Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recent Advances in The Estimation of Post-Mortem Interval in Forensic Taphonomy
Recent Advances in The Estimation of Post-Mortem Interval in Forensic Taphonomy
Recent Advances in The Estimation of Post-Mortem Interval in Forensic Taphonomy
To cite this article: Mohammad Asif Iqbal, Maiken Ueland & Shari L. Forbes (2018): Recent
advances in the estimation of post-mortem interval in forensic taphonomy, Australian Journal of
Forensic Sciences, DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1459840
Article views: 38
1. Introduction
Estimation of post-mortem interval (PMI; time since death) is an integral part of medico-legal
death investigations. Physical and anatomical changes such as algor, rigor, and livor mortis
can be used for PMI estimation within the first 72 h of death1. The chemical composition of
vitreous humour (i.e. hypoxanthine, K+, and free amino acids) has also been correlated with
a PMI of up to 120 h2,3. During the early post-mortem period and well beyond, insects can
be a powerful tool for PMI estimation. Forensic entomologists study the colonization and
succession of insect activity to estimate the PMI, and this is one of the preferred methods if
entomological evidence is available4. There are, however, scenarios where remains are skel-
etonized due to a lengthy recovery time or instances where insect colonization has been
restricted (i.e. burial decomposition)5. In such cases, the estimation of PMI using entomology
may not be possible4. As an alternative approach, Vass attempted to develop empirical for-
mulas based on three environmental parameters (i.e. temperature, moisture, and the partial
pressure of oxygen) to determine the PMI of human remains for surface and burial decom-
position in Knoxville, Tennessee, USA6. However, a recent attempt to validate these formulas
in a Canadian environment reported large variation of PMI estimation7. According to this
study, the rate of decomposition was not consistent throughout all stages of decomposition.
Differences in temperature extremes and humidity levels between geographic regions along
with other environmental and intrinsic variables make it impractical to apply formulas devel-
oped in one region to any other region7.
Forensic taphonomy is an important field that can assist the estimation of PMI, especially
when forensic pathology is generally redundant (i.e. PMI exceeds 72 h). Forensic taphonomy
research focuses on studying the decomposition of human remains and its interaction with
the surrounding environment to understand the process and the rate of decomposition8,9.
In general, the decomposition of a body follows a typical progression and is divided into
five stages – fresh, bloat, active decay, advanced decay, and dry remains or skeletonization5,10.
Temperature plays a vital role in determining the length of each stage and the overall rate
of decomposition, as the rise in surrounding temperature increases cellular metabolism
within the soft tissue by affecting the reaction rates of enzyme catalysts11. This follows the
classical chemical principle known as the Arrhenius equation, which states that the reaction
rate doubles for every 10°C rise in temperature11,12. Besides temperature, the local biome,
especially vertebrate and invertebrate scavengers, plays a vital role in the process of decom-
position8,13. Geologic parameters such as the environment of deposition (e.g. surface versus
burial) and soil variables (e.g. type of soil, soil microbiology, soil pH, moisture and the oxygen
content within the grave site) also greatly influence decomposition processes13,14. Additionally,
there are numerous anthropogenic factors that may impact the decomposition of a body
based on the circumstances surrounding death, including ante/post-mortem injuries13;
criminal burning of a body15; absence/presence of clothing or wrappings16; burial type (ter-
restrial versus aquatic)17, and the burial depth (shallow versus deep)18.
This article reviews the recent advances in PMI estimation in the field of forensic tapho-
nomy. As this is a review of recent advances and future aspects, articles published before
2005 were excluded. Considering the large number of published articles in the literature,
only studies that have post-mortem interval/forensic taphonomy/decomposition in the title
or as a keyword or focus are included. Studies that focused on forensic entomology, in par-
ticular insect colonization, are not within the scope of this article as they have been detailed
extensively elsewhere.
Table 1. Stages involved in cadaveric decomposition and applicable methods to estimate PMI in each
stage.
