Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Specification For Automotive Gasoline (Withdrawn 1990) PDF
Specification For Automotive Gasoline (Withdrawn 1990) PDF
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.
([lb
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
A S T M DL139 B9 W 0 7 5 9 5 1 0 0 0 3 5 2 9 0 I W
D439
3,1.3 gasoline-oxygenate blend-a blend consisting pri- maximum adjustments in antiknock index for seasonal
marily of gasoline and a substantial amount of one or more climatic changes are provided in Fig. 1.
oxygenates. 5.2.2 Vehicle octane requirements generally decrease with
NOTE2-Because a standard test method does not exist that can increasing altitude. The maximum antiknock index adjust-
quantitatively determine small amounts of oxygenafes or combined ments, established to protect cars driven from a high to a
oxygen in fuel, it is not possible at this time to set a maximum limit for lower altitude area while using fuel obtained in the high
oxygenate or oxygen content for gasoline. The intent of the above altitude area, are provided in Fig. 2.
definitions is to indicate that a spark-ignition engine fuel is a gasoline- 5.3 Additional requirements are listed in Table 1.
oxygenate blend when sufficient oxygenate is present to interfere with
the determination of properties using current standard test methods. It is 6. Workmanship
not the intent of the definitions to classifi as a gasoline-oxygenate blend 6.1 The finished gasoline must be visually free of
a gasoline containing: ( I ) alcohol used as a diluent for detergent or undissolved water, sediment, and suspended matter; it must
corrosion inhibitor additives and (2) small amounts of alcohols or
glycols used as anti-icing additives. When new test methods and be clear and bright at the ambient temperature or 21°C
technical data to support a limit are available, an oxygenate or oxygen (70"F), whichever is higher.
content maximum limit for gasoline will be considered.
7. Test Methods
4. Ordering Information 7.1 The requirements enumerated in this specification are
determined in accordance with the following methods:
4.1 The purchasing agency shall: 7.1.1 Distillation-Method D 86.
4.1.1 State the antiknock index as agreed upon with the 7.1.2 Vapor-Liquid Ratio-Test Method D 2533.
seller, 7.1.3 Vapor Pressure-Test Method D 323.
4.1.2 Indicate the season and locality in which the gaso- 7.1.4 Research Method Octane Number-Test Method
line will be used, D 2699 or Test Method D 2885.
4.1.3 Indicate the lead level required (Table 1). 7.1.5 Motor Method Octane Number-Test Method
D 2700 or Test Method D 2885.
5. Performance Requirements 7.1.6 Corrosion-Test Method D 130, three hours at 50°C
5.1 Volatility is varied for seasonal climatic changes by (122°F).
providing for five volatility classes of gasoline, which con- 7.1.7 Existent Gum-Test Method D 38 1, Air-Jet Appa-
form to the requirements prescribed in Table 1. ratus.
5.1.1 The seasonal and geographical distribution of the 7.1.8 Sulfur-Test Method D 1266, Test Method D 2622,
five classes is shown in Table 2. or Test Method D 3120. With Test Method D 3120, fuels
5.2 Antiknock index levels, defined as the average of the with sulfur content greater than 100 ppm (0.0100 mass %)
Research octane number (RON) and Motor octane number must bé diluted with isooctane. The dilution of the sample
(MON), and their application are set forth in Table 3. may result in a loss of precision. Test Method D 3 120 cannot
5.2.1 Vehicle octane requirements generally vary with be used when the lead concentration is greater than 0.4 g/L
atmospheric temperature and humidity. Recommended (1.4 g/gai).
Reid Vapor Lead Content, max, g/L (g/gai) Existent Sulfur, max, Mass % oxMation
Stability, Antiknock
v~~~~~ Pressure, max,B copperswp Gum,max,
Minimum, Index
kPa (psi) Unleadedc LeadedD conoslon*max mg/lmmL Unleaded Leaded ......_
._-
A 62 (9.0) 0.013 (0.05) 1.1 (4.2) No. 1 5 0.10 0.15 240 E
B 69 (10.0) 0.013 (0.05) 1.1 (4.2) No. 1 5 0.10 0.15 240 E
C 79 (11.5) 0.013 (0.05) 1.1 (4.2) No. 1 5 0.10 0.15 240 E
D 93 (13.5) 0.013 (0.05) 1.1 (4.2) No. 1 5 0.10 0.15 240 E
E 103 (15.0) 0.013 (0.05) 1.1 (4.2) No. 1 5 0.1o 0.15 240 E
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
A S T M D43'7 R7 W 0757530 00352'73 3 W
7.1.9 Lead-Test Method D 2547, Test Method D 2599, normal and correct operation of the test methods, exceed the
or Test Method D 3341. For lead levels below 0.03 g/L (0,l values in the following table in only one case in twenty.
