Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AA26
AA26
AA26
2 AIR ATTACK
OUR
TEAM
PUBLISHER
Neville ‘Ned’ Dawson
EDITOR
Mark Ogden
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
/ PHOTOGRAPHERS
Steve Whitby
Greg Doyle
A.R. Prince
Mike Gilbert
Michael Piper
Ben Shepherd
GRAPHIC DESIGN
Carolina De Armas
4 AIR ATTACK
OUR
DETAILS
EMAIL
info@airattackmag.com
airattackmag.com
AIR ATTACK 5
ISSUE 26 I 2023
6 AIR ATTACK
66
34
The Mi-26 is amongst Russia’s greatest aviation industry achievements.
The 56-tone dual-use rotorcraft holds a class of its own and is still being
maintained in low-rate production, mainly for military and government
customers, both domestic and export. Alexander Mladenov reports on
its use in the demanding firefighting role where the type excels due to its
tremendous payload and looks at the issues the unique type is facing in
Taking Stock of the civilian operation in Russia.
Undesirables -
Surveying invasive
plants in California 108
A project to survey infestations of
invasive plants demonstrates the
synergistic benefits accruing when two
complimentary organizations cooperate
in the pursuit of a single goal. Ned
Dawson talked to biologist Morgan Ball
and pilot Jean Paul (‘JP’) Robinson about
the ongoing project in California’s Santa
Monica mountains.
A Talk about Fatigue...
AIR ATTACK 7
AIR TRACTOR
DELIVERS.
8 AIR ATTACK
editor
letter from the
mark ogden
T
he crash of a large air tanker is sure to raise questions about how aerial
firefighting is being conducted. In January 2020, a Coulson Aviation EC-130Q
Hercules tanker was lost in New South Wales, Australia when it hit the ground
during firefighting operations. The crew were received fatal injuries. The wind
conditions were bad where the forecast included severe turbulence and the aircraft likely
encountered wind shear. In October 2022, a Canadair CL-415 crashed at Mount Calcinera, near
Linguaglossa, Sicily, in Italy. The two pilots onboard were also fatally injured when shortly
after dumping water on the site of the fire. when it hit the mountainside. In February this
year, Coulsons lost another tanker, this time a firefighting Boeing 737 in Western Australia.
Fortunately, the two pilots walked away. The investigation into that accident is ongoing.
Operating large aircraft close to the ground is risky – even before conditions of fire, smoke,
heat, and wind/turbulence are added to the mix. Pilots and these aircraft are often pushed
to their limits doing this job in these conditions and the margins for mistake or error
in judgement are almost nil. The risk needs to be understood by all including the crew,
aircraft operators and the agencies that employ these aircraft. I mean, how many close calls
are not reported?
I would argue that the risk is not well understood by many of those involved – remember,
many of the aircraft being used were never intended to be used in such a manner by the
manufacturers. Most of these aircraft have been modified and pressed into a new life. How
much testing is done to ensure the aircraft are actually capable of doing the task and to
establish the available margins? Are the life cycle changes on the airframe fully understood?
Tanker pilots by the nature of their task are very task focussed but this can lead to them
continuing in conditions where maybe the activity should be ‘knocked off’. The tasking
agencies are also task focussed – after all, they are charged with trying to save lives and
property. So, who, in this mix, are best suited to calling off activities when things get
unnecessarily dangerous? I don’t pretend to know but, I do think that operators and agencies
need strong sets of standards and standard operating procedures to help with ensuring
the aircraft are being operated correctly. A system is needed to identify that point where
the risk is too high and the reward too low, the point where operations should stop. There
needs to be an investment in training and there needs to be someone, who is oversighting
the operation, who is dispassionate about the activity, and who has enough experience to
recognise when the risks are getting too high and who has the authority to be able to call
off operations.
Generally, these operations are conducted safely but when things go wrong, they go wrong
quickly and catastrophically. Yet we seem to leave vital decisions about operations to the
person who is under the greatest stress to make the call, the pilot. Is that really the best way?
Mark
AIR ATTACK 9
INDUSTRY
News
“The closing of the transaction and our listing on Nasdaq is an important milestone
and an incredibly proud moment for the entire Bridger team,” commented Tim
Sheehy, who will continue to lead the combined company as Chief Executive
Officer. “We are excited to enter this new chapter as a publicly traded company,
uniquely positioned to expand throughout North America and continue our
mission to save lives, preserve our environment, and protect the people and
communities that are impacted by the growing wildfire crisis across the globe.”
Founded in 2014 and led by former Navy SEAL Tim Sheehy, Bridger is a mission-
driven company focused on addressing the year-round threat of economic and
environmental damage caused by wildfires. Through its effective, modern, and
purposefully designed fleet of aircraft, Bridger provides its federal agency and
state government client base with a comprehensive range of aerial firefighting
solutions. Bridger operates a large and sophisticated fleet of firefighting aircraft,
which includes “Super Scoopers” (CL-415EAF), air attack and logistical support
aircraft (Next Generation Daher Kodiaks, Pilatus PC-12s, DeHavilland Twin Otter
and legacy Twin Commanders), and UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles). Bridger also
offers FireTRAC, an innovative, proprietary data gathering, aerial surveillance and
reporting platform that complements its fleet of firefighting assets.
Jack Creek’s Executive Chairman, Jeffrey Kelter, who is joining Bridger’s Board of
Directors as Chairman added, “We are excited to finalize our business combination
and continue our partnership with the Bridger management team. As a public
company, Bridger is well-positioned financially to further expand its industry-
leading fleet and explore proprietary strategic investments to complete its growth
plans for 2023 and create significant and sustained value for all stakeholders as it
works to meet critical environmental and community needs.”
10 AIR ATTACK
INDUSTRY
News
Air Tractor dealer Lane Aviation sold serial number 802A-1000 through its Brazil
agent Aero Globo Aeronaves and is painted in the Brazilian flag colors of yellow,
green and blue.
It recently departed Olney, Texas for its new home at Grupo Moacir Smaniotto
(GMS) Agronegocios, the new AT-802A joins another Air Tractor 502XP purchased
in 2019.
Air Tractor President Jim Hirsch was presented with a plaque commemorating the
milestone from Natanael Vaz and Anthony Rossi of Pratt & Whitney Canada. “We’ve
come a long way with the 802 series,” remarked Hirsch. “In the early 1990s when
the very first 802s were built, our founder Leland Snow looked at the airplane and
offhandedly remarked, ‘We’ll probably build 10 or 12 of these.’ Well, Leland would
be really pleased about its worldwide distribution and success today.”
The 802 series is the largest production single engine agricultural airplane in the
world. Its power, rugged dependability and size made it quite versatile. Beyond
its use in agricultural and firefighting applications, AT-802 series aircraft work in a
variety of specialized applications, from oil spill cleanup and fuel hauling in remote
areas, to timber seeding and reforestation and coca crop eradication in South
America. “Its power and rugged design, low operating costs, payload capacity has
helped make 802s Air Tractor’s most versatile airplane.” notes Hirsch.
