Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Act Doesn't Represent Us:CCMF Report 2023
This Act Doesn't Represent Us:CCMF Report 2023
REPRESENT US.
Author:
Iman Bukhari
Editor:
Megan Eichhorn
Researchers:
Avery McNarland, Gabriela Urrego, Gilary
Guzman, Huong Hoang, Iman Bukhari,
Mansharn Toor, Megan Eichhorn
Graphic Designer:
Jasmine Tan
D A TA FOR GOOD
Dashboard:
Jennifer Walker, Jeremy Fan,
Melissa Valgardson
Database:
Fekrat El Wehedi
Project Management:
David Chan
Acknowledgements
Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation acknowledges the historical and current oppression of
the original Peoples, and their cultures, on the land we now call Canada. We strive to address this
oppression through education that contributes to our shared healing and decolonizing journey
as current inhabitants of this land.
This report, published by Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation, contains nation-wide research and
was produced on the traditional Treaty 7 territory and oral practices of the Blackfoot confederacy:
Siksika, Kainai, Piikani, as well as the Îyâxe Nakoda and Tsuut’ina nations. We acknowledge that
this territory is home to the Métis Nation of Alberta, Region 3 within the historical Northwest Métis
homeland. Finally, we acknowledge all Nations—Indigenous and non—who live, work and play on
this land, and who honour and celebrate this territory.
Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation consists of Millennial and Gen. Z volunteers working to
improve race relations across Canada through research, advocacy, events and other projects,
with a desire for an inclusive and equitable Canada.
Data For Good, who created the dashboard, is a collective of data scientists helping non-profit and
social service organizations harness the power of their data through analytics and visualizations
to leverage their impact in the community.
This research was made possible by generous volunteers from both Canadian Cultural Mosaic
Foundation and Data For Good.
Executive Summary
This first-of-its-kind five-year study by the Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation
provides groundbreaking data amalgamating characteristics of race-based hate
incidents across Canada that were reported by mainstream English-language
media sources from 2018-2022.
The above findings illustrate the profound way in which racism is deeply woven into
the foundational fabric of Canadian society—with far reaching and devastating
implications. These are the areas we must focus on for reform.
Call to Action
This report is intended as a catalyst for researchers to further analyze how racism is perpetuated
in Canada. The data within can be used to inform actions and interventions at a systemic level to
improve equity among racialized citizens. Collecting and interpreting data on race-based hate
incidents in Canada is critical for measuring and identifying existing inequities that stem from
race-based hate incidents and discrimination.
Many recommendations can be made based on this data. However, we are urging for one
major action to be taken by our government. We call upon the federal government to engage
an independent agency to collect national data on race-based hate incidents. The independent
agency must be separate and beyond Canada’s Anti-Racism Strategy fund and must:
So while I agree with people who say no one is born racist, it remains
a powerful system that we’re immediately born into. It’s like being
born into air: you take it in as soon as you breathe. It’s not a cold that
you can get over. There is no anti-racist certification class. It’s a set of
socioeconomic traps and cultural values that are fired up every time we
interact with the world. It is a thing you have to keep scooping out of the
boat of your life to keep from drowning in it.
I know it’s hard work, but it’s the price you pay for owning everything.
SCOTT WOODS
Introduction
People from around the world cross land and sea to reach the promised land of Canadian
multiculturalism and diversity—an international image that Canada eagerly promotes and prides
itself on as one of its greatest strengths.
Beneath that veneer, however, is racism ingrained so deeply in Canadian society that it appears
natural to the naked eye—normalized so extensively, since the first moment of colonial contact,
that it is the prevailing factor in how people engage not just with their neighbours, but also with
the institutions that run the nation. While Canadians may clutch their pearls in horror at the rawer,
more physically violent forms of race-based hate incidents, the daily experiences of racialized and
Indigenous Peoples are obscured behind the veil of purported multiculturalism.