Decomposition stage Description Forensic Methods References
[A] Fresh Autolysis Biochemistry 5,10,20,21,69
Time since death (1 h to 2/3 days: Fluid filled blisters on the skin Molecular Biology
From death to the first signs of Depletion of oxygen and Pathology
bloating)a marbling of skin
[B] Bloated Breakdown of soft tissues by Biochemistry 10,20,21,69
microorganisms
Time since death (3 to 10 days) Greenish discoloration of the skin Entomology
Accumulation of fluids followed Pathology
by purging
Anaerobic fermentation Taphonomy
[C] Active decay End of bloating/deflation Entomology 5,10,20,21,69
Time since death (10 to 20 days) Black putrefaction Taphonomy
Breaking of the skin and rapid Anthropology
leaching
Increased biological activity
including insects and bacteria
Collapse of abdominal cavity
Possible adipocere formation
[D] Advanced decay Dehydration of corpse Entomology 5,10,20,21,69
Time since death (20 to 50 days) Only skin, cartilage, hair, bones, Taphonomy
and minimal flesh
Butyric fermentation Anthropology
[E] Dry to skeletonization Diagenesis or mummification of Taphonomy 5,20,70,71
remaining skin
Time since death (50 to 365 days) Bone exposure and skeletoniza- Anthropology/Archaeology
tion
a
The time since death estimates are variable and typically based on warm conditions when biological activity is optimal6,35
the appearance of bloating10. Bloating results from the build-up of gases during autolysis
which causes distension of the torso, and represents the commencement of putrefaction,
i.e. the breakdown of the body by the action of micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, and pro-
tozoa)5. This process is identified by green/purple discoloration of the lower abdomen, due
to the overgrowth of colonic bacteria5,23,25. Through putrefaction, the complex molecules
present in soft tissues (e.g. carbohydrates, proteins and lipids) that started to break down
during autolysis continue to be catabolized into gases and liquids in the form of simple
molecules11,14,23. This process builds pressure inside the body cavity, and may result in severe
purging from the orifices, which can be mistaken for post-mortem injuries to the head5,14,23.
Following the purging of gases, the body deflates and the active decay stage begins,
which is characterized by black putrefaction and the darkening of the skin5,10. At this stage,
the insect activity (e.g. feeding of Calliphoridae larvae) is optimal26. Muscle proteins are
broken down into volatile fatty acids and other reported malodourous decomposition prod-
ucts, such as polysulphides, indole, skatole, cadaverine and putrescine5,10,14,23,26. Putrefaction
continues during active decay (generally, days to weeks post-mortem), as chemical constit-
uents are still being degraded, which results in the strong odour of putrefaction associated
with tissue liquefaction5,10. The increased activities by Calliphoridae larvae and other families
of flies and beetles (e.g. Staphylinidae, Histeridae, Muscidae, Silphidae, Sarcophagidae) accel-
erate the process of soft tissue loss and the bones become exposed, indicating the end of
active decay10. This stage is followed by advanced decay which normally occurs weeks to
months after death, depending on the environment10. This stage is characterized by the
butyric fermentation of the body in an anaerobic condition, releasing the earthy-cheesy
4 M. A. IQBAL ET AL.
odour of butyric acid10,27. Later in this stage, any remaining soft tissue dries out and the
remains are visible as predominantly skin, cartilage, hair and bones, with little soft tissue10.
Another important indicator of this stage is an increase in beetle activity and a reduction of
the fly activity on the body5.
The final stage of decomposition is dry, where any remaining moist skin and tissue are
converted to a ‘leather-like’ covering that adheres to bones5,14,23. Skeletonization also occurs
later in this stage, which is characterized by the appearance of exposed bones in over 50%
of the body and proceeds until only the harder and more resistant bones, teeth and cartilage
remain5,25,28. Chemical weathering of these remains continues but occurs over a considerably
longer timeframe than previous stages (several months to years post-mortem)5,10. Finally,
diagenesis occurs, which alters the proportions of organic collagen and inorganic compo-
nents of bone (e.g. calcium, phosphate, and magnesium) and the surrounding soil14,29.