AIR ATTACK 11
INDUSTRY
News
12 AIR ATTACK
INDUSTRY
News
ck
ational Forest is seeking the
pprehending those responsible
tanislaus National Forest’s Bald
8.
AIR ATTACK 13
INDUSTRY
News
“The delivery of our sixth Scooper will allow us to further expand our operations
and allow greater deployment of the Bridger aircraft fleet across the U.S.,”
commented Tim Sheehy, Bridger Aerospace’s Chief Executive Officer. “In
conjunction with our Air Attack and Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) fleet, we
believe that we are one of the most full-spectrum aerial fire service providers in
North America with a fleet of over 20 aircraft.”
The Super Scooper is an amphibious aircraft that skims the surface of a body of
water to scoop water into onboard tanks to drop on a fire. The purposeful design
of the Super Scooper allows for an aggressive low-altitude flight profile, which
enables pilots to deliver their drops with more precision, hitting the fire harder
and extinguishing it faster. Super Scoopers can scoop up to 1,412 gallons of water
in approximately 10 seconds, and with 90% of wildfires within 20 miles of a major
water source, Super Scoopers provide an extremely effective tool to economically
and expeditiously deliver water to a fire without having to return to an airport to
refill the water tanks.
“By adding to what was already the nation’s largest fleet of Super Scoopers, we
hope to ensure their availability to our federal and state government customers to
help combat the growing threat of wildfires,” added Sheehy.
GET YOUR ATU.
GET COMPLIANT.
GET PAID.
tracplus.com/atu
sales@tracplus.com
SHOTOVER ARS
THE PREMIER AIRBORNE
AUGMENTED REALITY SOLUTION
ARS is the most advanced and easy to use mission
management system specifically designed for airborne » Industry-leading map data
law enforcement, search and rescue and aerial firefighting » Overlay critical information in real-time
crews. The system provides unsurpassed situational » Map fire locations, hot spots,
awareness through state-of-the-art augmented reality and ground crew location
overlays coupled with 3D satellite and synthetic imagery.
16 AIR ATTACK
INDUSTRY
News
AIR ATTACK 17
INDUSTRY
News
ACT RFS Chief Officer Rohan Scott said the contract had been timed for
when this season’s fire risk is at its highest after such a wet spring and early
summer. “We’ve been monitoring the risk, and as people will see, there’s
significant grass growth out in the ACT and the surrounding areas that is
starting to dry off, so we have delayed the start of the aircraft to be available
to us to deploy in that heightened period of the fire season which is coming
towards the end of this month.”
The contract with United Aero Helicopters, based in Sydney and Microflite
in Victoria, was awarded through the National Aerial Firefighting Centre.
The AS350, call sign Firebird 100, will map the fire area and send data
to the Incident Management Team. It can also detect lighting strikes a
common cause of fires and mapping teams could forecast the fire path and
determine the resources that needed to be deployed.
AG600 start
flight-test ph
“We will be able to pick up lightning detections within hours rather than days, and
by the time they get detected days later, they’re actually a potentially significant The Aviation Indust
threat. It’s reducing the size of fires and detecting them early.” said Scott. announced that the
amphibious aircraf
Emergency Services Minister Mick Gentlemen said the high-tech helicopter
phase.
was a game changer that could be over a fire in 15 to 20 minutes providing a
flow of information back to headquarters so mapping teams could forecast Two AG600M firefig
the fire path and determine the resources that needed to be deployed. test center in Yanlia
Shaanxi Province to
Two Bell 412s, call sign Firebird 101and 102, are fitted with under-belly
type certification. T
tanks capable of carrying water or retardant, as well as a winch for inserting
modifications befo
firefighters.
Codenamed Kunlon
AG600 aircraft fam
rescue missions inc
other critical emerg
A member of the A
designed to comba
weight of 60 tonne
12 tonnes and fligh
of low-altitude flyin
accurately on fire s
It is expected that t
rescue model of AG
2024 and 2025 resp
18 AIR ATTACK
INDUSTRY
News
AIR ATTACK 19
20 AIR ATTACK
TimberlineAerospace.com
INDUSTRY
News
AIR ATTACK 21
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
TOMMASO L CRUCIANI
POSITION: FIREFIGHTING CO-PILOT
BABCOCK ITALIA
In this issue, we talk with Tommaso Cruciani, a
Firefighting Co-Pilot working for Babcock Italia and
based in Rome. Tommaso talks with us about his
experience flying the Canadair CL-415 and his path
into firefighting. He talks about how he mixes flying
civilian executive charter aircraft in the winter months to
firefighting in the summer season, plus he talks about
his favorite aspects of flying the CL-415.
22 22 AIRAIR
ATTACK
ATTACK
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
3. How long have you been a pilot, and what has your
career been like up to this point?
I began taking flying lessons at sixteen during the weekends
but had been reading about it for years. As a teenager, I
was lucky enough to be able to occasionally rent a simple
airplane and explore the Italian countryside with my
friends. Going to University in the UK, I continued building
hours, learned to fly gliders and joined a group of hobbyists
flying all over Europe.
After graduating, I completed my professional pilot licenses
and worked part-time in the hangar of a local fixed-wing
air ambulance company and worked my way into the right
seat as a pilot assistant. I never saw myself going into the
airlines for a career and enjoyed the air ambulance flying
because I felt I was using my skills to help others, and as a
‘people person’ I was able to make a difference where the
human side of the job was essential to mission success.
An unexpected opportunity to move to Malta as an
apprentice for a growing air charter company had me pack
my bags and rush down to fill a position in the back office,
where I learned to deal with everything from client services
to aircraft catering, crew travel and accommodation
requirements and other support tasks. In two years, I rose
to become a Team Leader in the client services department
and shortly after was promoted to a First Officer position
on the Embraer Legacy 600. We flew the aircraft mostly
across Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and the CIS
24 24 AIRAIR
ATTACK
ATTACK
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
26 26 AIRAIR
ATTACK
ATTACK
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
28 28 AIRAIR
ATTACK
ATTACK
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
10. What are your favorite aspects about the aircraft you
currently fly?
I have always hoped to fly the CL-415 and having achieved
that goal I can honestly say it is everything I had hoped and
more. As the only aircraft designed to fight fires from the
drawing board up, it is perfectly suited to that task. I love
how maneuverable it is at very slow speeds, how it can claw
every bit of lift you ask of it and always surprise you with
its ability to decelerate and turn on a dime. It is every bit as
robust as a fire truck and seems to handle the punishment
of rough seas, tight mountain lakes and winding rivers with
grunt and grace. It hauls a large load, expects a tough day’s
work and requires no babying - and most importantly is
forgiving of beginners like me. What’s not to love?
11. What would you say is the most satisfying part of flying
on fires?
