Field Report Krisna-C 2022

PERTAMINA HULU ENERGY OSES (PHE OSES)
FIELD REPORT
UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022
KRISNA-C WELL PLATFORM
PETEKA KARYA JALA

Office
Jl. Yos Sudarso No.33, RT.10/RW.11, Sunter Jaya,
Tj. Priok, Kota Jkt Utara, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 14360
Website: http://www.ptk-shipping.com

FIELD REPORT
FIELD REPORT
STRUCTURE DESIGNATION AND DATA RECORD
Structure Designation
Structure name : KRISNA-C
Structure Description : Well Platform
Number of Pile/Leg : 4 (four) Piles/Legs
Number of Riser : 1 (one) Riser
Date of Inspection : 30th – 31st of August 2022
Type of Inspection : L1, L2, L3, L4
Report Reference : PHEOSES-KRC-V-PFR-0002
PT. PETEKA KARYA JALA
Diving Supervisor : Febria Marganasidi Signature : _________________
: Sudrajat Signature : _________________
Assist. Supervisor : Sudaryanto Agus Sutoro
NDT. Diver Level II : Imam Arifin Mardi
EMT : Purnomo Santoso
Divers : Muhammad Johani Mahendra

Ahmad Komarudin M. Subur
Aditya Wahyu Yanuardi Zuraimi
Bambang Nurdiansyah Nasiki
Dive Technician : Wasma Ginanjar Wagino
Report Coordinator : Rudy Hermansyah

Report prepared by : PT. Peteka Karya Jala Report Coordinator
Reviewed by
Third Party
Name : Kapri Pratama Signature : _________________
Title : Surveyor
Company : PT. Radiant Utama Interinsco
Client:
Name : Tri Joko Santoso Signature : _________________
Title : Company Representative
Company : Pertamina Hulu Energy OSES
This Report Carried out for: PERTAMINA HULU ENERGY OSES.
Page 2 of 26

FIELD REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIELD REPORT ...................................................................................................................................................... 2
STRUCTURE DESIGNATION AND DATA RECORD ................................................................................................. 2
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 4
2022 INSPECTION PLAN ....................................................................................................................................... 5
SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS................................................................................................................... 7
GENERAL VISUAL INSPECTION ......................................................................................................................... 7
MARINE GROWTH MEASUREMENT ................................................................................................................ 7
CATHODIC PROTECTION SURVEY .................................................................................................................... 7
DEBRIS SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................ 7
ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENT ............................................................................................ 8
SEABED SCOUR SURVEY .................................................................................................................................. 8
RISER INSPECTION ........................................................................................................................................... 8
CLOSE VISUAL AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION................................................................................... 8
MARINE GROWTH MEASUREMENTS TABLE ........................................................................................................ 9
INSPECTED LEG: A2 .......................................................................................................................................... 9
PHOTOGRAPH MARINE GROWTH ................................................................................................................. 10
CATHODIC POTENTIAL READINGS TABLE .......................................................................................................... 11
PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION CATHODIC PROTECTION ................................................................................. 12
ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS TABLE .................................................................................. 13
INSPECTED LEG: A1 ........................................................................................................................................ 13
INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION .......................................................................................................................... 13
PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS ...................................................................... 14
SCOUR UNDER HORIZONTAL MUD BRACE ........................................................................................................ 15
SCOUR UNDER J-BOW AND PIPELINE ................................................................................................................ 16
RISER AND RISER CLAMP INSPECTION............................................................................................................... 17
ANODE TABLES .................................................................................................................................................. 18
LIST OF DEBRIS................................................................................................................................................... 21
CLOSE VISUAL AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION..................................................................................... 22
CLOSE VISUAL INSPECTION............................................................................................................................ 22
CLOSE VISUAL INSPECTION............................................................................................................................ 22
PHOTOGRAPH CVI WELD JOINT J273(262-273)............................................................................................. 23
PHOTOGRAPH CVI VDM MEMBER AT ROW “1” FACE “B1-A1” ..................................................................... 24
MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION ................................................................................................................ 25
Page 3 of 26