g/gal) use Test Method D 3 1 16, Test Method D 3229 or Test 8.2.4 Reproducibility-The difference between two inde-
Method D 3237. pendent sets of antiknock index determinations, obtained by
7.1.10 Oxidation Stability-Test Method D 525. . different operators working in different laboratories on
identical test material would, in the long run, and in the
normal and correct operation of the test methods, exceed the
values in the following table in only one case in twenty.
8. Precision and Bias
Repeatability Limits, Anti- Reproducibility Limits,
8.1 The precision of each required test method is included Antiknock Index h o c k Index Units Antiknock Index Units
in the standard applicable to each method. 83 0.2 0.7
8,2 Antiknock Index: 85 0.2 0.7
8,2.1 The following statements apply to antiknock index, 87 0.2 0.7
89 0.2 0.6
which is a composite quantity not addressed in any other 91 0.2 0.6
standard. 93 0.2 0.6
8.2.2 The precision of the antiknock index (RON + 95
91
- 0.6
0.7
MON)/2 is a function of the individual precisions of
NOTE 3-These precision limits were calculated from Research and
Research (D2699) and Motor (D2700) octane numbers. M o t o r octane number results obtained by member laboratories of the
The repeatability and reproducibility variances for these test A S T M National Exchange Group (NEG) participating in a cooperative
methods must be summed in proportion to their individual testing program. The data obtained during the period 1980 through
contributions to the antiknock index. 1982 have been analyzed in accordance with RR:W2-1007, "Manual
8.2.3 Repeatability-The difference between two sets of o n Determinhg Precision Data for A S T M Methods on Petroleum
antiknock index determinations, where two test results by Products and Lubricants," Spring, 1973.
each octane number method were obtained by one operator, 8.2.5 Bias-There being no criteria for measuring bias in
with the same apparatus under constant operating conditions these test-product combinations, no statement of bias can be
on identical test material would, in the long run, and in the made.
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
I_ _~_- ____ - ----
ASTM D439 8 9 W 0759510 0 0 3 5 2 9 2 5 W
(im D439
TABLE 2 Continued
State Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept ûct Nov Dec
Nevada
N 38' Latitude E B B
C 3 8 O Latitude D A A
New Hampshlre E C C
New Jersey E C C
New Mexico
N 34' Latitude EID A A
S 34O Latitude D A A
New York E C C
North Carolina EID C Cl6
North Dakota E Cl6 0
Ohio E C C
Oklahoma EID B 0
Oregon
E 122' Longitude E Cl0 0
w 1220 Longitude E C C
Pennsylvania E C C
Rhode Island E C C
South Cardina D C CP
South Dakota E 0 0
Tennes- EID C ClB
Texas
E 99' Longitude D CP B
W 99' Longitude D A A
Utah E 0 BlA
Vermont E C C
Virginia E C C
Washington
E 122O Longitude E Cl0 B 0 BlC
W 1 2 2 O Longitude E C C C C
West Virginia E C C C C
Wisconsin E C C C C
Wyoming E
- E EjD B 0 0 0
ADetails of State Climatological Division by county as indicated.
