Bài mẫu 1

There are two main schools of thought when it comes to what university students
should study. On one hand, there are those who believe that students should study
whatever they like. On the other hand, there are those who believe that students
should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as
those related to science and technology.
Those who believe that students should be free to study whatever they like argue that
university is a time for exploration and personal growth. They believe that students
should be allowed to follow their passions and interests, even if those interests don't
seem immediately practical. For example, a student might choose to study philosophy
or art history, which might not seem useful for a future career, but can still provide
valuable insights and broaden the student's understanding of the world.
On the other hand, those who believe that students should only study subjects that
will be useful in the future argue that in today's rapidly changing job market, it's
important to have skills that will be in demand. They argue that students should focus
on acquiring the skills and knowledge that will prepare them for the jobs of the future,
which are likely to be in fields like science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM).
For example, a student might choose to study computer science, which is a growing
field with many career opportunities.
In my opinion, both of these views have some merit, but ultimately I believe that
students should be encouraged to study a diverse range of subjects. While it's
important to have practical skills that will be in demand in the job market, it's also
important to have a well-rounded education that includes the humanities and social
sciences. This can help students develop critical thinking skills, become more
empathetic and culturally aware, and generally be more informed and engaged
citizens.
To illustrate this point, I can draw on my own experience as a student. I studied
computer science in university and went on to work in the tech industry, but I also
took courses in history, literature, and philosophy that helped me understand the
broader context in which technology operates. These courses helped me develop skills
like critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving that have been invaluable
in my career.
In conclusion, while there are different views on what university students should
study, I believe that a broad and diverse education that includes both practical skills
and the humanities is the best way to prepare students for the future.