FIELD REPORT
INTRODUCTION
The inspection of KRISNA-C Well Platform was carried out by PT. PATRA DINAMIKA inspection divers under
supervision of PT. RADIANT UTAMA INTERINSCO surveyor for PERTAMINA HULU ENERGY OSES by using
standard air diving technique and supported by Diving Support Vessel DSV. PATRA OFFSHORE.
The inspection had been carried out on 30th of August 2022 and was completed on 31st of August 2022.
This structure is situated in the CBU area – Java Sea at coordinate; Latitude 05O 13’ 13.52” South and Longitude
106O 11’ 40. 8” East, in water depth was -80Ft. with visibility near the seabed was approximately ± 10 feet.
Attachments to the platform:

Boat landing : 1 (one) boat landing at row “A” face A1-A2
1 (one) boat landing at row “2” face A1-B2
Pile / Leg : 4 (four) pile/leg
Conductor : 9 (nine) well conductors inboard
Riser : 1 (one)  12 Inch riser at Row “1” face A1-B1
The digital photographs and the videotapes of this report are provided separately.
Page 4 of 26

FIELD REPORT
2022 INSPECTION PLAN
Platform : KRISNA-C
Type of Inspection : L1, L2, L3, L4 Risk Based Inspection
Items to be checked:
1. Visual inspection from splash zone up to top of platform structure to verify structural integrity and
equipment layout, any modification on the deck shall be reported (recorded by sketch & photograph).
2. Visual inspection and video swim under surface control from splash zone down to seabed to verify
structural integrity and photographic documentation (if required).
3. Anode survey
Anode mapping shall be performed and estimates of depletion recorded, dimensional check of anode shall
be performed randomly (if required).
4. Scour survey
Scour beneath the bottom plan shall be determined and recorded at all legs & 3 locations (both end and
centre) up to radius of 20Ft. around jacket vicinity (recorded by sketch).
5. Debris survey
Any debris in contact with the structure and debris survey out to 20Ft. distance from jacket (recorded by
sketch).
6. Riser survey
All risers shall be surveyed from seabed to water surface for signs of damage.
Bolts and clamps of risers shall be inspected for sign of damaged, loose or missing at water surface down
to seabed and riser elbows on seabed shall be inspected, extended minimum 20Ft. off J-bow (recorded by
sketch).
7. Cathodic Protection Reading (all legs and outside only)
Reading carried out at splash zone and all nodes from water surface down to seabed.
8. Marine growth measurement, at Leg A2.
- Measurement starts from Msl. down to first elevation in every 5Ft. interval.
- Measurement taken below first elevation down to seabed shall be taken every 15Ft. interval.
- Photograph documentation may be required if deemed necessary for evidence and cleaning record if
any to be reported.
9. Thickness measurement, at Leg A1.
- Measurement shall be taken as near to the sea surface as possible for all members passing through
the sea surface.
- Measurement shall be taken at all legs or at least at leg A1, from sea surface down to seabed at leg
nodes and midpoint between elevations (taken at outside part).
10. Conductor survey (if any)
No. and location of all conductors to be recorded at splash zone down to seabed.
Outboard conductors that are welded to structure should be assessed corrosion and integrity.
Visual check of all bolted connection for damage or looseness.
11. Caisson supports (if any)
Visually check for weld cracking at splash zone down to the end of caisson.
12. MPI and CVI
- CVI and MPI at -30Ft. elevation Joint J273(262-273), no crack indication was found.
- Vertical Diagonal Member at Row “1” face “B1-A1” was selected for close visual inspection.
- No mechanical damage found at the VDM, good condition.
Page 5 of 26

FIELD REPORT
S
O
E
N
Boat Landing
A2 B2 2
Boat Landing
A1 B1 1
Riser #1
A B
KRISNA-C
WELL PLATFORM
KEY PLAN
Page 6 of 26

