Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture1 SystemReliabilityModelling
Lecture1 SystemReliabilityModelling
Assumptions of Modelling
Series Model
Series Model
The system reliability, Rs, for the series model is expressed as :
where, E1, E2,…En refer to the events of units (or components) 1,2, …
n being functionally good, respectively.
since pi = P(t1>t)
Tutorial 1
Consider a system having three components in series. The
reliabilities of these components are 0.7, 0.6, 0.9
respectively. Find the system reliability .
Series Model
Following observations can be made for a series model :
Tutorial 3
The failure rate of three components are 0.065 X 10-3, 0.18
X 10-3 and 0.96 X 10-3 per hour. Evaluate the failure rate,
MTTF of the system and the reliability at 500 hours if these
components are connected in series.
Parallel Model
Parallel Model
The reliability of a parallel system is given by
Parallel Model
+1
● +1= 1 − [1 − ]
● ∆ = +1 −
= [1 − ]
Tutorial 5
The failure rate of three components are 0.065 X 10-3, 0.18
X 10-3 and 0.96 X 10-3 per hour. Evaluate the failure rate,
MTTF of the system and the reliability at 500 hours if these
components are connected in parallel.
Series Parallel Model
Derive a general expression for the reliability of the model and hence evaluate
the unreliability of the system if all components have a reliability of 0.8.
k-out of-m system
● In many situations, a system functions properly if any k out of m units function
properly. If each of the units is identical, the probability of exactly k successes out of
m is given by,
Assuming two identical units, perfect switching, and both normally operating
and standby components have a constant hazard rate λ.
• After the first failure of the equivalent unit (failure of A), the standby
component (B) takes over for the remainder of the mission and therefore the
system does not fail.
• If there is a second failure of the equivalent unit (failure of B), the system
also fails.
• The logic of this system operation implies that the Poisson distribution can be
used to evaluate the probability of system.
−λ
P[no components fail] = 0(t) =
−λ
P[ exactly one component fails] = 1(t) = λ
● 2 standby components
● n standby components
A D
C E
C E
(a) A complex system
A D
C E
Decomposition Method
A D
C E
Example 1
Input 1 2 3
4 Output
6
Input 5 7
Output
Output
6
Input 5 7
Input 5
8
Input 1 2 3
6
Output
Input 5 7 Output 6
8 Input 5 7
8
Cut-Set Method
● A cut set is a set of system components which, when failed,
causes failure of the system.
● A set of components which must fail in order to disrupt all
paths between the input and the output of the reliability
network.
● A minimum cut set is the one that contains no other cut-
sets within it.
● The unreliability of the system is given by the probability
that at least one minimal cut-set fails.
Cut-Set Method
● It can be easily programmed on a digital computer for the
fast and efficient solution of any general network.
● The cut sets are directly related to the modes of system
failure and therefore identify the distinct and discrete ways
in which a system may fail.
● Approximations can be used to simplify evaluation.
Cut-Set Method
Cut-Set Method
Cut-Set Method
Cut-Set Method
Example 2
● Find the cut sets of the following figure:
2 3
Input 1 Output
4
Path-Set Method / Tie-Set Method
Path-Set Method
● A path set is the complete path through the reliability block
diagram
● Minimum path set is defined as the path set that contains
no other path set within it
● Reliability of a system is given by the union of all minimal
path sets
Path-Set Method
Path-Set Method
Event Space Method
● This method is also called Event tree.
● This method is based on listing all possible logical
occurrences of the system.
● The reliability of the system is then determined by the
union of all successful occurrences
● The number of occurrences depends on the number of
components in the system.
● For example a system with 5 components will have 25
occurrences.
Reduction Method
● Now we look for two terms from column 1 which differ in
only one literal and combine them into a single term at
column 2.
● We can construct the rest of column 2 entries in this
manner.
● This process is once again repeated for combining the
entries of column 2 to obtain the entries of column 3 and
subsequently in the same manner for column 4.
● Once a term is used in a combination, it is eliminated from
all further considerations, to ensure that all the retained
terms are mutually exclusive.
Reduction Method
● This process is repeated until no further comparisons are
possible.
● The reliability of the system is the union of all terms that cannot
be further compared.
● The order of the terms selected for the comparison process has
no effect on the estimation of system reliability.
Functional
States
ABCDE
ABCD
Reduction Table ABCDE
ABC
ABCDE
ABCD
ABCDE
E ABCDE
ABCE
ABCDE
A B C ABCDE
ABCDE ABCD ACE
D ABCDE
ABCDE
ABCE
ABCDE
ABCDE
ABCD
ABCDE
ACD