Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8617 Assignment 2-1
8617 Assignment 2-1
8617 Assignment 2-1
Semester:Autumn, 2022
Level: B.Ed
ASSIGNMENT No. 1
Q.1 Identify different modern technologies that may help in school mapping. (20)
Q.2 Explain the role of decision making in financing of higher education in Pakistan. Highlight different
factors which a planner should consider during the resources utilization (20)
Q.3 Critically review the various theories of organization with their basic assumptions.
(20)
Q.4 Explain the developing management control instruments. What are the effects of control on
educational employees in the context of Pakistan? (20)
Q.5 Give the requisite corrective action the educational manager should take to keep the cost down in
the construction of ideal secondary schools in your region. (20)
Q.1 Identify different modern technologies that may help in school mapping.
Learning methods are constantly improving, relying more and more on modern
technology. This advances communication, facilitates the acquiring of information
and makes it easier to explain the subject matter. These are only some of the ways
technology is used in education today.
Thanks to the educational methods of the 21st century, it is easier for the teachers
to impart knowledge, as well as recognize their students’ potential. On the other
hand, the students’ learning itself is hugely facilitated through the use of audio-
visual and interactive software and gadgets. This strategic synergy of technology
and teaching is what opens up new possibilities in education, and some methods
have stood out as especially noteworthy.
Distance learning
Distance education as a form of education has been used for decades, but it has
gained importance with the rapid advancement of the means of communication.
Now it is possible to attend class in real time from another end of the planet, and
even actively participate. The prerequisites for online education are an internet
connection and a computer or another smart device, and adequate communication
software.
Technology in education provides virtual attendance, live chat, as well as face to
face communication with teachers and students in real time. One can also access
the previously recorded lessons, as well as a wealth of other materials necessary
for studying.
This learning method is used at many American schools, sometimes as an
additional method of teaching and sometimes on its own, as full-time online
learning. The possibilities have expanded so much that it is now even possible to
attend the school’s extracurricular activities in this manner. And in the end, at
many schools across the USA, one can even graduate in this way.
What would an education without books look like? This question is easy to answer
– all information would be placed on a tablet (or computer). The digitization of
educational content would facilitate access to information, while hard-copy
textbooks would no longer be relevant.
Cloud technology
VR technology
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are relatively new advancements
in technology that bring a new dimension to the classroom. Using VR headgear,
students can visit remote areas and encounter ancient civilizations or dinosaurs.
This is an excellent supplement in the learning process, where one can gain close
experiences not feasible in reality (climbing a mountain, going to space).
Robotics
In addition to facilitating the learning process, new technology helps students get
acquainted with the world of modern work through problem solving. School
science projects are reimagined through the introduction of robotics, programming
and 3D printing. These are the foundations of many professions that are already
popular on the job market, with a great potential for future growth and expansion.
It was first established in 1974 as University Grants Commission (UGC), and came
into its modern form on 11 September 2002 after Atta-ur-Rahman's reforms, which
received international praise. The commission is responsible for formulating higher
education policy and quality assurance to meet the international standards as well
as providing accrediting academic degrees, development of new institutions and
uplift of existing institutions in Pakistan.
The commission also facilitated the development of higher educational system in
the country with the main purpose of upgrading the universities and degree
awarding institutes in the country to be focal point of the high learning of
education, research and development. Over several years, it has played an
important and leading role towards building a knowledge-based economy in
Pakistan by giving out hundreds of doctoral scholarships for education abroad
every year.
At the time of establishment of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, the country had only
one institution of higher learning, University of the Punjab and among forty
colleges expanded to four provinces of Pakistan. Education policy revised
by Prime Minister of Pakistan Liaquat Ali Khan, the government established
various universities and colleges in all over the country. The same
year, Mohammad Ali Jinnah held a National Education Conference (also known as
Pakistan Education Conference) of academicians and state holders to revise the
policy of higher education in the country, as he stated:
... The importance of education and the type of education cannot be over-
emphasized ... There is no doubt that the future of our state of Pakistan will and
must greatly depend upon the type of education we give to our children and the
way in which we bring them up as future citizens of Pakistan.... We should not
forget that we have to compete with the world which is moving very fast in this
direction....
In the 1960s, the financial policies and economic programs introduced by President
of Pakistan Ayub Khan greatly emphasized to importance of higher education in
the country. A significant proportion of the budget was actually spent to promote
higher education efforts in the country. Thesis written by Usman Ali Isani pointed
out that 912 million rupees were spent annually for the fiscal period of 1960–65 in
a joint collaboration led by Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Federal Education and
Professional Training (the then called Ministry of Education), University Grants
Commission and Planning Commission. Colleges were transformed into full-scale
research universities and special research institutes were established in all over the
country. According to the calculations performed by the Statistics Division and
published by Isani, around 430,000 students were enrolled in different universities
to pursue their higher education over the fiscal period of 1960–65. From 1965 to
1971, the government spent 173.8 million rupees on the education sector as
opposed to actual allocations of ₨. 278.6 million.
Prior to the year 2000, different higher education policies, priorities and the need
of competition between the political forces in Pakistan led to disturbances in the
higher education sector as well as adversely affecting the University Grants
Commission's ability. The inadequate financial funding and policy implementation
never matched the need of higher education in the country. In 2002,
President Pervez Musharraf took the initiative of dissolving the University Grants
Commission and establishing a new autonomous organisation which was
completely independent of the Federal Ministry of Education – the Higher
Education Commission. The Chairman of the Higher Education Commission was
given the status of a Federal Minister, while its Executive Director was given the
status of a Federal Secretary.