FIELD REPORT
SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS
GENERAL VISUAL INSPECTION

• The below sea level a general visual inspection was carried out with an underwater video
camera and surface monitoring capability from MSL down to -80 ft. elevation.
• The general inspection of the structural on the caisson, piles/legs and conductors revealed no
significant physical damage or defect, at the time of inspection.
• General visual inspection below sea level conducted from MSL down to the seabed, no
significant physical damage or defect observed.
• The construction integrity of boat landing and connection points to the structure had found in
good condition.
• The general visual inspection of this structure at above sea level, were carried out by the on
board of the PT. Radiant Utama Interinsco Surveyor.
• The underwater general visual inspection was carried out with an underwater video camera from
MSL. down to the seabed.
• The inspection of the structural member below sea level revealed no physical damage or defect.
• The all conductors and caisson were visually inspection for physical damage and looseness, no
physical damage was found.
MARINE GROWTH MEASUREMENT
• Leg A2 was selected for marine growth measurement.
• Measurements were taken from MSL. down to 1st level at -30 ft. elevation in 5 Ft. increments,
and 15 Ft. increments below 1st level at -30 ft. down to seabed at -75 Ft. elevation.
• The maximum thickness of hard marine growth was recorded 4.00 inches at -10 Ft. down to -
60 Ft. elevation and maximum thickness of soft marine growth was recorded 2.00 inches at -
10 Ft. down to -30 Ft. elevation (refer to the marine growth table).
• The photograph of marine growth was carried out at -30 Ft. elevation at the time of inspection.
CATHODIC PROTECTION SURVEY
• The cathodic potential measurements were taken on all legs of this structure, by using
Bathycorrometer BUCKLEYS Serial # BUC-C8110E and calibration carried out before and after
each dive.
• All cathodic potential readings fell between -0.922 volts to -0.973 volts at the time of inspection.
• Total 62 anodes were visually inspected, with the result 9 anodes were noted missing (leg only),
19 anodes were noted 100% depleted (frame only), 34 anodes were noted 20%-90% depleted,
3 anode rack pods were noted 75% depleted.
DEBRIS SURVEY
• During the general visual inspection, debris survey carried out on this structure from MSL.
down to the seabed at -80Ft. elevation.
• No metallic debris was observed from MSL. down to seabed, at the time of inspection.
• Large quantities of metallic debris were noted scattered on the seabed area, at the time of
inspection (refer to debris table).
Page 7 of 26

FIELD REPORT
SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS: (continued)
ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENT

• Leg A1 selected for Ultrasonic Wall Thickness measurements.
• The measurements taken from MSL. down to the seabed (refer to the Ultrasonic Wall Thickness
measurements table). The Ultrasonic Wall Thickness measurements taken by using a
CYGNUS-1 Serial #3330 and calibration carried out before and after each dive.
• The highest reading of the inspected leg wall thickness recorded was 38.3 millimeters; this had
been recorded at MSL., the lowest reading obtained was 13.0 millimeters; this had been
recorded at -55 ft. elevation.
SEABED SCOUR SURVEY
• Survey of the seabed area enclosed by the structure and immediate surrounding areas observed to be
fairly even.
• The maximum scour under all horizontal mud braces was noted 4 inches on leg A1 row “1” face “A1-B1”.
• The riser no. 1 under riser of J-bow was noted 1 feet 3 inch scour on seabed and the rest are touching to
50% buried in seabed toward 20 feet the pipeline.
RISER INSPECTION
• 1 (one) of riser had been installed on this structure.
• The riser was visual inspected with an underwater camera and surface monitoring system from MSL down
to seabed and 20 feet outward the pipeline.
• The riser appeared to run parallel to the jacket structure and no mechanical damage could be observed.
• All bolts of the riser clamp were checked for integrity and tightness. Total 3 bolts are loose and no missing
bolt, at the time of inspection.
CLOSE VISUAL AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
• 1 (one) member was selected for Close Visual Inspection, it was VDM member at Row 1 Face B1-A1,
no mechanical damage was found, good condition.
• 1 (one) weld joint was selected and carried out for Close Visual and Magnetic Particle Inspection.
• The digital photographs were taken at overall 12, 3, 6 and 9 O’clock positions of selected weld joint.
Weld joint number: J273(262-273) at -30Ft. elevation.
- The complete clock rotation of the weld and HAZ area were visually inspected.
- No crack indication was found on this weld joint.
Page 8 of 26