Without a doubt, the feeling of accomplishment that comes
from knowing you played a role in helping put out a wildfire
is the most satisfying part of the job. At the end of a hard,
hot day, when exhaustion sets in you can rest knowing that
the effort was towards a noble cause. I enjoy knowing that
I helped to preserve our wild spaces, the trees and animals
that inhabit them and the people that live around them in
the many small towns that dot the Italian landscape.
30 30 AIRAIR
ATTACK
ATTACK
AIR ATTACK PROFILE
15. What would you say was some of the best advice you
have received over your career?
Amongst the innumerable tips and tricks and good advice I
have received over my short career, one that sticks with me
is that part of the goal of every flight should also be to have
some fun, because otherwise why the hell are we doing
this? In this line of work, where emergencies can bring
challenging encounters with all manner of devastation, it is
important to always carry a bit of humor on every mission.
16. Who has been a role model for you to help you achieve
your flying ambitions?
I cannot name just one, but I have been especially inspired
not just by those Captains ahead of me in rank and
experience, but largely by those Co-Pilots at my level who
have helped motivate me at every step of the way, with
whom I have shared blood, sweat and tears to achieve our
goals and develop our professional careers.
17. What is one thing you always bring with you on every
flight?
A reliable watch, a cold bottle of water and a dry snack, all
essential items for a firefighting pilot.
Alan Norris trained as an engineer working for the British Government in Research and
Development for over 30 years. He has been a freelance aviation journalist for 45 years
specializing in helicopter related journalism and photography, and has been published in many
international aviation journals. He is one of the founders and a trustee of The Helicopter Museum,
located in the South West of England, and was restoration manager for over ten years organizing
the conservation and preservation of the collection. Alan is also a Fédération Aéronautique
Internationale registered judge for helicopter sport flying events at UK National, European,
International and World Championships.
AIR ATTACK 31
When an Agency needs a truly glo
– the choice is clear –
Since 1993 PAY’S Air Service has been operati
across Australia and was the first operator to u
and since 2001 taking their experien
Portugal
Greece
Italy
CURRENT FLEET:
–
A P.O.Box 158 Scone NSW
Australia 2337
”
E rpay@paysairservice.com.au
T +61 2654 01850
paysairservice.com.au
TAKING STOCK
OF THE UNDESIRABLE
SURVEYING INVASIVE PLANTS IN CALIFOR
STORY BY LEIGH NEIL
PHOTOS BY NED DAWSON
ES
RNIA
AIR ATTACK 35
A project to survey infestations of invasive plants
demonstrates the synergistic benefits accruing
when two complimentary organizations cooperate
in the pursuit of a single goal. Ned Dawson talked
to biologist Morgan Ball and pilot Jean Paul (‘JP’)
Robinson about the ongoing project in California’s
Santa Monica mountains.
FIRE RISK
38 AIR ATTACK
out that the work they are doing on this project uses helicopters to
allow the efficient location of smaller, incipient infestations of the
undesirable species before they become sufficiently well established
to build up a major seed bank. “That allows land managers to decide
on the appropriate action to take for each infestation. We help with
that decision-making and when we survey with helicopters, we follow
that up by prioritizing invasive plants that warrant management. We
consider such metrics as the quality of the habitat, ease of access,
presence of endangered species, recreational and aesthetic values,
and the virulence of the weed itself. Then we provide a full report
and management plan tailored to each agency’s requirements and
priorities, including recommendations on which infestations and
AIR ATTACK 39
locations should be targeted,” he related, pointing out that budgets are
limited so it is important to focus control efforts on the most critical
areas and those which will see the greatest benefit.
Once the grant for the program had been approved, the consortium
approached Ball to conduct the survey, as they were familiar with his
record and experience in similar projects. Over the last five years, Ball
has worked extensively with California-based English Air Service LLC
(EAS), which started out as an agricultural operator but subsequently
expanded into LIDAR mapping, construction and maintenance, and
utility work. EAS provides the MD500-E and pilot ‘JP’ Robinson for the
aviation portion of the project and Ball is highly complimentary about
JP’s flying skills and work ethic. “Our cooperation with EAS has evolved
over time, using many of the Kiwi (New Zealand) game recovery and
mountain flying techniques that you don’t usually see in the US, and
JP has adapted to them superbly. I typically fly about 400 hours a year
just with JP,” Ball reported. The list of work that JP has flown for Ball
40 AIR ATTACK
THE MOST ECONOMICAL AERIAL FIREFIGHTING SOLUTION
firebossllc.com
AIR ATTACK 41
42 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 43
includes many invasive plant and endangered species surveys, along
with large animal surveys, as well as dropping off crews to conduct
remote small mammal trapping and camera trapping.
CURRENT PROJECT
44 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 45
46 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 47
our partners, we always try to identify what their target plants and
concerns are, while for us it’s really about human traffic and whether
we can see the ground and any wires,” he remarked.
As funding for ecological and conservation projects is invariably
limited, Ball also engages early with land managers to establish what
limitations exist on their ability to conduct control measures, to aid
in determining priorities for survey and therefore eliminate expensive
helicopter time in mapping infestations that will be unfeasible or
impractical to exterminate. Aside from the invasive plants, a list of
endangered indigenous species is also maintained as a part of the
program and any examples found are also mapped and reported to the
customers. Among his many projects, Ball regularly provides ecological
management services to the United States Department of Defense
(DoD) through an association with the defense contractor, ManTech
International. For the work, the helicopter is regularly used to survey a
variety of natural resources across vast tracts land surrounding military
facilities and operations.
48 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 49
MILITARY CONTRIBUTION
Ball points out that, “many military bases require large areas of
undeveloped land to function as safety and security buffers. Ironically
these areas, free from human encroachment serve as some of the few
remaining refuges of numerous endangered species. The US military
goes to great lengths to survey and manage these resources. Dollar
for dollar, helicopters are still the most cost effective and ‘greenest’
way to survey the larger areas, and particularly where access is remote
or difficult. The only time that ground surveying is more efficient is
where there are large invasive plant populations close to road access
in easy terrain,”. To date, Ball and JP have performed low level survey
of over one million acres of DoD lands mapping everything from plants
to archeological sites, raptors, sage-grouse, seabirds, large ungulates
50 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 51
including deer, pronghorn and feral horses and even unexploded
ordinance.
PEOPLE PROBLEMS
Many parts of the Santa Monica range are subject to heavy hiking
and recreational traffic and Robinson noted, “It’s tricky. We can get
really close to the hikers at times, so we have to be careful not to fly
right over the top of them. That definitely slows down our progress.”
Ball estimated that a ten to fifteen percent progress deficit is incurred
when human traffic is in the survey area, which he jokingly refers to
as the project’s ‘people tax’. “When people are present, we typically
have to head off and work somewhere else, but as soon as we see that
they’ve moved out of the area, we hightail it back to finish up our work
before someone else arrives on the scene,” he commented.
