Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Sensitive #_x000D_

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS - Tracker Sheet


Project:
Technical Office - Delivery
4TAIF12
Department PMC PARSONS
Stage 100% Schematic Design LDC DAR
Reviewed by MAH Checked by DMT Approved by JTP
Transmittal No. :
Date (dd/mm/yy) :
Rev. 00
Comment
Reference Technical Reviewer LDC Response 03 11 2022 Technical Reviewer
Number

Discipline Drawing Number


Field Code

No. Comments Date IMP. Response Responder Name Status Date Status Response

Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and


there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
SEV-PM-BMD-00001).

Note: Parsons will use Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-


PORT-00-SEV-PM-BMD-00001) to verify Dar's upcoming
GN 1 BIM Standards General Project BIM scope reference details are missing 19-Oct-22 High Project BIM scope is outlined in the project BEP BIM uses. Closed 3-Nov-22 Open deliverables, and the EIR supersedes all the past agreements
without written approval or evidence.

The comment will be closed after Dar adds the missing


information to the BEP.
GN 2 BIM Standards General Geo data/Elev and Angle to True North missing 19-Oct-22 High Information will be added in Taif SBEP (from site location) Closed 3-Nov-22 Open

Dar must adhere to Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-


PORT-00-SEV-PM-BMD-00001). In addition, no data is
provided to prove the response given.
GN 3 BIM Standards General Compliance with EIR for each part of the process is missing 19-Oct-22 High Gap analysis have been shared with MACE prevoiusly, will shared with Parsons Closed 3-Nov-22 Open

Coverd under (QA/QC)


GN 4 BIM Standards General BIM KPIs are missing 19-Oct-22 High Appendix 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00006 Closed 3-Nov-22
Updated BEP's will be shared with Parsons next week earlier

Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and


there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
Open SEV-PM-BMD-00001).

LOIN and MDS spreadsheets have been submitted as part of the project BEP Note: Parsons will use Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-
Information exchange/LOD and LOI Information for each stage are PORT-00-SEV-PM-BMD-00001) to verify Dar's upcoming
GN 5 BIM Standards General
missing
19-Oct-22 High Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00003 Closed 3-Nov-22
Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00008 deliverables, and the EIR supersedes all the past agreements
without written approval or evidence.

Naming conventions for families and sheets, details of filters, and Naming Convention Appendix has been submitted as part of the project BEP.
GN 6 BIM Standards General
worksets  are missing
19-Oct-22 High Appendix 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00001
Closed 3-Nov-22

GN 7 BIM Standards General Document Authority is not specified in the BEP 19-Oct-22 High Comment has been cancelled during our 03-11-2022 meeting by Mr.Raul Closed 3-Nov-22 Closed

Section will be added to project general BEP


GN 8 BIM Standards General The goals and objectives of BIM on the project are missing 19-Oct-22 High Updated BEP's will be shared with Parsons next week earlier
Closed 3-Nov-22

Required Information is included in section 6 Team Configuration as part of the project


GN 9 BIM Standards General Roles and responsibility and the BIM Org chart are missing 19-Oct-22 High BEP
Closed 3-Nov-22

Required Information is included in section 10.7 BIM Progress and coordination meetings
GN 10 BIM Standards General BIM Communication protocol is missing 19-Oct-22 High as part of the project BEP
Closed 3-Nov-22

Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and


information is included in LOIN and MDS Spreadsheets. there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
GN 11 BIM Standards General Data and content management details are missing 19-Oct-22 High Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00003 Closed 3-Nov-22 the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00008 remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
Open SEV-PM-BMD-00001).

Section will be referenced in the project general BEP, Omniclass-Table 21 is referenced Note: Parsons will use Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-
GN 12 BIM Standards General The information Classification structure is missing 19-Oct-22 High in MDS Spreadsheet. Closed 3-Nov-22 PORT-00-SEV-PM-BMD-00001) to verify Dar's upcoming
Updated BEP's will be shared with Parsons next week earlier deliverables, and the EIR supersedes all the past agreements
without written approval or evidence.