FIELD REPORT
MARINE GROWTH MEASUREMENTS TABLE

(12 O’clock position being outside part of the leg)
PHE OSES Reps. : Tri Joko Santoso Inspection Date : 31 August 2022
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Mardi
PT. Patra Dinamika Diving Supv. : Sudrajat
INSPECTED LEG: A2
Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness Coverage % Compression
Elev.
Hard/Soft Hard/Soft Hard/Soft Hard/Soft Hard/Soft Circumference
(-)Ft.
12 O’clock 3 O’clock 6 O’clock 9 O’clock Average (in inches)
MSL. 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 70/80 120
5 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 80/80 120
10 4.00/2.00 2.00/1.00 3.00/2.00 4.00/2.00 90/80 125
15 4.00/2.00 4.00/2.00 3.00/2.00 2.00/2.00 90/90 125
20 2.00/1.00 2.00/2.00 4.00/1.00 3.00/2.00 80/80 125
25 2.00/2.00 4.00/2.00 4.00/2.00 3.00/2.00 80/70 125
30 2.00/2.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 70/70 125
45 3.00/1.00 3.00/1.00 3.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 70/80 125
60 4.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 3.00/1.00 70/80 123
75 2.00/1.00 3.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 2.00/1.00 60/80 122
Note:
• All measurements in Inches.
• Equipment used: Plastic Measuring Tape
• 12 O’clock positon being outside of structure
• The photograph of marine growth was carried out at -30Ft. elevation, at the time of inspection.
O’CLOCK POSITION OF LEG
12 3
LEG H/M
9 6
H/M
Page 9 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PHOTOGRAPH MARINE GROWTH
Marine Growth Leg A2 at -30Ft.
Marine Growth Leg A2 at -30Ft.
Page 10 of 26

FIELD REPORT
CATHODIC POTENTIAL READINGS TABLE

PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : M. Subur
PT. Patra Dinamika Diving Supv. : Sudrajat Nasiki
Potential Calibration Calibration

Elevation
Leg Readings Pre/Post Dive Pre/Post Inspection Date
(-) Feet
(-) Volt (Zinc) (Steel)
MSL 0.944
A1 30 0.939 1.033/1.043 0.521/0.531 31 August 2022
80 0.932
MSL 0.973
A2 30 0.946 1.033/1.043 0.521/0.531 31 August 2022
80 0.923
MSL 0.944
B1 30 0.951 1.033/1.043 0.521/0.531 31 August 2022
80 0.922
MSL 0.963
B2 30 0.928 1.033/1.043 0.521/0.531 31 August 2022
80 0.929
Note:
• All reading are expressed in negative volts.
• All readings had taken 12 O’clock position outside part of the structure leg.
• Equipment used: Bathycorrometer BUCKLEYS (Serial No: BUC-C8110E).

12 3
LEG H/M
9 6
H/M
Page 11 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION CATHODIC PROTECTION
Pre-Dive Calibration CP (Zinc) Post-Dive Calibration CP (Zinc)
Pre-Dive Calibration CP (Steel) Post-Dive Calibration CP (Steel)
Page 12 of 26

FIELD REPORT
ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS TABLE

PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : M. Subur
INSPECTED LEG: A1
Elevation Thickness Readings
(-) Feet (in millimetres)
MSL 38.3
15 13.4
30 25.6
55 13.0
80 26.0
INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
Calibration Calibration Calibration
Inspection Date
Test Block Pre-Dive Post-Dive
5 mm 5.2 mm 5.1 mm
10 mm 9.8 mm 9.8 mm
31 August 2022
15 mm 14.8 mm 14.8 mm
20 mm 20.0 mm 20.0 mm
Note:
• 12 O’clock position being outside part of the leg
• All readings were taken on outside part of the structure legs.
• Equipment used: CYGNUS-1 (Serial No. 3330)

