The document outlines a rubric for evaluating CSR presentations with criteria in three areas: Content, Relevance, and Sustainability. Content evaluates how well the presentation depicts the material and enhances understanding. Relevance examines the link between the CSR program and business objectives. Sustainability assesses whether the project has a lasting impact or requires ongoing funding. The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, good, fair, and poor performance in each criteria area.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating CSR presentations with criteria in three areas: Content, Relevance, and Sustainability. Content evaluates how well the presentation depicts the material and enhances understanding. Relevance examines the link between the CSR program and business objectives. Sustainability assesses whether the project has a lasting impact or requires ongoing funding. The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, good, fair, and poor performance in each criteria area.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating CSR presentations with criteria in three areas: Content, Relevance, and Sustainability. Content evaluates how well the presentation depicts the material and enhances understanding. Relevance examines the link between the CSR program and business objectives. Sustainability assesses whether the project has a lasting impact or requires ongoing funding. The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, good, fair, and poor performance in each criteria area.
The document outlines a rubric for evaluating CSR presentations with criteria in three areas: Content, Relevance, and Sustainability. Content evaluates how well the presentation depicts the material and enhances understanding. Relevance examines the link between the CSR program and business objectives. Sustainability assesses whether the project has a lasting impact or requires ongoing funding. The rubric provides descriptors to distinguish excellent, good, fair, and poor performance in each criteria area.
The presentation visually an overall theme that appeals to the The presentation are Some of the presentations depict material and assist audience and enhances concepts with unrelated to the content. It seem unrelated to the the audience in a high impact message. Explain and does not enhance topic/theme and do not understanding the flow of reinforce key points during the understanding of the content enhance concepts. Some information or content. presentation. Shows complete parts CONTENT and does not follow the parts of the paper are Followed the required of the paper and followed the (50%) required format missing/incomplete format for the paper required format
Clear link is established
Some link can be seen between the business core between the proposed objectives and the CSR program and the core of program. Some Clear link is established between the the business. It can't be explanation has been given business core objectives and the CSR No clear link has been shown seen how the business, showing how the business, program. A Good explanation has between the proposed community, environment community, environment been given showing how the business, RELEVANCE program and the core of the and customers may and customers can benefit community, environment and (25%) business benefit from it. from it. customers can benefit from it.
To some extent the project
The project can only be seen can be seen as having a The project can be seen as as a once off. It can't be seen lasting impact with having a lasting impact as having a lasting impact and stakeholder groups but it with stakeholder groups It is well explained how the project is SUSTAINABILIT it would require on going would require on going and it would not require sustainable and they have shown how Y funds from the business funds from the business on going funds from the the business will not have to (25%) indefinitely. indefinitely. business indefinitely. continually commit resources.