Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Immigration
Immigration
Immigration
[ Access provided at 17 Mar 2022 19:20 GMT from National University of Singapore ]
8
Migrant Landscapes:
A Spatial Analysis of South Asian
Male Migrants in Singapore
Junjia Ye
Introduction
Did it ever occur to you that the people we interact with daily are as
different as we are similar? (Singapore Heritage Festival Website)
The question above was featured on the homepage of the Singapore Heritage
Festival that took place in August 2010. It makes reference to Singapore as
an immigrant port-city that is, and has always been, diverse. The transnational
movement of migrants into a global city such as Singapore means diverse
groups must work, live and play in a shared urban setting (Yeoh 2004).
Drawing from personal interviews conducted as part of a larger research
project, this chapter focuses on the lives of low-waged and temporary
male migrants in Singapore to illustrate the constraints and exclusions they
experience in Singapore. This chapter further shows that there are instances
of spontaneity and informality that arise in the urban spaces used by low-
waged male migrants in Singapore during specific times of the week when
they have a rest day. I use examples of public spaces in Boon Lay that are
popular amongst Bangladeshi low-waged male migrants to highlight the power
relations that undergird these landscapes when migrant workers appropriate
public spaces.
142
degree of control over, migrants in various sectors of its labour force. The
bulk of its recent population growth is made up of migrants (The Straits
Times 2 June 2012). Singapore’s segmented labour market creates a mobile,
cosmopolitan labour force of highly skilled workers who are willing and able
to embrace social and career mobilities while low skilled workers become
increasingly exchangeable, replaceable, and most vitally, cheapened (McDowell
2003; Yeoh 2006).
Gender emerges as a significant factor in the way migrants are positioned
in the labour market. Indeed, it has been argued that women from developing
economies are seen to be suited for jobs in the textile and electronics
industries because of persistent assumptions about their obedience, patience
and dexterity. As a result of such attributes, they are also paid low wages,
denied job security and given limited work benefits (Mills 1999; Parrenas
2001; Wright 2006; Elmhirst 2007). While the impact of migration on
gendered identities and work has generally focused on female migrants, there
is a growing scholarship on the reproduction and experiences of masculinities
(Jackson 1991; McDowell 2003; Datta et al. 2009). This chapter draws
insights from scholars who research the interface of migration and gender,
but also extends their arguments towards analysing the spatial manifestations
of migrant masculinities.
The increase in Singapore’s non-citizen population has grown rapidly
since the turn of the century but was particularly sharp between 2006 and
2010. This is a direct consequence of the city-state’s restructuring policies
to recruit foreign labour (The Straits Times 2 June 2012). The workforce
has been configured strategically to incorporate a large foreign labour pool
that can be broadly divided into two categories: foreign talent and foreign
workers. Both groups of workers are brought into Singapore strategically
but they are treated differently (see for example, Yeoh 2006).
Migrant workers fill a gap in the labour market where physically
demanding, yet low-paying jobs are rejected by locals. Work permit holders
earn no more than $2,000 a month. The permits are valid for either one or
two years and, depending on the availability of work, can be renewed for up
to two years (Ministry of Manpower 2012). They take on jobs that require
manual labour or shift work in sectors such as manufacturing, construction,
shipbuilding, personal services as well as domestic work (The Straits Times
9 December 2009; Yeoh 2006). Gender, nationality and ethnicity profiles
shape the sort of work these migrants can access. Yeoh and Huang (1998)
have argued that the feminisation of migrant labour is apparent in the way
female migrant workers are channeled by state policies into domestic work
for Singaporean families. On the other hand, physically demanding labour,
such as construction and shipbuilding, is largely performed by foreign males,
with Bangladeshis and Chinese nationals among the most visible, though a
large number of Thais and Burmese also work in these sectors. Seventy per
cent of the labour force in construction is done by foreigners, far higher
than the national dependency ratio on foreign labour of 37.6 per cent
(The Straits Times 9 December 2009).
A measure of regulating foreign workers and the division of labour
that has not received much scholarly attention lies in the system of approved
source countries that varies according to job sector (see for example,
Rahman 2000). These are divided into “traditional source countries” (TSC),
“non-traditional source countries” (NTSC), North Asian countries (NAS)
and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Employers of each sector are
given regulations by the state to recruit only from the approved sources.