The Criminal Code of Canada contains provisions for hate crimes; however, they are largely reserved
for offences involving hate propaganda or the promotion or advocacy of genocide. Therefore,
most hate incidents do not meet the standard of a hate crime. Hate crimes and incidents are
vastly underreported while simultaneously increasing at a rapid rate. Yet, our governments and
institutions continue to neglect the dire need for national data on more than simply prosecuted
hate crimes, as collected by Statistics Canada.
The collection of race-based data from all social institutions is critical to discerning how race,
along with other intersecting characteristics, influence how racialized individuals experience
Canadian society.
So What Does Racism in Canada Really
Look Like?
This first-of-its-kind research project seeks to answer this question by
tracking and collecting data on race-based hate incidents reported
by mainstream, English-language media sources in Canada. Over a
five-year period (2018-2022), Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation
collected and analyzed race-based hate incidents, creating a
unique data set that begins to paint a fuller picture of interpersonal,
systemic and other forms of racism across the nation. The research
illustrates characteristics such as frequency and locations of
incidents, ethnicities targeted, intersectionalities (religion, gender
identity, sexuality, etc.) and more.
According to the Canadian Criminal Code, a hate crime is defined as a crime motivated by hate,
based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical
disability, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor. Only three sections of the Canadian criminal
code specifically deal with hate crimes: s. 318, s. 319 and s. 430. While the s. 430 is not specific to
race, there are intersections related to religion, race and ethnicity.
Historically, Canada has resisted the need for national race-based data—an attitude that became
more apparent with the government’s achingly slow response to the need for race-based data
collection in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the government’s lack of haste,
race-based data was eventually collected that highlights the collective, targeted and informed
calls to action needed to successfully move Canada closer to the equitable standards of other
western nations, such as the United Kingdom and United States.
However, no changes were made to the Canadian 2021 census with respect to race-based data,
as per the Government of Canada’s $6.2 million commitment to “increase reliable, usable, and
comparable data and evidence regarding racism and discrimination” and enhance the collection
of disaggregated race data (Building a Foundation for Change: Canada’s Anti-Racism
Strategy 2019-2022). As such, the government neglected to meet its anti-racism objectives by
the end of 2022.
Methodology
Race-based hate incidents in Canada are a multi-layered problem that requires a multi-layered
solution. The goal of this research is to provide disaggregated data as a foundation for the effective
implementation of evidence-based strategies and action plans for addressing race-based hate
incidents particular to each sector/institution.
Data Collection
Our research team employed Google Alerts to collect media articles related to potential
race-based hate incidents reported by media between 2018-2022. Google Alerts is a service
that emails the user when new search results (such as web pages and newspaper articles)
are found that match the user’s search term(s). With an anti-racist lens, volunteers carefully
reviewed each link in the Google Alert emails to identify incidents that fit our parameters for
data collection. Applicable articles were then stored in a data sheet that also tracked several
characteristics, including: the frequency and location of reported incidents; ethnicities targeted;
intersectionalities (religion, gender identity, sexuality, etc.); and more. The data from this sheet
was then visualized into the dashboard.
Limitations
Canadian Cultural Mosaic Foundation is entirely run by volunteers; thus, our projects, including
this research and report, are subject to limitations in time, funding and other resources. As such,
we urge researchers to use this freely available data to further improve standards around race-
based data collection.
• The data set is subject to the limitations of the Google Alerts system for monitoring.
• Article publication dates may differ from incident dates; however, all incidents
included in the research occurred between 2018-2022.
• Op-eds were generally excluded from the data set, unless referencing a particular
incident.
• While we have included hate crimes as identified in the source articles, we are
unable to accurately track and quantify the total number of hate incidents that
are later deemed hate crimes due to limited resources.
Protective Services
Protective services include law enforcement (police, peace officers,
security), as well as fire and military.
Transit
Transit includes public transportation services such as bus, metro,
trains, stops and stations.