Required Information is included in section 10 Collaboration procedure as part of the


GN 13 BIM Standards General CDE details are missing 19-Oct-22 High project BEP, and in CDE. Closed 3-Nov-22
Appendix 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00005

Required Information is included in section 16 BIM Quality Assurance and Quality Control
GN 14 BIM Standards General Internal and stage submission QAQC details are missing 19-Oct-22 High (QA/QC) as part of the project BEP, and in Appendix 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM- Closed 3-Nov-22
BEP-00006

Dar must share one combined NWD BIM model every


As Conclouded during meeting 03-11-2022 (And as discuused previuosly with
Thursday with Parsons to enable us to review and monitor
GN 15 BIM Standards General Reporting requirements are missing 19-Oct-22 High Seven/Mace) one interim WIP submission concluding the in progress status will be Closed 3-Nov-22 Open
the process to avoid a situation like the SD submission,
shared. where the models were full of clashes.

# Classification - Public Page 1 of 4 661988805.xlsx


Sensitive #_x000D_

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS - Tracker Sheet


Project:
Technical Office - Delivery
4TAIF12
Department PMC PARSONS
Stage 100% Schematic Design LDC DAR
Reviewed by MAH Checked by DMT Approved by JTP
Transmittal No. :
Date (dd/mm/yy) :
Rev. 00
Comment
Reference Technical Reviewer LDC Response 03 11 2022 Technical Reviewer
Number

Discipline Drawing Number


Field Code

No. Comments Date IMP. Response Responder Name Status Date Status Response

Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and


Discipline coordination standards and tolerances for each stage are Clash Detection Matrix has been submitted as part of the project BEP, Appendix there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
GN 16 BIM Standards General
missing
19-Oct-22 High 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00004, and clash detection report
Closed 3-Nov-22
the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
Open SEV-PM-BMD-00001).
Software details for existing conditions modeling, external services Required Information is included in section 8.1 Software Versions as part of the project
GN 17 BIM Standards General
modeling, and data coding are missing
19-Oct-22 High BEP
Closed 3-Nov-22

As discussed during meeting 03-11-2022,

As a conclusion:

_The current Workflow complies with the EIR


_The current Workflow is the Best practice for the Sake of Performance / File Sizes /
Sheets Production / Internal coordination work flow between the different engineering
trades/ etc.,
_Dar will be sharing the previous MOMs related to such subject with Parsons
Section H.2.5 of Seven's BIM requirements stated that all the
Refer to the below for further elaboration if needed: drawings must be inside the original 3D model file, and any
deviation should be after written approval from Seven. Dar
The design drawings preparation and extraction process for the Arch, failed to provide the approval; hence, it must abide by the
Under EIR.
STR, and Facade differs from the MEP, Landscape, ID, and Steel The Model segregation strategy has been discussed and agreed with SEVEN/PMO
GN 18 BIM Standards General
drawings extraction and certainly does not comply with the Project
19-Oct-22 High (Mace) at project initiation and with each site initiation,(correspondence and MOM dated Review
3-Nov-22 Open
BIM Standards. August 2022 and November 2021 will be shared with Parsons). Note: Parsons will use Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-
PORT-00-SEV-PM-BMD-00001) to verify Dar's upcoming
The overall approach is outlined in the general BEP while the specific implementation per deliverables, and the EIR supersedes all the past agreements
site is demonstrated in the Specific BEP. without written approval or evidence.

And due to the huge amount of information and data which also affected the files
performance and file size we had to divide the site by Buildings for some trades
( Architecture, facades, and Structural Concrete) which also complies to EIR.

While sheet production setup (technically translated by creating scope boxes for each
sheet) is per site and not per building, we had to create dedicated files for sheets
production were include the corresponding views/ annotations/ sheets.

The project Browser is not structured and is missing in most native Dar to issue WIP models on Nov 10 with the proper project
GN 19 All Models General
files.
19-Oct-22 High Project browser will be updated Closed 3-Nov-22 Under Review browser.

Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and


Dar compliance to DAR naming convention there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
GN 20 All Models General Family naming is not defined and used in the models 19-Oct-22 High Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00001
Closed 3-Nov-22 the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
Open uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
SEV-PM-BMD-00001).
Dar complince to DAR naming convension
GN 21 All Models General Worksets are not defined 19-Oct-22 High Appendix : 0PORG00-PORG-00-DAR-BM-BEP-00001
Closed 3-Nov-22

Filters are not used while modeling/Original files with the browsers Dar to issue WIP models on Nov 10 with the proper project
GN 22 All Models General
required
19-Oct-22 High Project browser will be updated Closed 3-Nov-22 Under Review browser.

