Swot Analysis of Sustainable Goals in An Australian Context 2022

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SWOT Analysis of Sustainable Goals in an Australian Context

Goal Key targets Strength Weakness Opportunities Threats


12.3.1 Currently Australian retailers On average 314kg of food waste is Due to inflation, most Australian Natural disasters such as floods and
Food loss index (Australian have programs such as the odd generated per person over a year households are buying only what they hurricanes contribute to a large amount
Government, 2023a) bunch and oz harvest in place to which currently all goes into landfill in need (Food and Agriculture of food waste on harvest, retail, and
ensure not all food is going to Australia (Gjorgievska, 2023). Organisation, 2013, pg. 7). consumer levels (Food and Agriculture
waste (Woolworths, 2023a). Organisation, 2013, pg. 60).
Over buying leading to food waste in
Food waste in Australian households (Baker, et al., 2005, pg.9). More food is going to waste in
households that is sent to landfill transportation due to issues like unsafe
Responsible Consumption and has decreased by 17% over the roads and other means of transport
Currently marked as a grey target
Production. past 2 years and therefore they (train derailments) which causes supply
meaning that data has not been
are either buying less or finding reported (Australian Government, issues in more remote places, causing
12.3 By 2030, halve per capita other, more sustainable ways to 2023a). panic over consumption by consumers
discard (Gjorgievska, 2023). (Food and Agriculture Organisation,
global food waste at the retail and
2013, pg. 60).
consumer levels and reduce food
losses along production and supply
chains, including post-harvest
losses.
(Australian Government, 2023a).
11.4.1 Total expenditure Australia is protecting significant Currently marked as a grey target Australia is recognising more cultural Some government agencies and leaders
(public and private) per capita heritage sites by not allowing the meaning that data has not been heritage areas through protests and have negative perspectives on
spent on the preservation, public to walk over and erode reported (Australian Government, discussions with indigenous Australians indigenous cultural heritage (Hamman,
protection and conservation them (E.g. Uluru) (Hamman, 2023b). (Hamman, 2022). 2022).
of all cultural and natural 2022).
heritage, by type of heritage Natural and/ or man-made disasters
(cultural, natural, mixed and Some heritage sites require an can destroy these both cultural and
World Heritage Centre entry fee which goes towards the natural heritage significantly (Hamman,
Sustainable cities and communities. designation), level of maintenance and protection of 2022).
government (national, these sights (Hamman, 2022).
 11.4 Strengthen efforts to protect and regional and local/municipal),
safeguard the world’s cultural and type of expenditure (operating Sights are monitored to ensure
natural heritage expenditure/investment) and they are not disrupted/
(Australian Government, 2023b). type of private funding destroyed (Hamman, 2022).
(donations in kind, private
non-profit sector and
sponsorship) (Australian
Government, 2023b).

You might also like