Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Report On The Use of Stem Cells in The Treatment of Human Disorders
Evaluation Report On The Use of Stem Cells in The Treatment of Human Disorders
Evaluation Report On The Use of Stem Cells in The Treatment of Human Disorders
Adult stem cells are important in medical science because they can be removed form a patient,
multiplied in culture, differentiated into the required cell types, and then transplanted back into
the same patient (therefore no immunosuppressant drugs are required – it’s an ‘autologous’
cellular medicine, compared to an ‘allogenic’ treatment involving cells from another person).
Clinical trials are underway and so many people believe this will be just as significant to society
as embryonic stem cells. Using IPSCs as alternative to embryonic stem cells (forcing somatic
cells to express key transcription factors and ‘reprogramming’ the cell) avoids the moral concerns
associated with embryos, and these cells also have very similar properties.
Supporters of human embryonic stem cell research contend that at such an early developmental
stage the embryo is just a mass of identical, undifferentiated cells, with no resemblance to a
human being or even a foetus. Scientists particularly believe that it’s morally wrong to allow
human suffering to continue when there is potential for alleviating it. As embryos are produced
for other purposes (e.g. fertility treatments) they see no reason to superfluous embryos that could
be used for research. In addition, they say that there is no guarantee that the early blastocyst stage
used for research would survive even if it never left the uterus. Yet others still say it’s wrong to
utilise embryos as a means to an end, even one as laudable as human suffering.
Public review in 2008 revealed that 60% of people surveyed supported the creation of these
embryos, provided that they lead to improved understanding of diseases – therefore a significant
40% minority strongly opposed their creation, regardless of medical potential. Often branded as
‘an offence to the dignity of humans and animals’, it appears that the controversy and difference
in opinions amongst the global population is a significant barrier to potentially further progress.
However, the decision-making process has to take into account everyone’s views regarding stem
cell research and its role in treating human disorders and diseases that are currently incurable.