12 3
LEG H/M
9 6
H/M
Page 13 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS
Pre-Dive Calibration UT
Post-Dive Calibration UT
Page 14 of 26

FIELD REPORT
SCOUR UNDER HORIZONTAL MUD BRACE
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Mahendra
ROW “1” FACE “A1-B1”

A1 B1
A 4 Inch scour on seabed

B 100% buried in seabed
C 100% buried in seabed
A B C
SEABED
ROW “A” FACE “A1-A2”
A1 A2
A Touching on seabed
C 100% buried in seabed
A B C
SEABED
ROW “2” FACE “A2-B2”

A2 B2
A 100% buried in seabed

C Touching on seabed
A B C
SEABED
ROW “B” FACE “B1-B2”

B1 B2
A 100% buried in seabed

C Touching on seabed
A B C
SEABED
Note:
• Measurements taken from outside the jacket
• No pile exposed
Page 15 of 26

FIELD REPORT
SCOUR UNDER J-BOW AND PIPELINE
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Ahmad Komarudin
PT. Patra Dinamika Diving Supv. : Febria M
Riser No.1  12 Inches
A 2 feet 5 inch gap to H/M

Knee Brace Cut Off
B 1 feet 3 inch scour on seabed
A Pledco Clamp C Touching in seabed
D Touching in seabed
E 50% buried in seabed
B F 50% buried in seabed
C D E F
5 FT 5 FT 5 FT 5 FT
Note:
• Measurements taken 5 points and distance 5 feet between each point.
• Measurements taken from under J-bow to 20 feet along the pipeline.
Page 16 of 26

FIELD REPORT
RISER AND RISER CLAMP INSPECTION
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Ahmad Komarudin
Riser No. 1  12 Inches

View from “A1” Toward “B1”
Riser Side
Number of Bolt : 4 bolts
Number of Bolt Missing : Nil
Number of Bolt Loose : 3 bolts
RISER Rubber Linings : Present
Rubber Gap : No gap
H/M CP. Readings : Not required
Member Side
Number of Bolt : 3 bolts
Number of Bolt Missing : Nil
Number of Bolt Loose : Nil
Rubber Linings : Present
Rubber Gap : 1 cm gap
Stub on Horz. Member : Telescopic Clamp
Remarks:
Covered with heavy marine fouling.
Good Condition
Page 17 of 26

FIELD REPORT
ANODE TABLES
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Mahendra, M. Subur
PT. Patra Dinamika Diving Supv. : Febria M / Sudrajat Bambang
Anode
Anode Condition Anode Number Anode Condition
Number
1 100% anode depleted 34 Missing anode (only leg)
2 30% anode depleted 35 Missing anode (only leg)
3 100% anode depleted 36 100% anode depleted
5 Missing anode (only leg) 38 100% anode depleted
30 100% anode depleted #1 75% anode depleted
33 100% anode depleted
Note:
• The number of anode and position please refer to drawing.
D MEASUREMENTS
A B C Taken on anode #42
A 1 feet 9 inch
B 2 feet 7 inch
C 1 feet 10 inch
D 3 feet 8 inch
Page 18 of 26

FIELD REPORT
A1 A2 A2 B2 B2 B1 B1 A1
BOAT LANDING BOAT LANDING
MSL.
3 10 12 20 28 30
1
13 22
2 4 11 21 23 29 31
(-)30Ft. 14 32
5 6 24 25
16 17 35
15 33 34
7
9 18 19 26 27
8 37
36 38
(-)80Ft.
Note:
Total 62 anodes were visually inspected at during of time inspection, with result 19 anodes were noted 100% depleted (only frame), 8 anodes missing (only
leg), 10 anodes in approx. 60% to 90% depleted (refer to the anode table).
Structure : KRISNA-C Well Platform O/B Client Reps. : Tri Joko Santoso
Water Depth : Msl. down to -80Ft. elevation O/B Surveyor : Kapri Pratama VERTICAL FRAMING
Insp. Date : 30 August 2022 Diving Supv. : Febria M / Sudrajat ANODE MAPPING
Drawing Scale : Not to scale Inspection Diver : Mahendra. M. Subur, Bambang
Page 19 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PLAN AT -30 FT ELEVATION PLAN AT -80 FT ELEVATION

