Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quicquid Plantatur Solo Solo Cedit Latin
Quicquid Plantatur Solo Solo Cedit Latin
Quicquid Plantatur Solo Solo Cedit Latin
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
LAND LAW
*Whatever attached to land it becomes part of a land and this depends on the degree of
attachment as well as its purpose of attaching. E.g;- If someone decides to put carpet on the floor
may not be part of a land but when he puts tiles this may be part of a land.
Definition of Land according to Land Act Section 2 – "land" includes the surface of the earth and
the earth below the surface and all substances other than minerals or petroleum forming part of or
below the surface, things naturally growing on the land, buildings and other structures permanently
affixed to or under land and land covered by water;
According to legal Latin Maxim which states that Quicquid plantatur solo, solo cedit (Latin,
"whatever is affixed or attached to the soil belongs to the soil") is a Legal Latin principle related to
fixtures. The legal principle means that something that is or becomes affixed to the land becomes
part of the land; therefore, title to the fixture is a part of and passes with title to the land and
consequently whoever owns that piece of land will also own the things attached.
That maxim is different from the Zanzibar Land tenure Act 1992 Section 2- “land” includes
land covered by water, all things growing on land, and buildings and other things permanently
affixed to land, except trees when specifically classified and owned separately.
Factors for determination of whether the item attached form a part of land depend on two
factors;-
1- Degree of annexation(attachment)
According to the degree of annexation test, an article is a fixture if it is attached to land or a
building in a substantial manner, such as by nails or screws. The more firmly or irreversibly the
object is affixed to the earth or a building, the more likely it is to be classified as a fixture. There
must be a physical connection with the land or with something that is part of the land and object.
Case;-
Elwis v. Maw(1802) 3 EAST 38.
Facts
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
In this case the farmer had build at his own cost of shade for animals, carpenters shade and fuel
house and the tenant removed before the end of the lease.
Held
It was held that the farmer could not remove chattels even if they were fixed to his hold for his sole
purpose of improving his agricultural operation
2- Written laws(statutes)
Land tribunal Act No.8 1994
Survey Act No. 9 1990
The village land Act 1999
The land tenure Act No.15 2003
Land registration Act Cap.334
The land acquisition of property Act
The land disputes Act
The mining Act
Zanzibar land tenure Act N0.12 of 1992
3- Customary laws
The Land Act provides the acquisition of customary laws as long as those customs fulfill the needs
4- Islamic laws
Especially when it comes to the issues of inheritance where by Muslims have their own ways of
inheriting as long as the parties in the case agreed to use Islamic law.
5- English laws
The court shall apply ;- Constitutional law, doctrine of equity, statutes of general interpretation in
implementing and interpreting Land Act 1999.
6-Case laws
These are cases and decisions of the judges in the courts concerning the land which may also be part
of the foundation of the laws of land.
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
LAND TENURE
This name has been taken or modified from a latin word known as tenere which means to hold.
This is a way or condition or mode of owning the land where by the tenure signifies the rights and
mode of owning the land.
RIGHT OF OCCUPANCY
According to Section 2 of L.A Right of occupancy means a title to the use and occupation of land
and includes the title of a Tanzanian citizen of African descent or a community of Tanzanian
citizens of African descent using or occupying land in accordance with customary law.
1- Granted right of occupancy – This is right of occupancy which is granted through permission
of government.
less than eighty percent of that area of land has been unused for the purpose for which the right of
occupancy was granted for not less than five years;
(iv)There has been a disposition or an attempt at a disposition which does not comply with the
provisions of this Act;
(v)There has been a breach of a condition contained or implied in a certificate of occupancy;
(vi)There has been a breach of any regulation made under this Act.