States where humidity, soil moisture, soil type and vegetation are similar to the study site.
However, the major limitation of these formulas is that the body under evaluation has to be
in the pre-skeletonization phase of decomposition (<1285 ADDs); otherwise, there is a very
high chance of error. In addition, the performance of formula II was relatively inferior to
formula I as there were several additional factors to further complicate the calculation (e.g.
variation of soil moisture content and the presence/absence of adipocere). Most importantly,
the successful application of both formulas was dependent on the accurate scoring of
decomposition, which required the involvement of experienced personnel6.
A study by Cockle et al.7 attempted to validate the two formulas developed by Vass6 using
a total of 64 Canadian cases with known PMIs (42 cases from a larger set of 96 cases for
formula I (bodies on the surface) and 22 cases for formula II (burial decomposition)). For
bodies exposed to warm temperatures, formula I consistently overestimated the known PMI
by a large and inconsistent margin, while formula II dramatically underestimated the PMIs
of bodies exposed to cold and freezing temperatures (< 4°C)7. According to this study, the
rate of decomposition was not consistent throughout all stages of decomposition. The study
concluded that differences in temperature extremes and humidity levels between geo-
graphic regions make it impractical to develop a universal formula applicable to all regions
of the globe7. The findings also indicated that apart from temperature and humidity there
are other region specific variables which may impact the rate of human decomposition and
must be considered for PMI estimation7.
The findings of a recent study indicate that conventional scoring systems28,36 are not
reliable in the estimation of PMI in buried human remains where the timespan can be sig-
nificantly longer (PMI: 12–19 years)37. This study analysed 86 human skeletons buried in
coffins and concluded that each burial creates a distinct micro taphonomic environment
that impacts the progression of decomposition37. Scoring older remains can be challenging
even in cases of surface decomposition. Nawrocka et al.38 assessed the inter-rater reliability
of TBS values obtained from 120 laymen trained to score decomposition of pig carcasses
from photographs. The performance of assessors was uniform irrespective of their qualifi-
cations. However, carcasses in the advanced decomposition stage received significantly
fewer accurate scores. Other factors impacting the inter-rater variation of scores included
the variable decomposition observed on the same carcass (e.g. mosaic or differential decom-
position) and the quality of photographs provided to the assessors. The authors recom-
mended a greater emphasis on these issues when teaching the TBS scale to improve the
performance of the assessors. In addition, they recommended the refinement of some com-
mon decomposition indicators (e.g. ‘heavy maggot activity’ or ‘some flesh relatively fresh’28,30)
to decrease inter-rater inconsistencies, and the addition of colour as an indicator of decom-
position status.
ADD values were also calculated from retrospective temperature data. The overall findings
of this study indicated that ADD had a significant effect on the decay process of submerged
bodies while no major differences in decomposition between the waterways were reported.
A single linear regression equation was also developed to predict PMSI by plotting the TADS
values against known logADD values from all three waterways: TADS = –3.706+7.778 log-
10
ADD. In subsequent studies, Humphreys et al.40 and De Donno et al.41 evaluated the equa-
tion developed by Heaton et al.39. In their study, piglet carcasses (n = 9) were submerged in
an agricultural reservoir located in Davis, CA, USA, and underwater in situ photographs were
taken to score decomposition in terms of TADS. The objective measurement of decomposi-
tion in this study required an in-depth examination of analogues using the TADS scoring
system rather than utilizing a carrion weight evaluation. The authors also developed an
equation for their system (TADS = – 13.746+4.8518 * LOG (ADD)). The PMSI equations devel-
oped by both Heaton et al.39 and Humphreys et al.40 are logarithmic in nature, which is similar
to the equations developed/evaluated by others in cases of terrestrial decomposition30−32,34.
