MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and content within and and/or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form about
teaching areas. knowledge of content
within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs developed
highlighting integration of
content knowledge
Efficiency
within and across subject
areas
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its
integration in other
subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify Timeliness
and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies that and/or inter-observer
enhance learner agreement form about
achievement in teaching strategies
literacy and that enhance learner
numeracy skills. achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-
centered strategies
that promote literacy
and/or numeracy skills Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-
centered strategies
that promote literacy
and/or numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
teaching
5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 3. Applied a 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education range of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies to and/or inter-observer
develop critical agreement form about
and creative teaching strategies to
thinking, as well develop critical and
as other higher- creative thinking, as
order thinking well as other higher-
skills. order thinking skills
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different
teaching strategies
that develop critical
and creative thinking Efficiency
and/or other HOTS
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies
that develop critical
and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration
teaching Timeliness
5. Results of assessment
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom Quality
Education Environment classroom observation tool (COT)
Services and Diversity structure to rating sheet and/or
of Learners engage learners, inter-observer
individually or in agreement form about
groups, in managing classroom
structure that engages
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
meaningful learners in various Efficiency
exploration, activities
discovery and 2. Lesson plans/modified
hands-on DLLs highlighting various
activities within a classroom management
range of strategies that engage
physical learning learners in activities/tasks
environments. in different physical
learning environments Timeliness
3. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services constructively by inter-observer agreement
applying positive form about teacher
and non-violent management of learner
discipline to behavior using the
ensure learning- following strategies:
focused 1. Providing motivation
environments. 2. Praising the Efficiency
learners/Giving
positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’
active participation
5. Allowing learners
to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal
opportunities to
learners Timeliness
7. Encouraging learners
to ask questions
8. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom Quality
Education differentiated, observation tool (COT)
Services developmentally rating sheet and/or
appropriate inter-observer
learning agreement form about
experiences to using differentiated,
address learners’ developmentally
gender, needs, appropriate learning
strengths, experiences
interests and 2. Lesson plans/modified
experiences. DLLs developed Efficiency
highlighting differentiation
in content, product,
process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and
experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in
content, product,
process, learning Timeliness
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences
4. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education and Planning managed and tool (COT) rating sheet
Services implemented and/or inter-observer
developmentally agreement form about
sequenced using developmentally
teaching and sequenced teaching
learning and learning process
processes to 2. Lesson
meet curriculum plans/modified DLLs
requirements and highlighting
developmentally
sequenced instruction
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
varied teaching that meet curriculum Efficiency
contexts. goals and varied
teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials
used to implement
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process to
meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of Quality
collegial teachers on
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetings
use teacher and with proof of
learner feedback attendance
to enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
practice. sessions on use of Efficiency
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
with proof of
attendance
3. Others (Please specify
and provide Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services organized and and/or inter-observer
used appropriate agreement form about
teaching and using appropriate
learning teaching and learning
resources, resources, including ICT
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
including ICT, to Examples: Efficiency
address  Activity sheets/task
learning goals. sheets/work sheets
 PowerPoint
presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention
Materials
 Others Timeliness
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and organized and and/or inter-observer
Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form about
formative and using diagnostic,
summative formative and
assessment summative assessment
strategies strategies
consistent with 2. Prepared lesson
curriculum plans/modified DLLs
requirements. highlighting
appropriate use of
formative assessment
strategies
3. Developed diagnostic
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior;
(b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior;
(b)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
with sample Efficiency
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior;
(b) with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored 1. Compilation of a Quality
Education and evaluated learner’s written work
Services learner progress with summary of results
and achievement and with signature of
using learner parents
attainment data. 2. Formative/summative
assessment tools with Efficiency
TOS and frequency of
errors with identified
least mastered skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs showing index
of mastery
5. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education Communicated corrected test papers of
Services promptly and the same 3 learners in
clearly the the same learning area
learners’ needs, with parents’ or
progress and guardians’ signature and
achievement to
date of receipt
key stakeholders,
2. Minutes of PTA
including Efficiency
parents/guardians meetings or Parent-
. Teacher conferences in
all quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting Timeliness
4. Communication with
parents/guardians
using various modalities
5. Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
6. Other documents
showing learner needs,
progress and
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Quality
Education various related Recognition or
Services works/activities Participation
that contribute to 2. Certificate of Training
the teaching- 3. Certificate of Speakership
learning process. 4. Committee involvement
5. Advisorship of Co-
curricular activities
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Results
per KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorshi
p
7. Coordinatorship/Chairper
sonship
8. Coaching and
mentoring learners in
competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers Timeliness
10. Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

JESUS A. MAUHAY ERNESTO D. LINDO

Principal I Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority