Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S231485351730447X Main
1 s2.0 S231485351730447X Main
1 s2.0 S231485351730447X Main
net/publication/324201776
CITATION READS
1 254
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Williams Kweku Darkwah on 13 July 2018.
Beni-Suef University
Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bjbas
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Morphology of the face depends on many factors, such as sex, ethnicity, race, climate, nutrition, genetic con-
Cephalometry stitution and socio-economic status. In the developed countries, there is well established database on facial
Facial height anthropometry and for the purpose of identification. In Ghana however, there is very little documented in-
Facial width formation on cephalometric indices for biometric and forensic purposes. This study therefore, aimed at estab-
Nasal width
lishing baseline data to assess the relationship between sex using upper, lower and total cephalometric indices.
Biocular diameter
One hundred participants made up of sixty males and forty females from KNUST were recruited for the study.
Sexually dimorphic
Linear facial anthropometry were taken using calibrated Shahe digital calipers whiles participants sat with head
in natural position. The facial anthropometric measurements were generally higher in males than in females.
Upper facial height, facial width, nasal width, biocular diameter, lower facial height, lip length and total facial
height were statistically significant and (p < 0.05). The present study shows the existence of statistically sig-
nificant sexual dimorphism in the study population using cephalo-facial dimensions.
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: williams.darkwah@stu.ucc.edu.gh (W.K. Darkwah).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2018.03.004
Received 11 November 2017; Accepted 17 March 2018
Available online 03 April 2018
2314-8535/ © 2018 Beni-Suef University. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
A. Kadri et al. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7 (2018) 215–219
Data collected in the study included upper, lower and total facial
measurements. Primary data concerning age and sex were also taken.
2.2. Measurements
216
A. Kadri et al. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7 (2018) 215–219
Table 1
Descriptive statistics of upper facial anthropometric measurements stratified by sex.
Parameters Mean ± SD (range) P – value
SD = standard deviation, N = number of participants, BD = binocular diameter in centimeters, ID = interocular diameter in centimeters, UFH = upper
facial height in centimeters, FW = facial width in centimeters.
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of lower and total facial measurements for males and females.
Parameters Mean ± SD (range) P – value
SD = standard deviation, N = number of participants, LFH = lower facial height in centimeters, NW = nasal width in centimeters, LL = lip length in
centimeters, TFH = total facial height in centimeters.
UFH 0.046 1.455 0.975 In the present study the means of the upper facial measurements
LFH −0.289 1.742 0.686
were generally higher in males than females. With the exception of
TFH −1.364 1.722 0.428
FW −2.151 0.728 0.003
interocula diameter (p > 0.05), upper facial height, facial width and
NW −2.760 1.205 0.022 binocular diameter were statistically significant and sexually dimorphic
LL −1.317 0.974 0.177 (p < 0.05).
BD 1.742 0.987 0.078 Mean upper facial height was higher in males than females in the
Constant 44.183 11.137 0.000
present study. Facial height is sexually dimorphic and depends on sex
B = coefficient of independent variables, SE = standard error, R2 = 0.599, hormones. These hormones are thought to be the main regulators of
UFH = upper facial height in centimeters, LFH = lower facial height in cen- sexual dimorphism in physical features in males and females (McEwen,
timeters, TFH = total facial height in centimeters, FW = facial width in cen- 1981). Females are thought to have large fat deposits particularly
timeters, NW = nasal width in centimeters, LL = lip length in centimeters, around the cheek area as a result of the high levels of oestrogen. For this
BD = binocular diameter in centimeters. reason facial bone structure in females may be masked (Enlow, 1982).
Alternatively, there may be some direct evidence for testosterone af-
Table 4 fecting facial bone growth in males (Verdnock et al., 1999). This could
Binary logistic regression equation for independent variables. be related to the facial bone size particularly facial width in males. This
Parameter Constant B SE P-value Nagelkerke R2 result was consistent with a study carried out on South Indians and
Immigrant Tibetans (Vankatesh et al., 2010).
