The document contains information regarding the land title of Tay Sook Bon, including memos of agreement signed in 2012 allowing PUNCA MEWAH to sublease the land, despite Tay Sook Bon not being the legal owner. A police report from 2016 indicates Tay Sook Bon reported losing land titles. The document also notes a caveat form filed by PUNCA MEWAH on the land in 2016, and a sublease form submitted by PUNCA MEWAH, suggesting an ongoing dispute over control and use of the land.
The document contains information regarding the land title of Tay Sook Bon, including memos of agreement signed in 2012 allowing PUNCA MEWAH to sublease the land, despite Tay Sook Bon not being the legal owner. A police report from 2016 indicates Tay Sook Bon reported losing land titles. The document also notes a caveat form filed by PUNCA MEWAH on the land in 2016, and a sublease form submitted by PUNCA MEWAH, suggesting an ongoing dispute over control and use of the land.
The document contains information regarding the land title of Tay Sook Bon, including memos of agreement signed in 2012 allowing PUNCA MEWAH to sublease the land, despite Tay Sook Bon not being the legal owner. A police report from 2016 indicates Tay Sook Bon reported losing land titles. The document also notes a caveat form filed by PUNCA MEWAH on the land in 2016, and a sublease form submitted by PUNCA MEWAH, suggesting an ongoing dispute over control and use of the land.
The document contains information regarding the land title of Tay Sook Bon, including memos of agreement signed in 2012 allowing PUNCA MEWAH to sublease the land, despite Tay Sook Bon not being the legal owner. A police report from 2016 indicates Tay Sook Bon reported losing land titles. The document also notes a caveat form filed by PUNCA MEWAH on the land in 2016, and a sublease form submitted by PUNCA MEWAH, suggesting an ongoing dispute over control and use of the land.
: Stated that Tay Sook Bon signed the MOA to give permission to PUNCA MEWAH the right to sublease the land WHEN Tay Sook Bon WAS NOT the LEGAL OWNER of the land?????