Degree Attestation
Entry Test Council
Faculty development
Curriculum revision
Higher education infrastructure development
Indigenous scholarships
Foreign scholarships
Patent filing support
Conference travel grants
Increase industry and university research collaboration
Developing new technology parks
Laptop Scheme
Q.3 Critically review the various theories of organization with their basic
assumptions.
They have been concerned with the best way of dividing up the tasks to be done,
with how to group these tasks together into departments, and how to deal with the
problems of coordination. They have paid particular attention to organisational
relationships between line and staff. They have stressed the need for a clear
definition of responsibilities and authority. They have sought to enunciate the
principles, which should be used in designing this formal structure.
The chief contribution of the classical school is the definition and analysis of the
tasks that have to be considered in building up an organisation. The emphasis is on
structural frame work in which grouped activities are assigned to people, authority
relations are established, individual efforts are properly coordinated and
responsibilities fixed. The structure is built to help accomplish enterprise goals
more effectively.
The theory has been criticised on many counts, especially by the behavioural
scientists. The approach of the classical writers is too concerned with the formal
structure, not sufficiently with the individuals who make the structure work. It is a
static approach, paying too little attention to the many interactions that take place
between different parts of an organisation. The principles of organisation are too
broad to provide much help in the actual work of organising.
Some of the principles are contradictory. Herbert A. Simon describes some of the
principles as “no more than proverbs” and being simple generalisations devoid of
predictive power. Since the classical theory ignores major facts of human nature,
the newer theorists have developed some new approaches to the study of
organisation.
The proponents of the human relations school are research oriented. They try to
find out what happens before seeking to explain it. This approach to the study of
organisations has contributed much that can be of value to the manager – If he
looks at a job only from the classical point of view, he will think of the tasks that
have to be done. If he adopts the human relations approach, he will appreciate what
it is like for the person who has to perform the tasks.
The human relations school has also its limitations. Some of its supporters have
claimed too much for what can be achieved by thinking about peoples’ needs and
behaviour. Much bigger limitation is that although we have learnt a lot about
people in organisations, there is still a great deal that we do not understand about
human behaviour.
Thus, the systems approach is concerned with the interaction between the different
aspect of the organisation, people, technology, formal structure, the physical
setting, and environment. The advantage of approaching any problem is that it
enables us to see the critical variables and constraints and their interaction with one
another. It keeps us alert and constantly aware that one single element,
phenomenon, or problem should not be treated without regard to its interacting
consequences with other elements.
It is also important to remember that the systems approach does not view
organisation as a static arrangement of jobs but calls for identifying the functions
required in terms of the decision areas involved in achieving goals. It calls for
developing a pattern of inputs, outputs, feed backs, delays, and flows of materials
and information. Frequent internal and external changes cause disturbances in the
organisation.
Consequently, for survival and growth of the enterprise the management must
adjust different variables so that they should function in an orderly fashion and
preserve organisational, integrity. Organisation should be viewed as an open
system, for neither objectives nor plans can possibly be set in the vacuum of a
closed company system; Markets, government regulations, competitors,
technology and many other elements of an enterprise environment affect plans and
objectives and cannot be overlooked.
Thus, the manager has to always bear in mind that the organisation exists within a
wider system of its community, of the government and of the country, all of which
may affect it. In other words, it is a part of a larger system with which it reacts.
Q.4 Explain the developing management control instruments. What are the
effects of control on educational employees in the context of Pakistan?
One of the best ways to understand management control systems or MCS is by
examining the different components that make it. The concept is built on three
distinct elements: management, systems and control.
Management
OK, so that explains the core concept, but what about the functions of
management? You need to identify and understand the key components of
management as well. The first component is the different functions of
management. The definitions can be different depending on the situation, but
generally, five functions are identified as the core functions of management. These
are planning, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling.
The other key part of management is the resource types it entails. The most
common forms of resourcing include: human resources, financial
resources, technological resources and natural resources. You could use the above
functions to allocate, control and monitor the different forms of resources. In
essence, you are combining the functions you have at hand – planning, staffing and
so on – with the resources, such as financial resources. The clearest example is
having the function of staffing and using the human resource funding to hire in
new staff.
The key to systems, especially in the case of MSCs, is the structure of which they
are formed and often perform. Every system comes with input, output and
feedback mechanism. The system is able to maintain itself even when the
surroundings are changing and it has a specific set of boundaries within which is
operates. The picture here illustrates the idea of a system in a business context
perfectly.
You have an input, the business system and the output. You also have the feedback
mechanism. The business system would be the strategy the business uses to create
a specific output. If the output is to provide cheap shoes, the business strategy is
manufacturing of the shoes with the specific elements this entails.
The input, therefore, is the resources (materials, labor, equipment) you need to
achieve the output. So, you take the resources, you implement them with your
chosen strategy and you get the results. The results then provide feedback to inputs
on the performance of the system. Perhaps you didn’t receive as many shoes as you
wanted and so, you can increase input. The objective of the system is to achieve a
pre-determined result each time it is executed.
Q.5 Give the requisite corrective action the educational manager should
take to keep the cost down in the construction of ideal secondary schools in
your region.