Another issue is private residences, as the park boundary goes right
up to the fence-line of many properties, and the presence of people
has a direct relationship to the prevalence of introduced weeds, a
substantial amount of survey flying is in close proximity to dwellings.
“We really don’t get many complaints, but we typically find large
infestations of a variety of weeds around private dwellings, that have
spread out into the surrounding native habitat. As result, we end up
spending a disproportionate amount of time hovering immediately
adjacent to private property and will often see the residents watching
us, completely confused as to what we are doing,” Ball advised.
Robinson added that local law enforcement and the FAA representative
are very good and well-aware of what the project entails, however, so
those complaints that do come in usually don’t progress beyond their
respective desks.
Additionally, operations near roads are frequently interrupted as
traffic tends to stop so vehicle occupants can watch the helicopter at
work. “Drivers pay so much attention to what we’re doing that they
don’t pay attention to their driving, or more often they’ll just stop in
the middle of the road and get out to take photos or videos, creating a
52 AIR ATTACK
major traffic hazard and being constantly mindful of that is one of the
things that slows us down,” Robinson recounted. “So, if we see vehicle
traffic, we’ll also move somewhere else until they’ve moved off.” The
likely presence of deer and other animals is a given throughout the
survey area, so operations around roads always start from the road and
work outward, away from the road so that any deer being pushed by
the helicopter are travelling away from the road and not becoming a
traffic hazard.
BOXING IT IN
AIR ATTACK 53
54 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 55
of wires, large numbers of people or significant equestrian activity,
we’ll just box that out. The helicopter is an amazing tool but there are
certain circumstances where you just have to pull the plug and have
people come in and survey it from the ground,” said Ball. “If we see
horses in an area where we are working, we just watch them and if
they start to get agitated, we’ll pull out and move somewhere else.”
Robinson listed strong and variable winds, flying below translational
lift and potential loss of tail rotor authority as additional hazards that
have to be guarded against constantly. “Because of the terrain and
knife-edge ridges, even fifteen knots of wind can be unflyable,” he
reported, while Ball advised that in some areas where the mountain
ridges run perpendicular to the prevailing wind, conditions have been
unflyable after 10:30am for the entire project to date.
As an aside, Ball pointed out the extra fire hazard inherent in
building residences in fire-prone wilderness areas, particularly when
56 AIR ATTACK
many people still choose to build with wooden structures or cladding,
and wooden roofing shingles. “Some people seem to either not know
or not understand the significance of the fire hazard where they choose
to build, and then there’s the extra cost and difficulty in firefighting to
protect those isolated homes when fires do break out.”
FLYING CONDITIONS
AIR ATTACK 57
feet off the ground but at times can be as low as a mere five feet, and
only a rotor-disc width from vertical faces. “Larger project areas are
easiest for us to survey because we can usually find a good flightpath
to suit our needs, whereas the smaller project areas can prove very
limiting if conditions don’t swing in our favor,” said Ball. The 500-E is
ideal for Ball’s work, as he explained. “It’s a great little workhorse. For
my work, I need a platform where I can stow multiple cameras and
computer systems but be able to pull them out quickly the photograph
or map things directly under the helicopter before we pass them by.
I need to be quick of the draw because our maneuverability margin
is often limited. When mapping, we try to get directly on top of our
subject because we map using an onboard GPS. The 500 has the power
we need, and the small rotor disc helps in tight spaces, I can see easily
out of both sides and JP flies it smooth so that my cameras aren’t being
shaken all over the floor.” In Robinson’s opinion the 500 is perfect for
the task and he commented that he wouldn’t want to fly the role in any
other type.
EAS originally supplied a 500-D in earlier years but the E model’s
lower bulkhead between the front and rear cabin allows Ball to see
the GPS more easily and makes it the preferred platform. Robinson
added that the unmatched agility of the 500 enables him to fly the
helicopter accurately enough to precisely map the perimeter of larger
infestations. “It’s definitely hands-on the whole time though, and you
never get a break during surveys. If it’s an area with a lot of weeds,
I may never get beyond translational lift. Five feet, stop, another
five feet, stop, go back a few feet, stop. It’s basically just one long
hover and it’s exhausting,” he noted. Ball commented that wherever
possible, they try to mix it up, breaking up those exhausting stints
with surveys on less infested areas so Robinson can get some relief
with some less demanding flying. A normal day’s surveying runs for
three two-hour fuel cycles, with a break in between of a half-hour to an
hour. At the end of each strenuous day of flying, Robinson then refuels
the helicopter and carries out any necessary cleaning and daily pilot
maintenance, so Ball’s obvious respect for his professionalism and
work ethic is understandable. Ball too has a physically demanding role
at times, often needing to stand on the skids when looking directly
58 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 59
underneath the aircraft, or surveying over riverbeds or steep cliffs.
When working over undulating hill country, however, he is able to work
sitting in the doorway facing outward.
MAPPING GEAR
60 AIR ATTACK
for freehand stylus drawing that can be linked to his required attribute
tables. “I don’t ever let these computers touch the internet though,
because if I did, they’d do an update and this program would be gone.
And instead of using aviation software for navigation, we use a system
called Gaia GPS while we’re flying – a system used by hikers. It lays
down beautiful tracks and I can stop and start it to make sure I only lay
down tracks when we’re actually surveying. It also really helps JP flying
because you can select the background visuals, so he can view the
landform and mentally relate it to the survey pattern in advance.” Ball
estimates that using the Gaia GPS has increased survey efficiency by
ten to fifteen percent.
With Ball in the rear cabin, an observer now flies in the front with
Robinson. This extra set of eyes is critical for ensuring a quality survey
but equally as important, this crew member plays a dominant role in
maintaining mission safety as the demanding flight regime utilized
for surveying makes lookout and situational awareness a crucial
AIR ATTACK 61
62 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 63
element of the operation. Both Ball and Robinson stressed that CRM is
critically important to flight safety and Robinson advised that EAS has
mandatory 12-monthly CRM training. The crew constantly talks about
any hazards or obstructions, rather than just identifying them once,
eliminating any likelihood of forgetting their presence or becoming
complacent. That said, Ball stated that he had never experienced as
much danger while flying as he did when attempting to negotiate some
of the rugged, unstable Santa Monica terrain on foot. The aircraft is
modified specifically for Ball’s work, with special hardpoints for his
harness, power receptacles for all his electronic devices, and exterior
handles to ease ingress and egress for the weed control crews with
their backpacks. Safety training for the weed crews is also thorough
and Robinson advised that a whole morning can be spent with the
helicopter running while training the crews on safe ingress/egress
techniques, clear hand signals and managing the interior facilities
such as seatbelts and headsets. “They have an amazing safety culture,”
he noted. “We often work a hybrid mission,” Ball explained, “I might
64 AIR ATTACK
be performing on an aerial mapping job but we often have a weed
crew running at the same time. In those situations, we maintain radio
communication with our crew and pick them up from one remote
weed infestation and transport them to a different population in a
matter of minutes. This mission synergy saves days of field crew effort.