However, the study by De Donno et al.41 reported a limitation of the TADS approach when
adipocere is formed in submerged bodies. A total of 68 human remains recovered from both
sequestered (n = 52) and non-sequestered (n = 16) marine environments were analysed. All
the bodies recovered from sequestered environments had a PMSI of more than seven months
and had initial adipocere formation which caused the preservation of some soft tissue. Such
formation of adipocere affected the accuracy of the TADS model41.
Estimation of aquatic decomposition was also reported in a multiple drowning accident
involving six victims at Meco Beach, south of Lisbon, Portugal42. ADD was calculated based
on the PMSI and sea surface temperature during this period using the following equation
∑n
ADD = i=1 (Ti × 24 hi
); where hi represents the number of hours in each day (i) during the
submersion period (n), and Ti the daily temperature]. The estimated PMSI was between 7.4
and 11.4 days, with an estimated ADD range between 115 and 174 (ADDmin) and 104 and
191 (ADDmax). The study found that there is a probable ADD range where it is expected that
a body will reach the bloating/floating stage and resurface. This was estimated to occur
somewhere in the ADD range of 100 to 140, with the PMSI depending on the ambient tem-
perature. The authors proposed a hypothetical ADD value of 130 for body resurfacing, which
may provide some information for search and rescue teams when locating drowned
victims42.
In a more recent study, Daalen et al.43 developed an aquatic decomposition scoring
method applying the TADS approach to colour photographs (n = 45) available from a total
of 38 bodies recovered within the borders of the North Sea during 1990 to 2013. These bodies
are part of a large dataset containing 703 bodies that were recovered in the study area during
this time frame; among them only 38 had colour photographs available. Twelve volunteers
participated in the study to score decomposition using a pictorial reference atlas containing
photographic examples of decomposition stages. The regression analysis performed in this
study demonstrated strong correlation (r = 0.91; p < 0.001) between PMSI and TADS values,
which indicates the potential of this method to estimate PMSI based on colour photographs
of bodies recovered from an aquatic environment43.
8 M. A. IQBAL ET AL.
investigated. Bone samples were collected from abandoned graves at six different cemeteries
(for a total of 28 bone samples) and from a cadaver under investigation (two bones). Through
the combined application of these methods it was possible to distinguish between remains
with/without forensic relevance within a cut-off interval of 30 years. Moreover, the correlation
between UV-fluorescence colour and PMI reported in this study was similar to that observed
by Hoke et al.49. Boaks et al.48 also applied UV-florescence to quantify the degradation of
bone collagen with PMI estimation. Resin embedded cross-sections of pig bones were
stained using a histochemical reaction that differentially stains collagenous and non-colla-
genous proteins. The ratio of proteins (collagenous/non-collagenous) declined significantly
with increasing PMI. However, the moderate correlation obtained in this study (r = ̶ 0.563)
indicated that along with time there are several other possible factors (e.g. burial environ-
ment, soil chemistry, etc.) affecting the composition of skeletal remains48.
Raman spectroscopy has also been investigated as a tool for determining post-burial
interval (PBI) of skeletal remains51. McLaughlin et al.51 analysed the sections of a turkey bone
that had been buried for short intervals (12–62 days) using Raman spectroscopy. The findings
determined that the chemical changes in bone due to soil bacteria are time-dependent and
there is a correlation between bone spectra and burial duration51. A model that was sensitive
enough to track the changes in bone composition in a scale of days was created using peak
integration of Raman bands. The potential forensic application of Raman spectroscopy is
further demonstrated in a study by Delannoy et al.52 who investigated the effect of moisture
and temperature on bone mass as time progressed. The mass loss of partially buried human
ribs was monitored over a period of 90 days using a gravimetric method52. Raman spectro-
scopic analysis was performed to assess the post-mortem alteration of the bone matrix. The
bone mass loss was faster in a dry environment, which was also reflected by the spectra of
bone samples. The findings demonstrate the potential of Raman spectroscopy to provide
valuable insight into the bone diagenesis process52.
two different environments (terrestrial and aquatic) for a period of 1–165 days. No significant
differences in citrate loss were identified between terrestrial and aquatic environments.