For example, in the manufacturing industry, only workers from Malaysia
(TSC), NAS and the PRC can be recruited, thus excluding migrants from
NTSC. In the marine and construction industries, however, workers can
be recruited from all the source countries. The exclusion of NTSC
migrants from the services and manufacturing sectors channels them
towards construction and shipbuilding/repair work in Singapore. Malaysians,
on the other hand, have fewer entry barriers into the Singaporean labour
market, thus accounting for their presence in many other sectors of the
economy. It is the enforced division of labour and structural unequal
access to work in Singapore that explains the concentration of workers from
particular sending countries in selected sectors, which is in turn interwoven
with the dynamics of “race”/ethnicity and nationality (Ho 2006). Migrants
on the work permit are also highly dependent on their employers as
stipulated by the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act in Singapore.
According to the Act, aside from their wages, workers entering through
the work permit system rely on their employers for housing, daily meals,
transportation to and from the work site, medical insurance and also
eventual repatriation.
NTSC migrants come from India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Philippines
and Pakistan.
along certain roads and creating a “buffer zone” between residents of the
Gardens and the foreign workers (The Straits Times 12 October 2008). These
measures serve to constrain workers spatially by containing and regulating
their movements, thus creating an enclave that is quite different from its
surroundings. The private living space of the migrant worker becomes a
landscape of surveillance and power. As the marketing director of Simpang
Lodge says,
I want to make the police presence felt to keep the residents on their
toes.… In other dorms, they can’t cook, so they’ll go out and explore.…
They may not approach girls, but girls may approach them.… We have
two guards, one going around, one just outside checking people. No
girls can go in.… Sex (work) in workers’ dormitory happens infrequently,
but this could be because of the workers’ physical needs. This must be
properly managed within the law instead of allowing them to prowl in our
neighbourhood residences. The dormitories’ security system (CCTV, entry
passes), guards, patrolling, strict discipline enforcement and working with
neighbourhood police to deter such cases would help to prevent such things
from happening.… (The New Paper 18 January 2009)
The above quote illustrates that while female sex workers are stigmatised
as “on the prowl”, it is the male foreign worker that must be kept in check.
His sexual urges are “to be deter(ed)” since he can easily fall prey to feminine
lures, even if he does not solicit for sex. His intrinsic “physical needs” as
a foreign, heterosexual male appear normalised yet under the gloss of this
rhetoric, these qualities pathologise him as a subject for close surveillance.
Containing workers within the company’s dormitory allows for policing and
remote supervision through the CCTV to prevent “unlawful” acts. These
housing regulations therefore recreate the low-status male foreign worker
as a person that needs to be disciplined, controlled and kept subordinate,
reaffirming unequal relations of power and hierarchy embedded within the
daily lives of male migrants. There is hence a landscape of surveillance in
the daily lives of these migrants where discriminatory politics are imbued in
the way space is regulated in and around their dormitories.
Indeed, male migrants continue to be stigmatised and excluded from
the everyday spaces of locals. In public spaces at HDB blocks they are also
often seen as a nuisance or as a danger to Singaporean residents. As one
resident of Bedok housing estate who was interviewed by the newspapers
remarked, “the workers sometimes call out to [our wives] when [they]
come home late” and that they see foreign workers “sitting, drinking and
sometimes sleeping at the void deck of Block 151” (The Straits Times
4 July 2010). Official responses to these contentions reinforce the “us” versus
“them” divide. The MP for Bedok in 2010 sought to “create another hub
for the workers to congregate”. The manager of a large migrant dormitory
in the neighbourhood of Pioneer housing estate also expressed, “We try to
have all these facilities [within the dorm’s compound] so that they don’t
have to go outside and disturb the residents when they are not working”
(Author’s interview 2012). As Yeoh and Huang argue, “[w]hen the dominant
concedes certain spaces to the ‘other’, it is not only seen as the power of
benevolence on the part of the dominant, but also simply redraws the lines
that divide” (1998: 594). Indeed, from the quotes above, it is possible to
argue that attitudes advocating the segregation of foreign workers become
powerful ways in which processes of “othering” become written into space.