Case;-
Rajabu Hassara v. Saraya Rashid (1983) TLR 111
Facts;-
The appellant was offered the right of occupancy was eventually revoked by the president for
alleged non compliance( failure to act in accordance with a wish or command) of the condition
stipulated in the right of occupancy in question. The crux(important point) of the appeal is whether
there had been “ a good cause” for the revocation of the right of occupancy following which the
said plot was relocated to the respondent.
Held;-
It was held that inter alia that non compliance with the condition stipulated in the right of
occupancy
Section 42(2) The Commissioner shall not accept any surrender of the whole or a part of any
occupied land unless the following circumstances apply–
(a) All rent, taxes and dues owned to the Government in respect of that land are fully paid up;
(b) The land will not create, cause or give rise to or a transfer of, any liability in contract, tort or
otherwise to the Government;
(c) The land is not subject to any subsisting mortgage, charge or encumbrance;
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
(d) The land is not subject to any action in court by a lender to possess and sell the land;
(e) The land is not subject to any action by a trustee in bankruptcy on
behalf of creditors or is not otherwise subject to an order of
attachment by any court;
(f) The surrender is not designed to defeat the rights of a spouse to share in or obtain part of the
land;
(g) Every co-occupier and person or body having any interest in that land has consented in writing
to the surrender;
(h) The land is surrendered in consideration of natural love and affection.
(3) Where the Commissioner is satisfied that an application for the surrender of the whole or a part
of the land is due to hardship or poverty and by reason of that hardship or property, the applicant is
not able to pay any rent, taxes and other dues which he owes to the Government, the Commissioner
may remit the whole or a part of any monies which the applicant owes the Government.
3- Abandonment of land
The giving up of a thing absolutely, without reference to any particular person or purpose. For
example, vacating property with the intention of not returning, so that it may be appropriated by the
next comer or finder. The voluntary relinquishment of possession of a thing by its owner with the
intention of terminating ownership, but without vesting it in any other person. The relinquishing of
all title, possession, or claim, or a virtual, intentional throwing away of property.
According to Section 51 of Land Act, Abandonment of land held under a right of occupancy
(1)Land held for a right of occupancy shall be taken to have been abandoned where one or more of
the following factors are present–
(a) The occupier owes any rent, taxes or dues in respect of the land and has continued to owe such
rent, taxes or dues or any portion of them for not less than five years from the date on which any
rent, taxes or dues or any portion thereof first fell to be paid;
b)The occupier has left the country without making any arrangement for any person to be
responsible for the land and for ensuring that the conditions subject to which the right of occupancy
was granted are complied with and that occupier has not given any appropriate notification to the
Commissioner;
(c) Any building on the land has failed into a state of such disrepair that it has become a danger to
the health and safety of any person occupying that building for any lawful purpose or a neighbour to
the occupier;
(d)Persons with no apparent lawful title so to do are occupying or using the land or any buildings on
the land and one or more of those persons or a person from a community which contains one or
more such persons have so occupied or used the land or any building on the land for a period of not
less than two years immediately preceding the date on which in accordance with this section, the
Commissioner publishes a notice of abandonment in the Gazette;
(e) by reason of the neglect of the land, the land is–
(i) no longer capable, without significant expenditure and remedial work, of being used for
productive purposes; or
(ii) suffering serious environmental damage.
Case
Yusuph Tindibali v. Stephano. High Court 1985. 0661 E.A.
Is the power of government to acquire private rights in land without the willing consent of its owner
or occupant in order to benefit society. This power is often necessary for social and economic
development and the protection of the natural environment. Compulsory acquisition requires
finding the balance between the public need for land on the one hand, and the provision of land
tenure security and the protection of private property rights on the other hand.
Section 3 L.A.A
The President may subject to this provision of this Act acquire any land for any estate or term where
such land is required for any public purpose.
(b) For or in connection with sanitary improvement of any kind, including reclamations;
(c) for or in connection with the laying out of any new city, municipality, township or minor
settlement or the extension or improvement of any existing city, municipality, township or minor
settlement;
(d) For or in connection with the development of any airfield, port or harbor;
Relevant case
Mulbadaw Village Council and 67 Others vs. National Agricultural and Food Corporation
(1984) TLR.
