Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bancassurance
Bancassurance
Bancassurance
Could banks be a new channel to sell insurance?
Three partnership models
Our research suggests that the sale of life insurance through banks will meet
an important set of consumer needs. Most large retail banks engender a great
deal of trust in broad segments of consumers, which they can leverage in
selling them life insurance. In addition, a bank’s branch network allows the
Dorlisa Flur is a principal and Lisa Lowie is a consultant in McKinsey’s Atlanta oƒfice; Darren
Huston is a consultant in the Pacific Northwest oƒfice. Copyright © 1997 McKinsey &
Company. All rights reserved.
Using the bank channel can also boost sales productivity. A strong life insur-
ance agent, for example, might sell only one policy a week; a less eƒfective
agent, only one a month. To compensate for this low productivity, life insurers
pay agents a handsome commission on sales – sometimes as much as $1.30
for every dollar of the first-year premium, then 5 to 10 percent of annual pre-
miums thereaƒter. Naturally, these commissions are for the most part passed
on to the consumer in the form of higher premiums.
Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3
highly profitable proposition (Exhibit 2). All told, we believe that the
prospects for bancassurance as a channel in the United States are probably in
the neighborhood of 20 to 25 percent of the life insurance market, equivalent
to $9 to $15 billion in annual revenues and roughly $2 billion in profits by
2000 (Exhibit 3).
The hostile regulatory climate that used to prohibit a mix of banking and
insurance is changing. Barnett vs. Nelson (1996) allowed national banks to
sell insurance in towns of less than 5,000 people. In addition, a recent Oƒfice
of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) ruling authorized national banks
Exhibit 4
In their natural roles and with their current skills, neither banks nor life insur-
ance companies could eƒfectively mount a bancassurance start-up (Exhibit 4).
Collaboration is the key to making this new channel work.
Banks bring a variety of capabilities to the table. Most obviously, they own
proprietary databases that can be tapped for middle-market warm leads. In
addition, they can leverage their name recognition and reputation at both
local and regional levels. Strong players also excel at managing multiple
distribution channels, cross-selling banking products, and using direct mail.
However, most banks lack experience in several areas critical to successful
bancassurance strategies: in particular, developing life products, selling
through face-to-face “push” channels, underwriting, and managing long-tail
investments (Exhibit 5).
Exhibit 5
Bank
Life
insurer
Broker
Where banks usually fall short, a strong life insurer will excel. Most have
substantial product and underwriting experience, strong “push” channel
capabilities, and investment management expertise. On the other hand, they
tend to lack experience or ability in the areas where banks prevail. They have
little or no background in managing low-cost distribution channels; they
oƒten lack local and regional name recognition and reputation; and they
seldom possess access to or experience with the middle market.
banks and insurers could rely on a third party, such as a broker, to integrate
their divergent skills (Exhibit 6).
Exhibit 6
Under the terms of the leveraged life distribution contract, the life insurer
would pay the banks a fee for each lead or ultimate sale. As an additional
incentive to banks, agents mining their middle-market customer base would
also take on a portfolio of bank products to cross-sell to the customers that
they contact. For its part, the life insurer earns profits from underwriting,
asset management, and distribution – and benefits by better leveraging its
distribution system. The current partnerships between Metropolitan Life and
Glendale Federal Savings and ITT Hartford and Norwest Corporation (and
others) resemble this model (Exhibit 7).
This model calls for a large bank with a range of eƒfective distribution
channels (branches, ATMs, trust salesforce, mail, phone). The bank mines its
Exhibit 7
own customer base while playing oƒf multiple life insurers against one another
to garner the most advantageous products for its channels.
The life companies benefit by earning underwriting profits from the extra
volume and investment profits from asset management. The bank captures
distribution profits and leverages its existing channels more eƒfectively. It may
also be able to extract some rents from the life insurers.
In this joint venture, the bank provides warm leads and its reputation and
brand name, while the insurer brings products and underwriting and servicing
expertise. The partners meld their individual excellences to forge a “best
practice” bancassurance operation with tailored products, tailored distri-
bution, a lead generation mechanism, and middle-market sales processes.
Although the bank may ultimately take over the distribution channels, the
life insurer will continue to benefit from the joint development through
guaranteed product sales and/or profit sharing.
In this case, the life insurer and bank share equally in the earnings. And
whatever opportunities they may lose by building a new channel rather than
leveraging their existing ones, they more than make up for by building a new
best-practice channel in which all elements – salesforce, products, and sales
techniques – have been designed, built, and tailored to work with the middle
market. Examples of such joint ventures that have been announced include
United Jersey Bank (now merged with Summit Bank) and Western National,
Banc One and Manulife, and Charter One and Jeƒferson-Pilot.