Consequently, these measures to keep migrant men within certain tightly
controlled spaces create wider landscapes of exclusion against them. This,
in turn, heightens the mobility constraints these migrants face in their lives
in Singapore. Examining low-waged migrants and their use of public space
highlights the ways in which existing power relations can be negotiated.
However, migrants can negotiate their use of public spaces in ways that
destabilise the regulations over their use of space temporarily, as will be
discussed in the next section.
08 C-Landscapes.indd 150
Source: Author’s personal collection.
7/30/13 10:35:55 AM
Figure 2 Male migrants along the corridor on a Sunday night
08 C-Landscapes.indd 151
Source: Author’s personal collection.
7/30/13 10:36:01 AM
152 Junjia Ye
spontaneity of this space comes from the informal ways in which these male
migrants use this pathway. While there is rarely direct interaction between
migrants and other users of this pathway, the spontaneous encounters are
characterised by looking, hearing, observing and sometimes gossiping about
the other. Low-waged male migrants mark their presence in the city by
appropriating public spaces that are unused by other urban residents such
as the sloped surfaces along the pathway. In other words, while their use
of such spaces is largely a result of exclusion from other urban areas, such
as shopping malls, the act of appropriating space and encountering locals
spontaneously allows them to challenge the constraints they face in much
of their daily lives.
This way of using public space therefore becomes an example of the
agency exercised by these male migrants. The pathway was not planned as
a site for such informal social gatherings
Agency in this context refers to nor encounters between people of
the actions taken by migrants to
different backgrounds but is part of the
rework the power relations under-
pinning their social positions in infrastructure or facilities that support
society. the adjacent transportation landscape.
The appropriation of this space becomes
an important node for the social survival strategy of many Bangladeshi male
migrants who work in the western part of Singapore. There are often social
gatherings before or after someone returns to or from Bangladesh, with the
sharing of news and food from home during such occasions.
As one respondent who visits this pathway every Sunday evening and
who has been working for four years at a shipyard in Jurong West says,
I also send money here because the rates are better. Inside Jurong Point,
(the licensed remittance companies) cheat our money. Rates so high. I must
send this back every month—that is why I come to Singapore. To send
money back because I am the only son and I also have a wife who would
be happy that I send money back.
Hundiwallas are undocumented remittance agents who transfer funds back to Bangladesh
on behalf of the migrants.
man working in a globalised labour force. The way in which migrants use
this physical space of the pathway is, therefore, part of a broader strategy
that is intertwined with their economic livelihoods in Singapore and their
transnational linkages to Bangladesh. The use of space here, as the quote
suggests, articulates a larger ongoing identity project where male migrants can
practise their masculine roles as the family’s breadwinner. Such relationships
are highly valued in that they enable the migrants to navigate the difficulties
of adaptation in an unknown place. The social networks that are forged in
these places are a significant source of emotional and often practical support.
The social relations that flourish in this pathway become a way in which
circulating flows of low-waged Bangladeshi workers stake an enduring claim
to the city’s public spaces despite the short-term duration of stay allowed by
their work permits. Through their regular, informal claims to this space, the
pathway behind Boon Lay MRT becomes part of the spontaneous landscape
inhabited by Bangladeshi male migrants.
Concluding Notes
This chapter has explored how the lives of Bangladeshi male migrants in
Singapore are not an exception to the fabric of Singaporean life, rather they
constitute ongoing urban processes in the city. Through the case study of a
pathway at Boon Lay, this chapter shows how male migrants can use public
spaces in ways that are not only different from other urban residents but
also contrary to how the space was meant to be used. Such unplanned
ways of using space become the informal means by which migrant workers
recreate certain public spaces as an exercise of their agency. The spontaneity
of their encounter with the other, however, is not only shaped by their
status within Singapore’s labour market but also a result of their social
relations with other urban residents. Such spaces enable them to maintain
transnational linkages with Bangladesh, such as through the remittance
activities. Remittance money fulfils economic as well as social roles as the
male migrants reproduce their identities as responsible breadwinners for
their families back home. The agency of the migrants is thus reflected in
the landscape but also highlights the power inequalities and negotiations
they face in Singapore.
Though there is much discrimination and exclusion in the lives of low-
waged Bangladeshi male migrants as reflected in the constraints they face in
the private sphere, the spontaneity of their encounter with Singaporeans in the
Discussion Questions
1. Other than the Bangladeshi male migrants discussed here, how do
other groups of migrants, low-waged or otherwise, use public spaces in
Singapore?