Design calculations are generated from specific softwaers like :

1- ETAP: for feeder data. Seven/Mace did not approve Dar's BIM Execution Plan, and
2- DIALUX: for lighting calculations. there is no record shared with us, but Dar promised to issue
Design calculation information is missing from all the MEP models, 3- STRIKE RISK ASSESSMENT: for risk assessment and lightning protection. the BEP for Parsons's review and approval. The comment will
GN 23 All Models General
which is one of the project requirements
19-Oct-22 High 4- CATERPILLAR SPECSIZER: for generator sizing.
Closed 3-Nov-22 Open remain open until Dar officially submits and matches BIM
uses with Seven's BIM requirements (EIR: PORG-PORT-00-
Regarding MEP parameters/informations DAR are following the latest agreed MDS/LOIN SEV-PM-BMD-00001).
with Seven/Mace/Egis (which is part from BEP) and for SC phase we are following LOD
200.

The Clash reporting strategy is missing from the process. Clashes


As discussed during meeting 03-11-2022,
GN 24 All Models General between MEP Equipment and Structural elements must be resolved 19-Oct-22 High DAR will adress all major/contrubility clashes in th eupcoming stages
Closed 3-Nov-22
before submission.
AR 25 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1000-00 Design drawings need to be moved to the native models 19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
AR 26 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1100-00 Design drawings need to be moved to the native models 19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model
AR 27 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1001-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 28 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1002-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 29 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1003-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 30 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1004-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 31 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1005-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 32 Architecture 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1006-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 33 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1101-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 34 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1102-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 35 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1103-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 36 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1104-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 37 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1105-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


AR 38 Facade 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1106-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 39 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1001-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

# Classification - Public Page 2 of 4 661988805.xlsx


Sensitive #_x000D_

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS - Tracker Sheet


Project:
Technical Office - Delivery
4TAIF12
Department PMC PARSONS
Stage 100% Schematic Design LDC DAR
Reviewed by MAH Checked by DMT Approved by JTP
Transmittal No. :
Date (dd/mm/yy) :
Rev. 00
Comment
Reference Technical Reviewer LDC Response 03 11 2022 Technical Reviewer
Number

Discipline Drawing Number


Field Code

No. Comments Date IMP. Response Responder Name Status Date Status Response

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 40 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1002-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 41 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1003-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 42 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1004-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 43 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1005-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model


CC 44 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1006-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22 Section H.2.5 of Seven's BIM requirements stated that all the
drawings must be inside the original 3D model file, and any
Design drawings are created and extracted from a separate model Open deviation should be after written approval from Seven. Dar
CC 45 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1107-00
that does not comply with the project BIM standards
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
failed to provide the approval; hence, it must abide by the
CC 46 Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-CC-MOD-1000-00 Design drawings need to be moved to the native model 19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22 EIR.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
HV 47 HVAC 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-HV-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
PL 48 Plumbing 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-PL-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
FF 49 Fire Fighting 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-FF-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
EL 50 Electrical 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-EL-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
TE 51 Telecom 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-TE-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
LS 52 Landscape 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-LS-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
ID 53 Interior Design 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-ID-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

The model contains all the design drawings, which shows a different
approach to drawings preparation and extraction. However, the
ST 54 Steel Structure 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-ST-MOD-1000-00
method aligns with the project BIM standards and must be followed
19-Oct-22 High same comment #18 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
for Architectural, Structural, and Façade drawings.

Native models are already submitted.


Aconix reference number :DAH-GENCORR-000066

Regarding sheets production,


Sewage Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
SE 55 Sewage 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-SE-MOD-1000-00
included are required
19-Oct-22 High Native Models are already included in the submission, but for the sheets, we have our inhouse Review 3-Nov-22
tool that produce the sheets individually from the c3d native model however that it is totally
consistent with the native BIM Model.

