Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IPPTChap 003
IPPTChap 003
IPPTChap 003
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 3-1
3-2
Consolidation: The Concept
S
3-3
Review
Parent
Company
3-5
Benefits of Consolidated Financial Statements
3-6
Limitations of Consolidated Financial Statements
3-7
Subsidiary Financial Statements
3-8
Practice Quiz Question #1
3-9
Practice Quiz Question #1 Solution
3-10
Learning Objective 3-2
3-11
Concepts and Standards
3-12
Indirect Control Example
51% 75%
Y Z
20% 40%
Does X control K?
Yes, indirectly through Y and Z!
X must consolidate Y, Z, and K. 3-13
Concepts and Standards
X
Ability to Exercise Control
90%
Sometimes, majority stockholders may
not be able to exercise control even Y
though they hold more than 50
percent of outstanding voting stock.
Subsidiary is in legal reorganization or bankruptcy
Foreign country restricts remittance of subsidiary
profits to domestic parent company
3-15
Concepts and Standards
3-16
Concepts and Standards
3-17
Concepts and Standards
3-18
Practice Quiz Question #2
3-19
Practice Quiz Question #2 Solution
3-20
Learning Objective 3-3
3-21
Noncontrolling Interest
<50% >50%
Sub
3-22
Noncontrolling Interest (NCI)
Two Issues:
NCI Parent (1) Should 100% of the
financial statements
<50% >50% be consolidated?
(2) Where to report NCI
Sub in the financial
statements?
3-23
Issue 1: Should 100% be Consolidated?
Proportional Full
Consolidation Consolidation
Percent
< 100% 100%
Consolidated?
Reports NCI
No Yes
Amounts?
Complies with
No Yes
US GAAP?
Relative
Easy Hard
Complexity?
3-24
Issue 1: Should 100% be Consolidated?
3-26
Noncontrolling Interest
3-27
Practice Quiz Question #6
3-28
Practice Quiz Question #6 Solution
3-29
Learning Objective 3-4
3-30
Summary of differences in consolidation
Investment = No
Book Value Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Differential
Investment >
Book Value Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Differential
No NCI NCI
Shareholders Shareholders
3-31
Consolidation of Less-than-wholly-owned Subs
Prepare a consolidation
worksheet for a less-than-
wholly-owned
consolidation.
3-39
Consolidation of < Wholly Owned Subs
3-41
Practice Quiz Question #9 Solution
3-42
Group Exercise 2: Consolidation < 100%
Elimination Entries
Pinkett, Inc. Smith, Inc. DR CR Consolidated
Income Statement
Sales $ 840,000 $ 300,000
Less: COGS (516,000) (156,000)
Less: Depreciation expense (12,000) (10,000)
Less: Other Expenses (192,000) (98,000)
Income from Smith, Inc. 32,400
Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000
NCI in Net Income
CI in Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 Assume Pinkett only purchases
Statement of Retained Earnings
90% of Smith.
