ANALYSIS OF MULTY STORIED BUILDING WITH

DIFFERENT PLAN CONFIGURATIONS

BHAVIGADDA MANJUNATH1 Mrs.NANDINI2
1
M. Tech scholar BHEEMA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, Alur Road Adoni- Kurnool
(Dist), A.P , 518301.
2
Associate professor BHEEMA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, Alur Road Adoni-
Kurnool (Dist), A.P , 518301,

Varies reciprocally with height of the construction.

ABSTRACT
The construction base shear for normal building is
Background: Extinct earthquakes events demonstrate highest compare to irregular form buildings.
that, buildings with irregularity are prone to
earthquake damages. Thus as it's essential to I. INTRODUCTION
identify the unstable response of the structure even in
Structural examination implies assurance of the
high seismic zones to chop back the seismic damages
general shape and all the particular measurements of
in buildings. a specific structure so it will play out the capacity for
which it is made and will securely withstand the
Objective: the foremost vital objective of this study
impacts which will follow up on it all through its
is to know the behavior of the structure in high
valuable life. ETABS was utilized to make the
seismic zone and conjointly to
numerical model of the Burj Khalifa, composed by
gauge construction overturning moment, constr-
Skidmore, Owings and Merrill LLP (SOM). The
uction Drift, Displacement, Design lateral
information, yield and numerical arrangement
forces. Throughout this purpose leven storey-high
systems of ETABS are particularly intended to
building on four all completely different shapes like
exploit the special physical and numerical qualities
Rectangular, O-shape, H-shape, and T-shape area related with building compose structures. ETABS
unit used as a comparison. The whole models were gives both static and dynamic examination for
analyzed with the help of ETABS 9.7.1 extensive variety of gravity, warm and parallel
version. Within the gift study, Comparative static and burdens. Dynamic examination may incorporate
Dynamic Analysis for all four cases is investigated to seismic reaction range or accelerogram time history.
gauge the deformation of the structure. This investigation chiefly manages the investigation
of a rectangular, H, O and T formed arrangement
Results & Conclusion: The results indicate that,
utilizing ETABS.
building with severe irregularity
produces additional deformation than those with less A 30m x 30m 11-stories structure having 3m x 3m
irregularity notably in high seismic zones. And put inlets is demonstrated utilizing ETABS. The tallness
together the construction overturning moment of every story is taken as 3m, making absolute stature
of the structure 33m. Burdens considered are taken as OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
per the IS-875(Part1, Part2), IS-1893(2002) code and
1. To calculate the design lateral forces on regular
mixes are acc. to IS-875(Part5). Post examination of
and irregular buildings using response spectrum
the structure, most extreme shear powers, twisting
analysis and to compare the results of different
minutes, and greatest story removal are registered
structures.
and afterward thought about for all the broke down
2. To study three irregularities in structures namely
cases.
mass, stiffness and vertical geometry
A RCC framed structure is fundamentally a gathering irregularities.
of sections, bars, segments and establishment 3. To calculate the response of buildings subjected
between associated with each other as a unit. The to various types of ground motions namely low,
heap move instrument in these structures is from intermediate and high frequency ground motion
sections to shafts, from bars to segments, and after using Time history analysis and to compare the
that eventually from segments to the establishment, results.
which thusly passes the heap to the dirt. In this basic 4. To carry out ductility-based earthquake-resistant
examination think about, we have received four cases design as per IS 13920 corresponding to
by accepting diverse shapes for a similar structure, as equivalent static analysis and time history
clarified beneath. analysis and to compare the difference in design.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Rectangular Plan
2. H-shape Plan Karavasilis et al. (2008) His examinations the
3. O-shape Plan inelastic seismic reaction of plane steel minute
4. T-shape Plan opposing casings with vertical mass anomaly. The
investigation of the made reaction databank
The building is 30m x 30m in plan with sections
demonstrated that the quantity of stories, proportion
separated at 3m from focus to focus. A story to floor
of quality of shaft and section
stature of 3m is accepted.
Athanassiadou et all,. (2008) He inferred that the
impact of the flexibility class on the cost of structures
is insignificant, while execution of every
unpredictable casing subjected to quake has all the
earmarks of being similarly agreeable, not mediocre
compared to that of the consistent ones,
notwithstanding for double the outline seismic tremor
powers.
Lee and Ko et all,. (2007) He subjected three 1:12
scale 17-story RC divider building models having
distinctive sorts of abnormality at the last two stories
Fig 1: Different Plan configurations of Building
to a similar arrangement of mimicked quake The flat loads includes wind load and tremor stack.
excitations to watch their seismic reaction attributes. The longitudinal loads i.e. tractive and braking
powers are considered in unique instance of plan of
III. METHODOLOGY scaffolds, gantry braces and so on.

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD

The portrayal of most extreme reaction of glorified

single degree opportunity framework having certain
period and damping, amid tremor ground
movements. This investigation is completed by the
code IS 1893-2002 (part1). Here kind of soil, seismic
zone factor ought to be entered from IS 1893-2002
(part1). The standard reaction spectra for sort of soil
considered is connected to working for the Types of loads acting on the structure are:

examination in ETABS V 9.7.4 programming.