Bài mẫu 2:
When it comes to what subjects university students should take, there are two major
schools of opinion. On the one hand, some people think that pupils should pursue
whatever they want to. Others, however, are of the opinion that students should only
be permitted to pursue fields of study that will be helpful in the future, such as those
involving science and technology.
The argument put forth by proponents of students studying whatever they want is
that college is a time for discovery and personal development. Even if students'
passions and interests don't seem instantly practical, they think students should be
permitted to pursue them. For instance, a student may decide to major in philosophy
or art history, which may not seem relevant to a future job but can still offer insightful
knowledge and expand one's perspective on the world.
On the other hand, proponents of the idea that students should only focus on future-
relevant topics make the case that it's critical to have skills that will be in demand in
the current employment market, which is changing quickly. They contend that
students should concentrate on gaining the information and abilities necessary to
prepare them for future careers in areas like science, technology, engineering, and
math. (STEM). For instance, a student may decide to major in computer science, which
is a rapidly expanding area with a variety of job options.
Both of these viewpoints, in my opinion, have some value, but in the end, I think that
students should be encouraged to study a variety of topics. A well-rounded education
that incorporates the arts and social studies is just as essential as having real skills that
will be in demand in the employment market. This can assist students in cultivating
their critical thinking abilities, growing in empathy and cultural awareness, and
generally becoming more educated and active citizens.
I'll use my own school experience to demonstrate this argument. I majored in
computer science in college and worked in the tech sector, but I also did courses in
history, literature, and philosophy that gave me a wider perspective on how
technology functions in society. My work has benefited greatly from these courses'
assistance in helping me build abilities like critical thinking, communication, and
problem-solving.
In closing, while there are various opinions on what university students should study, I
think the best way to prepare students for the future is to give them a well-rounded
education that incorporates both the arts and practical skills.
Bài mẫu 3:
There are varying opinions regarding the type of courses that university students should
undertake. While some argue that students should have the freedom to choose any
course of their liking, others contend that students should only pursue subjects that will
have relevance to their future careers. In this essay, I will discuss both views and finally
explain my own position.
To begin with, those in favor of students studying whatever they want believe that it is
important to allow students to follow their passion. They argue that such an approach
will lead to students developing their skills and knowledge in an area they are genuinely
interested in, leading to a more fulfilling career trajectory. Additionally, by exploring
their interests, students will develop valuable skills such as creativity, critical thinking,
communication and problem-solving, which are transferable to any field.
On the other hand, those who opine that students should only be allowed to study
subjects essential for their careers believe that it is crucial for students to have a clear
career path in mind. They contend that universities should provide courses that will
prepare students for the job market, particularly in fields such as science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics, which are in demand. Besides, some argue that an
excessive focus on liberal arts subjects may not result in viable career paths, unlike
technical subjects.
From my personal experience, I support the view that students should have the freedom
to choose their courses. Students should be encouraged to follow their passion and
explore their interests while pursuing their studies. Learning is meant to be exciting, and
there is no better way to learn than to study something you enjoy. On the other hand, it
is crucial for students to have clarity about their future career paths. Universities should
provide practical skills and knowledge that is crucial for succeeding in the job market.
The modern job market is becoming more competitive, and students need to be
equipped with relevant skills and insights to succeed in their careers.
In conclusion, students should be allowed to study whatever they choose as it is an
excellent way to follow their passion and develop essential skills. However, it is essential
to provide courses that are useful and practical and will prepare them for the job
market. Overall, a balance between liberal arts subjects and technical subjects must be
achieved to provide students with the best possible education.
Bài mẫu 4:
The topic of university education and its purpose is often a subject of debate. Some
people believe that students should have the freedom to choose the subjects they
enjoy, while others argue that they should only focus on practical, job-related courses.
This essay will discuss both perspectives and provide my own opinion.
On the one hand, those in favor of students studying what they like argue that this
approach can foster a sense of passion and enthusiasm that leads to better academic
outcomes. Students will be more likely to dedicate themselves to their studies if they
have a genuine interest in the subject matter. Moreover, universities should not only
provide academic knowledge but also personal growth and fulfillment. For example, a
student interested in film studies or art history could potentially become a respected
critic, impacting the field despite not working as a professional in that field.
On the other hand, supporters of practical education maintain that the primary purpose
of university is to prepare students for the job market. It is said that studying topics like
science and technology will position them better in the workforce compared to those
with more niche, abstract interests. Therefore, universities should focus resources on
offering courses that lead to high-paid and useful jobs. For instance, qualifications in
artificial intelligence or data analytics can provide lucrative and challenging careers,
which are in high demand globally.
In my opinion, the education system should have room for both academic and practical
subjects. While I think it is essential that students graduate with the knowledge and
skills that will enable them to succeed in their careers, education is not solely pragmatic.
This is especially true when considering the value of lifelong learning beyond just getting
a job. Pursuing a degree in something one finds fascinating can lead to a more satisfying
and enriched life.