However, higher citrate variation, lower citrate recovery, and a weaker association with time
was reported, compared with studies conducted in terrestrial environments54,55.
utilized the differential growth of fungus in the estimation of PMI. A broken twig with lichen
Xanthoria parietina was found on the ground under a plastic-wrapped body part. This species
grows deep orange sporophores in light, while the colour of sporophores becomes green
in dark and moist conditions. A simple experiment on the differential growth of this species
assisted in estimating the deposition time as less than a week. The use of taphonomic mycota
while still in its infancy has demonstrated potential in casework; however, controlled research
studies are required to further enhance the accuracy of forensic mycology as a tool for esti-
mating PMI.
in the soil extracts and seven of them (i.e. sodium, chloride, ammonium, potassium, calcium,
magnesium, and sulphate) were shown to be stable in the environment and to change with
ADD. In a subsequent study, Vass62 also reported the analysis of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) in soil samples (n = 186) associated with older gravesites (10–60+ years). The con-
centration of cyclic and halogenated VOCs in gravesoil decreased with increasing PBI; how-
ever, the trend was reversed in the case of aldehydes, ketones and straight-chain alkanes,
becoming more prominent as time progressed. A total of 56 compounds were reported to
be associated with human decomposition. The study provided information concerning the
approximate time interval when a particular compound is most commonly detected and
the decomposition phase when the compound is most likely to be present. This information
could offer valuable insights into the estimation of PBI based on the analysis of VOCs presents
in gravesoil.
Benninger et al.63 investigated the dynamics of gravesoil nutrients (e.g. carbon, nitrogen,
and phosphorus-based compounds) in soil beneath pig carcasses for the estimation of PMI.
Five pig carcasses placed on a soil surface were investigated for a period of 100 days and
soil samples beneath the carcasses were collected in weekly to monthly intervals.
Decomposition was assessed through physical observation and the measurement of soil pH
and nutrients. Soil pH and nutrients increased significantly as decomposition progressed
and different nutrients reached their maxima at different PMIs: 43 days (lipid-phosphorus),
72 days (total nitrogen), and 100 days (soil extractable phosphorus). Further studies were
required to validate these PMI estimations in different soil types and regions, which to date
have not been carried out.
A number of studies also reported the potential of ninhydrin reactive nitrogen (NRN) in
gravesoil as an indicator of PMI64,65. The study by Carter et al.64 reported that the decompo-
sition of rat carcasses can almost double the concentration of NRN in gravesoil and may
remain constant well beyond the skeletonization stage. A further study from the same
research group measured NRN influx into gravesoil during both surface and burial decom-
position of pig carcasses65. The burial trial utilized six pig carcasses that were buried at ~40 cm
depth; soil samples were collected from the graves once per month for six months and again
after 12 months. The surface trial utilized five pig carcasses and soil samples were collected
more frequently; once every day for 10 days, every two days for a further six days, and once
per week until 97 days post-mortem. NRN concentrations increased significantly in the centre
(~20 cm depth) and the in the base (~40 cm depth) of the graves during the initial two to
six months of burial, respectively. However, surface decomposition exhibited higher NRN
concentrations during the initial 97 days of decomposition. The results of this study reflect
the potential of soil NRN as a presumptive tool for the estimation of PMI within two to three
months post-mortem following burial and surface decomposition, respectively65. The anal-
ysis of NRN from a surface decomposition trial was also reported in a study which utilized
pig carcasses of different body masses (~1, ~20, ~40, and ~50 kg) to investigate the use of
NRN in gravesoil to estimate early PMI (up to 15 days)66. Small (~1 kg) carcasses were found
to release NRN at a slower rate but at a greater concentration (in terms of NRN/kg carcass).
