Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Reliability Perspective of The Smart Grid
A Reliability Perspective of The Smart Grid
A Reliability Perspective of The Smart Grid
1, JUNE 2010 57
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
58 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 1, NO. 1, JUNE 2010
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
MOSLEHI AND KUMAR: A RELIABILITY PERSPECTIVE OF THE SMART GRID 59
typically 10% to 20%. For solar thermal plants with storage, this
may reach over 70% [14]. Large scale solar resources could be
far away from loads and consequently face various transmission
limitations. However, solar resources have a positive correlation
with air conditioning loads.
From the reliability perspective, renewable resources such as
geothermal and biofuels behave similar to conventional genera-
tion. In contrast, wind and solar generally have adverse impact
on grid reliability due to:
• variability and low capacity factors making the net demand
profile steeper (as depicted in Fig. 2);
• low correlation with load profiles especially for wind;
• relatively larger forecast errors for longer horizons;
• transmission congestion due to large installations;
• distribution congestion due to dispersed resources; Fig. 3. Communications for demand response.
• operational performance issues such as voltage and regu-
lation.
gap. Battery storage appears to be most promising due to im-
Conventionally, hydro, pumped storage, and gas turbines
provements in technology as well as economies of scale. Storage
have been used as a remedy to address the variability of the
tends to make the net demand profile flatter and, as such, is ex-
net demand. As renewables grow over the long run, increased
pected to improve reliability. In addition, most battery storage
penetration of demand response, storage ,devices and PEVs
devices can respond in subsecond time scales. Hence they can
will complement the conventional remedies.
be valuable as enablers of fast controls in a smart grid. Storage
B. Load Management/Demand Response of various sizes can be distributed throughout the grid ranging
from end-use customer premises to major substations and cen-
Load management involves reduction of load in response to tral power stations. This can alleviate congestion in both trans-
emergency and/or high-price conditions. Such conditions are mission and distribution.
more prevalent during peak load or congested operation. Re-
duction initiated by the consumer is usually referred to as de-
D. Electric Transportation
mand response. Nonemergency demand response in the range
of 5% to 15% of peak load can provide substantial benefits in re- Electric vehicles (PEV, eCAR, etc.) continue to become
ducing the need for additional resources and lowering real-time more popular as environmental concerns increase. They are a
prices [15]. Demand response does not substantially change the significant means to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and emission
total energy consumption since a large fraction of the energy of greenhouse gases (GHG). They will be a major factor in load
saved during load curtailment is consumed at a more opportune growth with a potential to eventually consume 600 TWh/year.
time—thus a flatter load profile. This estimate assumes 30 kwh for a 100-mile trip [16], and
Load rejection as an emergency resource to protect the grid is 10 000 miles per year for 200 million vehicles in the United
well understood and is implemented to operate either by system States. From a purely reliability viewpoint, electric vehicles
operator command or through underfrequency and/or under- have features similar to both demand response and storage re-
voltage relays. In a smart grid, this can be enhanced to allow sources. However, as a significant factor of load growth, PEVs
more intelligence and wider customer participation. Price-based can aggravate demand variability and associated reliability
demand response as a system resource to balance demand and problems depending on the charging schemes and consumer
supply has not been widely adopted yet. Contract-based partic- behavioral patterns. Long recharge times lead to unacceptable
ipation has been typically below 5% (with MISO below 8%) of vehicle unavailability and short recharge times have potential
peak load [15]. In a smart grid, real-time prices enable wider to increase congestion at the distribution level.
voluntary participation by consumers through either automatic
or manual response to price signals, or through a bidding process
IV. ULTIMATE RELIABILITY IMPACT OF SG RESOURCES
based on direct communication between the consumer and the
market/system operator or through aggregators and/or local util- As depicted in Fig. 4, under ideal conditions, demand re-
ities (Fig. 3). In addition to capability to flatten the load pro- sponse, storage, and electric vehicles will be closely coordinated
file, demand response can serve as an ancillary resource to help with all other resources such that the net load profile would
reliability. be nearly flat. This implies that the grid would be operated
closer to near-peak load conditions most of the time. Initially,
C. Storage Devices the flattened profile tends to improve reliability by decreasing
Most of the existing storage resources are hydro and pumped the peak. However, over time, as the “flattened” load grows,
storage. However, growth potential for these resources is much forces of optimal asset utilization will push the system closer
smaller than the need for storage necessary to counter growing to the “edge” more often and thus make it more susceptible to
net demand variability presented by new wind and solar re- failure; hence, the need for a “smart grid” solution from a reli-
sources. Various storage technologies are emerging to fill the ability perspective.