Fact
The plaintiffs, a village council and 67 villagers of the same village sued the National Agricultural
and Food Corporation (NAFCO) for a large tract(area) of land in Hanang District, damages for
trespass and other related reliefs. National Agricultural and Food Corporation was given land by
district of Arusha region
ISSUES
8. Whether Act applies to the land belonging to peasants.
9. Whether land held under customary tenure falls under the definition of granted right of
occupancy
10. Whether authorities can grant a formal right of occupancy in respect of Land held under
customary tenure, i.e. deemed right of
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
Held:
The Mulbadaw Village council and Mulbadaw Villagers were lawfully possessing land and
they could only be deprived off their land by due operation of Law, not by mere blessings of
the government and party leaders in Hanang District and Arusha Region;
The provisions of the Land Acquisition Act (No. 47 of 1967) were not followed in acquiring
land belonging to Mulbadaw Village Council and Mulbadaw Villagers and therefore such
acquisition was unlawful;
Where someone is in lawful occupation of land no valid right of occupancy can be offered to
anyone else over the same land unless the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act (No. 47 of
1967) have been complied.
Section 20 L.A
(1) For avoidance of doubt, a non-citizen shall not be allocated or granted land unless it is for
investment purposes under the Tanzania Investment Act Cap. 38*.
Section 2 L.A
"derivative” is something which is based on another source.
“derivative right" means a right to occupy and use land created out of a right of occupancy and
includes a lease, a sub-lease, a license, a usufructuary right and any interest analogous to those
interests;
to a non-citizen or a foreign company, reversion of interests or rights in and over the land shall vest
in the Tanzania Investment Center or any other authority as the Minister may prescribe in the
"Gazette".
According to S.21
(1)The Minister shall make regulations prescribed under Section 179 of this Act providing for an
area of land that a person can hold under single right of occupancy or derivative right or in any way
otherwise disposed of to any person or body corporate.
INCIDENTS OF OCCUPANCY
*Meaning of Easement;- This is a right to cross or otherwise use someone else's land for a
specified purpose. Easement has been explained in;-
(1)Subject to the provisions of this Act or any other written law applicable to the use of land, the
rights capable of being created by an easement are–
(a) any right to do something over, under or upon the servient land; or
(b) any right that something should not be so done; or
(c) any right to require the occupier of servient land to do something over, under or upon that land;
(d) any right to graze stock on the servient land.
(3) Except where an easement has been created for specific period of time which will terminate at a
fixed date in the future or on the happening of a specific event in the future or on the death of the
granter, the grantee or some other person named in the grant, an easement burdens the servient land
and runs with the land for the same period of time as the right of occupancy or lease held by the
granter who created that easement.
(4)Subject to the provisions of this Part an easement shall be capable of existing only during the
subsistence of the right of occupancy or lease out of which it was created.
*Terminology
S.145 of Land Act
(1)The land for the benefit of which any easement is created is in this Act referred to as the
"dominant land" and the land of the person by whom an easement is created is referred to as "the
servient land".
(2)An easement is, in this Act, in relation to the dominant land referred to as "benefiting" that land
and is, in relation to the servient land, referred to as "burdening that land".
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Part, an easement shall be capable of existing only during the
subsistence of the right of occupancy or lease out of which they were created.
B) Express reservation- As opposed to express grant the owner of the servient doesn't actively
grant but reserves for himself in favor of a land retained by himself, the easement must be expressly
mentioned.
2- Implied easement
This is when no document or agreement has created an express easement, an easement right may
still be understood (or "implied") by a situation or circumstances. To create an easement by
implication.