• Dead loads
Following chart demonstrates the standard reaction
• Imposed loads
range for medium soil compose and that can be given
• Wind loads
as day and age versus ghostly increasing speed
• Snow loads
coefficient (Sa/g).
• Earthquake loads
• Special loads

Statement of problem
Salient features:
Utility of building : Residential complex
No of stories : G+10
Type of construction : R.C.C framed structure
Geometric details:

Response spectrum for medium soil type for 5% Ground floor : 3.5 m

damping Floor to floor height : 3 m.

Materials:
Different types of loads acting on the structure Concrete grade : M40
All steel grades : Fe415 grade
The sorts of loads following up on structures for
Bearing capacity of soil : 300KN/M2
structures and different structures can be
Seismic zones : I (Z=0.10). IS 1893(Part-
comprehensively delegated vertical burdens, level
1):2002, II (Z=0.16). IS 1893(Part-1):2002, III
loads and longitudinal loads. The vertical loads
(Z=0.24). IS 1893(Part-1):2002, V (Z=0.36). IS
comprise of dead loads, live load and effect stack.
1893(Part-1):2002
Soil type : II. IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Importance factor : 1.
Response reduction factor : 5. Dynamic analysis in Zone-2

Damping : 5%.
Story Drift X

Models in ETABS

Rectangular Building

Story Drift Y

O Shape Building

Lateral load (P)

T Shape Building

H Shape Building
Shear force (Fx)
Shear force (Vy) DYNAMIC ANALYSIS IN ZONE-V

Story Drift X

Building Torsion (T)

Story Drift Y

Bending moment (Mx)

Lateral load (P)

Shear force (Fx)

Bending moment (My)
Shear force (Vy) V CONCLUSIONS

From the results and discussions the following

conclusions were obtained

1. For the Drift (Lateral Displacement point of

view) in X-Direction and Y-Direction the O
Shape Building is having better results than other
cases (General, T Shape, H shape buildings) for
Building Torsion (T) both zone II and Zone V.
2. For the Shear force point of view the minimum
value of shear force was obtained for T shaped
buildings than other cases (General buildings,
H,O shape building) in X and Y Directions is
general building.
3. For the Bending moment point of view the
minimum value of Bending moment was
obtained for O Shape buildings than other cases
Bending moment (Mx) (General, H Shape, T Shape building) in both X
and Y Directions.
4. For the Building overturning the O Shape
buildings has less values than other cases
5. Results have been proved that O shape building
is more vulnerable compare to all other different
shapes.
6. Response spectrum method allows a clear
understanding of the contributions of different
modes of vibration. It is also useful for
approximate evaluation of seismic
Bending moment (My)
reliability of structures.
7. Building with regular square plan have the same
maximum base shear value compared with other
plan shapes and least base shear value for “H”
shaped plan configuration in IInd to Vth zone.
8. Time period does not depend the zone value.
9. Irregular shape building are severely affected
undergo more deformation during
earthquake especially in high seismic zones
REFERANCES

[1]. AminAlavi,P.SrinivasaRao.,EffectofPlanIrregula
rRCBuildingsinHighSeismicZone.Aust.J.Basic&
Appl.Sci.,7(13):1-6,2013.
[2]. BureauofIndianStandards:IS-1893,part
1(2002),CriteriaforEarthquakeResistantDesignof
Structures:Part1GeneralprovisionsandBuildings,
NewDelhi,India.
[3]. BureauofIndianStandards:IS-
875,part1(1987),DeadLoadsonBuildingsandStruc
tures,New Delhi,India.
[4]. Giordano,A.,M.GuadagnuoloandG.Faella,2008.“
PushoverAnalysisofPlanIrregularMasonryBuildi
ngs”.Inthe14thworldconferenceonearthquakeengi
neering.Beijing,China,12-17.
[5]. Guleria,Abhay."Structural Analysis of a Multi-
Storeyed Building Using
ETABSforDifferentPlan
Configurations."Vol.3.Issue5(2014):1481-484.
International Journal of Engineering Research&
Technology(IJERT).Web.1May2014.
[6]. Herrera,Raul Gonzalezand Consuelo Gomez
Soberon,2008.Influence of PlanIrregularity of
Buildings."Inthe14thworld conference on
earthquake eengineering.Beijing,China,12-17.
[7]. M.R.Wakchaure,Anantwad
Shirish,RohitNikam,“StudyofPlanIrregularityon
High-Rise
Structures”,InternationalJournalofInnovativeRes
earch&Developement,Vol1Issue8October2012.
[8]. Poonam,AnilKumarandA.K.Gupta,“StudyofResp
onseofStructuralIrregularBuildingFramestoSeism
icExcitations,”InternationalJournalofCivil,Struct
ural,EnvironmentalandInfrastructureEngineering
ResearchandDevelopment,Vol.2,Issue2(2012)25-
31.