UFH 7.491 −1.657 0.528 0.002 0.149 The mean facial width in the present study was higher in males than
LFH 9.604 −1.585 0.489 0.001 0.156
females and statistically significant with sexual variation. This finding
TFH 19.102 −1.759 0.416 0.000 0.297
FW 29.748 −2.336 0.552 0.000 0.312 agrees with the mean facial widths which were observed by Raj et al.
NW 13.067 −3.298 0.763 0.000 0.321 (2014) and Moldez et al. (2006). Similarly, the result of the present
LL 12.025 −2.328 0.584 0.000 0.267 study was in accordance with the studies conducted on Malaysian
BD 14.408 −1.422 0.569 0.013 0.090 students of Melaka Manipal Medical College (Shetti et al., 2011) and
South Indians (Prasnna et al., 2013).
B = coefficient of independent variables, SE = standard error,
R2 = 0.090–0.321, UFH = upper facial height in centimeters, LFH = lower fa-
Biocular diameter was statistically significant and sexually di-
cial height in centimeters, TFH = total facial height in centimeters, FW = facial morphic (p = 0.000) while interocular diameter on the other hand
width in centimeters, NW = nasal width in centimeters, LL = lip length in showed the opposite (p = 0.057). This result showed consistency with a
centimeters, BD = binocular diameter in centimeters. study carried on Raja Rajeshwari population (Peeyush et al., 2015).
Another study on facial anthropometry of Northwest Indians was also in
Sciences, version 20 (IBM SPSS 20) and Microsoft Excel 2007. The agreement with the results of the present study (Sahni et al., 2014).
mean, range and standard deviation of the facial dimensions were de- Biocular and interocular diameters increased from childhood to young
rived and correlations were made. adulthood. In the second decade of life all age-related increments were
higher in males than females (Sforza et al., 2013).
217
A. Kadri et al. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7 (2018) 215–219
3.2. Lower and total facial measurements disagreement with a study which showed an accurate sex determination
rate of 92% for males and 51% for females with an overall rate of 71%
The means of all the measurements for lower facial dimensions and (Singh et al., 2012). This difference in accuracy rates could be linked to
total facial height were higher in males than females. Statistical sig- the difference in sample size Tables 2–4.
nificance and sexual variations were observed in all the measurements The independent variables were further assessed for sex determi-
(p < 0.05). nation using binary logistic regression. The best individual predictor
In the present study, nasal width was significantly higher in males was nasal width which had classification accuracies of 83% for males
than females which again demonstrated the existence of sexual di- and 55% for females with an overall accuracy of 72% (R2 = 0.321). The
morphism. This is similar to a study conducted at the Ilorin Teaching present result is in contrast to a study by Patil and Mody (2005) on
Hospital in Nigeria (Ogah and Segun, 2014). Another study on Nigerian Central Indian populations where individual variable showed sig-
adults also reported the same results (Garandawa et al., 2008). Also nificant accuracy rate (R2 > 0.50). Comparing the two analyses of the
Zankl et al. (2002) concluded that the growth and subsequent nasal present study, the pooled variables showed a better and reliable result
projections continued in both males and females after skeletal growth than the individual variables.
had subsided. The present study appears to be the first study on binary logistic
In the present study, lip length showed a significantly higher mean regression for determination of sex on a KNUST student population. As
in males than females. This finding is consistent with the outcome of a differences exist in various races with regard to sex determination the
study on adults Igbo’s resident in Maiduguri (Emelike et al., 2012). results may be true for one population but may not be necessarily true
Nagle et al. (2005) also reported similar results in a group of healthy for another.
Latvian residents. Many investigators have shown significant differ-
ences in craniofacial complex among ethnic and racial groups (Hwang 4. Conclusion
et al., 2002). Several other investigators also suggested that genetic
factors exert a substantial influence on the individual difference in body The present study showed that the mean values of males were
shape and configuration (Livhits et al., 2002). generally higher than those of females for all the measured parameters.