An easement created out of implication are of two form;-
1. Implied grant
2. Implied reservation
According to S.146 of L.A (4) Where a co-occupier, by any disposition, severs any building or part
of it or any land separated by a common dividing wall or other structure, then, whether that wall or
other structure is a party wall or other structure,there shall be implied in the disposition cross
easements of support of the dividing wall or other structure in respect of the severed buildings or
land and the occupiers of the severed buildings or land and their successors in title shall be entitled
to the benefit and subject to the burdens of the cross- easements.
b) Intended easement
This easement arises if there is a common intention between the parties to use the property in a
particular way, in some definite and particular manor which is specific and not merely general.
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
Cases
Nickerson v Barraclough ([1981] Ch 426, CA (Eng))
Facts
Concerned a plot of land that had formed part of a larger estate. The estate had been divided into a
number of plots (including that owned by the plaintiff). It was contemplated that the plots would be
used for building purposes. The plans prepared at the time of the sale in 1906 had shown the
intended line of the roads to be built to serve the development. The conveyance had, however,
expressly stated that the line of the roads might be changed.
Issues
The question was whether, despite this, there could be an easement of necessity. Does a finding that
there is no intention to create an easement (here based on the express intention not to create an
easement) prevent a successful claim to an easement of necessity? Or are easements of necessity
based on public policy (or is public policy an aid to construction so as to make it easier to find that
there is an easement of necessity)?
Held
No easements were granted over any part of the seller’s land until the roads had been completed.
The English Court of Appeal held that easements of necessity are based on intention. A clearly
expressed intention not to grant an easement prevents an easement of necessity from arising.
*Characteristic of easement
Facts
Ellenborough Park is located across the street from a row of houses. The person who owned the
land the park was on gave the builders of the houses "the full enjoyment at all times hereafter in
common pleasure of the ground" when he sold them the land to build the houses. The people who
now live in the houses are applying to have their right to use the park recognized as an easement.
The trial judge found that this did constitute an easement, which the owners of the land appealed.
Issues
What do you need to have in order for an easement to exist?
Held or Decision
Appeal dismissed, easement granted.
amusement.
*Categories of easement
2. Way leave
This is used for particular purpose and for public or access to property granted by a landowner for
payment, for example to allow a contractor access to a building site. Or a right given to particular
organization or institution e.g;- Army's road which is authorized for army.
of the time allowed in subsection (6) of section 144 to appeal against the order of the Minister, take
any action which he may consider necessary and desirable or which may be prescribed–
(a) to cause to be recorded, using such forms as may be prescribed, the route of the public right of
way on any certificate of occupancy or other document of title held in any office of the land registry
having reference to land over which the public right of way has been created; and
(b) to cause to be delivered to him all certificates of occupancy having reference to land over which
the public right of way has been created held by–
(i) persons occupying such land under such right of occupancy; or
(ii) any lender of money secured by a mortgage or lien who is holding that certificate of occupancy
as part of the security for that loan, so as to amend that certificate of occupancy by recording the
route of the public right of way on that certificate of occupancy.
MORTGAGE
In ancient system the law of mortgage was same as pledge(promise), a property being a
gage(valued object) which is forfeited on default payment. This stage was affected by transaction
of either by delivery of possession or condition conveyance.
In common law origin of mortgage was rather than pledge then mortgage transfer was not title but
possession. When creditor took profit of discharge with both principal and interest the transaction
will serve to be vivum vadium.
Vivum vadium or living pledge is a sort of pledge which is not actually a mortgage. VIVUM
VADIUM, or living pledge, contracts. is when a man borrows a sum of money (suppose two
hundred dollars) of another, and grants him an estate, as of twenty dollars per annum, to hold till the
rents and profits shall repay the sum so borrowed.
Mortuum vadium - a mortgage agreement in early English law that gave possession of the
mortgaged land and the use of its rents and profits to the mortgagee until such time as the mortgage
was paid.