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
60 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 1, NO. 1, JUNE 2010
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
MOSLEHI AND KUMAR: A RELIABILITY PERSPECTIVE OF THE SMART GRID 61
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
62 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 1, NO. 1, JUNE 2010
C. Power Quality
In addition to reliability and efficiency issues, power quality
issues will assume importance at the distribution level. Accord-
ingly, the criticality of functional tasks and control actions in
each execution cycle can be different based on the characteris-
tics of the loads and dispersed resources connected to the rel-
evant feeders. For example, a feeder in a residential area with
a significant level of incandescent lights and heating loads may
not require faster cycles, while another feeder in an industrial
area with a significant level of motor loads may critically depend Fig. 7. Analogy for transformational technology.
on faster cycles to maintain feeder level stability and voltage
quality during motor startups, etc. Similarly, a feeder supplying account for developing and deploying necessary new software
a life-support system may need to maintain a higher level of innovations. It is assumed that once the necessary new tech-
power quality than others. niques are prototyped, demonstrated, and implemented in the
D. Cybersecurity in a Gridwide Infrastructure context of a selected function, they can easily be adopted for
other functions. Cost of communication links and human inter-
A distributed cybersecurity system monitors security faces such as visualization, and intelligent alarming were not
throughout the architecture to maintain data integrity, confi- included. Benefit models quantify selected significant benefits:
dentiality, and authentication, and to facilitate nonrepudiation. energy cost savings and value of reduction of service interrup-
Data critical for grid reliability and efficiency is delivered only tions. The methodology is fully scalable and can be adopted
to authorized agents, preventing unauthorized modifications, for a preliminary cost/benefit assessment for a system of any
and guaranteeing that delivered information is authentic while size. It has been applied to a generic example system and the re-
it traverses through the infrastructure. Security in depth is sults indicate that the benefits significantly outweigh the costs.
provided through such mechanisms as: Once the R&D “entry barrier” is overcome, the costs of subse-
• segmentation using firewalls, gateways, etc., for quick iso- quent implementations are of the same order of magnitude as
lation of security-breached components and/or classes of for conventional control centers. The recent stimulus funding in
applications and services; the smart grid arena [5] is a harbinger of the future investments
• role-based management of identity/authentication, access, at the levels suggested in [23].
and command level filtering;
• evolving security life cycle [25] in response to evolving
threats and infrastructure components through sufficiently VI. SYNERGIES WITH CURRENT PRACTICES
frequent secure remote updates; The proposed architecture provides a generalized framework
• efficient and scalable policy and key encryption mech- for the design and development of various components of the IT
anisms, resilient in the presence of active adversaries infrastructure and emergence of necessary standards and proto-
[26]–[28]; cols needed for the smart grid—especially with regard to relia-
• systemwide time synchronization for event correlation. bility issues. The essentiality of an architectural approach in the
E. Technical Feasibility transformation of the grid to a “smart grid” is analogous to the
role of the iPhone paradigm in the transformation of the phone
The technical feasibility of the proposed architecture relies
system from its intelligent form of the 20th century (represented
on recent advances in the areas of sensors, telecommunications,
by the touch-tone phone shown in Fig. 7) to its current state. It
computing, Internet technology, power equipment, and power
was not because of a few specific applications that iPhone rev-
system analysis. The flexibility and scalability of the design
olutionized the “phone” but for its architecture that led to an
has been established through a quantitative analysis of a large
explosion of functionality.