2. How do you think Singaporeans interact with these other groups
of migrants? An interesting activity to investigate this would be to
spend an afternoon at a site that has both Singaporeans and migrants.
How do they share the space and how do they interact with one
another?
3. What are the implications of Singapore’s growing cultural diversity for
notions of citizenship and belonging in the city-state? In your answer,
consider which types of migrants are included or excluded from
citizenship and belonging in Singapore.
Further Readings
1. For an analysis on how female domestic workers use and claim urban
spaces: see Yeoh, B.S.A. and Huang, S. (1998). “Negotiating public space:
Strategies and styles of migrant female domestic workers in Singapore”.
Urban Studies 35: 583–602.
2. For a discussion on how migrant masculinities have been discussed in
geography, see Datta, K., McIlwaine, C., Herbert, J., Evans, Y., May, J.,
and Wills, J. (2009). “Men on the move: Narratives of migration and
work among low-paid migrant men in London”. Social and Cultural
Geography 10 (8): 853–73.
3. Jackson, P. (1991). “Towards a cultural politics of masculinity: Towards
a social geography”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
16: 199–213.
References
Bangladesh High Commission Website. http://www.bangladesh.org.sg/cms/ [accessed 10
June 2012].
Beaverstock, J. (2011). “Servicing British Expatriate ‘Talent’ in Singapore: Exploring
Ordinary Transnationalism and the Role of the ‘Expatriate’ Club”. Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (5): 709–28.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. MA: Harvard University Press.
Coe, N. and Jordhus-Lier, D. (2010). “Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the
geographies of labour”. Progress of Human Geography 35 (2): 211–33.
Datta, K., McIlwaine, C., Herbert, J., and Evans, Y. (2009). “Men on the move:
Narratives of migration and work among low-paid migrant men in London”.
Social and Cultural Geography 10 (8): 853–73.
Elmhirst, R. (2007). “Tigers and Gangsters: Masculinities and Feminised Migration
in Indonesia”. Population, Space and Place 13: 225–38.
Ho. E.L.E. (2006) “Negotiating belonging and perceptions of citizenship in a
transnational world: Singapore, a cosmopolis”. Social and Cultural Geography
7 (3): 385‒401.
Jackson, P. (1991). “Towards a cultural politics of masculinity: Towards a social
geography”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16: 199–213.
McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant masculinities? Employment change and white working
class youth. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Mills, M.B. (1999). Thai Women in the Global Labour Force: Consuming Desires. NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
Ministry of Manpower Website. http://www.mom.gov.sg [accessed 10 June 2012].
Osella, F. and Osella, C. (2000). “Migration, Money and Masculinity in Kerala”.
Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 117–33.
Parrenas, R. (2001). Servants of Globalization: Women, migration and domestic work.
CA: Stanford University Press.
Rahman, Md Mizanur (2000). “Emigration and Development: The Case of a
Bangladeshi Village”. International Migration (USA) 38 (4): 109–30.
SCAL Website. http://www.scal.com.sg/ [accessed 12 June 2012].
Singapore Heritage Festival Website. http://www.heritagefest.org.sg/en/ [accessed 5 May
2012].
The Straits Times (2008). “The ‘them’ and ‘us’ divide”. 12 October.
——— (2009). “Employers want more foreign workers: Survey”. 9 December.
——— (2010). “Maid agencies eye Bangladesh”. 2 September.
——— (2010). “Foreign workers rile some Bedok residents”. 4 July.
——— (2012). “What foreigners think: Hostility comes from a small minority”.
2 June.
——— (2012).“Residents’ Corner in Little India may be cordoned off”. 13 April.
Wright, M. (2006). Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism. New
York and London: Routledge.
Yeoh, B.S.A. (2004). “Cosmopolitanism and its exclusions”. Urban Studies 41 (12):
2431–45.
——— (2006). “Bifurcated labour: the unequal incorporation of transmigrants in
Singapore”. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 97 (1): 26–37.
Yeoh, B.S.A. and Huang, S. (1998). “Negotiating public space: Strategies and styles of
migrant female domestic workers in Singapore”. Urban Studies 35: 583–602.