California, North Coast-Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humbdt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Frandsco, San Matw, Santa Clara,
Santa Cruz, Sdano, Sonoma, Trinity
California, interior-Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Wusa, EI Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern (except that portion lying east
of the LOS Angeles County Aqueduct), Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tudumne,
Yolo, Yuba, Nevada
California, South Coast-Orange, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles (except that portion north of the San Gabriel Mountaln range and
east of the Los Angeles County Aqueduct)
California, Southeast-Imperial, Riverside, San Bemardim, Los Angeles (that portion north of the San Gabriel Mountain range and east of the Los Angeles County
Aqueduct), Mono, Inyo, Kern (that portion lying east of the Los Angeles County Aqueduct)
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
A S T M D439 Aï ~
= 0759530 0035293 7
(im D439
5
s
FIG. 1 Antiknock Index Reductions for Weather”
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Northeast 1.o 0.5 0.5 O O O O O O 0.5 0.5 1.o
Southeast 0.5 O O O O 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 O O 0.5
Midwest 1.o 0.5 0.5 O O O O O O O 0.5 1.o
Northwest 1.o 1.o 0.5 0.5 O O O O O 0.5 1.o 1.o
Southwest 1.o 0.5 O O O O O O O O 0.5 1.o
California
No. Coaste 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 u.5 0.5 O O 0.5 0.5
so. Coaste O O 0.5 0.5 1.o 1.o 1.o 0.5 0.5 O O O
Alaska 1.o 1.o 0.5 0.5 O O O O O 0.5 1.o 1.o
Hawail O O O O o O O O O O O O
A Reductionsais apply to Motor octane number requirementfor unleaded gasdines with an antlknod< index of 87 to 89.9.
Detalis of Califomla coastal areas are shown in Footnote A of Table 2.
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
--.____. __ --___.-_
ASTM D439 89 M 0 7 5 9 5 1 0 0 0 3 5 2 9 4 9 W
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
A S T M DL139 8 9 W 0759510 0035275 O W
APPENDIXES
(Nonmandatory Information)
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
A S T M Dq39 8’7 m 075’7530 00352’7b 2 m
X1.3.5 (2) Boundaries of the areas defined in Fig. 2 and higher ambient temperature operating conditions.
the corresponding antiknock index reductions were estab- X1.5.3 Five volatility classes of gasoline are provided to
lished to protect cars driven from a high to a lower altitude satisfy vehicle performance requirements under different
(and hence higher octane requirement) area while using climatic conditions. The schedule for seasonal and geograph-
gasoline obtained in the high-altitude area. ical distribution indicates the appropriate volatility class or
X1.3.6 Vehicle octane requirements on the average rise classes for each month in ali areas of the United States, based
with increasing atmospheric temperature by 0.097 MON per on altitudes and on expected air temperatures. Volatility
degree Celsius (0.054 MON per degree Fahrenheit), and limits are established in terms of vapor-liquid ratio, vapor
decrease with increasing specific humidity by 0.245 MON pressure, and distillation properties.
per gram of water per kilogram of dry air (0.035 MON per X1.5.4 For sea-level areas outside of the United States, the
grain of water per pound of dry air). Because temperature following ambient temperatures are for guidance in selecting
and humidity of geographical areas are predictable the appropriate volatility class:
throughout the year from past weather records, octane levels 10th Percentile 90th Percentile
can be seasonally adjusted to match seasonal changes in 6-h Minimum Maximum
-
vehicle octane requirements. Figure 1 defines the boundaries Volatility Daily Temperatures, Daily Temperatures,
areas and the seasonal variations recommended for anti- CiasS ‘c! (‘F) Y! (‘F)
knock index variations. A >16 (60) 243(110)
B >10 (50) 4 3 (1 10)
C (40) 436 (97)
X1.4 Antiknock Additives D >-7 (20) <29 ( 8 5 )
E s-7 (20) <21 (69)
X 1.4.1 In addition to selecting the appropriate antiknock
index to meet vehicle antiknock needs, a choice must be The 6-hour minimum temperature is the highest tempera-
made between leaded and unleaded gasoline. Vehicles that ture of the six coldest consecutive hourly temperature
must use unleaded gasoline are required by Environmental readings of a 24-hour day. The 6-hour minimum tempera-
Protection Agency (EPA) regulation to have permanent ture provides information on the cold-soak temperature
labels on the instrument panel and adjacent to the gasoline experienced by a vehicle. The 10th percentile of this temper-
tank filler inlet reading “Unleaded Fuel Only.” Most 1975 ature statistic indicates a 10 % expectation that the 6-hour
and later model passenger cars and light trucks are in this minimum temperature will be below this value during a
category. Most 1971-74 vehicles can use leaded or unleaded month. The 90th percentile maximum temperature is the
gasoline. Pre- 1971 vehicles were designed for leaded gasoline; highest temperature expected during 90 % of the days, and
however, unleaded gasoline of suitable antiknock index may provides information relative to peak vehicle operating
generally be used in these vehicles, except that leaded temperatures during warm and hot weather. For areas above
gasoline should be-used periodically (after a few tankfuls of sea level, the 10th percentile 6-hour minimum temperature
unleaded gasoline have been used). Leaded gasoline may be should be increased by 3.6”C/1000 m (2”F/1000 fi) of
required in some vehicles, particularly trucks, in heavy duty altitude, and the 90th percentile maximum should be
service. Instructions on gasoline selection are normally increased by 4.4“C/1000 m (2.4”F/1000 ft) of altitude before
provided in publications of vehicle manufacturers (for ex- comparing them to the sea level temperature. These correc-
ample, owners’ manuals, service bulletins, etc.). Antiknock tions compensate for changes in fuel volatility caused by
agents other than lead alkyls may be used to increase the changes in barometric pressure due to altitude.