That open rear cabin makes this cost saving multitasking possible.”
ECONOMY OF EFFORT
Leigh Neil has always had an involvement with aviation, predominantly fixed-wing flying and
rotary-wing writing, and lives in New Zealand on the South Island’s West Coast with his wife of 33
years. Leigh works as a heavy machinery operator in mining, when not writing or editing, and on
the free time he has left explores the roads through the mountains and forests on his motorcycle.
Ned Dawson has had an interest in the helicopter world since his first ride in a 3 Sqn RNZAF Sioux
in his early years. Since then he has gone on to become an accomplished air to air photographer
shooting everything from R-22s to S-92s. Ned is also the group Publisher so he is more often
than not out travelling the world from Afghanistan to Africa shooting this amazing industry.
AIR ATTACK 65
STORY BY ALEXANDER MLADENOV
66 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 67
The Mi-26 is amongst Russia’s greatest aviation industry
achievements. The 56-tone dual-use rotorcraft holds a class
of its own and is still being maintained in low-rate production,
mainly for military and government customers, both
domestic and export. Alexander Mladenov reports on
its use in the demanding firefighting role where the
type excels due to its tremendous payload and
looks at the issues the unique type is facing in
civilian operation in Russia.
N
o doubt, a unique rotary-wing flying machine and
the largest one ever manufactured in significant
numbers, the Mi-26 offers a wide spectrum of
military, para-public and civilian usage. It provides
a much-needed heavy-lift capability for a dozen of military and
para-public operators in Russia and around the world and has
also been employed in the firefighting role on as-needed basis.
Civilian-operated Mi-26s in Russia have been called upon in the past
to provide all-encompassing support to numerous UN-sponsored
peacekeeping and humanitarian operations although their primary
role is to serve the domestic oil and gas industry in exploration fields
in the Russia’s otherwise inaccessible far northern territories. A small
proportion of the civil-registered machines have also occasionally
been called upon to participate in firefighting and disaster relief
missions in Russia and abroad, but the sharply reduced numerical
strength of the fleet put an end to this business.
68 AIR ATTACK
An EMERCOM Mi-26T seen during
firefighting with the VSU-15A external
bucket, sporting a capacity of up
to 15,000 litres of water (Russian
Helicopters)
AIR ATTACK 69
This is the first civilian-standard
Mi-26T2 built for Russia’s Ministry of
Emergency Situations, handed over in
December 2022. (Russian Helicopters)
70 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 71
Despite the mammoth size and weight,
the Mi-26 boasts a better manoeuvrability
and maintainability than the Mi-24 and
is considerably faster than the Mi-8/17.
(Alexander Mladenov)
PRODUCTION DATA
Nearly 370 examples are known to have been rolled out at Rostvertol
in Rostov-on-Don in southern Russia between 1980 and 2023, but the
vast majority of these machines, inducted in service in the 1980s, have
been withdrawn from use and scrapped, or are destined for scrapping
in foreseeable future. More than two thirds of the Mi-26s built were
originally taken on strength by military and parapublic operators
while the type remains serving in commercial operation in Russia only,
while the type remains in government service in China, Belorussia
and Kazakhstan, and the list of the military customers with helicopters
in active operation includes Algeria, Jordan, India, Kazakhstan
and Venezuela.
The civilian version of the Mi-26 entered production at Rostvertol
in 1985 under the designation Mi-26T while in 1995 the type got its
72 AIR ATTACK
The VSU-15A bucket seen at discharging,
offers discharge rates of up to 1,000 litters
per second. (Alexander Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 73
Ground servicing of a
Mi-26T2. (Alexander
Mladenov)
74 AIR ATTACK
The Russian Air
Aviation has on
strength some
30 Mi-26s and
all front-line
squadrons
equipped with the
type training for
the firefighting role
using the VSU-15A
bucket. (Russian
MoD)
AIR ATTACK 75
fleet of 67 Mi-26s compared to 69 in 2015 and 68 in 2014. 26 of these
machines were kept in active operation throughout the year, with
average flight time of 231 flight hour per helicopter in 2016 while the
rest was placed in long-term storage or was undergoing overhauls. In
early 2023, the fleet of civil-operated Mi-26s kept in active operation in
Russia accounted for between 15 and 20 machines, with prospects for
further reduction in the 2020s, chiefly due to the lack of commercial
demand for newly-built Mi-26T/T2s, combined with sharply increased
acquisition and support prices.
FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT
FOR THE GIANT
The Mi-26TP, flown for the first time in August 1994, is the first
dedicated firefighting derivative. The helicopter has an additional
operator workstation and is equipped with a system of four
internal tanks for a total of 15 tons of water in addition to two tanks
accommodating 900 liters of foam-forming chemicals. The tanks
are provided with a pressurization system and their discharge is
undertaken through two vents. This version, however, remained
in a prototype form and never launched into production due to its
demonstrated ineffectiveness when tackling fires.
The next firefighting derivative, which began flight testing in
September 1997, offered a much more flexible solution in the form
of an external sling bucket system. The Russian-made VSU-15A
accommodating up to 15 tons, developed by Technoeks and
NPK PANH companies, was successfully tested by Mil and Rostvertol.
The initial newly-built Mi-26Ts, modified for the VSU-15A use, were
delivered to the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations (EMERCOM)
in 1998. In total, EMERCOM got six helicopters capable of deploying
the VSU-15A and another example was taken in 1999 by Moscow’s
firefighting service. The EMERCOM Mi-26Ts are heavily involved in
fighting forest and steppe fires, with heavy utilization in the summer
firefighting campaigns when Russia suffers many fierce forest fires in its
European areas.
76 AIR ATTACK
VSU-15A WATER BUCKET
The primary fire attack hardware cleared for use by the Russian civil and
military-operated Mi-26 fleet consists of the VSU-15A flexible bucket system which
can discharge up to 15 tons of water and when fully laden provides coverage of a
swathe 412 and 1,089ft (125m to 300m) long and 45ft (15m) wide.
The bucket is controlled remotely by an operator in the helicopter, including
preparation for taking water and its discharge. Future upgrades include adding a
foam injection system (to dispense foam in the water in the bucket) and satellite
navigation receiver.
There are six adjustable sizes for the giant bucket for accommodating 7, 8, 9,
10, 12.5 and 13.5 tones, while in its maximum size for discharging 15 tons of water
the VSU-15A can be filled in ten seconds and the discharge rate is one tone per
second. VSU-15A’s own weight is 562lb (255kg) and the helicopter speed during
discharge is set at between 0 and 65kt (120km/h), while the speed limitation with
the bucket full with water is up to 97kts (180km/h) and with an empty bucket is
108kt (200km/h).
Design life of the Russian-made water bucket is set at 1,000 water drop cycles
or two years, whichever reached the first.