example power grid [22]–[24]. This analysis includes require-
The proposed architecture is intended to enable a similar
ments for monitoring, analysis and control. According to this
transformation of today’s grid to a “smarter” grid. It provides
analysis, the data exchange volumes at various levels of the in-
a framework for a systematic development of innovative ap-
frastructure are entirely feasible with contemporary technolo-
plications and the integration of new and existing applications
gies. The latency for an exchange ranges from a few millisec-
to meet various reliability concerns, and as such facilitate
onds at the substation to several seconds at the grid level. How-
integration of various smart grid resources.
ever, it is possible to provide a small selected subset of the in-
formation at the grid level with a 1-s delay. In spite of the large
A. Industry Trends
range in the latency, using the PMU timestamps, it is possible to
limit the time skew of the data at any level to 1 ms or even less The proposed architecture is in synergy with current industry
if so desired. practices. Many of the smart grid technologies are already in
To establish the financial feasibility of the proposed IT in- place in various ad hoc implementations. Examples of such im-
frastructure, a scalable methodology is developed [23] for as- plementations include wide-area monitoring and control, spe-
sessing the costs and benefits using published statistics. In ad- cial protection schemes, state estimation, and forecasting. These
dition to the cost of necessary IT hardware, the cost models are briefly reviewed below.
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
MOSLEHI AND KUMAR: A RELIABILITY PERSPECTIVE OF THE SMART GRID 63
Wide-area monitoring and control has been gaining world- In parallel with the above implementation trends, major stan-
wide interest. This involves gathering data from and control- dards initiatives are also underway sponsored by NIST [23],
ling a large region of the grid through the use of time synchro- IEEE (IEEE 2030) [24], etc. We believe these efforts would con-
nized phasor measurement units (PMUs). Currently efforts are verge sooner if a common vision for the smart grid architecture
underway for the design and development of a robust and se- is shared by all stakeholders.
cure data highway for the synchronized phasor data in the North
America [29]. Some key applications dependent on such data in- VII. CONCLUSIONS
clude [30]:
• phase angle monitoring; Smart grid is envisioned as a quantum leap in harnessing com-
• slow extended oscillation monitoring; munication and information technologies to enhance grid relia-
• voltage stability/transfer capability enhancement; bility and to enable integration of various smart grid resources
• adaptive line thermal monitoring /dynamic rating; such as renewable resources, demand response, electric storage,
• PMU augmented state estimation; and electric transportation. Based on a critical review of the re-
• geomagnetic disturbance recognition. liability impacts of these resources, it is concluded that an ideal
Special protection/remedial action schemes (SPS/RAS) are mix of the smart grid resources leads to a flatter net demand that
proliferating. They can be seen as precursors of intelligent eventually accentuates reliability issues further. Thus, the cen-
agents. The current customized schemes are too expensive trality of meeting reliability challenges in the realization of the
to build and maintain. Additionally, arming and disarming smart grid is underscored.
of these schemes is not adaptive. The proposed architecture Meeting these challenges requires a systematic approach to
will improve their effectiveness by frequent parameter up- develop a common vision for cohesive gridwide integration of
dates from a higher level and greater use of local intelligence; the necessary IT technologies. An architectural framework is
hence intelligent SPS/RAS or iSPS/iRAS. This together with proposed to serve as a concrete representation of such common
plug-and-play components allows real time coordination of vision to facilitate the design, development, and integration
numerous schemes/control actions at lower costs. Such coordi- of various components as well as the emergence of necessary
nation is already pursued in an ad hoc manner [31], [32]. standards and protocols. This architecture supports a multi-
State estimation provides reliable knowledge of the current tude of fail-proof geographically and temporally coordinated
state of the power system for use by the operator and other an- hierarchical monitoring and control actions over time scales
alytical functions as needed. In current practice, since all ana- ranging from milliseconds to operational planning horizon.