antiknock index of gasolines, and their concentrations may
also be limited due to either performance or legal require- X1.6 Vapor Pressure
ments. X1.6.1 The vapor pressure of gasoline must be sufficiently
high to ensure ease of engine starting, but it must not be so
X1.5 Volatility high as to contribute to vapor lock.
X1.5.1 In most spark-ignition internal combustion en-
gines, the gasoline is metered in liquid form through the X1.7 Vapor-Liquid Ratio ,
carburetor or fuel injector, and is mixed with air and X 1.7.1 Vapor-liquid (V/L)ratio is the ratio of the volume
partially vaporized before entering the cylinders of the of vapor formed at atmospheric pressure to the volume of
engine. Consequently, volatility is an extremely important gasoline tested in Test Method D2533. The V/L ratio
characteristic of motor gasoline. increases with temperature for any given gasoline,
X 1.5.2 At high operating temperatures, gasolines may X1.7.2 The temperature of the fuel system and the V/L
boil in fuel pumps, lines, or carburetors. If too much vapor is ratio that can be tolerated without vapor lock vary from
formed, the fuel flow to the engine may be decreased, vehicle to vehicle and with operating conditions. The ten-
resulting in loss of power, rough engine operation, or engine dency of a gasoline to cause vapor lock, as evidenced by loss
stoppage. These conditions are known as “vapor lock.” of power during full-throttleaccelerations, is indicated by the
Conversely, gasolines that do not vaporize sufficiently may gasoline temperature at V/L ratios of approximately 20. The
cause hard starting of cold engines and poor warm-up temperature at which the maximum V/L ratio is specified for
performance. These conditions can be minimized by proper each gasoline Volatility class is based on the ambient temper-
selection of volatility requirements, but cannot always be atures and the altitude associated with the use of the class.
avoided. For example, during spring and fall a gasoline of
volatility suitable for satisfactory starting at low ambient X1.8 Vapor-Liquid Ratio (Estimated)
temperatures may cause problems in some engines under X1.8.1 Three techniques for estimating temperature-V/L
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
ASTM D439 89 ~~
0759530 0035297 4 a
values using Reid vapor pressure (Test Method D 323) and are no ASTM test methods to evaluate corrosion of these
distillation (Method D 86) results are given in Appendix X2. metais.
X1.9 Distillation
X1.11 Existent Gum
X 1.9.1 Method D 86 for distillation provides another
measure of the volatility of gasoline. Table 1 designates the X 1.1 1.1 The test for existent gum measures the amount
limits for end-point temperature and the temperatures at of residue after evaporation of the gasoline and after a
which 10 %, 50 %, and 90 % by volume of the gasoline is heptane wash. The heptane wash removes the heptane-
evaporated, These distillation characteristics, along with soluble material such as additives and nonvolatile oils, which
vapor pressure and V/L ratio characteristics, affect the may have been added to gasoline. Excess existent gum may
following vehicle performance characteristics: starting, drive- cause harmful carburetor, engine intake manifold and intake
ability, vapor lock, dilution of the engine oil, fuel economy valve deposits.
and carburetor icing.