Education
Education includes K-12 schools and boards, as well as post-secondary
institutions.
In the data, politics covered a broad range of contexts but, often, involved political figures
discussing both systemic and person-to-person racism. Of these incidents, 49% involved
politicians denying the presence of racism in Canadian institutions and/or refusing to act on or
discuss anti-racism initiatives. This occurred at all levels of government—municipal, provincial
and federal. Notably:
Online
Our data found that 276 incidents occurring on digital platforms
were reported to the media, mostly race-based hate in the form
of comments, messages, posts and videos (83% hate speech. 57%
harassment). The most targeted groups on social media platforms
(e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Tik Tok, Twitter) were Black
people (37%) and Indigenous Peoples (19%). There are also social
media accounts solely dedicated to racist content (e.g. Nazis of
YEG) which have not been restricted, blocked or charged.
Businesses
Private businesses, such as retail stores and service providers,
experienced a high number of reported incidents (294), likely due to
the large and varied number of patrons utilizing businesses. These
incidents can be placed in sub-categories: businesses denying
the presence of racism in their practices; businesses selling racist
merchandise; and businesses targeted with racist attacks.
Violence
Violence as an overarching theme includes various types of harm done towards people, including:
• group-based physical assaults, including both organized hate groups and informal
groups of people perpetuating harm
Among all types of violence, Black and Indigenous Peoples were targeted most (32% and 16%,
respectively). These situations were the most likely to escalate to physical violence, which included
slapping, stabbing, pushing and physical assault, sometimes resulting in death. Twenty percent
of violent incidents were based on Islamophobia. For example, the accumulation of racist bullying
incidents caused the suicide of Amal Alshteiwi, a 9-year-old Syrian refugee, in 2019.
“Hate symbols”, in this report, is an umbrella term for physical-visual representations of hate. While
hate symbols and slurs can apply to various types of discrimination, they are inherently rooted in
racial hate to convey specific beliefs and opinions about race. Our data shows that 334 incidents
of vandalism used “hate speech: imagery” (including hate symbols and racial slurs) —36% of which
targeted Black people, primarily with racial slurs, and 25% of which were antisemitic in nature,
primarily with swastikas on various locations (e.g. schools, public parks, political campaign signs,
etc.). Swastikas, while specifically antisemitic in nature, are also symbols of white supremacy in
general, used to promote racial hierarchies and hate against racialized people.
Confederate flags, another hate symbol representing white supremacy, appeared multiple times
in the data. Generally, they were displayed on private property in places visible to the public (e.g.
front window of a home, on vehicles or clothing). Confederate flags are inarguably rooted in anti-
Black racism, and denial of this fact perpetuates hate. Additional white supremacy symbols in
the data often suggest the farcical concept of “reverse racism”—for example, the printing and
distribution of posters with the messaging, “It’s Okay to be White”.
Anti-Asian graffiti also featured prominently in the data, with 8.7% of vandalism incidents largely
targeting Chinatowns in various municipalities and Chinese Cultural Centres. This is likely attributed
to the spread of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a rise in anti-Asian
hate. Many incidents of anti-semeitic vandalism, specifically, were investigated as hate crimes;
however, it is unclear the result of such investigations.
VISUALIZED DATA
Visualized Data
Our unprecedented data set highlights the varied nature and complexity of race-based hate
incidents perpetrated against Indigenous and racialized peoples in Canada as reported by the
media. The harm caused by such incident is palpable and clearly pervasive. As such, we are sharing
our data with researchers, governments and institutions to build a more equitable future for all
Canadians. The full, complete and interactive dataset can be viewed on our website.