lytical functions are centralized, a typical state estimator is also The architecture delivers high performance through a virtual
centralized. To provide intelligence throughout the grid, timely hierarchical operation of a multitude of software agents and
state estimation must be available at local levels for all required services in organizational, geographical and functional dimen-
execution cycles/time scales (including subseconds). As such, a sions. This infrastructure can be thought of as a “super EMS”
distributed state estimator with functional agents at every level consisting of a network of networks that allows for evolutionary
of the three dimensional hierarchy can enable local analysis. For implementation of the infrastructure.
example, a transmission substation level agent retrieves neces- An architectural approach is essential for transforming the
sary data from the local substation and other substations within power grid to a “smarter grid” as the iPhone architectural par-
the “electrical” vicinity. It resolves topology errors, identifies adigm was for transforming the phone. It was not because of a
and rejects erroneous measurements, and when necessary, ob- few specific applications that iPhone revolutionized the “phone”
tains substitute data from other functional agents (e.g., bus load but for its architecture that led to an explosion of functionality.
estimation or forecast) at the substation level or other levels.
Other higher level agents have to coordinate their estimation REFERENCES
with lower level solutions. Similarly, state estimation agents at [1] Smart grid policy U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
various distribution levels feed processed information to higher (FERC), Docket PL09-4-000, 2009.
[2] “Title XIII—Smart Grid, Sec. 1301, Statement of Policy on Modern-
distribution level agents and ultimately to the appropriate cy- ization of Electricity Grid,” Energy Independence and Security Act of
cles of the transmission agents. This enables a well-coordinated 2007 (EISA).
scalable methodology. [3] Smart Grid Systems, California Senate Bill 1438 [Online].
Available: http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=
Demand and resource forecasting is usually done at a macro- sb_1438&sess=PREV&house=B&site=sen
scopic level such as control area and load zone. However, as [4] American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5.
need for more discrete and intelligent local control increases [5] Recovery Act—Smart Grid Investment Grant Program, Electricity
Delivery and Energy Reliability, Research, Development and
with distributed resources, accurate forecasts at the local level Analysis, U.S. Department of Energy, Funding Opportunity No.
will be required. The proposed architecture provides for plug- DE-FOA-0000058, CFDA#81.122.
and-play forecasting agents throughout the grid to access re- [6] K. H. LaCommare and J. H. Eto, Cost of power interruptions to elec-
tricity consumers in the United States, LBNL-58164, 2006.
quired information to produce such load and generation models. [7] Summary Statistics for the United States U.S. Energy Information Ad-
For example, at the substation level, the agents may forecast data ministration, 1996–2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.doe.gov/
for a bus subject to operating constraints suggested by higher cneaf/electricity/epa/epates.html
[8] 20% wind energy by 2030, U.S. Department of Energy, 2008
level agents who in turn can have lower level data folded into [Online]. Available: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/
their own forecasts. pdfs/41869.pdf
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
64 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, VOL. 1, NO. 1, JUNE 2010
[9] Annual report on US wind power installation, cost and performance [25] R. Creel, Assuring software systems security: Life cycle considerations
trends: 2007 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S Depart- for government acquisitions Carnegie Mellon University, Software
ment of Energy, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/ Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 2007 [Online]. Available:
fy08osti/43025.pdf https://buildsecurityin.us-cert.gov/daisy/bsi/articles/best-practices/
[10] I. Marti, “Evaluation of advanced wind power forecasting models,” pre- acquisition/892-BSI.html
sented at the European Wind Energy Conf., Athens, Greece, 2006. [26] H. Khurana, “Scalable security and accounting services for content-
[11] The effects of integrating wind power on transmission system plan- based publish/subscribe systems,” in Proc. E-Commerce Track of the
ning, reliability and operations, report on phase 2: System performance ACM Symp. Applied Computing (SAC), 2005.
evaluation New York State Energy Research and Development Au- [27] D. Dasgupta, Immuno-inspired autonomic system for cyber defense,
thority, Albany, NY, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.nyserda. information security, Tech. Rep. 12 (4), 2007.
org/publications/wind_integration_report.pdf [28] V. Gorodetski et al., “The multi-agent systems for computer network
[12] “Waiting for the sunrise (solar energy forecast),” The Economist, p. 95, security assurance: Frameworks and case studies,” in Proc. IEEE Int.