However, this the Methodology that currently / was adopted all over the other 5 sites

Section H.2.5 of Seven's BIM requirements stated that all the


drawings must be inside the original 3D model file, and any
deviation should be after written approval from Seven. Dar
failed to provide the approval; hence, it must abide by the
EIR.
Storm Water Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
SW 56 Stormwater 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-SW-MOD-1000-00
included are required
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply Review 3-Nov-22
Notably, we identified Dar's 2D drawings in other disciplines
Open that do not match the 3D models, so we disagree with
Water Supply Filling Line & External and Internal Fire Fighting proceeding with Dar's assurance of consistency between
Network Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under models and drawings. Instead, we need the drawings inside
WT 57 Water/FF/IR 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-WT-MOD-1000-00
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply Review 3-Nov-22
the model to review them to ensure consistency.

Furthermore, we are willing to understand if technological


Water Supply Filling Line & External and Internal Fire Fighting limitations (if any) prevent Dar from providing a 3D model
Network Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under with individual drawings.
WT 58 Water/FF/IR 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-WT-MOD-1001-00
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply
Review
3-Nov-22

4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-IR-MOD-1000-00 Irrigation Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
IR 59 Irrigation
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply
Review
3-Nov-22
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-GW-MOD-1000-00 Graywater Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
GW 60 Graywater
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply Review 3-Nov-22
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-LS-MOD-1000-00 Landscape Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
LS 61 Landscape
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply Review 3-Nov-22
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-RW-MOD-1000-00 Existing Surface Native models are missing. Original files with the Under
RW 62 Existing Surface
sheets included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply
Review
3-Nov-22
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-RW-MOD-1001-00 Existing Roads Native models are missing. Original files with the Under
RW 63 Existing Roads
sheets included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply
Review
3-Nov-22

# Classification - Public Page 3 of 4 661988805.xlsx


Section H.2.5 of Seven's BIM requirements stated that all the
drawings must be inside the original 3D model file, and any
deviation should be after written approval from Seven. Dar
Sensitive failed to provide the approval; hence, it must abide by the
EIR.
#_x000D_

TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS - Tracker Sheet Open


Notably, we identified Dar's 2D drawings in other disciplines
that do not match the 3D models, so we disagree with
proceeding with Dar's assurance of consistency between
Project:
Technical Office - Delivery
4TAIF12
Department PMC
models and drawings. Instead, we need the drawings inside
the model to review themPARSONS
to ensure consistency.
Stage 100% Schematic Design LDC Furthermore, we are willingDARto understand if technological
Reviewed by MAH Checked by DMT Approved by JTP limitations (if any) prevent Dar from providing a 3D model
with individual drawings.
Transmittal No. :
Date (dd/mm/yy) :
Rev. 00
Comment
Reference Technical Reviewer LDC Response 03 11 2022 Technical Reviewer
Number

Discipline Drawing Number


Field Code

No. Comments Date IMP. Response Responder Name Status Date Status Response

4TAIF12-DAR-SC-000-RW-MOD-1002-00 New Roads Native models are missing. Original files with the sheets Under
RW 64 New Roads
included are required.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #55 reply Review 3-Nov-22

As discussed during the call 03/11/2022 :

Out of 40,000 clashes there are 13,000 clashes are already resolved.
accordingly the actual number is 27,000 clashes which were prioritized per each stage as per
Dar to review and issue a concise report before moving further. The clash detection matrix.
clash report shows 40,000+ clashes, and Dar did not check them; it is Dar Aim is to address the major clashes at early stages , clash report will demonstrating clashs
GN 65 All Models General not an actual number. Dar Technical team must avoid giving 19-Oct-22 High according to thier peroirirtes. Closed 3-Nov-22
autogenerated clash reports, review the significant clashes and
assign the type and priority.
DAR will show only the major / Constructability clashes in the upcoming stages as agreed with
Parsons

Most clashes are modeling errors that increased the number of


GN 67 All Models General clashes, which we cannot review. Dar to be concise with the technical 19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
issues and clash reports.
Clash tests must be specific and concise because Parsons can not
GN 68 All Models General
review autogenerate tests.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22