AIR ATTACK 77
The military-standard Mi-26T2V is
expected to be the main version to be
rolled out at Rostverol in the near-to-
medium run. (Alexander Mladenov)
78 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 79
A scan into the Mi-26T2’s cockpit.
(Alexander Mladenov)
80 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 81
FACTS & FIGURES
Despite its giant size and superheavy weight, the Mi-26 features a surprisingly high
maximum speed, up to 159kts (295km/h), while cruise speed is 138kts (255km/h) and
range on internal fuel is 431nm (800km).
Sporting such performance becomes possible thanks to the combination of the sound
aerodynamic design with an eight-blade main rotor system combined with powerful
engines. In fact, the Mi-26 is the first helicopter in the world to fly successfully with an
eight-blade main rotor design.
The two Ukrainian-made Ivchenko-Progress D-136 turboshafts are rated at 11,400shp
(8,501kW) each at take-off while the continuous maximum rating is 6,100shp (4,486kW).
The VR-26 main gearbox, a huge assembly weighting 8,025lb (3,640kg), is rated at
22,000shp (16,405 kW).
The main rotor has a diameter of 105ft (32m) and consists of titanium rotor head
weighing 6,600lb (3,000 kg) that is supporting eight giant blades each weighting 826lb
(375kg). The main rotor blades use conventional steel spar.
The tail rotor has five blades mounted on starboard side of the fine; its diameter is 25ft
(7.62m), equal to the main rotor diameter of light twin helicopter types such as the MD
Helicopters MD500 or MD600 series.
The fuselage has conventional all-metal riveted semi-monocoque structure of pod and
boom type. The rear of the pod has clamshell loading doors and ramp. The Mi-26 was
designed from outset for fully autonomous basing, without the need for bulky ground
82 AIR ATTACK
servicing equipment for day-to-day maintenance. All the airstairs are built-in while two
large panels on each side of the main rotor mast fairing hinge downwards in order to be
used as work platforms during engine servicing. Electrical power, hydraulic pressure and
compressed air supply when engines are not working is provided by a TV-8V auxiliary
power unit (APU) installed under the flight desk.
The maximum gross weight is 123,459lb (56,000kg) and the helicopter is designed to
be capable of lifting off loads up to 44,029lb (20,000kg), either in the cargo hold or on
external sling. The helicopter’s empty weight is only half of the helicopter’s maximum
take-off weight. The standard internal fuel capacity is 12,000 liters in eight underfloor
tanks. The cargo hold has a length of 39ft 8in (12.1m) excluding the ramp, width of 10ft8in
(3.25 m) and height of 10ft5in (3.15m), while total volume is 4,273cu ft (121m3). It is
unpressurised and can accommodate up to 68 fully-equipped paratroops or 82 troops
on lightweight folding seats arranged in four rows. When equipped for the medevac duty,
the cargo hold can house up to 60 litters.
Cargo hold size allows accommodating a standard ISO container, two infantry fighting
vehicles, or other light armored wheeled/tracked military and civil equipment.
Cargo handling is made possible thanks to the availability of two LG-1500 electrical
winches on overhead rails, each rated at 5,551lb (2,500kg) allowing loads to be
transported along the cabin. There is another winch for hauling loads with 1,110lb
(500kg) capacity. For easy loading of large-size cargoes inside cabin there is a system for
reducing the ground clearance by adjusting the length of the main undercarriage legs.
Loading is via a downward-hinged lower door, with integral folding ramp.
AIR ATTACK 83
The Belarusian Ministry of Emergency
Situations operate a fleet of Mi-
26Ts, mainly in the firefighting role,
on contracts in southern Europe.
(Belorussian Ministry of Emergency
Situations)
84 AIR ATTACK
AIR ATTACK 85
airbus.com
HCARE
IS
MISSION
LIKE NO
OTHER
AIR ATTACK 87
The Russian Aerospace Forces operate
about 30 ‘vanilla’ Mi-26s in the Army
Aviation branch, to be complemented by
at least two dozens of Mi-26T2Vs in the
medium term. (Alexander Mladenov)
88 AIR ATTACK
The VAP-42 water bombing
system has manual control,
with operators opening
the discharge valves upon
command issued by the pilot.
(Ognyan Stefanov via Alex
Mladenov)
AIR ATTACK 89
camera displaying the image of the external load on one of the displays
in the cockpit.
The all-new avionics systems allow for the reduction of the Mi-26T2’s
crew to three (pilot, co-pilot and flight mechanic), down from the
original figure of six (pilot, co-pilot, navigator, radio operator, flight
engineer and flight mechanic) as used on the military version. Two
foreign military customers have already ordered the Mi-26T2 version,
built in a militarized subversion featuring NVG compatibility and
coming equipped with self-protection aids.
Algeria was the launch customer with a total of 14 helicopters
ordered, and then delivered between 2015 and 2017. Jordan is the
second customer, with a contract signed April 2017, covering four
machines for the country’s military. The first of these Mi-26T2s,
sporting a colorful military-style camouflage, was spotted undergoing
post-assembly flight testing at the Rostvertol plant in Rostov on Don in
mid-October 2017.
So far, there is no interest expressed from Russian commercial
operators to the Mi-26’s facelift and it is set to be purchased by
domestic government customers only. The first order for the EMERCOM,
which is an existing Mi-26T operator, was placed in 2020, covering one
machine only, taken in December 2022.
The Russian MoD invested in procurement of the Mi-26T2, in a
significantly militarized version designated as the Mi-26T2V, which
retains the firefighting capability of its processor, by using an
underslung water bucket. It made its maiden flight in 2018 and the first
deliveries of production-standard machines to the Russian Aerospace
Forces were reported in mid-2022.
The Mi26 is set to continue doing its unsung job for at least the next
three decades. The type will also continue to keep selling, albeit in
small numbers, to various military and government customers around
the world, both existing and new Mi-26 operators. It is likely, however,
90 AIR ATTACK
The cavernous cargo hold is, capable to
accommodate one ISO container, one big or two
smaller trucks. (Alexander Mladenov)
that there will be few orders from civilian customers for newly-built
Mi-26T2s - if there are any at all.
There is no doubt that the Mi-26 will continue to be unmatched in
the super heavy lift rotary-wing arena, as the type is set to stay firmly
in a class of its own. So, it would be rather difficult if not impossible
to foresee a Mi-26 one-to-one replacement to match its load-hauling
capabilities in the near-to-medium future. n
Alexander Mladenov is an aviation and defense journalist and photographer, based in Sofia, Bulgaria. His
articles and photos have appeared in no fewer than two dozen aerospace and defense publications around
the world and his first contribution to HeliOps dates back to 2008. Alex specializes in East European and
Soviet/Russian military and civil rotorcraft topics with a particular interest in the latest combat and civilian
technology, air-launched weapons, combat employment and business developments. He is also a co-
founder and managing partner of an aerospace and defense consulting company based in Sofia, Bulgaria.
