Pairing 1 (Augustus Gloop is no longer fat. He’s enormous.

And that’s sweet with me)

INTRO:
Recently, publishers have decided to make changes to Roald Dahl's works, which has sparked
a debate about the appropriateness of these changes. Andy Griffins, in an opinion piece
titled "Augustus Gloop is no longer fat. He is enormous. And that's sweet with me."
published in The Age on February 20, 2023, argues that language should evolve over time,
and therefore, the language used in Dahl's works needs to change as well. He addresses the
"gatekeepers" of children's literature, stating that although Dahl was a great children's
author, his language is no longer acceptable in today's society. On the other hand, Raj
opposes the changes made to Dahl's works, claiming that it is akin to vandalism. He believes
that readers should be able to decide for themselves what is offensive or not.
P1:
Argument 1= he article argues that words and phrases that were once deemed acceptable in
the past, like descriptions of women as “fearfully ugly” and having “horse-shaped faces,” are
now recognized as offensive and should be replaced in children's books.

Griffith argues that language evolves over time, and words and phrases that were once
considered acceptable can now be seen as offensive. In particular, the author notes that
certain descriptions of women in Roald Dahl's works, such as "fearfully ugly" and "horse-
shaped faces," are no longer acceptable in today's society. Griffith appeals to gatekeepers of
children's literature to make changes to such language in order to create a more inclusive
and respectful environment for all readers. By updating language in children's books, Griffith
argues that we can help combat harmful stereotypes and promote more positive
representations of diverse individuals.
P2:
Argument 2= The article argues that modern publishers have a delicate tightrope to walk
between preserving the original text of classic books and making them palatable to a society
that values diversity and inclusivity.

Griffith presents that the article acknowledges the challenges faced by modern publishers in
preserving classic books while ensuring they are inclusive and acceptable to today's society.
The argument suggests that publishers must balance between maintaining the original text
of classic literature and adapting it to modern times. This involves editing words or phrases
that may be considered offensive or harmful in today's society. The article recognizes that
this is a difficult task, as altering the original text of classic books can potentially affect the
authenticity of the work. However, the argument suggests that publishers have a
responsibility to make sure their publications do not harm or offend readers, particularly
young children who are susceptible to internalizing harmful messages. Overall, the argument
emphasizes the need for publishers to approach classic literature with sensitivity and caution
to ensure it remains relevant and valuable for future generations.
P3:
Argument 3= asserts that while updating offensive language is important, children's books
should still be exciting and engaging for their readers. The creators of these books have a
responsibility to produce content that sparks imagination and stimulates thought. It is
essential that children are presented with material that captures their attention and
encourages them to think outside the box. By doing so, these books will not only entertain,
but also educate and inspire their young audience.
Griffith highlights the importance of balancing the need to update offensive language with
the need to create engaging content for children's books. The argument emphasizes the
responsibility of creators to present imaginative and thought-provoking material to their
readers. This is an essential aspect of children's literature, as it not only entertains but also
educates and inspires children. The argument recognizes that children have short attention
spans, and therefore, creators must produce engaging material that will keep them
interested. By doing so, children will be more likely to continue reading, developing their
reading skills, and broadening their horizons. In summary, while updating language is
essential, it is equally important to create exciting and stimulating content that will capture
the imaginations of young readers.