MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: Ma. Theresa P. Ramirez

Position: Position: Principal I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Rufino Aguilar Memorial High School Date of Review: February 7, 2023
Rating Period: August 2022-June 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and content within and and/or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form/s done
teaching areas. through
(PPST 1.1.2) onsite/face-to-face/in-person Efficiency
classroom observation.

If onsite/face-to-face/in-
person classes are not
implemented,
*through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC session.

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that inter-observer agreement
enhance learner form/s done through
achievement in onsite/face-to-face/in-person
literacy and classroom observation.
numeracy skills.
(PPST 1.4.2) If onsite/face-to-face/in-
person classes are not
7% implemented,
*through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
LAC session. Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies to and/or inter-observer
develop critical agreement form/s done
and creative through onsite/face-to-
thinking, as well face/in-person
as other higher- classroom observation.
order thinking
skills.(PPST If onsite/face-to-face/in-
1.5.2) person classes are not
implemented,
7% *through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC session.
Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom observation Quality

Education Environment classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and Diversity structure to and/or inter-observer
of Learners engage learners, agreement form/s done
individually or in through onsite/face-to-
groups, in face/in-person
meaningful classroom observation.
exploration, Efficiency
discovery and If onsite/face-to-face/in-
hands-on person classes are not
activities within a implemented,
range of physical *through observation of a
learning demonstration teaching via
environments. LAC session.
(PPST 2.3.2)
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education learner behavior tool (COT) rating sheet
Services constructively by and/or inter-observer
applying positive 7% agreement form/s done
and non-violent through onsite/face-to-
discipline to face/in-person
ensure learning- classroom observation.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
focused Efficiency
environments. If onsite/face-to-face/in-
(PPST 2.6.2) person classes are not
implemented,

*through observation of a
demonstration teaching via LAC
session

Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services developmentally and/or inter-observer
appropriate agreement form/s done
learning through onsite/face-to-
experiences to face/in-person
address learners’ classroom observation. Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, If onsite/face-to-face/in-
interests and person classes are not
experiences. implemented,
(PPST 3.1.2)
*through observation of a
demonstration teaching via Timeliness
LAC session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services implemented observer agreement form/s done
developmentally through onsite/face-to-face/in-
sequenced person classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite/face-to-face/in-
processes to person classes are not
meet curriculum implemented,
requirements and
varied teaching *through observation of a
contexts.(PPST demonstration teaching via Efficiency
4.1.2) LAC session.

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC
discussions that 7% sessions/FGDs/meetings/oth
use teacher and er collegial discussions
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC
to enrich teaching sessions/FGDs/
practice.(PPST meetings/other collegial Efficiency
4.4.2) discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/FGDs/meetings/oth
er collegial discussions that
use teacher and learner
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance.
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education developed, tool (COT) rating
Services organized and sheet/s and/or inter-
used appropriate observer agreement
teaching and form/s done through
learning onsite/face-to-face/in-
resources, 7% person classroom
including ICT, to observation.
address learning Efficiency
goals.(PPST If onsite/face-to-face/in-
4.5.2) person classes are not
implemented,

*through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet/s and/or
Services and organized and inter-observer agreement form/s
Reporting used diagnostic, done through onsite/face-to-
formative and face/in-person classroom
summative observation.
assessment
strategies If onsite/face-to-face/in-
consistent with person classes are not
curriculum implemented,
requirements.
(PPST 5.1.2) *through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC session.

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner  Individual Learning
Services progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
7%
achievement  Peer Assessment Plan
using learner  Sample of learners’
attainment data. output with
(PPST 5.2.2) reflection/self- Efficiency
assessment
 Progress
charts/anecdotal
records
 Class/e-record/grading
sheets Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
 Frequesncy of errors
with identified least/most
mastered skills
 Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. 1. . Any one (1) of the Quality
Education Communicated following:
Services promptly and  A sample of corrected
clearly the test paper of a learnner
learners’ needs, in a learning area with
progress and 7% parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to signature and date of
key stakeholders, receipt.
including  Minutes of the meetings Efficiency
parents/guardians with key stakeholders
. (PPST 5.4.2) (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
 Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting.
 Communication with key
Timeliness
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
 Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
 Others (pls. Specify)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal entry that Quality

Education Growth & personal highlights the application of a
Services Professional philosophy of learner-centered teaching
Development teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or
learner-centered. community work.
(PPST 7.1.2) Efficiency

Timeliness

14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the ICT Quality

professional Coordinator/ School Head/Focal
development Person in charge of e-SAT
goals, based on 2. IPCRF-DP
the Philippine 3. Mid-Year Review Form
Professional 4. updated IPCRF-DP from
Efficiency
Standards for Phase II
Teachers. (PPST
7.5.2)

Timeliness

Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
various related  Committee involvement;
works/activities  Involvement as
that contribute to module/learning ,materi
the teaching- al writer/validator;
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learing process  Involvement as a Efficiency
resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based
instruction;
Timeliness
 Book or journal
authorship/co-
authorship/
contributorship ;
 Advisorship/
Coordinatorship
/chairpersonship;
 Participation in
demonstration teaching;
 Participation as
research presenter in a
forum/conference;
 Mentoring of pre-
service/in-service
teachers;
 Conducted research
within the rating period;
 Others (pls specify)

MA.THERESA P.RAMIREZ ______________ DR. EDMARK IAN L. CABIO, Ed.D., CESO VI

Rater Ratee Approving Authority