AIR ATTACK 91
STORY BY PAUL KENNARD
AIR ATTACK 93
Regular readers of Air Attack will likely
recall mention of Rain Industries in
previous issues. Rain has been at the
cutting edge of the use of Uncrewed
Air Vehicles (UAVs) in firefighting
operations - eschewing the more prosaic
uses of drones, such as overwatch
and Full Motion Video (FMV) feed to
enhance Situational Awareness (SA) for
firefighters on the ground, for an entire
self-contained ecosystem that offers
the promise of Rapid Initial Attack, 24/7,
in areas assessed as highly vulnerable to
wildfires. This ecosystem comprises of
a complimentary suite of Electro Optic /
Thermal cameras, firefighting drones and
an underpinning Command and Control
(C2) network, which takes the 'feeds'
from the cameras and external sources
(for example, lightning strike detection
and weather/wind reports) to provide
augmented decision making to control
room staff, or indeed act autonomously
within a framework of guidelines.
94 AIR ATTACK
Air Attack was fortunate to be able to
talk to Ephraim Nowak, Chief Engineer
at Rain, to gain a better appreciation of
what the company is bringing to market,
and where it might fit in with the current
Air Attack order of battle.
RAINING
BUT HOW?
AIR ATTACK 95
greatly enhancing both the efficiency and safety of those 'boots on
the ground'. There have been obvious shortcomings as well. Smaller
drones can struggle to remain in control in the strong updraughts and
local winds that can accompany a wildfire - they simply lack the mass,
control power and engine/rotor performance to remain stable in such
conditions. There are also concerns about deconfliction with manned
assets and the relatively short endurance that current power density
batteries can provide. Finally, UAVs have struggled to deliver credible
payloads of dispersant or water onto smaller fires, limiting their appeal
to many firefighting organisations.
The team at Rain understood this 'capability gap’ and canvassed
numerous Fire Chiefs and fire departments to define requirements for
a UAV-delivered capability that could prove to be more than just an
'eye in the sky'.
DETECTION
1. https://www.faasafety.gov/files/gslac/library/documents/2011/aug/56407/faa%20
p-8740-40%20windshear%5Bhi-res%5D%20branded.pdf
96 AIR ATTACK
point of rapid initial attack and knock-down, and the mission switches
instead to containment until enough 'heavy' resource can be deployed
to extinguish it - often relying on ceding ground until a favourable
attack area is identified.
Secondly, in BC and California in particular, the terrain is often
steeply sided valleys - making access by land difficult and operations
by larger fixed wing aircraft difficult, if not high-risk (as sadly recently
demonstrated in Italy). This is where the helicopter and 802 SEAT /
Fireboss come into their own, being able to operate more safely in
challenging topography, but unable to deliver the sheer weight of
water that the larger jet-powered fixed wing Air Tankers can. The
Fireboss and helicopters can also exploit local water sources, such
as rivers and lakes (depending on depth and run length), while
helicopters can also use swimming pools and ponds if needed.
However, they are both relatively slow in transit terms, and are
expensive to purchase and operate when compared to a UAV.
Their biggest limitation is the lack of ability to detect and suppress
fires in remote areas during the hours of darkness. Large fixed-wing
and even 802/Fireboss operations at night are extremely difficult, if
not impossible. The lack of NVG compatible cockpits and the high
AIR ATTACK 97
risk of flight into obstructions and terrain make such flying a dubious
proposition. A few helicopters are equipped with NVG certified
cockpits, and their crews trained for night operations. Often these
crews are ex-military aviators with extensive goggle flying experience
and used to the dangers of the low-level environment at night, and
they are flying ex-military aircraft such as the CH-47 Chinook and
UH-60 Black Hawk which require relatively modest upgrades to satisfy
civil NVG operating requirements. However, attempts by Government
organisations to drive down the cost of retained, contracted, air attack
assets are having an impact on even this limited capability; companies
wary of the financial 'race to the bottom' simply cannot find the margin
in their operations to maintain NVG proficiency. Crews require regular
recurrency flying, compatible cockpits need to be maintained and the
NVG's themselves purchased and updated - none of which is cheap.
One of the biggest complaints of the new Lowest Price Technically
Acceptable (LPTA) contracting methodology amongst those users is
this dwindling ability for operators to service night-time fires. As it was
explained to me several times, fires are spotted in the early hours by
police, members of the public or passing aircraft. A fire that could be
suppressed or extinguished by a helicopter in the early hours instead
98 AIR ATTACK
NETWORKING THE
GLOBAL AERIAL
FIRE-FIGHTING INDUSTRY
The aerial fire-fighting industry is truly worldwide
these days – from Europe to Australia –
from South Africa to the United States & Canada
SU BSC RI B E H E RE
has, potentially, time to grow into something considerably larger by
first light. The cost of that few hours of NVG helicopter time are rapidly
dwarfed by the effort required to contain a fire that has been given time
to grow in size and intensity, but the LPTA doesn't seem to take this
into consideration - the system seemingly preferring to low ball for day
capability and, if the fire outstrips retained capability, use central Federal
funds to activate more expensive 'Call When Needed' provision. As
discussed in earlier articles, there is a lingering risk that LPTA contracts
may see larger providers refusing to offer up assets for retained contracts
DEMONSTRATOR
sales@tracplus.com
tracplus.com
AIR ATTACK 103
allowing a small number of operators at the Command Station to
oversee the safe operation of multiple UAVs and co-ordinate their
efforts during a multi-vehicle response. Each of the UAVs have a
thermal camera fitted, enabling on-board real-time image processing,
and information on the fire to be passed to the Control Centre. This
camera feed enables Control Centre staff to monitor the progress of
the fire, and ongoing efforts to suppress it. If the fire is not immediately
extinguished overnight, then the feed can be a vital briefing tool for
ground and Air Attack assets to ensure that effort is targeted effectively
in the morning.
Ephraim suggested that, depending on the circumstances, after
dropping its water load, UAVs could be kept 'on target' acting as
a dedicated camera asset. The network architecture of the Rain
System could see multiple Rain UAVs launch, transit, drop on target,
assume a short overwatch period, handing over to the next UAV then
returning to the refuel/reload site before entering the rotation again.
Such a process would see almost unbroken 'water on target' and fire
monitoring during darkness. As an extension, given the relatively low
operating cost of the Rain MK2, during periods of particularly high
risk, a 'Combat Air Patrol' could be established, where UAVs could
be constantly adding their thermal camera to other sensors, looking
for the first signs of a fire starting or ember-caused spot fires ahead
of the fire front, and meeting that 'really, really, rapid initial attack'
aspiration.