this anode check by random
B2 43 44 45 46 B1 B2 B1
42 #2
55 57 47
41
56
40 48
58
39 59 49
54 #1
A2 53 52 51 50 A1
60
#3
A2 62 61 A1
Note:
Total 3 (three) rack pods of anodes, contain 8 anodes in each rack pod and noted in approx. 75% depleted located inside of jacket at this structure.
Structure : KRISNA-C Well Platform O/B Client Reps. : Tri Joko Santoso
Water Depth : Msl. down to -80Ft. elevation O/B Surveyor : Kapri Pratama HORIZONTAL FRAMING
Insp. Date : 30 August 2022 Diving Supv. : Febria M / Sudrajat ANODE MAPPING
Drawing Scale : Not to scale Inspection Diver : Mahendra. M. Subur, Bambang
Page 20 of 26

FIELD REPORT
LIST OF DEBRIS
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Bambang
Removal
No Items Quantity Location
(Yes/No)
MSL down to seabed at -80Ft. elevation
Clear of metallic debris.
Bottom level, seabed area at -80Ft. elevation.
1 Pipe Ø 2 inch x 1 m 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
2 Tire Fender 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
3 L-bow 2 inch x 2 m 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
4 Pipe Ø 2 inch x 1 m 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
5 Grating 1 m x 1 m several Please refer to drawing/sketch No
6 L-Bow 6 inch Pipe Ø 4 inch 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
7 Pipe Ø 4 inch 2m 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
8 Tire Fender 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
9 Pipe Ø 4 inch 40cm 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
10 Pipe Ø 4 inch 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
11 Grating several Please refer to drawing/sketch No
12 L-Bow 3m 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
15 Grating 1m x 80cm 1 Please refer to drawing/sketch No
Note:
• All the charting is metallic debris only
• Due to poor visibility condition on the seabed, size of the debris can only be limited regarded in
approximate. Furthermore, visibility during inspection was approximately 10 feet.
• Numbers of items at list above refer to sketch/drawing.
Page 21 of 26

FIELD REPORT
CLOSE VISUAL AND MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION
PT. Radiant Surveyor : Kapri Pratama Inspection Diver : Imam Arifin
PT. Patra Dinamika Diving Supv. : Sudrajat Weld Joint No. : J.273(262-273)
Type of Weld Cap : 4 bead of weld caps

Weld Circumference : 180 cm
Width of Weld Cap at 12 o’clock position : 30 mm
Overall appearance and condition : Good Condition
CLOSE VISUAL INSPECTION

Joint J273(262-273)
CLOCK
FINDINGS
POSITION
12 Tool mark
Tool mark
1
General Pitting Corrosion on chord average 2 mm Dia. X 2 mm (D)
Spatter on brace 2 mm Dia. x 2 mm (H)
2
Pin hole 2 mm Dia.
3 Start/Stop 2 mm
4 Start/Stop 2 mm
5 Start/Stop 2 mm
6 Clear
7 General Pitting Corrosion on chord average 3 mm Dia. X 2 mm (D)
8 Start/Stop 2 mm
9 Spatter on brace 2 mm Dia. x 2 mm (H)
10 Start/Stop 2 mm
11 Clear
CLOSE VISUAL INSPECTION