These findings suggest that the release of NRN is influenced by body mass and that smaller
bodies (e.g. neonatal carcasses) require a different equation from larger carcasses when
using gravesoil chemistry to estimate PMI66.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 13
test the formulas in varying environments are rarely successful, highlighting an inherent
limitation of scoring systems as well as a subjectivity in visual observations. Likewise, dating
of hard tissue (skeletal remains) often finds success in separating historical from recent
remains, but is less valuable in criminal death investigations where the PMI may be much
shorter and the error too large to be helpful.
Alternative methods have been investigated in the form of evidence associated with
remains such as taphonomic mycota, botanical evidence and soil biomarkers. All reported
studies have shown some potential but have limited validation to date. Similarly, studies to
identify biomarkers in soft tissue and decomposition fluid need further replication in order
to provide valuable information for both the early and later post-mortem period. Like all
forensic science research, we have come a long way in developing new and alternative
methods for estimating PMI; however, research must continue in these areas if we hope to
develop the elusive formula for time since death.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
ORCID
Maiken Ueland http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-3502
References
1. Henßge C, Madea B. Estimation of the time since death in the early post-mortem period. Forensic
Sci Int. 2004;144(2-3):167–175.
2. James RA, Hoadley PA, Sampson BG. Determination of postmortem interval by sampling vitreous
humour. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997;18(2):158–162.
3. Jashnani KD, Kale SA, Rupani AB. Vitreous humor: biochemical constituents in estimation of
postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(6):1523–1527.
4. Amendt J, Richards CS, Campobasso CP, Zehner R, Hall MJR. Forensic entomology: applications
and limitations. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011;7(4):379–392.
5. Swann L, Forbes S, Lewis S. Analytical separations of mammalian decomposition products for
forensic science: a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2010;682(1-2):9–22.
6. Vass AA. The elusive universal post-mortem interval formula. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1-3):34–40.
7. Cockle DL, Bell LS. Human decomposition and the reliability of a ‘universal’ model for post mortem
interval estimations. Forensic Sci Int. 2015:253 (136):e131-136.e139.
8. Pokines J, Symes SA. Manual of forensic taphonomy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2013.
9. Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Netherlands: Springer Science
& Business Media; 2008.
10. Statheropoulos M, Agapiou A, Zorba E, Mikedi K, Karma S, Pallis G, Eliopoulos C, Spiliopoulou
C. Combined chemical and optical methods for monitoring the early decay stages of surrogate
human models. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;210(1-3):154–163.
11. Gill-King H. Chemical and ultrastructural aspects of decomposition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
Forensic taphonomy: The postmortem fate of human remains; 1997: 93-108.
12. Steinfeld JI, Francisco JS, Hase WL. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice
Hall Englewood Cliffs; 1998.
13. Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains. Boca Raton
(FL): CRC Press; 1997.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 15
14. Vass AA. Beyond the grave-understanding human decomposition. Microbiol Today. 2001;28:190–
192.
15. Ubelaker DH. The forensic evaluation of burned skeletal remains: a synthesis. Forensic Sci Int.
2009;183(1-3):1–5.
16. Card A, Cross P, Moffatt C, Simmons T. The effect of clothing on the rate of decomposition and
diptera colonization on sus scrofa carcasses. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(4):979–982.
17. Anderson GS, Bell LS. Deep coastal marine taphonomy: investigation into carcass decomposition
in the saanich inlet, British Columbia using a baited camera. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110710.
18. Forbes S, Troobnikoff A, Ueland M, Nizio K, Perrault K. Profiling the decomposition odour at the
grave surface before and after probing. Forensic Sci Int. 2016:259:193–199.
19. Micozzi MS. Postmortem change in human and animal remains. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas.
A systematic approach.