Balances, 1/1/X8 $ 124,800 $ 72,000
Add: Net Income 152,400 36,000
Less: Dividends (108,000) (12,000) REQUIRED
Balances, 12/31/X8 $ 169,200 $ 96,000
3-43
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Book Value Calculations
Parent’s Subsidiary’s Equity Accounts
NCI Investment = Common Retained
(10%) Account (90%) Stock Earnings
Balances, 1/1/X8 NCI (10%) (90%) Stock
Earnings
+ Net Income
Dividends
Balances, 12/31/X8
3-44
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Book Value Calculations
Parent’s Subsidiary’s Equity Accounts
NCI Investment = Common Retained
(10%) Account (90%) Stock Earnings
Balances, 1/1/X8 NCI (10%)118,800 (90%)
13,200 Stock
60,000 72,000
Earnings
+ Net Income 3,600 32,400 36,000
Dividends (1,200) (10,800) (12,000)
Balances, 12/31/X8 15,600 140,400 60,000 96,000
3-45
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Book Value Calculations
Parent’s Subsidiary’s Equity Accounts
NCI Investment = Common Retained
(10%) Account (90%) Stock Earnings
Balances, 1/1/X8 13,200 118,800 60,000 72,000
+ Net Income 3,600 32,400 36,000
Dividends (1,200) (10,800) (12,000)
Balances, 12/31/X8 15,600 140,400 60,000 96,000
3-46
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Book Value Calculations
Parent’s Subsidiary’s Equity Accounts
NCI Investment = Common Retained
(10%) Account (90%) Stock Earnings
Balances, 1/1/X8 13,200 118,800 60,000 72,000
+ Net Income 3,600 32,400 36,000
Dividends (1,200) (10,800) (12,000)
Balances, 12/31/X8 15,600 140,400 60,000 96,000
3-47
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Don’t forget the accumulated depreciation elimination entry:
3-48
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Don’t forget the accumulated depreciation elimination entry:
20,000 20,000
190,000 0
Shows the Buildings and Equipment “as if” they have been
recorded on the Sub’s books as new assets at book value.
3-49
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Elimination Entries
Pinkett, Inc. Smith, Inc. DR CR Consolidated
Income Statement
Sales $ 840,000 $ 300,000
Less: COGS (516,000) (156,000)
Less: Depreciation expense (12,000) (10,000)
Less: Other Expenses (192,000) (98,000)
Income from Smith, Inc. 32,400
Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000
NCI in Net Income
CI in Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 58,800 $ 48,000
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000
Inventory 204,000 90,000
Investment in Sub 140,400
Property & Equipment 336,000 210,000
Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000)
Total Assets $ 709,200 $ 384,000
3-50
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Elimination Entries
Pinkett, Inc. Smith, Inc. DR CR Consolidated
Income Statement
Sales $ 840,000 $ 300,000
Less: COGS (516,000) (156,000)
Less: Depreciation Expense (12,000) (10,000)
Less: Other Expenses (192,000) (98,000)
Income from Smith, Inc. 32,400 32,400
Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 32,400 0
NCI in Net Income 3,600
CI in Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 36,000 0
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 58,800 $ 48,000
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000
Inventory 204,000 90,000
Investment in Sub 140,400 140,400
Property & Equipment 336,000 210,000 20,000
Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000) 20,000
Total Assets $ 709,200 $ 384,000 20,000 160,400
3-51
Group Exercise 2: Solution
Elimination Entries
Pinkett, Inc. Smith, Inc. DR CR Consolidated
Income Statement
Sales $ 840,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,140,000
Less: COGS (516,000) (156,000) (672,000)
Less: Depreciation Expense (12,000) (10,000) (22,000)
Less: Other Expenses (192,000) (98,000) (290,000)
Income from Smith, Inc. 32,400 32,400
Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 32,400 0 $ 156,000
NCI in Net Income 3,600 (3,600)
CI in Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 36,000 0 $ 152,400
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 58,800 $ 48,000 $ 106,800
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000 180,000
Inventory 204,000 90,000 294,000
Investment in Sub 140,400 140,400
Property & Equipment 336,000 210,000 20,000 526,000
Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000) 20,000 (154,000)
Total Assets $ 709,200 $ 384,000 140,400 $ 952,800
3-52
Learning Objective 3-6
3-53
Combined Financial Statements
3-56
Practice Quiz Question #6
3-57
Learning Objective 3-7
3-58
The Rise and FALL of Enron
Press Release Tuesday, October 16, 2001
3-59
Special Purpose Entities
3-60
Variable Interest Entities
3-61
Enron’s Accounting “Sleight of Hand”
3-62
“Raptors”
3-63
Example: The Chewco Raptor
A diagram of the Chewco transaction is set forth below:
3-64
Raptor’s Impact on Earnings
Raptor’s
Quarter Earnings Raptors
Impact
3Q 2000 $364 $295 $69
3-65
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
As a result of the Enron collapse and other notable
scandals related to SPEs, the FASB issued guidance on
VIEs in 2003 (ASC 810-10-25) and updated this
guidance later the same year (ASC 810-10-38C).
