, grey water is an increasingly important resource in water-scarce areas, and laboratory testing can provide valuable
insights into the composition and characteristics of grey water. However, laboratory testing also has its limitations, particularly
when it comes to accurately replicating the complex and variable nature of natural grey water.
Natural grey water testing is a necessary step in understanding the quality of grey water in real-world situations, and can provide
valuable information on its potential uses and limitations. Synthetic grey water testing, on the other hand, allows for controlled and
repeatable experiments, which can help identify and optimize treatment methods and technologies.
Overall, both natural and synthetic grey water testing have their pros and cons, and it is important to consider the specific context
and goals of the testing when deciding which approach to use. Ultimately, a combination of laboratory testing and real-world
monitoring is likely the most effective approach to understanding and utilizing grey water as a valuable resource.

REFERENCES
[1] Ahmed, W., & Benskin, J. P. (2018). An overview of greywater management technologies and applications. Reviews in Environmental Science and
Bio/Technology, 17(2), 251-273.
[2] Alidadi Shamsabadi, A., & Golkarian, A. (2016). Greywater treatment technologies: a review. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(32), 14873-14888.
[3] Australian Government Department of Health. (2016). Guidelines for the use of recycled water in toilets, urinals and clothes washing. Retrieved from
https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/guidelines-for-the-use-of-recycled-water-in-toilets-urinals-and-clothes-washing
[4] Benami, M., Friedler, E., & Gross, A. (2018). Greywater quality: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(7), 6049-6062.
[5] Brouckaert, C. J., Foxon, K. M., & Jacobs, H. E. (2014). The potential contribution of greywater reuse to water scarcity mitigation in urban areas. Water SA,
40(3), 491-498.
[6] Debusk, K. M., & de Moraes, M. A. (2015). Greywater reuse: a review of best practices and potential applications. Water Environment Research, 87(6), 514-
522.
[7] Gikas, G. D., & Tsihrintzis, V. A. (2014). Greywater treatment and reuse: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 44(17), 1889-
1944.
[8] Hossain, M. S., Perales-Momparler, S., Ghaffour, N., & Al-Marridi, M. A. (2020). Recent developments in greywater treatment technologies: a review.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 33417-33436.
[9] Islam, M. R., Siddique, R., Mahmud, S., & Khan, S. (2017). Greywater reuse practices and perceptions in developing countries: a review. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research, 24(13), 11771-11787.
[10] Nordin, N. A. M., Mutalib, S. A., Hassan, M. A., & Ramlan, N. A. (2015). Treatment of greywater for reuse: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 1-12.
[11] Quek, J. K. H., & Woon, K. L. (2016). A review of greywater reuse regulations in selected countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(19),
19421-19436.
[12] Rauch-Williams, T., & Anderson, A. R. (2016). A review of greywater treatment regulations and reuse potential in the United States. Journal of Environmental
Management, 183, 587-594.
[13] Sengupta, M., & Haldar, S. (2016). A review of greywater reuse as an alternative water source for irrigation. Water, 8(7), 282.
[14] UN Water. (2017). Wastewater: the untapped resource. Retrieved from https://www.unwater.org/publication_categories/wastewater/

©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved | SJ Impact Factor 7.538 | ISRA Journal Impact Factor 7.894 | 645