In conclusion, while maintaining the practicality of university education is essential,
restricting students to only job-relevant courses would be counterproductive. Students
should pursue their interests as much as their careers to develop creativity, innovation
and broad perspectives, which cannot purely come from a practical curriculum.
Bài mẫu 5:
There are differing opinions regarding the subjects that university students should be
allowed to study. Some people believe that students should be free to pursue
whatever interests them, regardless of the subject's practicality. Others argue that
only subjects related to science and technology should be encouraged as these
subjects are deemed most useful for future employment.
On one hand, allowing university students to study any subject they choose can have
several benefits. It can help them develop their intellectual and creative abilities,
which may not be possible if they are forced to study only specific subjects. Moreover,
a passion for a subject can lead to students becoming experts in an area, which can
bring positive contributions to society.
On the other hand, some believe that if universities allowed students to study only
practical subjects such as science and technology, it could contribute to faster growth
and development of technology and industry. These subjects can lead to students
having higher-paying jobs, providing greater opportunities for an individual in their
future, as well as increasing the overall global economic strength.
However, my opinion on this is that students should not be restrained to just studying
practical subjects. Students should have the freedom to choose their area of study
based on their interests, but the universities should use practical learning methods
and integrating real-world problem-solving skills in the courses which would allow
students to develop skills that can be employed in practical situations. Education
should stimulate creativity, regardless of the subject. For example, an art student
could broaden their horizons and incorporate technology to create new industry fields
requiring interdisciplinary understanding.
In conclusion, while students should have the freedom to choose their subject of study,
the education system should incorporate practical education, incorporating necessary
and useful knowledge while also allowing creativity and exploration. This balance of
ideas would lead to well-rounded professionals who positively impact society.
Bài mẫu 6:
There are different views regarding what university students should study. On one
hand, some people argue that students should be free to choose any subject they like
without any intervention from anyone. On the other hand, others believe that
students should be guided towards subjects that are more relevant to today's needs,
such as science and technology. I think both sides have valid arguments, but I tend to
lean towards the latter viewpoint.
Those who argue for freedom of choice in university education believe that students
should be allowed to explore their interests and passions, even if they do not directly
relate to future job prospects. They believe that studying a variety of subjects can
broaden a student's intellectual curiosity and enhance their creativity. For instance,
some students may feel more drawn to fields like art or philosophy, which do not
necessarily lead to lucrative careers but can provide a lot of personal satisfaction.
However, those who advocate for more practical education believe that students need
to prepare themselves for the job market and economic realities of today's world.
They argue that certain subjects, such as science, engineering, and technology, are in
high demand in the job market and provide more stable career paths. Moreover, they
contend that universities should prioritize subjects that have a direct impact on society
and are likely to solve real-world problems.
In my opinion, while students should be free to explore their interests, it is important
to balance this with practical considerations. Higher education is a significant
investment in terms of time, effort, and finances, and students should consider the
potential value of their degree in the job market. For example, a student who is
passionate about art could also consider a degree in graphic design or video game
design, which are fields that offer more concrete job prospects. Similarly, a student
interested in philosophy could supplement their education with courses in ethics or
law, which offer more employable skills.
Overall, I believe that students should be given more guidance in choosing their
degrees, particularly if they are unsure of their career goals. Universities should also
ensure that their programs are relevant to today's society and provide practical skills
that will prepare students for the workforce.
Bài mẫu 7:
Important topics are hotly discussed, including whether university students must study
subjects of their choosing or resist taking career-oriented science and technology
courses. This essay explores both of these perspectives and shares my opinion before
coming to a reasonable conclusion. Both of these perspectives have reasons for and
against them.
On the one hand, a university is the pinnacle of a nation's educational system and is
thought to be responsible for producing the next generation of skilled leaders. In this
sense, the entire country is impacted by the educational and instructional policies of
this institution. According to some experts, college students should have the flexibility
to choose their own disciplines and should not be required to follow a set curriculum.
They contend that making them study a few current topics in preparation for the
forthcoming job would turn them into office workers rather than leaders for the
country. They claim that allowing them to study a wide range of topics would increase
their knowledge and willingness to face challenges, and that this policy would
encourage students pursuing higher degrees to pursue their dreams rather than
simply pursuing their careers. In addition, society needs an equal number of artists
and academics. It would be unjust to require university students to study only science
and teach associated topics.
Instead, the university administration must consider the implications of allowing
pupils to select their own courses. This is a worrying problem, so the university
administration should reconsider implementing the policy. Today's workforce must be
digitally savvy for a country to continue growing, and colleges should produce such a
workforce. From this vantage point, it would seem to make perfect sense for colleges
to teach the majority of pupils about scientific subjects.
Universities must weigh the benefits and drawbacks of any policy before deciding
whether to implement it, including whether or not students have the freedom to
choose their own courses. In my opinion, letting university students choose their own
subjects has much more advantages and makes more sense overall.
Bai mau 8:

While some believe that all university students should be able to choose the courses they want to
take, others believe that it would be preferable if students were required to take important courses
like science or technology. Although majoring in these fields may improve students' employment
chances, I think they should be allowed to pursue their areas of interest openly because society will
gain more from students who are enthusiastic about their studies.

Some believe that it is crucial for students to choose a university topic that they are passionate about,
while others believe that science and technology should be taught to them because these subjects will
have a significant impact on their career route. They will be more effective in their future lives, in my
opinion, if they pursue their passions.

Others contend that pursuing STEM subjects, which are more advantageous in the future, should be
the only choice available to students, while some believe that students should choose their classes
based on personal preferences. Although STEM grads have a higher chance of finding work, I think
that in the long run society gains more when people choose to study topics that they find entertaining.

There is no denying the importance of learning new things, particularly in today's information-focused
culture. But while many people contend that university students should have the freedom to choose
any subject they like, I think that emphasizing science and technology degrees is very important for
the future of humanity.

Some believe that all university pupils should choose the courses they want to take. Others believe
that they should focus on disciplines that will be useful in the future, particularly those in science and
technology. The first theory seems more logical to me because it allows people to accomplish their
objectives because they follow their favorites.

Some believe that all university students should be allowed to choose the courses they want to take.
Others, on the other hand, contend that only STEM topics should be taught there. A student should, in
my opinion, select a course based on his or her own special skills, abilities, and gifts, but what good is
that if, upon graduation, the student is unable to find a suitable job? Therefore, we must stop them
from focusing their efforts on pointless issues.

a lot of ferocious debate No, there hasn't been any discussion about whether university students
should study only STEM subjects or favored topics that are important for the future. I believe that in
order for students to succeed in their community, they should be able to openly choose their university
courses.

Some people frequently believe that students should be able to study their favorite topics at
university, as opposed to being required to do so, while others believe that students should only be
allowed to choose those that will be beneficial to them in the long run. I concur with the earlier
position because students should be allowed to choose what they want to learn.
Bai mau 9:
In recent times, there has been a heated debate about what subjects university
students should be allowed to study. Some people argue that university students
should study whatever they like, while others propose that students should only be
allowed to pursue courses that will be useful in the future, such as courses in science
and technology. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my personal opinion
about the matter.
On the one hand, proponents of the first view suggest that university is an opportunity
for students to explore their interests and passions. Forcing students to study subjects
they do not like or have no interest in will only lead to the students being demotivated
and disengaged. Additionally, it is argued that universities should not only produce
graduates for the job market, but they should also produce well-rounded individuals
who are capable of critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity.
On the other hand, supporters of the second view argue that universities should focus
on practical courses that will better prepare students for the job market. In this view,
university students should be allowed to pursue courses that will equip them for their
future careers, such as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. It is
believed that these courses are the key to solving many of society's problems and
would contribute to economic growth in the long run.
In my opinion, I believe that universities should strike a balance between both
viewpoints. Students should be allowed to study whatever they like, but universities
should encourage them to combine their interests with practical skills. For instance, a
student who loves literature can also take courses in creative writing, journalism, or
copywriting. Alternatively, a student with an interest in technology can study
computer science, data analysis, or cybersecurity. This way, students are not only
exploring their interests but also gaining skills that can be useful in their future
careers.
In summary, the debate about whether university students should study whatever
they like or focus on practical courses will always be contentious. While both views
have their merits, it is essential to strike a balance between allowing students to
pursue their passions and equipping them with practical skills. Ultimately, what
matters is that universities produce graduates who are capable of contributing
positively to society.
Bai mau 10

There has recently been a contentious discussion about what topics university
students should be permitted to study. Some people contend that university students
should study whatever they want, while others argue that only classes that will be
helpful in the future, like those in science and technology, should be available to
students. I will address both points of view in this article and offer my own viewpoint
on the subject
On the one hand, proponents of the first viewpoint contend that college provides
students with the chance to discover their hobbies and interests. Students will become
unmotivated and disinterested if they are made to study things they do not enjoy or
are not interested in. Additionally, it is asserted that colleges ought to produce grads
who are not only prepared for the workforce but also well-rounded individuals with
the capacity for creative problem-solving and critical thinking.
Supporters of the second viewpoint, on the other hand, contend that colleges ought to
prioritize practical classes that will better prepare students for the workforce.
According to this viewpoint, college students should be able to enroll in classes like
science, technology, engineering, and math that will prepare them for their future
jobs. These programs are thought to hold the solution to many of society's issues and,
in the long run, would promote economic expansion.
Universities, in my opinion, ought to find a compromise between the two points of
view. Although colleges should urge students to merge their hobbies with real skills,
students should be free to pursue any course of study they choose. A student who
enjoys reading and writing might also consider taking creative writing, news, or
advertising classes. An alternative course of study for a student interested in
technology is computer science, followed by data analysis or hacking. Students can
discover their hobbies while also learning skills that will be helpful in their future jobs.
In conclusion, there will always be disagreement over whether university students
should prioritize practical classes over elective courses. Although both points of view
have value, it's important to find a balance between letting students follow their
interests and giving them useful skills. In the end, what counts is that universities turn
out graduates who can make a good difference in society.