TOK exhibition assessment instrument
‘The TOK exhibition is an opportunity for students to explore links between knowledge questions and the
world around us. The assessment ofthis task s underpinned by the fellowing single driving question.
Does the exhibition successfully show how TOK manifestsin the world around us?
“The assessment instrument provided describes five levels of performance in response to this diving
question. These levels are toe seen as holistic descriptors rather than asa checklist of characteristics.
Please note: Ifa student only provides images and accompanying commentaries for two objects, teachers
should award a maximum of 6 math. If student only provides an image and accompanying commentary
for one object, teachers should award a maximum of 3 marks.
oes the exibition successflly show how TOK manifests in the word around ws?
Tacallent | Good | Satisfactory | Basie | Rudimentary | 9
[Theeshibtion [Theedhibtion |Theexhibiion |Theedibiion |The shibtion [The exhibivon
[desl identifies dari thee |idenifies tie identfis thee presents three doesnot reach
thes objects Jobjetsand objects, | objeas, although objects, but the |the andar
landtheir —_theirrealword|altheughthe the realworld [real-world |descibed by
I-peaficreal contexts inks |realworld cantetzafthe leant of [the ctherlvele
|worid cortex. |between each |contensof jobjeasmaybe |theseobjets Jordeesnotuse
lunksbeween foftterhee — |rheseobjecs impledratier farerotstaed, lone ofthe
lsachofthe objects andthe |maybe vaguely |thanexplictly [ortheimages [prompts
[tres objects |selectediA —Jorimpreciely stated Bas links presentedmay |provded.
lndthe lpromptare |stated Thereis |betweenthe |behighly
Iselectedi—lexpined, {some ‘cbjeasandthe |genericimages
lorometae although this Jewplanationof |selecediA —_|oftypesof
Jdeaiymade explanation |thelnks | promptare __objectrather
landwall-—|maylack | hotwecn the made, butthe |thanof specie:
jexpined —_|precsionand [three objects jexplaationof [real-world
Ithereisastrong|Catiyin pans. [and:he —theseliks s [objects Lnks
|ustficaticn of |Thereisa —_[seletedA unconvincing [between the
ithe pariclar |jusicationof [Prompt andlor objects and the
Icniibution [the contribution) Thereissome unfocused. selected iA
Ithateach —_fthateach——_ustifcationfor |Thereisa _[promptare
Individual fndiidual [she inclusion of |zupericial__|made.butthese
object makes to fobjectmatesto|eachobjecrin justfeationfor_fateminimal,
Itheexhibrion. |theexbiion. |xhe exibiton. |the ncuson of |fenvous, otis
[ll oenearyall,|Maryofthe |Someofthe eachabjectin_|notdearwhat
lofthe pointsare|poirtsare |poinssare the eshibition._|thestudernis
jwellsuppored |supportedby |supportedby Reasons forthe "ving
lbyappropriate [appropriate |evidenceand |inclsionofthe |comey.
jevidenceand evidence and |refeencesto obiecsare | Thereis voy
jexpict Teferencesto |thesslactedIA offered but litle
rcferoncecto fthosolocediA |prompt. | thesearernat __|justifeation
Itheselected A prompt. supported y offered forthe
Jerome. ‘appropriate linchston ct
‘evidence and/or |eachabjact in
lackrsievance to |the exhibition.
thestlecediA |The
prompt. There [commentary on|
may be lhe eblecsis
‘ignifcant high,
repotion sree |dosciptve
‘the justifications |consets only of,
‘the diferent nspported
bjeas. [sserions,
Possible characteristic
[Convincing Focused Adequate |Simpistic __|inetfactive
lucid Relevant |Comvetent’ Limited Desciotve
Precise [Coherent [Acceptable | Underdeveloped [incoherent