The document discusses whether land reform has failed in the Philippines. It states that the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program was intended to correct inequities in land distribution and provide secure tenure, but has fallen short of expectations. Instead of benefiting farmers with higher incomes, yields, and market access, land reform has disempowered farmers who struggle to pay obligations to obtain land titles. Several weaknesses, including unclear land policies, an inefficient land administration system, and a politicized tax system, adversely impact land markets and economic growth.
The document discusses whether land reform has failed in the Philippines. It states that the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program was intended to correct inequities in land distribution and provide secure tenure, but has fallen short of expectations. Instead of benefiting farmers with higher incomes, yields, and market access, land reform has disempowered farmers who struggle to pay obligations to obtain land titles. Several weaknesses, including unclear land policies, an inefficient land administration system, and a politicized tax system, adversely impact land markets and economic growth.
The document discusses whether land reform has failed in the Philippines. It states that the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program was intended to correct inequities in land distribution and provide secure tenure, but has fallen short of expectations. Instead of benefiting farmers with higher incomes, yields, and market access, land reform has disempowered farmers who struggle to pay obligations to obtain land titles. Several weaknesses, including unclear land policies, an inefficient land administration system, and a politicized tax system, adversely impact land markets and economic growth.
Yes, land reform is a failure in the Philippines. The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program has been the fundamental strategy for poverty reduction and for increasing productivity in the agriculture sector. It was envisaged as the main instrument to correct inequities in land distribution and to provide secure tenure to former agricultural tenants. Unfortunately, however, the performance of agrarian reform seems to have fallen short of expectation. The impact of an agrarian reform depends primarily on the intensity of the reform measures on how much land and how many landowners will be covered by the reform and how many rural people will benefit from its various components. Instead of having the advantage of the said reform to have a higher farm income and yield, improved land tenure, access to market and credit, and reduction of poverty incidence among farmer- beneficiaries, however it ultimately disempowering farmers who do not have the capital to sustain production on their own while struggling to pay their obligations so they can get their land titles. Several weaknesses in land-use policy, administration and management adversely affect the efficiency of land markets, and thus the country's economic growth potential and equity: firstly the unclear and inconsistent land policies wherein in this case is the failure clearly to identify society's preferences regarding land use, secondly an inefficient land administration infrastructure which the land administration infrastructure in the Philippines, including the land information system, is poor and inadequate. Information about landownership, location, boundaries, actual land uses and land values cannot be provided systematically by many local governments. One result is fraudulent land titling that causes landownership conflicts, and takes years to resolve, and lastly a highly politicized land tax system, because the cost of holding idle, unimproved land in the country is minimal, there are opportunities for land speculation and concentration of landownership.