The clash detection summary dashboard is issued separately as a Dar's response is an incorrect interpretation of the
PDF file but does not assist in reviewing the package as the numbers discussion.
GN 69 All Models General
are unrealistic and far from the facts. Dar to revise and reissue the
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
summary dashboard. Dar's clash detection report is generated automatically,
which creates 282 clash types, resulting in 40 thousand
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1003-01 200+ clashes walls vs. walls within model #AR-1003-“Seven FEC- clashes without any findings or conclusions. Such reports are
AR 70 Architecture Junior FEC- Electrical Substation” result from poor modeling. Dar to 19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22 of no use and just a way to hide a few hundred real clashes
revisit clash tests and eliminate unnecessary tests. Open among 40 thousand clashes.

Dar is to review the model and issue a report showing real


Clashes between walls and floors are the result of poor modeling. clashes and technical issues before moving forward.
Refer to Clash the model #AR-1001-“Wellness-Bowling-Golf- Alternatively, Dar can present the SD100% combined model
GN 71 All Models General
Electrical Substation-Retails/F&B; Dar to revisit clash tests and
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
to all the parties and convince us how services like
eliminate unnecessary tests. underground and above-ground pipes, trays, and ducts that
overlap and pipes passing through structural columns will
work.
Dar needs to avoid all the modeling errors and not show them as
GN 72 All Models General
clashes before proceeding further.
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-AR-MOD-1004-01
Clashes between concrete walls and block walls show a lack of
coordination between the departments. Refer to clash #66, Model
AR 73 Architecture
AR-1004 – “Car Parking-Basement floor” and Model CC-1004 – “Car
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
Parking-Basement Floor”
Dar BIM Modelers must model all the elements correctly and avoid all
the basic modeling errors. 4000+ clashes between block walls and
GN 74 All Models General
floors are modeling mistakes. They can not be reviewed or
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
considered as issues.

Dar to be concise while creating clash types. Clashes such as WC


Flush plate placed on the wall are not clashes. Accessories/elements
placed on the walls/floors must be out of selection in the clash tests.
GN 75 All Models General
The modeling team needs to be careful when placing the families,
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
and the Technical team must conduct a detailed walk-through before
issuing the models to PMC.

Dar created 282 clash tests. The objectives for most of them are
undefined. Before proceeding further, it must have concise goals and
objectives for each clash test and define the tests considering the
GN 77 All Models General
disciplines, subdisciplines, and objects/families. Random element
19-Oct-22 High same comment #65 reply Closed 3-Nov-22
selection and presenting modeling errors as over 40K clashes wastes
time—Dar to revisit the 282 Tests and eliminate unnecessary ones.

4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-LI-MOD-1000-00 Dar added a new lighting model but should have finalized
deliverables in the MIDP for the 50%/100% SD and DD packages.
EL 66 Lighting
Dar to confirm any further addition to the number of models for SD
19-Oct-22 High MIDP submitted 100%SC submission is final , Dar will notify with any further change Closed 3-Nov-22 Closed Noted
and DD before proceeding further.

The MIDP format is incomplete. DAR should include all the drawings
As discussed previously with Seven / Mace, the drawing list in metadata and registry are
GN 76 All Models General and the model references (separate columns within the drawing list) 19-Oct-22 High separated. Such is adopted all over the sites
Closed 3-Nov-22 Open No records provided of the previous agreements
in the MIDP.

Areas on hold, such as Mechanical for AMC Cinema, must be out of


GN 78 All Models General BIM QA/QC process because it negatively affects the entire QA/QC 19-Oct-22 High noted Closed 3-Nov-22 Closed Will be reviewed in the upcoming submission
conclusion.
4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-HV-MOD-1000-01
Dar is using Standard MEP fittings as per industry standard conforming to LOD300, Any deviation
Modeling needs to be proper; pipes and ducts fittings are missing. The comment is about disconnected pipes and missing
HV 79 HVAC
Refer to Model # 4TAIF12-DAR-SC-100-HV-MOD-1000-01
19-Oct-22 High would be a specific case which is mistakenly placed however such cases will be taken into Closed 3-Nov-22 Open fittings. Dar to review the model specified in the comment.
consideration in the next stage (If any)

# Classification - Public Page 4 of 4 661988805.xlsx

You might also like