This document outlines the syllabus for a course on media laws and ethics in the Philippines. It covers several topics, including freedom of speech and of the press under the constitution as well as relevant court cases. It also discusses the regulatory framework for media, including laws around libel, intellectual property, elections, and cybercrime. Administrative bodies that regulate media such as the MTRCB are mentioned. The syllabus closes with sections on self-regulation and codes of ethics for journalists as well as other related laws concerning issues like wiretapping and anti-terrorism.
This document outlines the syllabus for a course on media laws and ethics in the Philippines. It covers several topics, including freedom of speech and of the press under the constitution as well as relevant court cases. It also discusses the regulatory framework for media, including laws around libel, intellectual property, elections, and cybercrime. Administrative bodies that regulate media such as the MTRCB are mentioned. The syllabus closes with sections on self-regulation and codes of ethics for journalists as well as other related laws concerning issues like wiretapping and anti-terrorism.
This document outlines the syllabus for a course on media laws and ethics in the Philippines. It covers several topics, including freedom of speech and of the press under the constitution as well as relevant court cases. It also discusses the regulatory framework for media, including laws around libel, intellectual property, elections, and cybercrime. Administrative bodies that regulate media such as the MTRCB are mentioned. The syllabus closes with sections on self-regulation and codes of ethics for journalists as well as other related laws concerning issues like wiretapping and anti-terrorism.
a. FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OF EXPRESSION, & OF THE PRESS i. Erwin Tulfo vs. People of the Philippines and Atty. Carlos T. So, G.R. No. 161032, 16 September 2008.) ii. Soriano vs. MTRCB, G.R. No. 165636 (2009) iii. Garzon vs. People (G.R. No. 228583, September 15, 2021) 1. 3-prong test iv. Atty. Causing, A.C. No. 12883 v. Lao vs. Atty. Causing, A.C. No. 13453
b. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK i. Revised Penal Code 1. Article 154 RPC as amended by RA 10951 2. Crimes Against Honor (Article 354, 355, 356 of the RPC) a. Libel i. Brillante vs. CA, GR No. 118757 and 121571 (2004) ii. Baguio Midland vs. Labo, G.R. No. 107566 (2004) iii. Yuchengco vs. The Manila Chronicle (GR No. 184315 (2011) iv. Punongbayan-Visitacion vs. People, G.R. No. 194214, 10 January 2018 v. Nova Communications vs. Atty. Canoy GR No. 193276 (2019)
3. Offenses Against Decency and Good Customs, RA 10364 & RA 9208 a. Grave Scandal b. Immoral Doctrines c. Obscene Publications d. Indecent Shows e. Sale or Distribution f. Pornography (Sec. 3. RA 10364, Sec. 3 RA 9208) ii. Intellectual Property Code iii. Republic Act 8792 (E-commerce Law) iv. Election Laws 1. National Press Club vs. COMELEC, GR No. 102653 (1992) 2. SWS vs. COMELEC, GR No. 147571 (2001) 3. ABS-CBN vs. COMELEC, GR No. 133484 (2000) v. PRIVILEGE COMMUNICATION 1. Belen vs. People, GR No. 211120, Feb. 13, 2017 (Read also dissenting opinion of Justice Leonen) 2. Manila Bulletin vs. Domingo & People, GR No. 170341, July 5, 2017 3. Castillo vs. Sandiganbayan, GR No. 138231, Feb. 21, 2002 vi. RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012) 1. Cyber Libel, elements. 2. Virginia Dio vs. People, Gr No. 2018146 (2016) 3. Disini vs. Secretary of Justice (G.R. No. 203335, February 11, 2014) 4. Republic Act No. 11469 5. Maria Ressa Case 6. Cadajas vs. People, GR No. 247348 (2021) Ruling about cybercrime vii. MTRCB Rules 1. MTRCB vs. ABS-CBN, GR No. 155282 (2005) 2. Iglesia in Cristo vs. CA, GR No. 119673 (1996)
c. ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1. MTRCB 2. Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center 3. The IPO 4. The NTC
d. SELF REGULATION i. THE KBP ii. SAFETY AND PROTECTION OF MEDIA PRACTITIONERS
e. ETHICAL ISSUES AND CONCERNS i. JOURNALIST’S CODE OF ETHICS ii. BROADCAST CODE
f. OTHER RELATED LAWS i. WIRETAPPING ii. ANTI-TERRORISM ACT iii. SAFE SPACES ACT iv. ANTI-PHOTO AND VOYEURISM ACT v. ANTI-CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ACT of 2009 as amended by REPUBLIC ACT NO. 11930 or Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children (OSAEC) and Anti- Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materials (CSAEM) Act a. Cadajas vs. People, GR No. 247348 (2021)