X1.9.2 The 10% evaporated temperature of gasoline x1.12 sulfur
should be low enough to ensure starting under normal X1.12.1 The limit on sulfur content is included to protect
temperatures. against engine wear, deterioration of engine oil, and corrq-
X1.9.3 Gasolines having the same 10 % and 90 % evapo- sion of exhaust system parts.
rated temperatures may vary considerably in driveabiiity
performance because of differences in the boiling tempera-
tures of the intermediate components or fractions. Drive- X1.13 Oxidation Stability
bility and idling quality are affected by the 50 % evaporated X1.13.1 The induction period as measured in the oxida-
temperature. The 90 % evaporated and end-point tempera- tion stability test is used as an indication of the resistance of
tures should be low enough to minimize dilution of the gasoline to gum formation in storage. Experience indicates
engine oil. that gasolines with an induction period equal to or greater
than that in Table 1 generally have acceptable short-term
X1.10 Corrosion storage stability. However, correlation of the induction
X1.10.1 Gasolines must pass the copper strip corrosion period with the formation of gum in storage may vary
test to minimize corrosion of copper parts in fuel systems. markedly under different storage conditions and with dif-
Some gasolines corrode other fuel system metals, but there ferent gasoiines.
-
Calculated Temperature-V/L Technique,” CRC Report No. 370, February 1963. Q = F-E,’Cand
The CRC correlation was modified by a task group of Subcommittee A of R = H/Q, except that if H/Qis greater than 6.7, make R = 6.7.
Committee D-2to adapt it for computer processing, as well as the linear equation X2.2.2 (2) If A, B, C, and D, are to be calculated, use the
and the nomogram. following equations:
/- \, 9
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
--_____ I _ ~ _ _ _ ~ ___ ~ ~s ~.
A S T H Dg37 87 m 0757530 0 0 3 5 2 9 8 b H
(#ID439
80
70
oow
a.
$ 5 0
6
y 40
30
20
30 40 60 ô0 70 80 90 100 110 120
A - 1.36599P+ 0.009617P’
102.859
- 0.000028281P3 + 207.0097/P
B = -5.36868 + 0.910540Q - 0.040187Q2
+ 0.00057774Q3 + 0.254183/Q
S = -0.00525449 - 0.367 1362/( P - 9.65)
-0.812419/(P - 9.65)’ 0.0009677R +
-0.0000195828R2 - 3.3502318R/P2
+1241.1531R/P4 - 0.06630129R2/P
+0,û0621839R3/P + 0.0969 193R’IP’
C = 0.34205P 0.555561s+
D = 0.62418 - 0.68964R 0.132708R2 +
-0.0070411R3 + 5.84851R FIG. x2.3 Function C versus Ratio R and Reid Vapor Pressure P
X2.2.2 (3) if A, B, Cyand D, are to be obtained from X2.2.2 (4) Calculate the estimated temperature (‘C or O F )
charts, read them from Figs. X2.1,X2.2, X2.3, and X2.4, at V/L ratios 4, 10, 20, 30, and 45 from the following
respectively. equations:
T4-A+B
+
T45 = F 0.125H C +
+
T10 = T4 0.146341 (T45 - T4) +D
+
l20 = T4 0.390244 (T45 T4) - + 1.46519D
+
T30 L= T4 0.634146 (T45 - T4) +D
where:
T4, T10, T20, T30 and T45 are estimated temperatures at
V/L ratios 4, 10, 20, 30, and 45.
O 5 10 15 20 25
TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE O, OC
RATIO R
FIG. X2.2 Function B versus Distillation.Temperature
Difference Q FIG. X2.4 Function D versus Ratio R
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
10 --~
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
REID VAPOR PRESSURE P, BOUNDS
-
O 10 20 30 40 60
TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE Q, D E G F
FIG. X2.6 Function 8 versus Distillation Temperature Difference Q
11
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
-----
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\ Y?