Principles of Mortgage
After the common law mortgage was modified by three major principles;-
1. Equity looks at the essence(nature) of transaction which is borrowing transaction. This is
where by you don't have money but you have a land, so the bank can give or lend you
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
Facts
The respondent borrowed money from the appellant bank, Upon failure to pay the appellant
exercised his right under mortgage -deed and sold the house, after the sale of the house brought a
suit before the court of law on the next day.
The civil procedure code for order of temporary injunction restrain the NBC from transferring the
title of the house and preventing eviction of tenants therefrom.
Held
The judge who heard the application issued an order that the sale of the of the house should be set
aside, and that NBc and registrar of be restrained from transferring the title to the house and further
prevented eviction of the tenants.
Where a mortgagee is exercising its power of sale under a mortgage-deed, the court can not
interferer unless there was corruption or collusion with the purchaser in the sale of property.
MORTGAGE TERMINOLOGIES
Section 58(2) of Transfer of property decree cap 150
Mortgagor- The transferor (Land owner)
Mortgagee- The creditor (The boss)
Mortgage-money- Is a principle of money and interest of which payment is secured at being time.
Mortgage-deed- Is an instrument by which transfer is effected.
CHARACTERISTICS OF MORTGAGE
1. Mortgage property is served as security, that means is there waiting for time to be paid. It is
governed by a principle that 'Once mortgage always mortgage'
2. Mortgage shall always remain mortgage as intended by the parties.
3. Redemption(payment). The right to redeem shall always be there until the payment of
money is fulfilled. The creditor has the right to apply for closure of that property in default
of payment.
4. There must be limitation, that means within 12 years if the bank did not seek for closure the
debt will be closed also. S.3(1) Limitation Act.
Facts
In a suit before trial primary court to redeem a mortgage purportedly(claimed) enter into more than
70 years ago, the appellant succeeded on appeal by the respondent, the district court found that there
had been no mortgage arrangement as contended by the appellant and that even if there had been
one period for redeeming it had lapsed.
According to the primary court decision was reversed. The High court on further appeal found that
there was mortgage but its redemption was hopelessly barred by limitation.
Held
A suit to redeem the land in possession of mortgage must be brought within 12 years as prescribed
LAND LAW
BY DATIUCE DIDACE
TYPES OF MORTGAGE
1.Simple Mortgage
According to Section 58(3) of Transfer of property Act
Where, without delivering possession of the mortgaged property, the mortgagor binds himself
personally to pay the mortgage-money, and agrees, expressly or impliedly that in the event of his
failing to pay according to his contract, the mortgagee shall have a right to cause the mortgaged
property to be sold and the proceeds of sale to be applied, so far as may be necessary, in payment of
the mortgage-money, the transaction is called a simple mortgage and the mortgagee a simple
mortgagee.
This means It shall stand to be mortgage until that date and after that date thats where the sale is
going to be absolutely.
3. Usufructuary Mortgage
Usufruct is a limited real right (or in rem right) found in civil-law and mixed jurisdictions that
unites the two property interests of usus and fructus:
Usus (user) is the right to use or enjoy a thing possessed, directly and without
altering(modify) it.
Fructus (fruit, in a figurative sense) is the right to derive profit from a thing possessed: for
instance, by selling crops, leasing immovables or annexed movables, taxing for entry, and so
on.
money, the transaction is called a usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee a usufructuary
mortgagee.
4.English Mortgage
According to Section 58(6) of Transfer of property Act
Where the mortgagor binds himself to repay the mortgage money on a certain date, and transfers the
mortgaged property absolutely to the mortgagee, but subject to a proviso that he will re-transfer it to
the mortgagor upon payment of the mortgage money as agreed, the transaction is called an English
mortgage.
5. Anomalous Mortgage
A mortgage which is not a simple mortgage, a mortgage by conditional sale, an usufructuary
mortgage, an English mortgage or a mortgage by deposit of title deeds within the meaning of
section 58 is called an anomalous mortgage.
THANK YOU