Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exam 2: P Is A Universal Function For All The
Exam 2: P Is A Universal Function For All The
Problem 1:
For a pure, simple fluid the molecular form of the corresponding states principle can be
written
P* = f1 (T *,V*) (1)
(a) What assumptions are implicit in this equation? Explain why argon,
krypton and methane obey this law, but water, methanol, neopentane and helium do
not.
where X is some appropriate third parameter. Discuss appropriate criteria for choosing
a suitable third parameter X, and give an example of a widely used third parameter of
this kind.
(d) The surface tension of saturated liquid argon at 69.4K (T* = 0.570) is
0.01726 J/m2. Using the data presented in Table 1:
(i) estimate the surface tension of saturated liquid nitrogen and saturated liquid
water at the same reduced temperature. The reduced surface tension can be written as:
γσ 2
γ*=
ε
Given:
æ ¶P ö æ ¶ 2 P ö
Critical point conditions: ç ÷ = 0, ç 2 ÷ = 0
è ¶V øTC è ¶V øTC
Boltzmann’s constant: k = 1.38066 x 10-23 J.K-1
Problem 2.
B = ∑ ∑ xα xβ Bαβ (4)
α β
where
∞
where uαβ (r) is the pair potential for a molecule of component a interacting with a
molecule of component b, and is of the form
⎛ r ⎞
uαβ (r) = ε αβ f ⎜ ⎟ (6)
⎝ σ αβ ⎠
where f is assumed to be the same function for all pairs in the mixture. The unlike pair
parameters ε αβ and σ αβ are often approximated by the Lorentz-Berthelot combining
rules, which relate them to the like pair parameters:
( )
1/2
ε αβ = ε αα ε ββ (7)
(
σ αβ = σ αα + σ ββ / 2 ) (8)
(a) Derive an equation for B for a mixture of square well molecules, having the pair
potential
What is the limit for Bab when T approaches infinity? Do you expect the square well
model to work well at high temperatures?
(b) For pair potentials of the form of eqn. (6), show that Bab obeys a corresponding
states relation of the form
*
Bαβ = f (Tαβ* ) (10)
where Bαβ *
= Bαβ / (2 / 3)πσ αβ
3
, Tαβ* = kT / ε αβ . Also, show that an equivalent
corresponding states relation for the second virial coefficient is
where Tcα and Tcβ are the critical temperatures for pure a and pure b, respectively.
Derive the corresponding equation for the pseudocritical volume Vcab in terms of the
pure component critical volumes, Vca and Vcb .
Given: In simple corresponding states theory the reduced (i.e. dimensionless) critical
temperature, Tc* = kTc / e , pressure, Pc* = Pcs 3 / e , and volume, Vc* = Vc / s 3 , are
universal
constants.
3N /2
1 ⎛ 2π mkT ⎞
Z ( qelec qrot qvib )
N
Q=
N ! ⎜⎝ h2 ⎟⎠
( )
Z = ∫ ...∫ d r1 d r2 ... d rN d ω 1 d ω 2 ... d ω N exp ⎡⎣ −U r N ,ω N / ( kT ) ⎤⎦
and integrations over the dri are over the volume of the system, and integrations over
the wi are over all possible values of the molecular orientation angles.
(b) Which parts of the partition function can usually be treated classically at room
temperature, and which cannot? What is the criterion that determines whether we can
use classical mechanics or not?
(c) Which parts of the partition function depend on the volume of the system? Which
parts of the partition function depend on the temperature?
(d) Which part(s) of the partition function must be known to determine the pressure, P
(i.e. the equation of state)? Why is this difficult to evaluate for a liquid?
(e) Which part(s) of the partition function must be known to determine the internal
energy, U?
Given:
Q = ∑ne
− En /kT
⎛ ∂lnQ ⎞
P = kT ⎜
⎝ ∂V ⎟⎠ T ,N
⎛ ∂lnQ ⎞
U = kT 2 ⎜
⎝ ∂T ⎟⎠ N ,V
Problem 1
The simple corresponding states principle works well for argon, krypton and
methane because these are relatively heavy molecules for which quantum effects for
translation are negligible at normal temperatures, and because their intermolecular
potential energy is well described by a function with only two parameters. For water,
methanol and neopentane a two-parameter potential is insufficient so the second
approximation is not valid. For helium, since this is a very light molecule quantum
effects for translation will be significant and cause departures from simple
corresponding states.