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
------ ~ ~ _ _
I__---
+ia
u.
w
a
-10
u'
a
E -20
V
z
z
-30
-40
1.0 2.0 3.O 4.0 5.0 6.0
RATIO R
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
ASTM D437 8’7 0757530 0035303 2
t l EXAMPLE:
100
NOMOORAM SOLVES E W A T I O N
TVIL = 2o = 52.47
WHERE
TVIL
TIO
TW
RVP
2o -
-.
--
-
0.33 RVP + 0.20 TIO i 0.17 T50
RVP
110
FIG. X2.9 Relationship Between Gasoline Volatility and Temperaturefor V/L Ratio at §ea Level-§I Units
only the temperatures (“C or O F ) at which a V/L value of 20 Tv/tZo 114.6 - 4.1 (RVP) + 0.20 TIO+ 0.17 T,,
exists. They make use of two points from the distillation where:
curve, T,, and T,, (“C or OF), and the Reid vapor pressure TV,*,, = temperature, O F , at V/L of 20:1,
(kPa or psi) of the gasoline with constant weighting factors RVP = Reid vapor pressure, psi
being applied to each. Experience has shown that data TIO = distillation temperature, O F , at 10 % evaporated,
obtained with these simple linear equations generally are in and
close agreement with those obtained by the computerized T50 = distillation temperature, O F , at 50 % evaporated.
version given above. The limitations pointed out in X2.1.1
through X2.1.4 must be kept in mind when use is made of X2.4 Nomogram Method
this procedure, X2.4.1 Summary-Two nomograms have been devel-
X2.3.2 Procedure-Obtain 10 % evaporated and 50 % oped and are included herein (Figs. X2.9 and X2.10) to
evaporated points from the distillation curve (Method D 86) provide the same function ,as the linear equations procedure
along with the Reid vapor pressure value (Test Method outlined above. Figure X2.9 is in SI units and Fig. X2.10 is
D 323); apply these directly in the equation. in inch-pound units. The nomograms are based on the two
equations and the same limitations apply to their use in
Tv/L 20 = 52.47 - 0.33 (RVP) + 0.20 Tio + 0.17 T50 estimating V/L (20) temperatures.
where: X2.4.2 Procedure-Obtain 10 % evaporated and 50 %
Tv,L=io = temperature, OC,at V/L of 20:1 , evaporated points from the distillation curve (Method D 86)
RVP = Reid vapor pressure, kPa, along with the Reid vapor pressure (Test Method D 323).
TIO = distillation temperature, OC,at 10 % evaporated, Select the SI unit (Fig. X2.9) or inch-pound unit (Fig. X2.10)
and nomogram based on the units of TIO, T50,and RVP, Using a
T,, = distillation temperature, OC,at 50 % evaporated, straightedge, locate the intercept on the line between the “TIO
and T50)> scales after selecting the applicable T,, and T50
or in the inch-pound customary unit equation: values. From this intercept and the proper point on the
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG
-- - _ _
ASTM D439 8?7 m 0759530 0035302
______-
4
--
=
D439
T50
260
RVP
250 -6
TIO
-
210 1 1
150
-
-9
10
I
200 Il
120
190 12
ia0 EXAiiPLE: 13
90
110
w-- 10.7
UO°F
TIO
170 ?50 - 23OoF RVP li)
NWCGRAH SOLVES EQUATIW y 2 0 = 132
FIG. X2.10 Relationship Between Gasoline Volatility and Temperature for V/i. Ratio of 20 at Sea Level-Inch-Pound Units
?RVP? scale, a second intercept can be obtained on the V/L data estimated by any one of these three techniques and
?LTV,L=2,,?
scale to provide the desired value directly. data obtained by Test Method D 2533 has not been estab
lished.
X2.5 Precision
X2.5.1 The precision of agreement between temperature-
The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibiiky.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrewn. Your comments are Invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
end should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful conslderation at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may ettend. if you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Stendards, 1916 Race St., Phil8de@hla,PA 19103.
&RS\ULJKWE\$670,QW
ODOOULJKWVUHVHUYHG0RQ6HS*07
'RZQORDGHGSULQWHGE\
.$5$6$'0RKDPHG1$)7$/SXUVXDQWWR/LFHQVH$JUHHPHQW1RIXUWKHUUHSURGXFWLRQVDXWKRUL]HG