What is a VIE?
An entity that either
does not have equity investors with voting rights and a
percentage of profits and losses, OR
has equity investors that do not provide sufficient
financial resources to support the entity’s activities.
What is a variable interest?
an interest that changes with changes in the VIE’s net assets.
3-66
Variable Interest Entities
3-67
Purpose of ASC 810
Investor ($3k)
How would ABC Corp. typically determine whether to consolidate Leasing Corp.?
A controlling financial interest through voting rights.
What if ABC Corp. were a related party to Investor?
What if ABC Corp. guaranteed the value of the building at the end of the lease?
What if ABC Corp. received any residual value above $100k when building sold?
3-69
Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
3-70
VIEs: “Contractual Arrangements”
3-71
VIEs: Potential Variable Interests
3-73
VIEs: The Primary Beneficiary
3-74
Group Exercise 3: To Consolidate (or not)?
Parch Inc. and Rees Urch, Parch’s former head of R&D, formed
Sede Inc., which will perform research and development.
Sede issued 10,000 shares of common stock to Urch, who is
now Sede’s president. Parch lent $800,000 to Sede for initial
working capital in return for a note receivable that can be
converted at will into 100,000 shares of Sede’s common stock.
Parch also granted Sede a line of credit of $1,000,000.
REQUIRED
1. Is consolidation appropriate?
2. What would Parch accomplish with this arrangement?
3. If consolidation were not appropriate, what serious
reporting issue exists regarding Parch’s separate
financial statements?
3-75
Group Exercise 3: To Consolidate (or not)?
Parch Inc. and Rees Urch, Parch’s former head of R&D, formed
Sede Inc., which will perform research and development.
Sede issued 10,000 shares of common stock to Urch, who is
now Sede’s president. Parch lent $800,000 to Sede for initial
working capital in return for a note receivable that can be
converted at will into 100,000 shares of Sede’s common stock.
Parch also granted Sede a line of credit of $1,000,000.
Rees Urch
10,000 shares
$1,000,000
Line of credit
Parch Sede
$800,000 loan
Option
100,000 shares 3-76
Group Exercise 3: Solution
Requirement 1: Is consolidation appropriate?
Consolidation is appropriate.
1. By having an option exercisable at will, Parch has the exclusive
potential to control Sede.
2. In substance, it is doubtful that Sede would make any decisions not to
Parch’s liking, since Parch could immediately exercise the option and
prevent those decisions from being implemented. Thus it seems that
Parch effectively has control over Sede from a substance versus form
perspective.
3. If conditions had to be met before the option could be exercised,
however, that might change things.
4. Sede’s total dependency on Parch for financing also points toward
consolidation.
Presumably Sede’s president, as sole owner of the company, appointed the
board of directors. Thus technically, Parch did not appoint the board, which
implies that it does not control Sede. It is doubtful, however, that the
president would appoint board members whom Parch did not approve.
3-77
Group Exercise 3: Solution
3-78
Practice Quiz Question #3
3-79
Practice Quiz Question #3 Solution
3-80
Practice Quiz Question #4
3-81
Practice Quiz Question #4 Solution
3-82
Learning Objective 3-8
3-83
IFRS Differences Related to VIEs and SPEs
3-90
Different Approaches to Consolidation
3-91
Proprietary Theory
3-92
Parent Company Theory
3-93
Entity Theory
3-94
Recognition of Subsidiary Income
3-95
Entity Theory
3-96
Reporting Net Assets of the Subsidiary
3-97
Current Practice
3-98
Current Practice
3-99
Practice Quiz Question #7
3-100
Practice Quiz Question #7 Solution
3-101
Conclusion
The End
3-102