20. Forbes SL. Potential determinants of postmortem and postburial interval of buried remains. In
Potential determinants of postmortem and postburial interval of buried remains. Soil analysis in
forensic taphonomy: chemical and biological effects of buried human remains. Boca Raton (FL):
CRC Press; 2009. p. 225–246.
21. Paczkowski S, Schütz S. Post-mortem volatiles of vertebrate tissue. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.
2011;91(4):917–935.
22. Clark MA, Worrell MB, Pless JE. Postmortem changes in soft tissues. In Postmortem changes in
soft tissues. Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains; Boca Raton (FL): CRC
Press; 1997. p. 151–164.
23. Vass AA, Sega G, Caton J, Synstelien J, Love JC, Skeen J, Barshick S. Decomposition chemistry of
human remains: a new methodology for determining the postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci.
2002;47(3):542–553.
24. DiMaio D, DiMaio VJ. Forensic pathology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2001.
25. Dent BB, Forbes S, Stuart B. Review of human decomposition processes in soil. Environ Geol.
2004;45(4):576–585.
26. Vass AA, Wolt JD, Foss JE, Ammons JT, Bass WM. Time since death determinations of human cadavers
using soil solution. J Forensic Sci. 1992;37(5):1236–1253.
27. Dekeirsschieter J, Verheggen F, Gohy M, Hubrecht F, Bourguignon L, Lognay G, Haubruge E.
Cadaveric volatile organic compounds released by decaying pig carcasses (sus domesticus l.) in
different biotopes. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):46–53.
28. Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones AM, Henry TE, Parks BO. Decay rates of human remains in an arid
environment. J Forensic Sci. 1989;34(3):607–616.
29. Hedges REM. Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes. Archaeometry. 2002;44(3):319–328.
30. Megyesi M, Nawrocki S, Haskell N. Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem
interval from decomposed human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(3):618–626.
31. Simmons T, Adlam RE, Moffatt C. Debugging decomposition data—comparative taphonomic
studies and the influence of insects and carcass size on decomposition rate. J Forensic Sci.
2010;55(1):8–13.
32. Myburgh J, L’Abbé EN, Steyn M, Becker PJ. Estimating the postmortem interval (pmi) using
accumulated degree-days (add) in a temperate region of South Africa. Forensic Sci Int. 2013:229(1):
165. e161-165. e166.
33. Sutherland A, Myburgh J, Steyn M, Becker P. The effect of body size on the rate of decomposition
in a temperate region of South Africa. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;231(1-3):257–262.
34. Fitzgerald CM, Oxenham M. Modelling time-since-death in Australian temperate conditions. Aust
J Forensic Sci. 2009;41(1):27–41.
35. Marhoff SJ, Fahey P, Forbes SL, Green H. Estimating post-mortem interval using accumulated
degree-days and a degree of decomposition index in Australia: a validation study. Aust J Forensic
Sci. 2016;48(1):24–36.
36. Behrensmeyer AK. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology.
1978;4(2):150–162.
37. Buekenhout I, Cravo L, Vieira DN, Cunha E, Ferreira MT. Applying standardized decomposition stages
when estimating the pmi of buried remains: reality or fiction? Aust J Forensic Sci. 2016;50:1–14.
16 M. A. IQBAL ET AL.
38. Nawrocka M, Frątczak K, Matuszewski S. Inter‐rater reliability of total body score – a scale for
quantification of corpse decomposition. J Forensic Sci. 2016;61(3):798–802.
39. Heaton V, Lagden A, Moffatt C, Simmons T. Predicting the postmortem submersion interval for
human remains recovered from UK waterways. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(2):302–307.
40. Humphreys MK, Panacek E, Green W, Albers E. Comparison of protocols for measuring and
calculating postmortem submersion intervals for human analogs in fresh water. J Forensic Sci.
2013;58(2):513–517.