⎛ ∂P * ⎞
⎜⎝ ∂V * ⎟⎠ = 0
C
⎛ ∂2 P* ⎞
⎜⎝ ∂V *2 ⎟⎠ = 0
C
Applying the two equations to equation (1):
( )
f1' TC*,VC* = 0 (1)
f (T ,V ) = 0
1
'' *
C
*
C
(2)
Solving equations (1) and (2) for the two unknowns TC* and VC*
kTC
TC* = = c1 = constant
ε
V
VC* = C3 = c2 N A = constant
σ
ε T
∴ = C
k c1
VC
σ3 =
c2 N A
PCσ 3
∴ PC* = = f1 (TC* ,VC* ) = f1 ( c1 ,c2 N A ) = c3 = constant
ε
ε P
= C
σ 3
c3
∴Eqn.(3-c) becomes
P ⎛ T V⎞
c3 = f1 ⎜ c1 ,c2 N A ⎟
PC ⎝ TC VC ⎠
or
Pr = f2 (Tr ,Vr )
(c)
The appropriate criteria for choosing a third parameter, X, are:
(a) it should be sensitive to the acentricity of the intermolecular forces, i.e. to
departures from assumption (ii) above, namely that the intermolecular forces
can be described by a two-parameter potential function.
(b) It should be easy to measure, so that its’ value is likely to have been measured
for many different substances.
An example is the Pitzer acentric factor, ω, which is a measure of the slope of the plot
of log10Prsat vs. 1/T. This is sensitive to departures from approximation (ii), so that the
slopes of such a plot are very different for water, benzene and the inert gases. Also,
vapor pressure is very easy to measure.
(d)
For
nitrogen:
T=T*(ε/k)=0.5696*96.92=55.21
K
γN
=(96.92*1.38066E-‐‑23*1.136)/ (3.663E-10)^2 = 0.009973 J.m-2
For water:
T=
T*(ε/k)=0.5696*809.1=460.86
K
γH20=(809.1*1.38066E-‐‑23*1.136)/ (2.641E-10)^2 = 0.1819 J.m-2
The result for nitrogen is lower than the experimental value but not by a great deal.
This difference is due to the fact that the simple corresponding states theory is not
highly accurate for nitrogen, also the CST calculation does not properly account for
three-body forces which are known to have a large effect on surface tension.
The result for water is more than four times the experimental value. This is because
water cannot be described by a two-parameter potential function, and surface tension is
very sensitive to this breakdown of assumption (ii).
Problem 2
(a)
( )
∞
Bαβ = 2π ∫ drr 2 1− e
−uαβ (r )/kT
0
2π 3 2π 3
=
3
σ αβ + σ αβ ( R 3 − 1) 1− e αβ
3
ε /kT
( )
B = ∑ α ∑ β xα xβ Bαβ
When T approaches infinity the second term on the right vanishes and Bαβ approaches
( 2π / 3)σ αβ3 . This is physically incorrect, it should approach zero. Thus the square
well model does not work well at high temperature, but is a useful model at lower
temperatures.
∞
Bαβ = 2π ∫ dr ∗r ∗2 1− e
0 ( ( )
− f r ∗ /Tαβ
∗
)
or
∗
Bαβ = Bαβ / ( 2 / 3) πσ αβ
3
∞
= 3∫ dr ∗r ∗2 1− e
0 ( ( )
− f r ∗ /Tαβ
∗
) = f (T ∗
αβ )
Moreover, the pseudocritical temperature and volume are related to the potential
parameters by:
⎛ε ⎞ ⎛ε ε ⎞
1/2
= c1 (Tcα Tcβ )
1/2
T αβ
= c1 ⎜ αβ ⎟ = c1 ⎜ αα 2 ββ ⎟
c
⎝ k ⎠ ⎝ k ⎠
1
( 1
) ( )
3
Vcαβ = c2 N Aσ αβ
3
= c2 N A σ αα + σ ββ = c1/3
2 N A σ αα + c2 N A σ ββ
1/3 1/3 1/3
8 8
(
1 1/3
)
3
= Vc,α + Vc,1/3β
8
where the Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules of eqns. (7) and (8) have been used for the
unlike pair parameters.
Problem 3
⎛ ∂lnQ ⎞
P = kT ⎜
⎝ ∂V ⎟⎠ N ,T
so the only parts of the partition function that contribute to the pressure are
those that depend on the volume. In the semi-classical approximation the only
part of Q that depends on V is the configurational part, Z.
⎛ ∂lnQ ⎞
U = kT 2 ⎜
⎝ ∂T ⎟⎠ N ,V
Since all parts of the partition function depend on T, they all contribute to U.