100
75
INCIDENTS
50
25
0
JAN 2018 JUL 2018 JAN 2019 JUL 2019 JAN 2020 JUL 2020 JAN 2021 JUL 2021 JAN 2022 JUL 2022
MONTHLY
600
490
INCIDENTS
428
400
303
249
188
200
0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
YEARLY
3
incidents
5
incidents
5
incidents
22
311
incidents
incidents
210
incidents
71
incidents
178
incidents
56
incidents 558
incidents 25
incidents
95
incidents
Latin America 17
0 100 200 300 400
Middle Eastern 58
Female includes cis and trans women; male includes
South Asian 93 cis and trans men; other/unknown includes any gender
outside of the previously mentioned, as well as if the
article does not reference the gender of the victim. Due
Southeast Asian 27
to limited data in media reports, the other/unknown
category cannot be further segmented.
Not Specified* 524
Excludes incidents where gender is not applicable (e.g.
vandalism in a public space where no specific person is
* The “not specified” category applies when
the victim). Some incidents have multiple victims and are
the race of the victim is not mentioned or the
counted in more than one gender category.
victim(s) are racialized people in general.
IDENTITY-BASED INTERSECTIONALITIES
Xenophobia 335
Religious
328
Discrimination
Sexism 89
Anti
47
2SLGBTIQIA+
Harassment 909
Denial/Inaction
301
on Racism
Vandalism 189
Other/Unknown 17
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
We ask the Government of Canada to hire an independent agency—not Statistics Canada or law
enforcement/policing organizations, due to broken trust in racialized communities—to collect
national data on race-based hate incidents and their characteristics. As previous initiatives have
failed due to government agendas and lack of funding, it is paramount that this work is data-driven
and done in partnership with provincial and municipal governments, but without interference from
any governments, including law enforcement or the wider justice system. The independent agency
must receive adequate, ongoing funding (separate from Canada’s Anti-Racism Strategy budget),
in order to collect data as trends evolve over time, and a comprehensive understanding of anti-
racism pedagogy.
While our study is urging one major recommendation—for the federal government to hire an
independent agency to collect nation-wide data on race-based hate incidents—we encourage
policy-makers to use our data to generate further recommendations in areas such as politics,
government services, media, policing, education, sports, workplaces, businesses, online and other
industries/sectors where racialized Canadians are negatively impacted.
Conclusion
Every Canadian deserves to live a life of dignity and to share equitably in community with one
another. While we have highlighted these experiences of race-based hate incidents as a way to
catalyze solutions, the overarching devastation of racism is painfully immeasurable, as illustrated by
the disproportionately high rates of social issues amongst racialized communities. Socioeconomic
factors — conditions in which people are born into and live under—determine much of an individual’s
health. For example, one major social determinant of health, according to the World Health
Organization, is social inclusion and non-discrimination—i.e., feeling safe in one’s own community.
The time has come for Canada to lift its international mask of multiculturalism. This nation must
acknowledge the harm being perpetrated against Indigenous and racialized people daily, while
our institutions hide behind their lack of race-based data. More data is urgently needed to create
preventative approaches that will save lives.
Our research illustrates the importance of collecting robust and comprehensive race-based data
in creating policy changes that address systemic racism. Our data set is intended as a prototype
for conducting a full exploration of Canadian racism to end these ongoing injustices.
Historically, we have seen racial inequity data co-opted to push false narratives of racial inferiority,
and to justify heinous acts of racism. Researchers should strive to understand the traumatic effects
of racism, and how that presents in various contexts, to ensure sensitivity in the collection, storing
and interpretation of data. This helps to prevent the misappropriation of data and further harm to
racialized communities.
New studies, conducted through an anti-racist lens, are necessary to investigate the degree,
prevalence, frequency and intersectionalities of race-based hate incidents, and how racialized
communities are impacted. The data collected can inform actions and interventions at a systemic
level that will help to improve racial equity.
Beyond our recommendation, we call on all federal, provincial and municipal policymakers to
examine our findings, for characteristics specific to their legislation, to engage in necessary reform.
Racism isolates, marginalizes and destroys — it is a centuries-old pandemic that must be addressed
and eradicated.