41. De Donno A, Campobasso C, Santoro V, Leonardi S, Tafuri S, Introna F. Bodies in sequestered and
non-sequestered aquatic environments: a comparative taphonomic study using decompositional
scoring system. Sci Justice. 2014;54(6):439–446.
42. Mateus M, Vieira V. Study on the postmortem submersion interval and accumulated degree days
for a multiple drowning accident. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;238:e15–e19.
43. van Daalen MA, de Kat DS, Grotebevelsborg O, Bernice F, Leeuwe R, Warnaar J, Oostra RJ,
Duijst-Heesters M, Wilma L. An aquatic decomposition scoring method to potentially predict
the postmortem submersion interval of bodies recovered from the North Sea. J Forensic Sci.
2017;62(2):369–373.
44. Cappella A, Gibelli D, Muccino E, Scarpulla V, Cerutti E, Caruso V, Sguazza E, Mazzarelli D, Cattaneo
C. The comparative performance of pmi estimation in skeletal remains by three methods (c-14,
luminol test and ohi): analysis of 20 cases. Int J Legal Med. 2015;1–10.
45. Schrag B, Uldin T, Mangin P, Froidevaux P. Dating human skeletal remains using a radiometric
method: biogenic versus diagenetic 90sr and 210pb in vertebrae. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;220(1-
3):271–278.
46. Froidevaux P, Bochud F, Haldimann M. Retention half times in the skeleton of plutonium and 90sr
from above-ground nuclear tests: a retrospective study of the Swiss population. Chemosphere.
2010;80(5):519–524.
47. Ramsthaler F, Ebach SC, Birngruber CG, Verhoff MA. Postmortem interval of skeletal remains
through the detection of intraosseal hemin traces. A comparison of uv-fluorescence, luminol,
hexagon-obti®, and combur® tests. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;209(1-3):59–63.
48. Boaks A, Siwek D, Mortazavi F. The temporal degradation of bone collagen: a histochemical
approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2014:240:104–110.
49. Hoke N, Grigat A, Grupe G, Harbeck M. Reconsideration of bone postmortem interval estimation
by uv-induced autofluorescence. Forensic Sci Int. 2013:228(1): 176. e171-176. e176.
50. Sterzik V, Jung T, Jellinghaus K, Bohnert M. Estimating the postmortem interval of human skeletal
remains by analyzing their optical behavior. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(6):1557–1566.
51. McLaughlin G, Lednev IK. Potential application of Raman spectroscopy for determining burial
duration of skeletal remains. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401(8):2511–2518.
52. Delannoy Y, Colard T, Le Garff E, Mesli V, Aubernon C, Penel G, Hedouin V, Gosset D. Effects of the
environment on bone mass: a human taphonomic study. Leg Med. 2016:20:61–67.
53. Wilson SJ, Christensen AM. A test of the citrate method of PMI estimation from skeletal remains.
Forensic Sci Int. 2017:270:70–75.
54. Schwarcz HP, Agur K, Jantz LM. A new method for determination of postmortem interval: Citrate
content of bone. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(6):1516–1522.
55. Kanz F, Reiter C, Risser DU. Citrate content of bone for time since death estimation: results from
burials with different physical characteristics and known PMI. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(3):613–620.
56. Carter DO, Tibbett M. Taphonomic mycota: fungi with forensic potential. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48(1):1–
4.
57. Ishii K, Hitosugi M, Kido M, Yaguchi T, Nishimura K, Hosoya T, Tokudome S. Analysis of fungi detected
in human cadavers. Leg Med. 2006;8(3):188–190.
58. Hitosugi M, Ishii K, Yaguchi T, Chigusa Y, Kurosu A, Kido M, Nagai T, Tokudome S. Fungi can be a
useful forensic tool. Leg Med. 2006;8(4):240–242.
59. Hawksworth DL, Wiltshire PE. Forensic mycology: the use of fungi in criminal investigations.
Forensic Sci Int. 2011;206(1-3):1–11.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 17