As the Rain MK2 demonstrates the air vehicle part of the ecosystem,
Ephraim provided an insight into ongoing work on the C2 structure
and potential operating models. He explained that the 'drone in a
box' concept was not a mere soundbite. Having them packaged as
such would enable UAVs to be pre-positioned - not just locally, but
also globally. The UAVs will 'learn' the area they are placed into,
continually improving the 'recce map' and understanding the slight
discrepancies between the a priori terrain and obstruction data
bases that are pre-loaded and the real world. In suitable areas, and
S/N: 79-23274
l Survival Kit
l First Aid Kit
l Winter
l Main
Main Rotor Blade Covers
Rotor Blade Tie Downs
All aircraft
l Pitot Tube Covers USFS FOR ENQUIRIES P
PLEASE CONTACT:
Air Attack magazine wants to help the international and U.S helicopter
safety efforts by discussing human factor and safety issues. In this and the
next two editions we will be featuring human factors discussions in aerial
firefighting to engage the community to elevate awareness across the aviation
niche industry. This month we start with a part one which will focus on the
U.S. helicopter forestry fire (HFF) industry and look at current pilot duty and
rest standards, review accident data and related research, and introduce
some questions and topics which should warrant further industry and agency
discussion. Moreover, we must concurrently be willing to ask if there are
attitudes, expectations, and stereotypes present in the aerial firefighting
community which can be barriers to honest assessment and discussion. Do
the well-known and documented dangerous pilot attitudes in aviation apply
only to fire pilots whom have a financial and heroic motivation to drop the
wet stuff on the red stuff?
What if I told you U.S aerial firefighting crew duty and rest standards are
taken from commuter and on-demand airline policies? Well, I am telling you
this is true. U.S. federal and state forestry aerial firefighting agencies generally
accept and adopt (whether they know it or not) 14 CFR 135.267 Federal
Aviation Regulations (FARs) commuter airline operations crew endurance
standards (duty, rest, and flight hour limitations) for airplane and helicopter
pilots engaged in aerial firefighting (Veillette, 1999, IHOG, 2016)? During
the evolution and expansion of aerial firefighting operations and policy
development in the last half of the 20th century one of the available crew duty
standards in the FARs (Part 135) was simply adopted into aerial firefighting
and by the 1990’s they had become the foundation to U.S. crew duty
standards for the DOI and USFS. State agencies generally accept (sometimes
restrict farther) the federal agencies’ policies published through the IHOG in
order to maintain agency interoperability.
Let’s now look at what these standards are and at what they mean. The
DOI, USFS, and most state agencies aviation firefighting crew duty day general
standards which are adopted from FAR 135.267 are: limits duty to 14-hours of
duty with 10-hours of rest within a 24-hour period; no more than 8-hours max
flight time (reduced to 7 for California’s CAL FIRE) in a day; and cumulative
work day limitations requiring 2-days off in a 14-day period (Part 135 wording
is 13-days off in three month period) (IHOG, 2016. Form HCM-12). The agency
policies provide cumulative flight time limitations over periods for aerial fire
pilots which are also tied the FAR 135 cumulative hour limits, but our focus for
this talk will be on extended shift work and fatigue in helicopter pilots.
Let’s ask some questions. What is the reality of these policies on the fire
lines? The reality is fire pilots can and frequently do work 12-days straight,
often while chasing hot fires and in transient field and hotel conditions. Are
the commuter airline flight, operational, and living environments similar
enough to air tanker operations? What are the conditions and readiness
posture of air tanker pilots versus helicopter pilots, especially for the contract
vendors chasing fires? The same as helitanker and helitack operations?
Aside from a few minor similarities, the answer is unequivocally - NO. The
operational and flight environments are very dissimilar.
The question really becomes rhetorical. Those pilots for whom it did not
work really do not have a voice, and therefore the answer is, - yes- it works,
mostly. As with most rules in aviation, FAR Part 135 crew endurance standards
are derived from the accidents, history, and studies related to the airline
industry. Whether you are a pilot or not, the fact aerial firefighting standards are
based on commuter and on-demand airline regulations should raise several
questions regarding how well they work and whether we could do better.
The argument that the current rules and policies are fine are based on
anecdotal comments, agency self-reported safety records, or just not seeing a
need for change. The U.S. fire industry may be known for resistance to change,
so who is the advocate? Let’s find one – research and data. To continue to
tackle the problem it becomes necessary to determine what the safety record
is, to analyze the fire aviation environment, to probe the question whether
aviation accidents are effectively tracked and reported in U.S. public aircraft
operations (forestry), and to determine again if FAR Part 135 crew endurance
rules are appropriate as foundational policy for fixed and rotor wing aerial
firefighting in the U.S.
As man first learned to operate equipment, drive vehicles, and fly, human
(pilot) errors have been the leading cause of accidents in multi-modal
transportation systems of the world. Let’s start big picture concerning leading
causes of accidents. A National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
(1989) report found 80–85% of the general aviation accidents in relation to
“pilot error” (Rogers, Logan, & Boley, 1989). A study conducted by Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2000 reported 70–80% of all civilian and
military accidents were related to human error (Shappell & Wiegmann,
2000). In 2014, the FAA again reported seven of the ten top accident causes
as human error or related to human error (FAA, 2014). A current search on the
Internet will reveal the reality - pilot error has been, and will continue to be,
the primary cause of aviation accidents and fatalities. This fact is not new to
aviation, to the fire line, or to many industries, but restating it is necessary as
we look at the prevalent contributing factor to pilot error.
A significant amount of scholarly and scientific literature on pilot error
studies confirm fatigue as one of the largest contributing or causal factors
of pilot error. National Transportation Board (NTSB), FAA, and other studies
substantiate 77–85% of aviation accidents are attributable to human errors,
with over twenty 20% of those being fatigue related (Marcus & Rosekind, 2016;
NTSB, 2015; Moore, 2012; Rogers, Logan, & Boley, 1989). NASA states over
21% of all accidents attributable to fatigue as a causal factor to human error
(Lyman & Orlady, 1980). Rosekind et al. (2000) found 85% of the participants
in a study on commercial/executive operations believed fatigue to be a
moderate or serious safety issue. A 2008 Department of Interior (DOI) U.S.
Forest Service (USFS) Inter-agency Safety Alert cited 80% of accidents were
related to human error, with fatigue cited as a critical factor. For the sake of
argument and to establish a shared terminology foundation, let’s select a
definition for fatigue: the time-dependent summation of internal and external
influences, which adversely affects human performance irrespective of any
subjective awareness, either of the influences or of the impairment (Bonger et
al., 1990). Expanding further, a 2010 FAA Advisory Circular 120–100 states:
‘Fatigue associated with aviation operations is a risk factor for occupational
safety, performance effectiveness, and personal wellbeing. The multiple flight
legs, long duty hours, limited time off, early report times, less-than-optimal
sleeping conditions, rotating and non-standard work shifts, and jet lag
pose significant challenges for the basic biological capabilities of pilots,
HELICOPTER FORESTRY
FIREFIGHTING ACCIDENTS
KEEP UP TO DISCOVER
DATE & INSPIRING
HAVE A SAY IMAGES
HCARE
IS
MISSION
LIKE NO
OTHER