In the present study, the mean lower facial heights were higher than With the exception of interocular diameter, the rest of the measure-
the mean upper facial heights. This coincides with a study carried on ments were statistically significant and showed sexual dimorphism. The
young Turkish adults (Bormah et al., 1999). It is also in agreement with binary logistic regression analysis of the pooled variables provided a
a study by Hatwal et al. (2015) on Garhwali population of Uttarakhand. better sex determination accuracy rate than the individual variables.
The reverse of the present finding was observed in a study conducted in The results of the present study can be used as a baseline data for
adult Nigerians (Garandawa et al., 2008). This difference in variations further studies.
could be attributed to shape and length of nose, race, tribe and en-
vironmental climatic conditions. Conflict of interest statement
Total facial height obtained in the present study conforms to the
established anatomical principle that females have smaller crania with I declare that I have no conflict of interest.
shorter facial height than males (Moore et al., 2006). The results are
also in agreement with those of previous anthropometric studies which References
reported sexual dimorphism with males having higher mean values of
total facial height than females, such as in Binis of Edo State by Bormah, H., Ozgor, F., Gursu, N., 1999. Evaluation of soft tissue of the face in 1050 young
Omotoso et al. (2011) adults. Annal Plastic Surg. 42 (3), 280–288.
Emelike, N.V., Garba, S.H., Dalori, B.M., Numan, A.I., 2012. Anthropometric study of Lip-
A total of 100 participants were recruited for the study with 60% Nose complex in adult Igbo’s resident in Maiduguri. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 1 (3), 29–31.
males and 40% females. The mean age of participants was Enlow, D., 1982. Handbook of Facial Growth, Philadelphia: Saunders.
22.03 ± 2.95 years with a range of 17–34 years. The mean age of Farkas, L.G., Katic, M.J., Forest, C.R., Alt, K.W., Bagic, I., Baltadjev, G., 2005.
International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic group/
males and females was 22.22 ± 3.10 years and 21.75 ± 2.73 years race. J. Craniofac. Surg. 126, 615–646.
respectively. Garandawa, H., Nwaorgu, O., Oluwatosin, O., 2008. Morphometric nose parameters in
adult Nigerians. Int. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 10 (2).
Hatwal, P., Atal, D.K., Das, S., 2015. Correlation of upper and lower facial heights in
3.3. Upper facial measurements Garrhwali population of Uttarakhand. J. Indian Acad. Forensic Med. 37 (3), 281–282.
Hwang, H.S., Kim, W.S., McNamara Jr., J.A., 2002. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue
Males had mean biocular diameter of 10.53 ± 0.43 cm whereas profile of Korean and European – American with normal occlusion and well balanced
faces. Angle Orthod. 72 (1), 72–80.
females had 10.32 ± 0.36 cm. The mean interocular diameter was
Livhits, G., Rost, A., Yakovenko, K., Trotimov, S., Kobyliansky, L., 2002. Genesis of body
3.10 ± 0.35 cm for males and 2.98 ± 0.25 cm for females. The mean size and shape: body proportion and indices. Ann. Hum. Biol. 29 (2), 271–289.
upper facial height was 4.92 ± 0.44 cm and 4.60 ± 0.42 cm for males McEwen, S.B., 1981. Neural gonadal steroid action. Science 211 (4488), 1303–1311.
and females respectively. The mean facial width for males was Moldez, M.A., Sato, K., Sugawara, J., Mitani, H., 2006. Linear and angular Filipino ce-
phalometric norms according to age and sex. Angle Orthod. 7 (5), 800–805.
13.18 ± 0.44 cm and that of females was 12.64 ± 0.54 cm. With the Moore, K. J., Agur, A. M. R. and Dlley, A. F., 2006. Clinical oriented Anatomy 5th edition
exception of interocular diameter, the rest of the measurements were USA: William and Wilkins Lppincott: Boltimore 887–912.
statistically significant and sexually dimorphic (p < 0.05) in (Table 1). Nagle, C., Teibe, U., Kapoka, D., 2005. Craniofacial anthropometry in a group of healthy
Latvian residents. Acta Memca Lituanica 12 (1), 47–53.