May 19, 1990. Conf. Artif. Intell. Syst. (ICAIS’02).
[13] Solar energy industry forecast: Perspectives on U.S. solar market tra- [29] North American SynchroPhasor Initiative [Online]. Available: http://
jectory Solar Energy Technologies Program, U.S. Department of En- www.naspi.org/
ergy, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://giffords.house.gov/DOE%20Per- [30] Working Group 601 of Study Committee C4, Wide area monitoring
spective%20on%20Solar%20Market%20Evolution.pdf and control for transmission capability enhancement CIGRE Technical
[14] Executive summary: Assessment of parabolic trough and power Brochure, Final Report, 2007.
tower solar technology cost and performance forecasts Na- [31] P. Arons, “Piloting a centralized remedial action scheme (C-RAS)
tional Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2003 [Online]. Available: with emerging telecomm/protection technologies,” presented at the
http://www.nrel.gov/csp/pdfs/35060.pdf OSISOFT User Conf., Monterey, CA, 2007.
[15] Harnessing the power of demand—How ISOs and RTOs are inte- [32] C. W. Taylor et al., “WACS—Wide-area stability and voltage control
grating demand response into wholesale electricity markets, Markets system: R&D and on-line demonstration,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 5,
Committee of the ISO/RTO Council, 2007 [Online]. Available: pp. 892–906, May 2005.
http://www.isorto.org/atf/cf/%7B5B4E85C6-7EAC-40A0-8DC3- [33] Smart Grid Interoperability Standards Project, [Online]. Available:
003829518EBD%7D/IRC_Renewables_Report_101607_final.pdf http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/
[16] R. Gawel, “Tesla’s tests confirm roadster’s 245-mile range,” [34] IEEE P2030 Draft Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy
in Electron. Des., Nov. 5, 2007 [Online]. Available: http:// Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric
electronicdesign.com/article/power/tesla-s-tests-confirm-roadster-s- Power System (EPS) and End-Use Applications and Loads, [Online].
245-mile-range173.aspx Available: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc21/2030/2030_index.
[17] Reliability Standards, Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) North html
American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) NERC [Online].
Available: http://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20
[18] Data bus technical specifications for NASPInet; phasor gateway tech-
nical specifications for NASPInet U.S. Department of Energy [Online].
Available: http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/solicitations/ NASPI/
[19] Smart grid cyber security strategy and requirements National Institute Khosrow Moslehi (S’76–M’82) received the Ph.D. degree from the University
of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce [Online]. of California, Berkeley.
Available: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/ nistir-7628/draft-ni- He is the Director of Product Development at ABB Network Management in
stir-7628.pdf Santa Clara, CA. He has over 25 years of experience in R&D in power system
[20] K. Moslehi et al., “Control approach for self-healing power systems: analysis and optimization, system integration and architecture, electricity mar-
A conceptual overview,” in Electricity Transmission in Deregulated kets, and smart grid.
Markets: Challenges, Opportunities, and Necessary R&D. Pitts-
burgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2004.
[21] Transmission fast simulation and modeling (T-FSM)—Functional re-
quirements document EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2005. 1011666. Ranjit Kumar (S’73–M’78–SM’84) received the Ph.D. degree from the Uni-
[22] Transmission fast simulation and modeling (T-FSM), architectural re- versity of Missouri, Rolla (now known as Missouri University of Science and
quirements EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2005. 1011667. Technology).
[23] Intelligrid Transmission fast simulation and modeling He has over 30 years of experience in research and development of algorithms
(T-FSM)—Business case analysis EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2005. and software for the design, operation, and real-time control of power systems,
1012152. markets, and smart grid. He has made several contributions related to power
[24] K. Moslehi et al., “Framework for a self-healing power grid,” presented system stability, fuel resource scheduling, and dynamic security analysis. He is
at the IEEE PES General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Jun. 2005. a Consultant to ABB Network Management, Santa Clara, CA.
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Inst of Training & Indust Eng - Mumbai. Downloaded on May 01,2023 at 11:17:14 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.