Member at Row “1” face “B1-A1”
• Vertical Diagonal Member at Row 1 “B1-A1” was selected for Close Visual Inspection.
• The VDM was in good condition and no mechanical damage was found at the time of inspection.
Page 22 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PHOTOGRAPH CVI WELD JOINT J273(262-273)
UNDERWATER INSPECTION AT -30FT. ELEVATION
WELD JOINT J273(262-273) AT -30FT. ELEVATION WELD JOINT J273(262-273) AT -30FT. ELEVATION
(12 O’CLOCK POSITION) (9 O’CLOCK POSITION)
WELD JOINT J273(262-273) AT -30FT. ELEVATION WELD JOINT J273(262-273) AT -30FT. ELEVATION
(6 O’CLOCK POSITION) (3 O’CLOCK POSITION)
Page 23 of 26

FIELD REPORT
PHOTOGRAPH CVI VDM MEMBER AT ROW “1” FACE “B1-A1”
Page 24 of 26

FIELD REPORT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE INSPECTION

Equipment used & method: Huatec HCDX-310 #22055 Permanent Magnet
Int Type: Mi-Glow underwater type #1
Cleaning method: Dry-grit (Garnet 20-40 MESH)
Light source: Day Light
Magnetic Particle Inspection Results: No Crack Indication

positive readings of magnetic flux indicator on 12, 3, 6 & 9 o’clock positions.
Remarks: (See weld configuration drawing as following page for details)
Page 25 of 26

FIELD REPORT
WELD CONFIGURATION
HDM H/M J273(262-273)
6 o'clock
H/M H/M 3 o'clock 9 o'clock
TO LEG A2 TO LEG A1 12 o'clock
Structure : KRISNA-C MPI. Results:

NDT. Diver : Imam Arifin = Close Visual Inspection
Weld Joint : J273(262-273) = Photographs
Elevation : -30Ft. = Magnetic Particle Inspection
Date Inspection : 31 August 2022 Drawing not to scale
Page 26 of 26

Field Report Krisna-C 2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Field Report Krisna-C 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PERTAMINA HULU ENERGY OSES (PHE OSES)

PETEKA KARYA JALA

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

: Sudrajat Signature : _________________

Assist. Supervisor : Sudaryanto Agus Sutoro

NDT. Diver Level II : Imam Arifin Mardi

EMT : Purnomo Santoso

Divers : Muhammad Johani Mahendra

Dive Technician : Wasma Ginanjar Wagino

Report Coordinator : Rudy Hermansyah

This Report Carried out for: PERTAMINA HULU ENERGY OSES.

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

Attachments to the platform:

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

2022 INSPECTION PLAN

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS

GENERAL VISUAL INSPECTION

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

SUMMARY OF INSPECTION RESULTS: (continued)

ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENT

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

MARINE GROWTH MEASUREMENTS TABLE

O’CLOCK POSITION OF LEG

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

PHOTOGRAPH MARINE GROWTH

Marine Growth Leg A2 at -30Ft.

Marine Growth Leg A2 at -30Ft.

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

CATHODIC POTENTIAL READINGS TABLE

Potential Calibration Calibration

O’CLOCK POSITION OF LEG

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION CATHODIC PROTECTION

Pre-Dive Calibration CP (Zinc) Post-Dive Calibration CP (Zinc)

Pre-Dive Calibration CP (Steel) Post-Dive Calibration CP (Steel)

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS TABLE

O’CLOCK POSITION OF LEG

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

PHOTOGRAPH CALIBRATION ULTRASONIC WALL THICKNESS

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

SCOUR UNDER HORIZONTAL MUD BRACE

ROW “1” FACE “A1-B1”

A 4 Inch scour on seabed

ROW “2” FACE “A2-B2”

A 100% buried in seabed

ROW “B” FACE “B1-B2”

A 100% buried in seabed

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

SCOUR UNDER J-BOW AND PIPELINE

Riser No.1  12 Inches

A 2 feet 5 inch gap to H/M

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

RISER AND RISER CLAMP INSPECTION

Riser No. 1  12 Inches

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022

PLAN AT -30 FT ELEVATION PLAN AT -80 FT ELEVATION

UNDERWATER INSPECTION 2022