Ogah, S.A., Segun, B.S., 2014. Sexual dimorphism in nasal morphology as seen at the
3.4. Sex determination University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 13 (9) 45 4.
Omotoso, D.R., Oludiran, A.A., Sakpa, C.L., 2011. Nasofacial anthropometry of adult Bini
tribe in Nigeria. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 14 (3), 219–221.
In the present study the means of the statistically significant mea- Patil, K.R., Mody, R.N., 2005. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis and
surements were greater in males than females. Binary logistic regres- stature by regression analysis: a lateral cephalometric study. Forensic Sci. Int. 147
sion analyses were performed on the pooled variables and individual (2–3), 175–180.
Peeyush, S., Lata, S., Sowbhagya, M.B., Ashish, G., Vinitr, V., Usha, J., 2015. Intercanine
variables to check for the best reliable results. In the present study, width as a tool in two dimensional reconstruction of face: an aid in forensic dentistry.
binary logistic regression analysis of the pooled variables showed sta- J. Forensic Dent. Sci. 7 (1), 1–7.
tistical significance (p < 0.05) and accurate sex determination at a rate Prasnna, L.C., Bhosale, S., DeSouza, A.S., Mamatha, H., Thomas, R.H., Shachin, K.S.,
2013. Facial indices for North and South Indians: reliability in stature estimation and
of 85% for males and 77.5% for females with an overall rate of 82%
sexual dimorphism. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 7 (8), 1540–1542.
(Nagelkerke R2 = 0.599). It was noted that facial and nasal widths were Raj, K., Reddy, M.Y., Sreekanth, C., Luaxman, K., Vishnuvardhan, R., 2014. Soft tissue
the major variables in sex determination. This finding is however in analysis in aesthetically pleasing profile. Indian J. Mednodent Allied Sci. 2 (2),
218
A. Kadri et al. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 7 (2018) 215–219
155–160. Stephan, C.N., Norris, R.M., Hennegerg, M., 2005. Does sexual dimorphism in facial soft
Sahni, D., Sanjeev, H., Jaggi, S., Aggarwal, A., 2014. Sexual and ethnic differences in tissue depth justify sex distinction in craniofacial identification? J. Forensic Sci. 50,
facial anthropometry of Northwest Indians. J. Postgraduate Med. Educ. Res. 48 (4), 513–518.
171–182. Vankatesh, G.N., Rahul, S., Sunil, M., 2010. Determination of sex in South Indians and
Sforza, C., Elamin, F., Tommasi, D.G., Dola, C., Ferrario, V.F., 2013. Morphology of the immigrating Tibetans from cephalometric analysis and discriminant functions.
soft tissue of the orbital region in Northern Sudanese persons. Forensic Sci. Int. 288 Forensic Sci. Int. 197 (1–3), 122.e1–122.e6.
(1-3), 180.e1–180.e11. Verdnock, A., Gaethof, M., Carels, C., Zegher, F., 1999. Effect of low dose testosterone
Shetti, V.R., Pai, S.R., Sneha, G.K., Gupta, L., Chethan, P., 2011. Study of facial index of treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty. Eur. J. Orthod. 21,
Indians and Malaysian students. Int. J. Morphol. 29 (3), 1018–1021. 137–143.
Singh, I.P., Bhasin, M.K., 2004. In: A Manual of Biological Anthropology. Kamla-Raj Zankl, A., Eberle, L., Molinari, L., Schinzel, A., 2002. A growth chart for nose length, nasal
Enterprise, Indian, pp. 179–183. protrusion and philitrum length from birth to 97 years. Am. J. Med. Gen. 111,
Singh, R.A., Dhar, V., Arora, R., Diwanji, A., 2012. Cephalometric norm for Mewari 388–391.
children using Steiner’s analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 5 (3), 173–177.
219